- It is clear that the flight that struck the second of
the TwinTowers on 9/11 was not United Airlines Flight 175, because views
from underneath the plane reveal a 20 m. long, 1/2 m. diameter, cylinder
that opens just before impact. The pod appears in all photographs that
clearly show that aspect of the plane, and can be seen in the frame-by-frame
analysis of all videos of the impact, where there is sufficient contrast
and resolution.
-
- See: http://www.911review.org/Wiki/Wtc2PlanePod.shtml
-
- The Barcelona daily La Vanguardia, which has run a series
of articles based on a technical report on this pod, asked Boeing about
these features, who claimed they were unable to respond for reasons of
national security!
-
-
- Comment
- From Paul Higginbotham
- 7-9-4
-
- Hello Jeff - This concerns the article about the anomaly
on the 767 that struck the tower. I have worked on Boeing 767s as a licensed
aircraft mechanic for fifteen years and I can tell you there is nothing
that even remotely resembles what I see in the photographs on "normal"
aircraft.
-
- I know the 767 literally inside-out as I have overhauled
them hundreds of times and that "pod" or device is NOT normal.
But what strikes me the most - and sends chills up my spine - is the frame
that shows the plane JUST hitting the building. Where in the HELL do the
flames come from?? The fuel is stored in the WINGS!! The is NO fuel,
not a DROP near the nose of the aircraft. It is held in the wings and
pumped to the engines. That's it. The nose contains NOTHING that could
cause a fire on impact.
-
- I believe this was a deliberate act by our government.
Also, when I saw it live on TV my first thoughts when the buildings collapsed
was "Hey! that looks EXACTLY like a professional demolition"
to keep the debris in the same "footprint" as the building.
It was too neat of a job. If this is true, what kind of country are we
living in now?
|
