Rense.com




Why Is Aafia Siddiqui On
John Ashcroft's
Wanted Poster?

By Kurt Nimmo
nimmo@zianet.com
5-27-4
 
It's like a bad movie you've watched one too many times. AG Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller stand before the cameras and tell the people of the United States al-Qaeda is out there lurking. "Credible intelligence from multiple sources indicates that al-Qaeda plans to attempt an attack on the United States in the next few months," Ashcroft warns.
 
It is by now all so drearily familiar and predictable. It's the same song and dance the Bushites have tirelessly performed since the twin towers fell and everything changed. Even faithful flag-wavers and sleepless paranoids must be bored with it after nearly three years.
 
Ashcroft rolls out a big wanted poster bearing the mugs of several dour-looking Muslim bad guys. Each presents "a clear and present danger" to the United States because of their language skills, familiarity with American culture, and ability to travel under multiple aliases and use forged documents, explains Ashcroft.
 
But wait a minute. Something is wrong here.
 
One of the suspects is Aafia Siddiqui, a former Boston woman and American citizen with a biology degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 
After 9/11 the FBI issued a global alert for Siddiqui. "Although the FBI has no information indicating this individual is connected to specific terrorist activities, the FBI would like to locate and question this individual," explained a "Seeking Information" page posted on the FBI's web site. Siddiqui's photo and particulars were subsequently broadcast on American TV and radio. She was described as an al-Qaeda operative. Last March it was reported she was arrested on the way to the Karachi airport and interrogated by Pakistani officials.
 
But Pakistani officials deny this. "She has not been arrested," said Interior Minister Faisal Saleh Hayat during a news conference covered by the Urdu daily on April 1, 2003. On the following day Hayat repeated the assertion, adding that Siddiqui was involved with al-Qaeda and on the run from the authorities.
 
According to a June 23, 2003 issue of Newsweek International, the FBI became interested in Aafia Siddiqui because "she rented a post-office box to help a former resident of Baltimore named Majid Khan (alleged al-Qaeda suspect) to help establish his US identity." The Newsweek article repeated the claim Siddiqui was arrested in Pakistan, contrary to the repeated assertions of the interior minister.
 
But according to a different version of Newsweek, Aafia Siddiqui did more than simply rent a post office box for Majid Khan.
 
"Newsweek reported," wrote the Boston Globe, "that [Hatem al-Dhahri, a Saudi Arabian man who shared a lease in 2001 on a Mission Hill, Boston, apartment with Siddiqui's now estranged husband, Mohammad Amjad Khan] and another Saudi Arabian man who lived in the building during 2001 were involved in a $20,000 wire transfer from the Saudi Arabian embassy flagged as suspicious by Fleet Bank. The Saudi embassy said that the transfer was routine financial assistance for medical treatment." Fleet Bank filed a SARS (suspicious-activity report) with the US Treasury Department and this alerted the FBI.
 
The SARS filed by Fleet Bank revealed several purchases of interest to the FBI, primarily "debit-card purchases from stores that 'specialize in high-tech military equipment and apparel,' including Black Hawk Industries in Chesapeake, Va., and Brigade Quartermasters in Georgia. (Black Hawk's Web site, advertises grips, mounts and parts for AK-47s and other military-assault rifles as well as highly specialized combat clothing, including vests designed for bomb disposal.)"
 
Naturally, for the FBI, these purchases spelled al-Qaeda in 50 foot high neon letters.
 
At first the FBI claimed Pakistan had Siddiqui -- and then suddenly they changed their minds. "She is not in custody," said John Iannarelli, a special agent with the FBI's national press office, and was "certainly not being interviewed by the FBI ... We're still looking for her."
 
On March 30, 2004, more than a year after Siddiqui's disappearance, the Pakistani newspaper Dawn speculated that she had indeed been detained by authorities and subsequently "handed over to the Americans."
 
On December 30, 2003, according to the Dawn account, "Dr Fawzia Siddiqui, elder sister of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, saw Mr Faisal Saleh Hayat at Islamabad ... regarding the whereabouts of Dr Aafia Siddiqui ... Mr Faisal Saleh Hayat told Dr Fawzia ... that according to his information Dr Aafia Siddiqui had already been released and that Dr Fawzia Siddiqui should go home and wait for some phone call from her sister. But, alas, that phone call has not yet come (third week of March) and the whole family of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, including the author of these lines, are in a state of severe mental torture."
 
If Aafia Siddiqui was "handed over to the Americans," as Dawn claims, why is her face plastered on Ashcroft's wanted poster? Is there something Ashcroft is not telling us about Siddiqui? Is it possible Siddiqui was released by the Pakistanis and simply disappeared? Or was made to disappear? Nobody knows.
 
During Ashcroft's news conference, not a soul asked these questions. But then nobody asks John Ashcroft tough questions, least of all journalists from the corporate media -- they want to be invited back and above all keep their jobs.
 
Is it possible "professional" journalists -- with massive databases and powerful research tools at their fingertips -- are unaware of Siddiqui's disappearance and the claim that she is already in US custody?
 
What does it say about the corporate media when one guy searching Google with a dial-up internet connection reveals more about Aafia Siddiqui than the New York Times, CNN, and Fox News combined? Or is there a reason the corporate media has not commented on what Newsweek and the Boston Globe reported about Aafia Siddiqui last year? Is it intellectual laziness or something else?
 
Obviously, Bush does not like to answer questions, especially questions about his business dealings with Saudi Arabia and the bin Laden family, a subject Michael Moore deals with in his latest documentary. Is it possible Aafia Siddiqui's association with people receiving money from Saudi Arabia -- transactions and debit-card purchases that sent up red flags at the Treasury Department and the FBI -- suddenly became a forbidden subject? And if so, why is Siddiqui's photograph on Ashcroft's wanted poster? We don't know. And nobody seems inclined to ask, least of all the corporate media.
 
All we know is Aafia Siddiqui has disappeared.


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros