Rense.com




EPA Deliberately
Underestimating Toxic
Releases - Report

BushGreenwatch.org
6-24-4
 
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this week distributed its Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for 2002. TRI reports the release of chemicals from refineries and chemical plants. According to the data, the amount of chemicals released into the air was up 5% in 2002.
 
But a new report by two organizations that monitor enforcement of pollution law charges that EPA and state governments are knowingly underreporting toxic air emissions from refineries and chemical plants, to the tune of 330 million pounds per year. They assert that certain carcinogens -- benzene and butadiene -- are in the air at levels 4 to 5 times higher than what the EPA leads the public to believe.
 
The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), a nonpartisan organization that monitors enforcement of environmental laws, and the Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention (GHASP), show in their report, "Who's Counting? The Systematic Underreporting of Toxic Air Emissions" that because most air pollution is estimated instead of actually monitored, the result is systematic underreporting.
 
"The 'guesswork' is being done by the polluters, who have the incentives to keep the numbers as low as possible," said Kelly Haragan, EIP counsel and equal justice fellow.
 
New rules adopted this year by EPA require polluters to monitor emissions little more than once every five years. Previous standards mandated that major air pollution sources monitor at a level sufficient to show compliance with federal pollution limits. [1]
 
"Refineries and chemical plants report their toxic emissions under an honor system that is based on calculations that are outdated and inaccurate," Haragan said. "Instead of cleaning up this problem, the EPA has further weakened monitoring rules and continues to knowingly feed the public inaccurate data regarding toxic air emissions."
 
The EIP-GHASP report is based on findings by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. It shows extreme jumps in carcinogens released into the air. In one case -- a reported release of 6 million pounds of benzene, a known carcinogen -- the 2001 TRI in fact totaled more than 20 million pounds. [2]
 
In 2001 the U.S. General Accounting Office asked that EPA improve oversight reporting for large facilities, noting that 96 percent of all emissions estimates were based on "emissions factors". [3] Emissions factors were originally developed as a way to estimate long-term average emissions, but are recognized by EPA as not being accurate for calculating a particular facility's emissions. Nevertheless EPA has actively limited the amount of direct monitoring that large sources of air pollution are required to perform.
 
"We are tired of industry accounting tricks that always seem to show pollution releases dropping rapidly, while air quality improvements seem so slow. It is time for EPA and the states to require real measurements from industry, and take forthright action to protect the public from chemicals that cause cancer, respiratory, cardiovascular and reproductive diseases," said John Wilson, director of GHASP. [4]
 
SOURCES: [1] EIP press release, Jun. 22, 2004. http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/pubs/TRI_news_release_FINAL.pdf [2] "Who's Counting? The Systematic Underreporting of Toxic Air Emissions," EIP report, Jun. 22, 2004. http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/pubs/TRIFINALJune_22.pdf [3] EIP report, op. cit. [4] EIP release, op. cit.
 
http://www.bushgreenwatch.org/mt_archives/000143.php


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros