Rense.com




Did Napoleon Die From
Too Many Enemas?

Discovery Channel
7-25-4


(AFP) -- The enduring mystery surrounding the demise of Napoleon Bonaparte has just been given another twist.
 
The official verdict, supported by an autopsy, was that l'Empereur died of stomach cancer on May 5, 1821, at the age of 51, while in exile on Britain's South Atlantic island colony of St. Helena.
 
But French conspiracy theorists suspect that Napoleon was slowly poisoned, either by the British, or by his confidant, Count Charles de Montholon, who was supposedly in the pay of French royalists opposed to the emperor's return to France.
 
The scientific evidence for that is a chemical analysis conducted in 2001 on a lock of hair cut from Napoleon's hair after his death that found huge traces of arsenic.
 
But, according to Saturday's issue of the British weekly New Scientist, all are wrong.
 
"Medical misadventure" by Napoleon's over-enthusiastic doctors was to blame, according to forensic pathologist Steven Karch at the San Francisco Medical Examiner's Department.
 
Every day, the doctors gave Napoleon an enema to relieve his symptoms of a sick stomach and intestinal cramping.
 
"They used really big, nasty syringe-shaped things," Karch said. This, combined with regular doses of a chemical called antimony potassium tartrate to induce vomiting, would have left poor Boney perilously short of potassium.
 
This can lead to a lethal heart condition known in English as in French as "torsades de pointes" in which the blood flow to the brain is disrupted by bursts of irregular heartbeats.
 
Karch's theory is that any arsenic in Napoleon's body that may have come from smoke or other environmental sources would have made him more vulnerable to torsades.
 
But that on its own would not have sent him to meet his maker. Instead, the final straw would have been a massive 600-milligram dose of a purgative, mercuric chloride, which would have sent his potassium levels plummeting. Napoleon drew his last breath only two days after this brutal treatment.
 
So has the arsenic puzzle been replaced by another mystery ó the riddle of the sphincter?
 
Emphatically not, said Phil Corso, a retired Connecticut doctor, who is an outspoken advocate of the cancer theory.
 
"It's really far-fetched when you think about it," Corso says, pointing out that Napoleon had clearly been sick for some time and would have died from his tumor regardless of the treatment.
 
The autopsy was carried out by Napoleon's personal doctor, Francesco Antommarchi, and was observed by five British physicians.
 
In October 2002, the conspiracy theory was given a knock by the French publication Science et Vie (Science and Life), which took arsenic readings from 19 hairs taken from Napoleon in 1805, 1814 ó before he went into exile - and in 1821.
 
All the samples contained massive doses of arsenic, ranging from 15 to 100 parts per million (ppm), compared with a normal level of only 0.8 ppm of arsenic. The maximum limit considered safe is three ppm.
 
The most plausible source for this was hair restorer, a product that in the early 19th century typically contained lots of arsenic.
 
In 1840, Napoleon's remains were taken back to Paris, where he lies buried in a vast marble tomb beneath the gilt dome of the Invalides military hospital.
 
Even then, the conspiracy theorists are still vocal. A small group, led by lawyer Bruno Roy-Henry, believe that the British switched the bodies for a laugh, gulling the French into burying a Bonaparte lookalike.
 
Copyright © 2004 Discovery Communications Inc. http://dsc.discovery.com/news/afp/20040719/napoleon.html
 
 
Comment
From Tony Oatley
7-27-4
 
Hi Jeff,
 
I would like to comment on the above article concerning the death of Napoleon. Firstly, I believe that Napoleon was poisoned, but he was not poisoned by mercuric chloride that was allegedly administered to him as a purgative in a 600mg dose. That is because mercuric chloride is not normally used as a purgative.It is also known as 'corrosive sublimate' and doses above 7.5 grains (approximately 487mg) would usually end in death anyway.
 
Steven Karch is asserting that Napoleon was given a 'massive 600 milligram dose of a purgative, mercuric chloride'. If that in fact were the case, I would argue that since Napoleon was already suffering from chronic arsenic poisoning, and he was already being given tartar emetic (antimony potassium tartrate to induce vomiting which is also toxic) he would have surely been 'sent to meet his maker' but not because of 'torsades de pointes' as Karch suggests - but because of the synergistic effect of the poisons.
 
However, I would again like to add that Napoleon was not given mercuric chloride at all - rather it was mercurous chloride, otherwise known as calomel which was a favoured purgative at that time. Whereas, mercuric chloride was mainly used in a dilute solution as an external antiseptic because it is so toxic if taken internally - it is not called 'corrosive sublimate ' for nothing. It did have an internal use in the treatment of syphilis in very small doses of 1/32 to 1/16 grain.
 
So, in nuce, it is far more likely that Napoleon Bonaparte still died of poisoning after all, (and there were more poisons involved than those mentioned e.g.'orgeat' a drink containing hydrocyanic acid that the Emperor was given to quench his burning thirst due to the chronic arsenic poisoning) and not the enemas depleting his potassium levels. I would argue that the conspiracy theory still stands and it worked out in practice on Napoleon Bonaparte in his last days on the British island colony of St. Helena.
 
--Tony Oatley BA (Hons)




Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros