Rense.com




Warnings Of Abuse In
Iraq's Prisons Ignored
Coalition Brushed Aside
Similar Complaints For Six Months

By Peter Beaumont and
Kahal Ahmed in London, Edward
Helmore in New York and
Jason Burke in Baghdad
The Observer - UK
5-2-4


The vast British base at the international airport on the outskirts of Basra is a curiously quiet place. In the arrivals hall - with its little coffee bar - the desert boots of British soldiers squeak across the floor. Go up to the first floor and the officers will tell, with a slightly patronising air, how the British Army is doing things differently here in the south. They will tell you about their unique experience, about lessons learnt in Northern Ireland, compared with the ill-trained US forces in the north.
 
By yesterday those reassurances sounded increasingly hollow as pictures of British soldiers - allegedly members of the Queen's Lancashire Regiment - were published yesterday apparently showing them beating an Iraqi detainee and urinating on him during an eight-hour long assault last year. It was the second set of photographs to emerge in two days, after US soldiers in the north were shown abusing detainees.
 
Suddenly the two major Allies have been tarred with the same awful brush - charged with beating and abusing Iraqis in their care. After weeks of bad news from Iraq the pictures have threatened to explode the fragile and contentious legitimacy of UK operations in Iraq.
 
In the images published in the Mirror newspaper yesterday, a hooded Iraqi, allegedly a thief, is sitting in the back of what looks like a canvas-sided vehicle, stripped to his underpants and a T-shirt with an Iraqi flag on it. In one photograph a soldier urinates on his head. In another a kick is aimed at his head, while in a third an assault rifle is jabbed at his genitals.
 
It is a story whose details were filled in by two unnamed soldiers - A and B - who told the Mirror how the young man had been picked up from the nearby docks for stealing. 'As we took him back,' said soldier A, 'he was getting a beating. He was hit with batons on the knees, fingers, toes, elbows and head ...
 
'Because it was so hot we put him in the back of a four-tonner truck which has a canopy over it. That's where the photos were taken. Lads were taking turns to give him a right going over, smashing him in the face with weapons and stamping on him. We had him for about eight hours ...
 
'He was missing teeth. All his mouth was bleeding and his nose was all over the place. He couldn't talk, his jaw was out ... he was on his way to being killed.'
 
The soldiers claim that at least one officer was aware of the treatment being handed out and ordered the men involved to dump the victim. It was not, says the Mirror's editor Piers Morgan, an easy story to run even though he immediately knew he had a scoop when the photographs came across his desk more than a week ago.
 
According to Morgan, a team of his journalists had been investigating the Queen's Lancashire Regiment after allegations that rogue elements were seeking reprisals for the death of a popular captain at the hands of an Iraqi mob.
 
But Morgan himself was worried about the effect of running such disturbing images in a paper known for its opposition to the war. He knew that no one else had the pictures. They had been given to the paper by one of the soldiers involved in the attack, which happened several months ago.
 
His mind was made up when pictures of American atrocities against Iraqi captives were televised around the world on Thursday. Suddenly the tenor of the debate changed.
 
'We did not publish these photographs lightly,' Morgan told The Observer. 'We were very aware of the reaction but the simple truth of the matter is that this type of behaviour has no place in the British Army. It should never have happened and it will have a very adverse effect on opinion in Iraq where we are supposed to be winning people's hearts and minds.'
 
Yesterday the picture of the urinating soldier and his victim was published under the headline 'VILE.'
 
Coming hard on the heels of Tony Blair's condemnation of similar photographs of United States soldiers abusing detainees at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison, it sent a shock wave rushing through the Ministry of Defence, the Foreign Office and Downing Street.
 
In Number 10, as the first copies of yesterday's Mirror landed late on Friday night, the first response to the photographs was 'are they real?' Officials are still asking that question but they quickly realised that it would be impossible to build a 'handling strategy' around such a premise.
 
'There were two routes for us,' said one Downing Street adviser. 'We could have stalled and said we were looking at the issue but that could have given the wrong impression that we weren't taking it seriously. So we decided to immediately make it clear how appalled we were about the allegations.'
 
For senior coalition officials in Iraq, as well as for Downing Street and the White House, the Mirror's revelations were a double whammy coming hard on the heels of photographs of abuse by US soldiers at Abu Ghraib prison broadcast by CBS's 60 Minutes programme on Thursday and carried around the world. But one thing was quickly clear - the very different nature of the images and even of the abuse involved.
 
In the American photographs there is no attempt to hide the identities of the soldiers who were involved but there is something about the smiling casualness of the abuse that makes them equally sinister.
 
In perhaps one of the most shocking of the photographs that have emerged, a woman private called Lynndie England is shown with a cigarette dangling from her mouth giving a thumbs-up sign while pointing at the genitals of a naked and hooded young Iraqi who has been ordered to masturbate. In another, a grinning England poses behind a pile of naked Iraqis piled in a clumsy pyramid.
 
Also pictured is Staff Sergeant Ivan 'Chip' Frederick, a tall, muscular man, a corrections officer in a Virginia prison.
 
Frederick, a reservist, occupies a unique position in the scandal as - in his ever more vocal justification of his behaviour - he has provided the most coherent insight into how soldiers turned to abusers in a country they went to liberate.
 
Frederick blames the US army for its lack of direction from above and says that he will plead not guilty to any charges made against him. 'We had no support, no training whatsoever,' he told CBS's 60 Minutes. 'I kept asking my chain of command for certain things ... like rules and regulations. And it just wasn't happening.'
 
Frederick makes clear that the abuse was not only for pleasure but was regarded as part of interrogations led by US intelligence and private contractors in the prison.
 
'We had military intelligence, we had all kinds of other government agencies, FBI, CIA ... All those that I didn't even know or recognise. Military intelligence has encouraged and told us, "great job". We help getting them to talk with the way we handle them ... We've had a very high rate with our style of getting them to break. They usually ended up breaking within hours.'
 
While the source of the British photographs remains anonymous and difficult to authenticate, the pictures from Abu Ghraib came from an outraged military policeman - Specialist Joseph M. Darby - who was given a CD containing pictures of the naked and abused Iraqis by one of those who is facing prosecution. Darby penned an anonymous complaint and attached the CD. He later came forward to give evidence against his colleagues.
 
Darby was not alone in having become aware of abuse at the hands of British and US forces. As early as last summer, researchers for Amnesty International had began picking up worrying allegations of torture and killings within the then still chaotic system for the detention of Iraqis. These claims, Amnesty says, have persisted despite its own report warning the occupying powers of their obligations under the Geneva Conventions.
 
It was not only Amnesty that was hearing reports of abuse. Over the past six months, as has now become clear, a number of warnings were being sounded about abuse by allied soldiers. And they were warnings the coalition forces appear to have ignored until this year.
 
By November last year dark rumours of violence and sexual abuse were in circulation among Iraqis, human rights groups and the media - many of them impossible to verify. But some should have been easy to check out, not least those pointing to Abu Ghraib and the persistent claims of abuses within its walls.
 
Among those who complained but were ignored was Sheikh Sharif al-Qubaysi, a 72-year-old tribal leader imprisoned in Abu Ghraib. According to Qubaysi, as he was sitting in his cell one evening a US woman soldier came in and ordered him to strip before parading him in front of other inmates.
 
Qubaysi is not the only victim to describe this form of humiliation. Another credible report of persistent sexual humiliation at Abu Ghraib was supplied by a journalist with Al Jazeera who was wrongly arrested by US forces and taken to the prison.
 
In an interview with the US political magazine the Nation , Salah Hassan, 33, described his experiences in detention last November, alleging he was stripped naked and hooded with a plastic bag by soldiers who addressed him as 'Al Jazeera', 'boy' or 'bitch'.
 
He says that he was forced to stand hooded, bound and naked for 11 hours in the cold, and that when he fell down soldiers kicked him until he got up again.
 
But if these allegations now seem chillingly credible in the light of the photographs, more serious allegations have emerged from Abu Ghraib that remain impossible to establish - not least allegations of rape involving both male and female detainees.
 
US military investigators are examining one case of male rape but last year allegations emerged in an anonymous letter widely disseminated among Iraqis that US soldiers had also raped women - claims that were being circulated by Iraqi rebels to foster animosity against coalition forces.
 
But if the warnings were ignored for months, by early this year others in the US military had become aware of abuses inside the prison. At the beginning of this year the US commander in Iraq, Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, ordered a confidential investigation by Major General Antonio M. Taguba.
 
Taguba's report - leaked to the New Yorker magazine - stated that between October and December last year there were multiple incidents of 'sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses' in the prison carried out by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the intelligence community.
 
After months of operating with impunity in a twisted little world, the net was closing in on England and Frederick and was about to catch rogue elements of the Queen's Lancashire Regiment.
 
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1208000,00.html



Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros