- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. has long interpreted that
the Bush administration true mission in the Middle East was to control
OPEC. See www.senderberl.com/BMI.htm. Thus, it is important for you to
recognize that the solution to the quagmire in Iraq would be to turn the
covert agenda inside out and allow OPEC to control the election process
to representative government for the Iraqi people.
-
- Covert agendas mean that no one is supposed to recognize
or admit to the true scope of the purpose of invading Iraq. Thus, it is
then appropriate for us to formally proffer that the Bush administration
can exit its own agenda and extract itself from the quagmire by removing
itself completely from Iraq, including all interest in its national treasures,
other than to conclude with OPEC a long term deal for favorable pricing
in respect to the great sacrifices of the USA in freeing Iraq from the
tyranny of Saddam Hussein. Now, it is just and fair for the Bush administration
to conclude that OPEC, carrying large representation of Arab/Islamic nations,
could best implement a new government, one free from the tyranny represented
by Saddam Hussein.
-
- The USA would have no other role except for assuring
candidates from a full spectrum of interests and that the elections are
in fact free and open and that OPEC itself does not influence the elections
or pact the field with candidates to its favor and bias.
-
- Can it be that dynamically simple? Yes.
-
- The Middle East nations and leadership see the threat
of future USA intrusions abated and removed and the USA receives for its
sacrifices in freeing Iraq from the stranglehold of Saddam Hussein favorable
long-term oil contracts. It also serves as a platform to rebuild trust
and respect for the USA in that it helps prove that the USA is no longer
out for world domination and control and that its primary purpose in invading
Iraq was not oil.
-
- There is only one reason why the Bush administration
at this point would not jump at this portal to resolving the mess the US
faces in Iraq, now irretrievably forged due to a set of photographs causing
the US to lose the high moral ground: that the President continues to push
his original agenda.
-
- Regarding the photos of Iraqi prisoner abuse, we can
only add that these photos were long known to the US military and the Bush
administration and albeit the President publicly saying yesterday that
he is shocked by such unacceptable conduct, US troops have been indiscriminately
killing innocents on a wholesale basis since January (a moral outrage we
think at even a higher level than these photos). This latter type of conduct,
where the British noted that US troops were treating Iraqis as sub human,
rationalizing wholesale loss of human life, platformed our efforts to highlight
to the Congress that if it didn't stop the course of the current administration,
it was relegating the country to a fate similar to both Rome and Germany
in times past. SenderBerl emphasized that when a Congress allows a leader
to move unchecked, the consequences per history are routinely abuse and
a leadership first slowly moving and then more quickly moving to police
state control. This is exactly the course of the country under the current
administration.
-
- Thus it is crystal clear that if the Bush administration
does not extricate itself as it should as presented above or in similar
fashion, quickly, efficiently and with a chance of regaining some of the
honor and respect lost, then there is no alternative but to conclude that
President Bush continues in his mission as set forth in our exposition
www.senderberl.com/BMI.htm .
-
- If this course is accepted and works, feel free to ask
us the solution for the Israel/Palestinian quagmire. Once you cast off
the hidden covert agendas of an administration, the road and solution to
peace is, excuse us, quite simple. The Bush administration from day one
never wanted peace but only the predicate to obtain control over OPEC as
the prelude to pursuit of the President's National Security Strategy for
world domination and control (see footnote below). What is it that President
Bush boldly said in the straightforward manner and way he likes to speak:
-
- "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of
a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." --President-Elect
George W. Bush, CNN News,
- Aired December 18, 2000 - 12:00 p.m. ET
- http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.html
-
- Footnote. The CIA and other intelligence agencies consistently
thwarted President Clinton from pursuing a military course against Saddam
Hussein. We have long asserted that Saddam was the bogeyman for the move
against OPEC when the time was right. Bush 41 expected to win a second
term. He did not. If President Clinton pursued a military course against
Saddam, Clinton and the Democrats would be in the oil business. No way.
Thus, after 9-11, the portal was open for the quest to control OPEC. What
undermined it is that the Bush cabal was wrong on two major points: Saddam
did not use WMD after the US through the UN stripped him of all effective
military hardware (he had nothing else to use) AND when he did not use
WMD to defend Iraq, the Bush cabal is still recovering from the failure
of their primary backstop: that they would find WMD in Iraq. If either
of these two events had happened, Bush would have been in both Syria and
Iran already and would not have faced the quagmire he now faces in Iraq.
-
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
- <mip://02934770/www.senderberl.com>www.senderberl.com
- senderberl@AOL.COM
|
