- This is important, because only when something gets to
this level can it become of potential importance to others. So what does
this title refer to: The first thousand what-dollars, lies, obscenities,
human lives, or all of the above?
-
-
- With the official numbers now in four digits-the time
has come to again ask. "What does this war have to do with US policy-why
are we there and what's the plan"?
-
-
- Some of their answers included: "We will never forget
the lessons of 911!" or "Iraq is the front line in the war on
terror." Later, after it became clear that we have lost control, and
that we have lost this takeover attempt in Iraq, Bush and the Pirates said:
"We must stay the course" and " we will do whatever it takes
to accomplish the mission." Since neither the course nor the mission,
have ever been identified for ordinary mortals, this means absolutely nothing.
Whatever the Pirates are referring to in their pomposity, Bush seems very
comfortable with sending people out to die for something that he chooses
to classify as secret. Would Bush be so cock-sure of his easy proclamations
if his kids were going off into the fog of a war declared by a guy who
says he speaks for God?
-
-
- How do the Pirates define success anywhere, and is there
a difference in what is going on now in Iraq, versus some other kind of
success? Is success a numbers game because according to the White
House we've been "at war" now for One Thousand and Ninety-three
days. Did Bush expect that we would lose as many people as we have days
invested? Or is the number of dead more suitable if it reaches 10,000,
or even 50,000? Do the numbers alone give any war more meaning? How many
more need to die on any side. How many more need to be mangled, damaged
or destroyed for the mystery and the illegality that George and Dick and
Donald, have so proudly claimed as their war upon the world?
-
-
- Great nations are measured by the viability of their
people, and by the feasibility of their national policies: And also, by
how often their politicians tell the truth by design instead of by default.
None of the real topics that came into question with the Bush decision
to attack the world has ever been discussed or debated. It was simply ordered
by Bush and that was that no questions, no holdouts.
-
-
- Now three years after the fact, both parties held hollow
conventions that decided nothing and that kept the public from having anything
to say about our national stance: on pre-emptive attacks, on violations
of International law, or on prisoner abuse and the responsibility for all
of the above. The reason for the conventions had already been stolen from
the delegates, by the national media and their puppet-masters, who felt
that choosing candidates for public office was far too important to be
left to ordinary citizens. The public has seen this, and most are not disturbed
by having their choices made for them by those who would have had to earn
that choice, if there were to be a real election.
-
-
- George W. tends to think of himself as a King, even though
he is not Monarch material. Bush does however play to the gallery that
seems to need to be literally guided through every act in their waking
life. "There lives within a great many Americans a latent yearning
for some kind of Monarchy, some kind of feudal dependence upon a patriarchy
that is repellant to free and independent thought. This emanates from a
fear of the world that is born of indecision, just as it seeks protections
from even life itself. There can be no protection for any individual within
an artificial net of fantasies and lies. Enter the one-size fits all dominance
of the New World Order." Maybe Bush is thinking that he's the King
of the all the Pirates? That works!
-
-
- The questions we have not faced are the ones we never
asked Bush to explain. He arranged to have himself appointed to the presidency,
after having lost the popular count by over 500,000 votes which we
did not challenge. Then he targeted a place and an outlaw band, as our
enemies, that he said committed the actions that resulted in 911-yet he
chose not to investigate, or even to attempt to prove any of his own allegations.
- http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2004/080904wargamescover.htm
- Our part in his criminal actions was, that we did not
demand that he do more.
-
-
- Since we did not challenge him on anything at all to
that point, he went further. After holding more clandestine meetings with
his fellow outlaws, together they created a policy that flies in the face
of all of history, all international laws, and common sense. He created
the Bush Doctrine of 2002 that sanctions pre-emptive wars, based on nothing
but the personal determination of the resident of the oval office.
-
-
- This policy provided no oversight, no congressional or
judicial checks or balances for his actions, and provides no timetable
for conclusion of this permanent state of Outlawed Warfare. And still the
American public did not challenge any part of this action that targeted
the US Treasury, to pay for all of it, and the public that would need to
furnish the human cannon fodder for this insanity that the Bush Administration
claims is necessary, to protect the people from "terrorism."
-
-
- Despite the obvious flaws in all of this-the public still
has not challenged any of the actions that have led us to this impasse.
Possibly because we have chosen to believe that no president would knowingly
commit treason, knowingly violate international laws, or chose to send
men and women into unending wars, with only the false flag of patriotism
as our sole justification of those actions. No president would: but Bush
is not the valid president, he's an imposter.
