Rense.com




OZ Shark Kills, Eats Surfer
7-11-4
 
A surfer was yesterday attacked and killed by a shark at a popular surfing spot outside Perth.
 
Police and paramedics rushed to the tiny holiday town of Gracetown, 280km southwest of Perth, in an attempt to save the man but it is believed he died at the scene.
 
Witnesses at the beach said there were two sharks -- estimated to be between 3m and 5m long -- in the area at the time of the attack.
 
"It was the larger one that attacked," said Sgt Ian Pheasant, of Margaret River police.
 
Police said the victim was in his early 30s, but was not a local.
 
The tragedy occurred in front of surfers and holidaymakers at a popular surf break called Lefthanders.
 
It is the second fatal shark attack in WA in four years, following the death in November 2000 of Ken Crew, who was attacked at North Cottesloe beach, 12km west of Perth, while swimming.
 
Yesterday's attack is the latest in a series of attacks in WA this year.
 
On March 21, a monstrous 5m white pointer menaced swimmers when it was spotted cruising in the shallows.
 
Weeks earlier, professional diver Greg Pickering, 47, survived a mauling from a 1.5m bronze whaler while spearfishing.
 
In January, Allan Oppert, 46, was pulled to safety after being attacked by a 4.5m great white during a spearfishing trip.
 
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/printpage/0,5481,10102257,00.html
 
 
From Ralph S. Collier
Shark Research Committee
7-11-4
 
Dear Mr. Rense,
 
I read the posting on your web site today regarding the fatal attack on 29-year-old surfer Bradley Adrian Smith at Left Handers beach near Margaret River just south of Gracetown, and about 280 kilometers south of Perth, in Western Australia. I thought it best to clarify several aspects of this attack that have been mentioned by the Australian media.
 
I have examined and analyzed white shark interactions with humans globally for more than 40 years. My analysis of these events has determined substantially dissimilar behaviors for attacking white sharks from numerous geographic locations, including; the United States, Australia, South Africa, and Chile to mention but a few.
 
The following is what is current know about this unfortunate incident at Left Handers beach. Smith was surfing with about 20 other surfers when two white sharks attacked. One shark was described as being about 5 meters (17 feet) in length and the second shark about 3 meters (10 feet) in length. Witnesses said the attack lasted about 20 seconds with the larger shark striking Smith so ferociously that his board was bitten in half by the initial strike. Following the initial strike the larger shark released Smith momentarily before the smaller shark "launched itself up out of the water" according to witnesses. The smaller shark bite the victim several times as Smith hit the shark repeatedly in an attempt to get away.
 
Photographs of the surfboard taken by a bystander on the beach suggest a white shark at least 5 meters in length was responsible for the initial strike. This estimate is based on the size and shape of the dentition impression left in the front section of the victim's surfboard shown in the photograph.
 
Two nearby surfers went to Smith's aid and brought him ashore. He died from exsanguination before reaching the beach. The surfers described the larger white shark as being "as big as a car." This was the sixth fatal shark attack in Australian waters since 2000.
 
Comparison of white shark predatory attack behavior from global locations would seem to favor the Pacific Coast of North America as the location where you are least likely to suffer a serious or fatal injury. In my analysis of 117 shark attacks from the Pacific Coast since 1900, injury data was available for 114 cases. For those 114 cases, 47 (41%) victims sustained serious injury that required hospitalization and in 9 cases (8%) the attack was fatal. Therefore, only 9 fatal white shark attacks were reported for the entire Pacific Coast of North America during a period of 104 years. Of the 117 total unprovoked shark attacks reported for this geographic region during this period, 103 (88%) were attributable to the white shark.
 
The majority of the interactions between white sharks and humans off the Pacific Coast are more investigatory than predatory. The motivation for the majority of these incidents from other global locations appears to be predatory. I attribute this dissimilar behavior as a result of abundant prey species available to juvenile and adult white sharks. This is aptly demonstrated when length/weight relationships for white sharks is compared from these locations. It is not uncommon for their to be as much as a 1,000 pound difference between comparably sized white sharks from California and Australia, and/or South Africa, with the California specimen always heavier. This relates to frequent feeding and abundant prey.
 
The adage that "white sharks usually mistake humans for seals" is not supported by my analysis of these interactions and the physiology of the white shark eye. The ratio of rods to cones in the white shark retina is equal to that of a human. That suggests that their visual acuity and ability to see colors is the same as yours and mine. When silhouettes of surfboards, kayaks and divers are compared with those of pinniped prey species, they are not even closely representative of one another.
 
I've attached a link to my research web site for your perusal. If you would like any additional information please do not hesitate in contacting me.
 
http://sharkresearchcommittee.com
 
Sincerely yours,
 
Ralph S. Collier
Shark Research Committee
 


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros