- Tony Blair's claim that Iraq was within 45 minutes of
launching weapons of mass destruction a central plank of his case for
war fell apart yesterday as the Foreign Secretary formally withdrew the
infamous claim and revealed MI6 had abandoned its source for the bogus
intelligence.
-
- In a humiliating climbdown, Jack Straw told MPs in a
special Commons statement that MI6 has severed ties with the sources for
both the 45-minute claim and intelligence that Saddam Hussein had produced
a biological weapons agent in 2000.
-
- The decision to lay to rest the most notorious intelligence
claim in the case for war increased pressure from Labour and opposition
MPs for the Prime Minister to make a full personal apology for the decision
to invade Iraq "on a false premise".
-
- Sir Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat deputy leader,
said: "The withdrawal of the 45-minute claim drives a horse and cart
through government credibility."
-
- "The building blocks of the Government's case for
military action are crumbling before our eyes."
-
- The party's leader, Charles Kennedy, wrote to the Prime
Minister yesterday accusing him of "avoiding answering" questions
on the absence of WMD following the conclusion by the Iraq Survey Group
that Saddam Hussein possessed none and may have destroyed his stockpiles
a decade earlier.
-
- Mr Kennedy called on Mr Blair to make a personal statement
today on the findings, when he appears at the dispatch box to answer Prime
Minister's questions.
-
- "The Iraq Survey Group Report shows beyond doubt
that we went to war in Iraq on a false premise. The Prime Minister must
not avoid these questions any longer and he should not bypass Parliament,"
he said.
-
- Mr Straw said yesterday the Prime Minister had accepted
in his speech at the Labour party conference that "some of the information
on which we based our judgements was wrong" but he defended the dossier
and assessments of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC).
-
- "That dossier accurately reflected the views of
the JIC at the time that it was signed off by them," he said. "Far
from the dossier being some confection, it was based on the best judgements
not just of ourselves but of the wider international community. Everybody
assumed Saddam had these weapons."
-
- The withdrawal of the claim caps a remarkable fortnight
of backtracking by Governments on both sides of the Atlantic. At the Labour
Party conference, Mr Blair went some way towards apologising for the faulty
intelligence used to justify the war. Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary,
said there were no concrete links between Iraq and al-Qa'ida. And last
week, Patricia Hewitt, the Trade Secretary, went even further by actually
saying "sorry" for the way intelligence such as the 45-minute
claim was used.
-
- Yesterday, the Foreign Office also took the extraordinary
step of releasing a document indicating that Dr Hans Blix, the former UN
chief weapons inspector, believed a draft of the UK's 2002 dossier on Iraqi
weapons may have understated the extent of Saddam's chemical weapons capacity.
-
- According to an internal memo dated September 2002 about
a discussion with Dr Blix about a draft of the dossier he thought the document,
two weeks before its publication, "did not exaggerate the facts".
-
- But the decision to publish the internal memo from the
UK mission to the United Nations in New York was seen at Westminster as
a diversionary tactic and an attempt to "undermine" the inspector
who became a vocal critic of the Government's case for war.
-
- Robin Cook, the former foreign secretary, pointed out
that Dr Blix did not return to Iraq for inspections until the end of November
2002."What he is saying in September reflects what was around in the
ether at the time. But not his subsequent statements after he was in Iraq,"
Mr Cook said.
-
- Sir Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat deputy leader,
said: "By releasing this document the Government is seeking to undermine
Dr Blix. But this is hardly likely to wash with public opinion in this
country. If the people of Britain are asked who they believe over the subject
of WMD in Iraq then Dr Blix is likely to come top of the poll."
-
- Yesterday, in a Commons statement Jack Straw said John
Scarlett, the MI6 Chief, had formally dropped the source of intelligence
on the 45-minute claim and a "liaison service" which came up
with the false claim that Saddam Hussein had produced a biological weapons
agent in 2000. The same liaison service had passed on information from
a source reporting that Iraq had developed mobile facilities to produce
biological weapons agents, which was also subject to doubt.
-
- Mr Straw told MPs: "The Chief of SIS (Secret intelligence
Service) has now written to the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC)
to inform the committee that, as a result of further investigation by SIS,
both these lines of intelligence reporting have been formally withdrawn."
-
- The formal climbdown follows criticism in the Butler
report on intelligence published in July of the 45-minute claim. Lord Butler
disclosed that M16 had withdrawn the intelligence from a source as it was
now considered unreliable.
-
- Information about Iraqi production of biological agent
- believed to have been passed to MI6 by the intelligence service of another
undisclosed country - was also criticised in the Butler Report as "seriously
flawed".
-
- ©2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd. All rights reserved
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=571592
|