- The 9/11 Commission's report of Mohamed Atta's final
days does not match what's already on the record. See: http://www.madcowprod.com/
-
- June 26--Exactly 1000 days after hijacked airliners crashed
into the World Trade Center the American people finally heard public testimony,
during the final hearings of the 9/11 Commission last week in Washington,
D.C., about the plot that took nearly 3000 lives.
-
- It wasn't worth the wait.
-
- "9/11: the Plot" was the subject of a day-long
hearing on what were supposed to be the specifics of the conspiracy. But
the distortions, inaccuracies, omissions, and evasions offered during the
session suggests that the real 9/11 plot involves efforts by the FBI to
keep the American people in the dark, for whatever reason, about the facts
of the attack.
- Still, the trickle of new evidence released cleared up
several questions and 'conspiracy theories' which some found compelling:
the notion that there weren't any Arab hijackers on the planes (the dread
Remote Controllers); and the suspicion that a NORAD stand-down had allowed
the attack to succeed.
-
-
- But staff and FBI testimony also created a major new
mystery: Why doesn't the account given by FBI and staff investigators about
the final days of the terrorist conspiracy match what's already on the
public record?
- The discrepancies, to no one's surprise, call into question
the credibility of the FBI's basic chronology of the terrorist conspiracy.
Bottom line: there's hard physical evidence to prove that something is
very wrong with the only official explanation the American people are ever
likely to get.
- FULL STORY AT:
-
- The MadCowMorningNews
- www.madcowprod.com
-
- "When Matt & Katie aren't enough."
-
- READ A BOOK YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO: "Welcome to
TerrorLand!: Mohamed Atta & the 9/11 cover-up in Florida."
|
