- It has been reported (see below) that MI6 withdrew intelligence
used in the "infamous dossier" (September 2002) because sources
from which it emanated were discovered to be unreliable. Not only was the
dossier content with this intelligence already weak - with these last bricks
removed, it would have toppled completely.
-
- Note the date MI6 decided to cease reporting this intelligence:
the article below reports that it was July, last year. What date? 17th.
(Courtesy BBC Newsnight). 17th July 2003 is the day that Dr Kelly disappeared.
Kelly had twice been subject to severe grillings by British MoD/intelligence
during the previous 10 days. Isn't it a striking possibility that MI6 discovered
their sources were unreliable from Kelly during those grillings? If Kelly
knew how unreliable the dossier sources were, this would have made him
a severe liability. MI6 kept the information under wraps as long as they
could... but with his high regard for truth and accuracy, had Kelly lived,
he might not have done the same. RT
-
-
- No 10 Admits Hutton Cover-Up
By Colin Brown, Kim Sengupta and Andrew Grice
The Independent - UK
7-17-4
-
- Downing Street admitted yesterday that MI6 embarked on
an unprecedented cover-up after it withdrew intelligence supporting the
Government's dossier on Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction because
it was unreliable.
-
- In an astonishing admission after the disclosure of the
cover-up in yesterday's Independent, Tony Blair's official spokesman said
MI6 decided not to tell the Hutton inquiry - set up to investigate the
death of the government scientist David Kelly - that crucial intelligence
on Saddam's chemical and biological weapons was unsound. The security services,
he said, felt it was "too sensitive'' to be made public. The head
of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, also decided not to tell Mr Blair. The Prime
Minister's spokesman said Mr Blair only became aware of the withdrawal
of the intelligence as a result of the inquiry by Lord Butler of Brockwell,
which was delivered three days ago.
-
- Senior sources close to last year's Hutton inquiry said
they were unaware that crucial intelligence had been withdrawn, and had
this been known, a number of government witnesses would have faced questions
about the matter. The sources insisted that the fact that intelligence
had been withdrawn by MI6 was not revealed to Lord Hutton either orally
or in written evidence.
-
- After the death of Dr Kelly, Mr Blair asked Lord Hutton
to conduct an inquiry. Mr Blair's official spokesman said on 21 July last
year: "The important point is that we have said that he will have
whatever papers and people he needs."
-
- The inquiry began on 11 August. Giving evidence, the
Prime Minister, Sir Richard Dearlove and John Scarlett, the head of the
Joint Intelligence Committee, all failed to mention the withdrawal of intelligence.
All three insisted that intelligence from agents in Iraq was believed to
be reliable.
-
- Downing Street insisted yesterday that the first time
Mr Blair knew about the discredited intelligence was in the Butler report.
And the reason Mr Scarlett had not mentioned it, when giving evidence two
months after MI6 had withdrawn the intelligence, was that "the validation
process was still ongoing".
-
- Senior MPs said Downing Street's comments had all the
hallmarks of a damage limitation exercise. Had Mr Blair known, he would
face fresh allegations of misleading Parliament on Tuesday when he opens
a debate on the Butler report.
-
- Downing Street gave three reasons for not telling the
Hutton inquiry: it was not relevant to the investigation into Dr Kelly's
death; it was only one element in the chemical and biological weapons "picture";
and, because validation of the intelligence and its source was continuing,
it was too sensitive to make public. "Lord Hutton was not misled.
He saw everything that was relevant to his picture," said Mr Blair's
spokesman.
-
- Two parliamentary committees were also kept in the dark
and last night there was a backlash as MPs claimed they had been misled.
The Prime Minister's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) will meet
next week to decide whether to hold a fresh inquiry into the disclosures
in the Butler report.
-
- A senior member of the ISC said: "We were not told
about this. We were shown some of the evidence. I think it is a real issue
of concern that the SIS [Intelligence and Security Committee] have done
this without telling us." Lord King, a former chairman of the ISC,
said: "It was for Lord Hutton to decide whether it was not relevant.
"
-
- The intelligence services also failed to tell the Commons
Foreign Affairs Committee, which investigated the death of DrKelly, that
it had "withdrawn'' the crucial intelligence.
-
- The decision to withdraw the intelligence was taken in
July, last year, the same month that Mr Blair was forced to call the Hutton
inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Dr Kelly, who was
named as the source for reports that the dossier had been "sexed up''
by Downing Street.
-
- Exactly a year ago, Dr Kelly went for his fateful walk
in the woods. Mr Blair is finding it impossible to draw a line under the
events that his death set in train.
-
- http://news.independent.co.uk/low_res/
story.jsp?story=541887&host=3&dir=62
|
