Rense.com



Really, Who Is There
To Vote For?

By Al Benson Jr.
Cpprhd10@aol.com
4-29-4
 
The prospects for the upcoming presidential election this year are truly grim. It has gotten to the point where we can't even hold our noses and vote for the lesser of two evils (which would still be evil). Both presidential candidates are simply horrendous. Let's be honest enough to face reality. The "two" major political parties are really just two branches of the same big government, big business, internationalist leviathan. No matter which party you vote for you will get the same socialist programs. All that changes from one party to the other is the rhetoric.
 
Some have said they feel George Bush is closer to those things the Southern Movement holds dear than Kerry would be. I have serious doubts about that. His sneaky removal of the Confederate plaques in Texas before the last election, and Vice-president Cheney's questionable attitude toward the Confederate flag make that a pretty remote possibility. In fact, we might almost be better off were Kerry to win the election. At least then, the conservative element in the country might begin to realize just how bad off we are. Bush has curtailed more of our liberties than Bill Clinton would have dreamed about doing, and the conservatives have gone blindly along with him, thinking he was conservative, or not thinking at all, just because he is a Republican.
 
We can vote for a third party candidate in the upcoming election purely as a conscience vote. Should I vote for a presidential candidate I would probably vote for the Constitution Party candidate because his values seem pretty much to reflect where I am coming from. I realize he will end up with one tenth of one percent of the vote, or at least that's what the media will tell us he got, but I see no other options. I can not, in good conscience, vote for either Bush or Kerry.
 
Rather than being overly concerned about who will win the presidential election, because, at this point, we have no real choice there anyway, I would urge Southern heritage folks and others of a patriotic ilk to begin to think about getting involved in trying to do something regarding the election of county or parish candidates. Many third parties, though well-intentioned, spend a lot of money trying to run a presidential candidate that, quite frankly, doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hell of winning. It seems to me that a lot of that money could be spent in crucial county races in various Southern states. Our people in various Southern states should begin to look at possible target counties in their states that seem to reflect at least some respect for Southern heritage, values, and limited government. We should then begin to look for qualified candidates in those counties that will reflect our values and support them. County races are not nearly so expensive as presidential races, and often, a few thousand dollars might be all that is needed in a particular county. If we could begin to elect pro-Southern candidates to important county offices in several counties in states across the South, pretty soon we would have a network of counties across the Southland that will be representative of our values and aspirations.
 
The Southern Independence Party, now organized in several Southern and Southwestern states, promotes the idea of running good candidates at the county level, where we have some chance of winning various county offices. They realize that, at this point, running a candidate for president would be an act of futility, but they may, in God's providence, be able to find and run good candidates for county sheriff, country clerk, or whatever other county offices are on the ballot.
 
Using this concept set forth by the Southern Independence Party, and probably by others also, it seems that it would be much more within our grasp to be able to influence county elections in specified places rather than to be concerned with trying to influence the presidential election.
 
We need to begin having counties in our Southern states where people that are sympathetic to our views hold county offices. It would seem to me, at this point in our history, that such is much more realistic than worrying about which socialist will be the next president, because no matter which one gets elected, the program he presides over will be a socialist program. That goes without saying. Third party candidates have to start somewhere to build political influence. Why not at the county level? County government should be the most important level of government in this country because it is much closer to the local folks and they can have more input into it than they can into the Washington monstrosity. This is an option we should seriously be considering at this point.
 
http://www.southerncaucus.org/191.htm


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros