Rense.com



BP Ready To Quit Iraq
By Terry Macalister
The Guardian - UK
4-30-4
 
BP's chief executive delivered a serious setback to hopes of rebuilding Iraq when he said that the oil company has no future there.
 
John Browne, one of Tony Blair's favourite industrialists, indicated he had given up on Iraq because the political and security situation in the country had deteriorated so much.
 
Yet only 18 months ago he was extremely enthusiastic about prospects, lobbying in Washington and London to ensure American rivals did not cut him out of the action.
 
"We need a government, we need laws and we need decisions. We have not got any of that yet. A whole range of steps need to be taken," said the BP boss as he unveiled new record profits this week.
 
"It's not obvious to me you need foreign oil companies to do that [redevelopment]." He added that private oil firms could destabilise an already sensitive situation and perhaps it should be left to local state-owned groups.
 
The pessimistic view about the future in Iraq was expressed hours after Lord Browne had met the prime minister at the launch of a new climate change organisation.
 
The downbeat message contrasts with the optimism expressed in the autumn of 2002 when the BP chief was desperately worried that American firms would monopolise Iraq once Saddam Hussein was overthrown.
 
"We have let it be known that the thing we would like to make sure, if Iraq changes regime, is that there should be a level playing field," Lord Browne had said.
 
Western oil firms originally hoped there would be a bonanza as the country with the second biggest oil reserves in the world expanded its production dramatically.
 
But these aspirations have evaporated as the hopes of peace following invasion by American and British forces have given way to ferocious guerrilla attacks.
 
Bruce Evers, oil analyst with Investec Securities, said the future of Iraq depended on foreign oil companies such as BP rehabilitating the country's only real export earner.
 
"Iraq could not begin to get itself back on its feet without the western oil companies. It needs their technology, expertise and balance sheets [cash], apart from anything," he said.
 
The Iraqi oil fields were dilapidated and the surface equipment was so out of date it was a "miracle that anything functioned at all".
 
While Halliburton and other large energy services firms had won major contracts to get the oil industry running at prewar levels, it was the oil majors such as BP which drilled wells and produced oil, he added.
 
The threat to Mr Blair and US president George Bush on Iraq was underlined last night by the International Energy Agency following a meeting with the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries to look at future investment worldwide.
 
Claude Mandil , executive director of the IEA, said: "A pivotal area in shaping the flow of investment to oil developments is the Middle East. Although the costs of developing the region's reserves are lower than anywhere else in the world, financing this investment will be determined partially by perceptions of security."
 
He said privately owned international oil companies - which would include BP - can mobilise "large cash resources" which state firms could not always do because they were constrained by other demands on the national budget.
 
BP and some other large foreign oil firms have become increasingly wary of the Middle East, preferring to invest in Russia if not Angola or the Caspian.
 
"Oil companies have become increasingly frustrated by the attitude of many Middle East rulers such as Saudi Arabia, which do not seem able to decide whether they want us to operate there or not," said one oil man, who asked not to be named.
 
Energy experts from accountants Ernst & Young also em phasised the importance of western cash for transforming the oil industry - and national wealth - of Kazakhstan. Speaking at a joint UK-Former Soviet Union seminar in Aberdeen yesterday, Gerard Young said that oil and gas related investment in Kazakhstan could be worth $150bn (about £84bn) by 2015.
 
Kazakhstan had only been able to begin to realise the value of its huge natural energy resources since foreign capital and expertise became available following the collapse of the Soviet Union, he argued.
 
But Iraq's redevelopment has been hampered by widespread opposition to American and British troops - and also service companies working in the country.
 
Foreign workers have been targeted by militants and the Guardian revealed on Tuesday how work on a number of infrastructure projects had ground to a halt as contractors pulled out their employees.
 
The irony of oil companies not investing in Iraq is that they are flush with money because of high crude prices and many people believed the US invaded the country only to secure future oil supplies.
 
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,4912718-103550,00.html


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros