Rense.com




Return Of The Blue Hare
By Alfred Lehmberg
AlienView.net
8-3-4
 
I've just finished, again, the highly-controversial Max Burns magazine article "The Usual Suspects" (in the Winter 03-4 "Notes From The Borderland" edited by Dr. Larry O'Hara), and, based very conclusively on personal interactions with some of the principals, what ~has~ occurred since the article was published, and what has ~NOT~ occurred since the article was published, I can make a, now, confident prediction regarding where I'd come down at some quickly approaching ufological denouement.
 
Additionally, and as hyperbolic as the reader may believe this to be, I am energized to even higher levels of ufological rage with regard to the way things appear to be ...and as they have been verified by the principals in this disheartening affair...! Verily, I'm fit to be tied, good reader, and more to the point, I hope to engage you in this rage, encourage your indignation, precipitate your resentment, and fan the very flames of ~your~ well provoked wrath!
 
It appears we have been done ~blithe~ disservice, fellow ufological travelers! We're led down smug and defeatist paranormal paths leading to confusion, indifference, ignoble bias, programmed ignorance, and likely... personal loss!
 
Ufology's wheels are wastefully spun in this disservice (and continue to spin); personal liberties may have been lost in this disservice (and are still denied due process!); civil rights may have been suspended in this disservice (sic temper tyrannous!); ufology may have been set back a generation with this disservice! Egregious crimes against the rising and advancing of a human spirit may have been perpetrated, and it may ~be~ that what has been exposed is a likely tip of the proverbial iceberg!
 
...Any reader considering the preceding mere hyperbole can just go straight to hell and pound hot sand; there was no arguing with ~you~ anyway!
 
For the rest... there has evolved, disastrously, a way of doing ufological business, for some, that must be nipped in its suppurating seed-pod, nerve gassed, and otherwise discouraged with extreme prejudice! The Neo-psychosocials (exposed by noted ufologist Jerry Clark) have at last demonstrated that they have gone too far! Astonishingly, they may have airily admitted to a decades long program (a pathology, really, on reflection) of ~deliberate~ obfuscation, evidence corruption, witness manipulation (if not, ~intimidation~!), and quasi-criminal confabulation with regard to UFOs and ufological investigations... extending god-knows where and concealing god-knows-what!
 
What ~have~ these insentient sociopaths sullenly done?
 
Significant and well known persons (names we know!) are implicated in a seemingly well supported charge of conspiracy to deceive and defraud... as a result of hoaxes fabricated by ~them~ and serving only to confound ~legitimate~ researchers... and invalidate ~real~ research! Proclaiming they work only to increase ufological clarity, their actions only increase its aggregate opaque... This is to their capering glee.
 
Laughingly, the admitted ~fact~ of this hoaxing behavior is defended, suspiciously, by the principals... as a practical exercise in the "interests of science", and as an "honorable" devise to keep our ufology (-already- rife with debilitating hoaxes) honest! That is too little, too late, and too conveniently contrived, good reader! Moreover, likely an employed prevarication, it doesn't wash!
 
It's like a person caught pissing in your swimming pool protesting it needed to be done to lower the water's pH! It's like a thief selling a bogus insurance policy and laughing at the subscribers inability to get a pay-out! It's like an obvious sinner protesting his ultimate saintliness and loyalty... and then dashing off with his best friend's wife for a furtive sport-boink! I would hope that all these persons implicated in this scurrilous deception (psycho-socials and assorted CSICOPians alike) step out of their cheating shadows (Burns has intimated in his article) and disclose what they ~know~ about this admitted programmed hoaxing... in an effort to filter the befouled ufological waters! What's been hoaxed! When! How! Who was involved! I won't hold my breath!
 
These misguided, erroneous, and unethical neo-psychosocials and reactionary CSICOPians have needlessly, arrogantly, and as a result of self-involved conceit and clear disrespect for ~you~, good reader... ~completely~ overstepped their ethical bounds... and in the name of 'science', no less!
 
Pause to guffaw!
 
I cannot ~conceive~ of the sneering arrogance from Mr. Andy Roberts or the false bravado he trumpets with regard to his PRIDE in this scurrilous perpetration of an entire ~series~ of energy wasting hoaxes (...for ~how~ many years now?)! How blatantly ignorant! How tragically unenlightened! How unconscionably destructive! How inexplicably stupid!
 
Moreover, who died and elected him our ufological god of manipulated ufological reality? More still, from what fetid depths of bald-faced self-involvement could this monstrous conceit even originate? Just who does he think he is, what personal credibility does he imagine is ~not~ destroyed, and why does he think we need believe a single thing a psycho-social ufologist has to say... ever again!?!
 
Don't these people realize that it is ~their~ behavior that is the most lamentable, and that much more is said about ~them~ in cases such as this... than is said with regard to anything or anyone they'd pretend to criticize! Can they ~not~ understand how their performance is no different than them going to the police with a well constructed report for a fictional crime being committed, and then chastise and ridicule the ~police~ for believing their fabrication? Where is the difference?
 