-
-
- When his first strike against Afghanistan began to get
bogged down in the impossibility of any chance to win-we allowed Bush to
change the subject, ignore his promise "to get Osama bid Laden dead
or alive" and just change the subject from Afghanistan to Iraq. Why-simply
because the "president" said that Iraq was involved with 911.
No proof was offered, only the word of a discredited and increasingly suspicious
White House, whose allegations have proven to be nothing but a pack of
lies. Having all of this come back to haunt them now, the subject has now
become "the next attack." Some of what has been ignored now includes
the torture of people throughout the Middle East, in hideous and bloody
ways. The White House, through Rumsfeld, apparently ordered this: That
it became an open secret with no investigation until after the election
seems to follow the familiar pattern. The reason given is because the people
who were tortured were all terrorists, and not deserving of civil treatment.
Given that nine-tenths of all those held by us, were guilty of nothing
at all, was ignored. More flags and uniforms were paraded, and the necessary
questions were again - not asked.
-
-
- Why is it so difficult for so many to grasp that other
people will quite naturally chose to fight anyone who tries to seize their
way of life, or who comes into their own country to kill them? The media
calls these people "insurgents" (assuming that they are acting
against the natural order). Wrong! Those people are fighting the Invaders
of their nation, for a variety of reasons, and this is taking place in
their country, not ours.
-
-
- We did the same thing in Viet Nam, where we killed millions
of people in that country and in Cambodia and Laos as well. But we lost
that war, outright. That cost over 57,000 American lives, but millions
and millions of other people also paid for our arrogant and illegal actions
in that region. The Bush-Wars will have costs that will make Viet Nam look
like child's play, compared to the chaos that will flow from these much
larger and more obscene claims of obscenity that we are now making upon
the world.
-
-
- Pre-emptive war has been a major failure worldwide. Just
look at the increase in government lawlessness (introduced by the Bush
doctrine of 2002) everywhere else. Nowhere is safe from extreme violence,
no situation has improved at all: All that has happened since we launched
pre-emptive warfare has been the erosion of law and order everywhere else.
"Terror" and suicide bombings result from frustration beyond
endurance, and from the failure of global policies that mirror the deep
imbalances between the powerful and the ultra poor. When all hope for change
has been lost then there is only fury and the will to die rather
than to live under the tyranny that some people feel, has become their
daily way of life.
-
-
- America, despite all the Bush administrations attempts
to take everything away from us, is "still at Risk." Which means
that we gave up our constitution, our privacy, even our ability to question
for nothing! Read that sentence again all our fears have earned
us nothing but more fear, more paranoia, and on the horizon there is only
"War, war, lots more war!"
-
-
- Real policies cannot be founded on national paranoia,
or on fear alone. Whenever "Security" is the only reason for
anything, then the result will always be insecurity.True security comes
directly from sound and balanced national and international policies, not
from war, and never from pre-emptive strikes. The world has known this
for centuries-yet we have let our presidential imposter decide, that he
knows so much more than the collective wisdom in the whole of human history
"about what's best for this nation." And by implication,
for the remainder of the world, that also has to live with our delusions.
-
-
- Kerry, the other non-choice for 'next imposter', mumbled
about a nation that remembers it's dead, as though this was the highest
honor conferrable upon a war. Why not ask our dead how many of them thought
that it was a great idea to die for someone else's bottom line, and then
call that "the American Dream!"
-
-
- Kerry is a half-hearted excuse 'for something else to
do.' His platitudes and obvious boredom with the race, leave the public
bereft of any real choice: which is why he was chosen (by the power brokers)
to run against Bush. And as for Bush, whose life was not investigated,
(thanks to the subservience of the media), Bush did not come into politics
with a personal history, at least not one that he could point to, or that
would qualify him to be anything to anyone besides himself. Hence his trademark
"style" the snear, the snide and petty cynicism of a man who
knows he should have long ago been busted!
-
-
- This game is rigged, and while there are at least two
candidates, there is no real choice evident in the coming November farce.
Whoever wins we'll lose. That's part of the price we paid for remaining
silent when it was time to question everything. Don't forget-this number
is just "The First Thousand," and that in only one of the many
wars we've all been promised!
-
-
- So please stay quiet, and do your duty to the state -
send your family into uniform, the draft is coming in 2005 and then everyone
can play in the real-life-game of Empire!
-
-
- kirwan
|
