- From Deacon Elurby founders_america@hotmail.com 10-11-4
-
- Hi, Jeff -
-
- Re: http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html
-
- I possess a genius-level mechanical aptitude, for what
it's worth to the debate:
-
- No passenger plane hit the Pentagon. And THERE WAS a
pod-like device attached to that "airbus" (( actually, a transport
plane )), as seen the the 911InPlaneSite video.
-
- Recall my letter to Matt Drudge (( see postscript and
following messages )).
-
- To reiterate:
-
- REGARDING THAT 60 MINUTES II photo:
-
- That device was as clear to me as the noonday sun, and
there WASN'T ANY play of shadow and light to effect just an illusion of
a device.
-
- One could clearly see a near-cylindrical device hanging
ON THE RIGHT SIDE of its underbelly.
-
- That photo was not hazy--not distorted in any way!
-
- One would have to be blind or brain- dead not to see
that that device did not belong on that plane.
-
- As for the above Website, one has to ask: What is its
real purpose? : to deflect attention away from t-h-e VISUALLY INDISPUTABLE
evidence?
-
- Best Regards,
-
-
- P.S.
-
-
- #######
-
-
- April 14, 2004
-
- Dear Matt Drudge,
-
- Did you watch 60 Minutes II tonight?
-
- If so, did you notice in the picture of the airbus heading
for the tower, it appears to have a strange attachment on its undercarriage
- a POD?
-
- Rense posts information other news sites fear to post.
Here's a collection of photos showing that POD, posted on his Web site
((enlarge photos by clicking on the lower-right icon)):
-
- http://www.rense.com/misslepod.JPG
-
- Best,
- -Deacon
-
-
- Maybe you know what the device is hanging underneath
that doomed airbus:
-
- http://www.rense.com/misslepod.JPG
-
- Find related missives below:
-
-
- - Forwarded Message -
-
-
- April 25, 2004
-
- Dear Steve,
-
- Maybe Frontline would be interested in those pictures
(( frontline@wgbh.org )): http://membres.lycos.fr/applemacintosh2/Pentagon2.htm
-
- I've copied Frontline on this missive, but you ought
to make direct contact.
-
- Best,
- -Deacon
-
- P.S. See forwarded messages below.
-
-
-
- - Forwarded Message -
-
- April 24, 2004
-
- Frontline Staff:
-
- Here are two other interesting links, related to finding
out what that "pod" is:
-
- http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2004/042004podmissile.htm
-
- http://www.rense.com/general51/nopod.htm
-
- Would you please return this missive to me, as acknowledgment
of your having received it.
-
- I had expected an auto-response from you, which was not
forthcoming after sending the below missive to you earlier. So I can't
be certain it has reached you.
-
- Best,
- Deacon
-
-
-
- - Forwarded Message -
-
- April 24, 2004
-
- Dear Front Line Staff,
-
- Look at this. What is it? : http://www.rense.com/misslepod.JPG
If you've looked into that, please send a short note of explanation.
-
- Thanks,
- Deacon Elurby
-
-
- - Forwarded Message - ]
-
- =======
-
- To: cbsstore@ordering.com
- Cc: DRUDGE@DRUDGEREPORT.COM
- BCc: JR@Rense.Com
- Subject: Attn: 60 Minutes II Staff; (Fwd) 60 Minutes
II Shows Pod
-
- =======
-
-
- Attn: CBS Store, please forward this to any or all staff
members of 60 Minutes II, as no e-mail address is given for direct contact.
-
-
- April 15, 2004
-
- Dear 60 Minutes II Staff,
-
- Re: "The Interrogator" http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/06/60II/main610556.shtml
-
- During Scott Pelley's interview with "Tom,"
you displayed a photograph of one of the planes heading for a tower.
-
- In that photo, one could see a strange POD-like structure
attached to the bottom of the doomed passenger plane.
-
- What is that?
-
- Maybe you'll report on that next week, as a follow-up
clarification for your viewers.
-
- See my below missive.
-
- Best,
- -Deacon
-
-
-
- - Forwarded Message -
-
-
- April 14, 2004
-
- Dear Matt Drudge,
-
- Did you watch 60 Minutes II tonight?
-
- If so, did you notice in the picture of the airbus heading
for the tower, it appears to have a strange attachment on its undercarriage
- a POD?
-
- Rense posts information other news sites fear to post.
Here's a collection of photos showing that POD, posted on his Web site
((enlarge photos by clicking on the lower-right icon)):
-
- http://www.rense.com/misslepod.JPG
-
- Best,
- -Deacon
-
- P.S. Please consider carrying Rense's Web site in your
list.
-
-
-
- - Forwarded Message -
-
- April 7, 2004
-
- Dear Matt Drudge, Look at Jeff Rense's Web site:
-
- http://www.rense.com/
-
- His format is THE BEST on the Internet, as it is attractive,
well organized and easy to follow the event/news articles he posts; and
the colors and backdrop for essays he displays are EASY ON THE EYES.
-
- "Packaging is everything," it's said by ad
men about selling products. Well, that's also true of selling news. And
Jeff Rense is a master salesman.
-
- His Web page is ENTERTAINING and PROVOCATIVE ((he has
a POWER- HOUSE collection of archives on this and that AND MORE))!
-
- Please consider putting a link to his web page under
your "World Front Pages" section.
-
- Thanks,
-
- -Deacon
-
- P.S. Yeah, he's competition.
-
- But he posts articles you'd like to post but can't, because
the powers that be would hang you from the nearest tree ((re: 9/11, Iraq,
Zionism, etc.)).
-
- Keep the idea in mind, please.
-
-
- To All The Pod-Heads
-
- Comment
- From Ogre
- 10-12-4
-
- Dear Jeff,
-
- For the love of Christ, would the "Pod" people
stop it. There is far more evidence of run-of-the-mill aircraft hitting
the towers than any combination of pods, bombs, missiles, EMP weapons,
goblins, gremlins, aliens, or Girl Scouts. No disrespect intended to the
victims aboard those aircraft, the towers, the other two flights, or the
Pentagon. I'm just up to *here* with non-facts leading to unfounded theory
followed by ridiculous conjecture. At times my eyes roll so hard one can
actually hear the tendons creaking.
-
- For all you Pod-heads I have one question: Why would
anyone need to attach a little bitty missile pod and tiny bomb to a massive
aircraft that could easily have all cargo holds filled with explosives?
Considering the sheer size and fuel capacity of the aircraft, a bomb or
missile added to the mix would be much like a fly fart in a cyclone. Compare
a large bomb, say 2000lbs, to the cargo hold of this aircraft. Which do
you think is bigger?
-
- Ogre
-
- P. S. Jeff -- I still love your site!
-
-
-
- Comment
- From Ken Webber
- kensmindmovie@hotmail.com
- 10-13-4
-
- Dear Mr. Rense,
-
- OGRE posted the following letter about the pods. He
wanted to know why the pods in the first place. I have posted the reason
why...following his letter below.
-
- Ken Webber
-
- To All The Pod-Heads
-
- Comment
- From Ogre
- 10-13-4
-
- Dear Jeff,
-
- For the love of Christ, would the "Pod"
people stop it. There is far more evidence of run-of-the-mill aircraft
hitting the towers than any combination of pods, bombs, missiles, EMP weapons,
goblins, gremlins, aliens, or Girl Scouts. No disrespect intended to the
victims aboard those aircraft, the towers, the other two flights, or the
Pentagon. I'm just up to *here* with non-facts leading to unfounded theory
followed by ridiculous conjecture. At times my eyes roll so hard one can
actually hear the tendons creaking.
-
- For all you Pod-heads I have one question: Why would
anyone need to attach a little bitty missile pod and tiny bomb to a massive
aircraft that could easily have all cargo holds filled with explosives?
-
- Considering the sheer size and fuel capacity of the
aircraft, a bomb or missile added to the mix would be much like a fly fart
in a cyclone. Compare a large bomb, say 2000lbs, to the cargo hold of this
aircraft. Which do you think is bigger?
-
- Ogre
-
- Dear Ogre,
-
- I would like to answer your reason why a pod would be
on those aircraft - Dov Zakheim is your answer! Who is Dov Zakheim? Dov
is connected to a project known as Global Hawk. A good place to start
is this link:
- http://www.wardrobe.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/murder_inc/911-6.html
-
|