What service is, remotely, performed... but the marginalization of the ~righteous~ and the minimalization of any ~truth~? Why would we not be completely opposed to ~any~ confabulation of the truth, for ~any~ reason? Why would we ~remotely~ tolerate this heedless and ~enraging~ ... insulting (!)... ethical transgression?
 
Will ~you~ tolerate it? Ufological hoaxes are bad enough reader, but hoaxes planted to indicate that 'everything' in ufology is a hoax crosses a ~fat~ line! Don't tolerate it!
 
Was a 'ringer' (the "Blue Hare" in the title of this piece) sent into a Max Burns lecture to record false testimony planted as a function of Mr. Roberts ongoing and proudly ADMITTED program of shameful duplicity and fatuously 'clarifying' hoaxes? How is this ~not~ evidence of the psycho-socials unethically trying to torpedo Max Burns' investigation into Sheffield, and sabotaging a righteous ufology in general!?!
 
Verily, were these individuals to play the dishonorable game with me that they have played with Max Burns they could compensate me in civil court for infringing on my civil rights... forgetting the ponderous intellectual disservice done the rest of us! It's an outrage!
 
As an example, does the reader remember when Dr. John Mack had a seminar of abductees some years ago and used much of the testimony of the individuals at the seminar in his research later on? When he published his findings, subsequently, the robed and hooded CSICOPians gleefully trotted out the female *ringer* that they had intelligently prepared and then scurrilously planted in Dr. Mack's perfectly ~innocent~ bosom... to demonstrate the invalidity of his ~entire~ research! Does anyone ~else~ see a parallel here? Sincerely, how can this do anything but invalidate the ~invalidator~!
 
Really, good reader! How does an artful and prepared ~liar~ invalidate a research, at all... but by its innocent and guileless inclusion in that research? Remove the planted lie and the research is made more valid! What was the provenance of Mack's lie? Was it ~Mack~? Decidedly, NO!
 
A color test for sugar PRESUMES that there won't be any ~salt~ used as a control, reader! The 'salt' was not provided by Dr. Mack! Truly, this duplicity, therefore, shall ~not~ be taken as a comment on Dr. Mack's competence as a scientist... rather it be taken as an ~indictment~ on the acts of what can only be called his "less than honorable, uptight, and reactionary" ~persecutors~!
 
Is Max Burns being persecuted in a similar fashion? This writer remembers the plight of John Ford and wonders; the question is ~heavily~ begged! Are the busy imps of "Psycho-socia" passionately engaged in poisoning Burns' ufological wells, refusing his challenges to debate on the record, denying him his opportunity to be heard, assassinating his character, or sabotaging his research and investigation? Burns makes a good, non-paranoid, case that they are! He has citation, he names 'names', and significant persons have come out in his defense (not the least of which [ironically!] are his own most ~vociferous~ hecklers...[!!] ...by their own admissions!!!). His artless, suspicious, and canted detractors, on the other hand, use inflated verbiage, character smears, duplicitous spins (one involving ~this~ writer!), deliberate hoaxing, and strength of skepti-bunky ~numbers~ to invalidate, harass, minimalize, and marginalize him!
 
Seriously, reader! When Max Burns says he spent 15 months writing his article in order to make a report demonstrating how ~some~ of our number are unethically prosecuting their ufological business, he wasn't just whistling "Dixie"!
 
Something is ~indeed~ rotten in psycho-social 'Denmark', it's stinking to high heaven, and it is to the detriment of all of us if it be allowed to continue unchallenged! This ADMITTED neo-psychosocial program of hidden duplicity, false witness, and dodgy ethics is counterproductive, cross-purposed, and flatly unintelligent. Verily, these neo-Psychosocialists are a ufological al-Qaida in our midst and must be rooted out by flower, seed and stem!
 
Where is your rage, good reader? You've been played for a ufological fool... and continue to be played as such! Get angry! You're entitled! These Neo-psychosocials (Ufological PsychoPATHS!) intellectually spit in your face!
 
I highly recommend the Max Burns article, which is a long and detailed read, but an indicator, at the denouement, that ufology is one ~hell~ of a lot more muddled than it needs to be, suffers needless and deliberately contrived hurdles in its hamstrung and hobbled execution, and is manipulated or intimidated by self-styled agents of extremely ~malicious~ misdirection! I suspect these practitioners of easy duplicity should be run out of town on a ufological rail! They've betrayed the obvious trust and ~must~ be censured! Verily, they perform no service but a clear disturbance of the ufological peace!
 
Moreover, they are the antithesis of the very science they say they pay allegiance to! They are dirt on our ufological shoes. They are Vaseline on our ufological lens. Sincerely, they must be... stopped!
 
Look around, reader! Psycho-social Ufology is not as it appears! Resent being deliberately fooled, manipulated and confused!
 
Buyer be vigilant! Buyer... beware! Their task is your ignorance... confusion... despair!
 
AlienView.net
 
The Usual Suspects.pdf




Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros