Rense.com



History Channel's Even-Handed
Look At MJ-12 Papers

By Alfred Lehmberg
AlienView.net
10-12-4
 
October 10's History Channel Documentary by Kathleen Quinn regarding "MJ-12" was a remarkable program. I detected an even-handedness and balance rarely seen on television about ufological issues.
 
I won't be getting into the details of Quinn's excellent doc other than to say that Dr. [immaterial] Joe Nickel, bless his little corn-fed traditionalistic's coal black patrician heart, is credited with putting a true face on the total irrationality that is the whole of CSICOP's "Klasskurtzian" *shtick*... pardon the newly coined word. It's meaning can be drawn, easily, from its context with the forthcoming.
 
And, in a quick sidebar, you know what? Klasskurtzianism ~is~ about ideologically canted and authoritarian storm-troopers from the biased realms of CSICOPia, after all! Thank you, Doctor Rudiak!
 
I digress...
 
Back at the ranch, "Ufologists are, at best, irresponsible," implies an *earnest* Dr. [immaterial] Joe Nickel towards the end of the hour long program. Stanton Freidman is derelict. Richard Dolan is reckless. Richard Hall is an elder scoundrel from an even deeper strata of irresponsibility. Jerry Clark lacks accountability. So do a lot of men and women seriously investigating the single most important eventuality of our time.
 
The preceding radical seditionists are not *dependable* persons, Nickel feels. They are without *responsibility*. They ~have~ no *liability*... Stop! Nickel's (et al) stuffy pontification is ~so~ much prolapsed and expulsive nonsense... steaming monkey droppings from high up in the canopy. Get to cover!
 
Moreover, our [immaterial] doctor implores that, "the public should be outraged"! Not because critical information is withheld from interested individuals for spurious and manipulative reasons by an autocratic and authoritarian elite! No. But that Ufologists, those radical funsters and seditious gamesters, actually ~threaten~ America's culture and society by making, "a lot of [us] distrust [our] government" and by "causing invalid suspicions" with regard to currently
*worshipped* "historical figures"! And there we have the dieing CSICOPian philosophy completely contained in its moldy nutshell of reproductionist tediousness.
 
To wit, their "Prime Directive": At all costs to sense and sensibility, maintain the status quo. End of line.
 
That's it. That's all they've got. Everything else is stentorian proclamation, stretched assumption, and pompously insentient axe grinding.
 
Pushing 60, a good citizen taxpayer, combat veteran, and intelligent patriot... I find it repugnant to the ~extreme~ that *Governments* can not earn distrust, or that *historical figures* are beyond the suspicions they themselves provoke! ...Even our own governments and historical figures... ~especially~ our own governments and historical figures!
 
That's not the America I served in a highly decorated military career. That's not the America I described to my immigrant wife and only son! That's not the America I internalized in the freaking Cub Scouts, boys and girls!
 
Some figures of history have ~more~ than earned our suspicion, and governments, ~abundantly~, our distrust, then AND now! If that is not obvious in extremis... than you're just not keeping up with current events, you're chewing window sills lathered in wet lead paint, or you know the truth and ~choose~ to turn away.
 
...Misleading, mislead, or mentally ill... "M" cubed. Sound familiar? Feel it deviate your septums, skeptibunky spawn, CSICOPian caperers, and "klasskurtzian" sycophants!
 
Forget for a moment that it is just ~that~ recognition of provoked *mistrust*, and the *suspicions* that justifiably arise, which ~provide~ for an enlightening reexamination, revision, or more realistic result for an evolving human condition, at ~all~! Understand, first, that the doctor [immaterial] Joe Nickel exposes the CFInistic or CSICOPian "prime directive" in a few chosen words that won't respect individual sensibility and insensiblely supports a status quo continuing only to discredit ~itself~ as it shortchanges ~you~, reader, on a plethora of levels.
 
"Mistrust of government is dangerous and without support". I paraphrase the [immaterial] doctor. "Suspicions regarding the *respected* are dangerous and unsubstantiated." Is it ~any~ wonder which side of the bullhorn our Dr. [immaterial] Nickel prefers to be?
 
No. Weigh the pros and cons as they were ladled out in last night's surprisingly credible and balanced treatment of the mystery surrounding the controversial MJ-12 documents to see for yourself which is more *nourishing*. Mistrust of government ~is~ justified. Suspicion with regard to historical figures is ~not~ without support. Friedman, Dolan, and Rodeghier were just more convincing, less presumptive, and more authoritative than Kurtz, Klass, or Nickel, who were ~less~ than authoritative, ~entirely~ assumptive, and ~profoundly~ less convincing. The former were credible while the latter were "klasskurtzian," to use that word one more time.
 
Verily, and in a manner similar to Dan Rather's "Bush Memo" imbroglio, even if the MJ-12 documents ~are~ fakes... they're the likely truth, I'm betting. MJ-12 ~is~ a reality. Suspicion ~is~ validated. Mistrust ~is~ appropriate.
 
Together, they are the true skeptics very ~soul~... and an apparent klasskurtzian antithesis.
 
alienview@adelphia.net
www.AlienView.net
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros