- Kapo. Definition: 1. individuals who have been recruited
by an enemy to police their own people; "Kameradenpolizei."
-
- The late Yasir Arafat was the Israelis' dream leader
for the Palestinians: immensely corrupt and incompetent, he ran the Palestinian
cause to ground with his naive faith in America as an "honest broker"
in the Middle East.
-
- Arafat's first name seems to have derived from the fact
that he went around the Israelis and Americans so often muttering, "Yassir,
Boss," just as the next "Palestinian President" will be
required to do if he wants to live past next month.
-
- The only meaningful, defiant stand Arafat ever took--
and even that was done mainly under pressure from militants-- was to refuse
the Barak/Clinton "generous offer" at Camp David in 2000, which
would have given the Palestinian seal of approval to the dreadful state
of affairs that evolved under Sharon: the carving of the occupied territories
into disconnected Bantustans and the repudiation of the "right of
return" of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees, now living
miserable lives in camps in Jordan under the CIA-linked Jordanian monarchy.
-
- Any such deal cut with Ehud Barak would be particularly
odious, since Barak is one of the most despicable Israeli terrorists and
assassins. In 1994, as military chief, Barak massacred Palestinian demonstrators
in the course of disturbances in the wake of the now nearly-forgotten slaughter
of 40 Palestinian civilians by an off-duty Israeli army officer from Brooklyn,
Baruch Goldstein. Barak actually killed more Palestinians during the protests
than Goldstein had at the mosque.
-
- The source of Arafat's rise to power is murky. The perfect
Palestinian foil to the Israelis, after the demise of the USSR Arafat was
always looking to a US President or the United Nations to save him and
his people. When George W. Bush proved to be as much of a Likud lunatic
as Sharon, Arafat's mantra became, "the international community"
(i.e. western Europe).
-
- Europe, the UN and the White House were foremost on Arafat's
list of Palestinian allies. Strangely absent was the Arab League, the Saudis,
Egypt, Jordan or any other Arab country. With the sole exception of the
non-Arab Islamic Republic of Iran, the Muslim nations were absolutely impotent.
They stood by in disgrace as Peres, Shamir, Netanyahu, Barak and Sharon
did whatever they liked to the Palestinians: machine-gunning, rocketing
and bombing grandmothers, infants and children, mothers and fathers with
the insouciance of Saturday afternoon plinkers at a carnival shooting gallery.
-
- In the end, Arafat was no longer needed by the Israelis,
and Sharon confined him to his quarters like a recalcitrant schoolboy,
while figuring out a way to have him killed without risking the ire of
Colin Powell, who regarded the assassination in broad daylight of a head-of-state,
with American-financed weapons and munitions, as somewhat excessive.
-
- So dominant are the Israelis now that they don't need
a "Palestinian peace partner," just a Kapo to administer on their
behalf--behind a front of Palestinian nationalism-- the enormous concentration
camp that is Gaza and the West Bank. Any other successor to Arafat, any
Palestinian patriot who truly represents the legitimate aspirations of
his people for independence, will very likely be assassinated by Sharon
as an "al-Qaeda connected terrorist." This is the same risible
charge that Likudniks, Fox TV and conservative talk radio hosts in the
US have made in connection with Arafat, who was despised by radical Islamic
militants everywhere--including Hamas-- who did not make war on him solely
in order to avoid falling into the contrived trap of Palestinian civil
war, which the Israeli chess players had so dearly sought to provoke.
-
- The bin Ladens of the world are no alternative, of course.
Their mime of US and Israeli terrorism plays directly into the hands of
the Mossad and the CIA, if indeed they are not actually agents of those
intelligence services, as seems likely.
-
- The dominant Judeo-Masonic system in the West today,
which I style the Cryptocracy, loves terrorism, incites and feeds upon
it like a vampire at a blood bank. Conversely, what the Cryptocracy hates
and fears is an enemy that would behave like the old Sicilian Mafia, confining
its warfare to soldiers only, leaving all women and children unharmed.
The resulting contrast between Israeli contempt for Arab civilians ("Amalek"
in Talmudic theology, no matter what Uri Avnery continues to pretend in
this regard), and the conduct of a new Saladin, who would exhibit the highest
ideals of nobility in warfare, could shake the West off its foundations.
-
- Alas, this is not on the horizon, because al-Qaeda is
too convenient a stage dummy for the Western ventriloquists, who can run
this shadowy public relations operation by means of virtual reality videotapes
seeded to al-Jazeera satellite television, even as the corrupt Arab states
fall ever deeper in thrall to US cash and threats, and their own penchant
for wallowing in oil riches in the midst of Palestinian and Iraqi misery.
-
- The Arab world desperately needs reform and revolution,
but the notion that such positive change will come from US occupation is
a neo-con horse-laugh. In spite of all the attention on the murder of Dutch
filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who criticized alleged Islamic misogyny, no furious
indignation anywhere in the West is observed in connection with the near
fatal beating administered to Professor Robert Faurisson in France in 1989,
because he wrote essays casting doubt on homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz.
Before him, Francois Duprat, also a teacher, was killed in France for harboring
similar doubts. Yet so amnesiac is Europe when it comes to the crimes of
Judaic religious fanatics against critics of their sacred lore, that the
assault on Van Gogh is being described as "unprecedented."
-
- Dozens of other dissenting intellectuals, like publisher
Ernst Zundel, researcher Jean Plantin, school teacher Jurgen Graf, Max
Planck chemist Germar Rudolf, film maker Vincent Reynouard and historian
David Irving, have been banned or prosecuted in Canada, Australia, and
Europe for anti-Zionist thought crimes, with virtually no outcry from the
intelligentsia of the West, who mount an enormous hue-and-cry over the
outrage in Holland, chiefly as a pretext for weakening the power of Zionism's
Islamic nemesis.
-
- According to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz (Nov. 4, 2004),
Israeli Justice Minister Tommy Lapid supports legislation in the Knesset
calling for any "Holocaust denier" anywhere in the world to be
tried in Israel: "Lapid told Haaretz that he feels denying the Holocaust
'is a clearly neo-Nazi crime. Anyone involved in this belongs to the group
of criminals whom our arm must reach anywhere in the world."
-
- This outrageous declaration of inquistion and religious
fanaticism from a state possessing the atomic bomb -- threatening to kidnap
scholars who "deny" the dogmas of Holocaustianity-- just doesn't
strike a chord with those trendy liberals and crusading conservatives who
weep and wail over the "ravages of Islamic fanaticism." This
is because their real issue is not freedom of speech. If it were, revisionist
researchers would be protected, not prosecuted. The real issue is the continued
stoking of western hatred for Islam in order to foment a World War III
"clash of civilizations" for the salvation of the tiny bandit
state of "Israel."
-
- Bush recently signed into law a heresy-hunting measure
that empowers the US government to track intellectuals and publications
throughout the world that are skeptical of the gas chamber stories, as
a prelude to the arrest and prosecution of these doubters.
-
- In a growing number of cases, Islamic youth are becoming
aware of this hypocritical double-standard and they are gaining a working
knowledge of the fact that the advancement of "western democracy"
is little more than a code-word for the imposition of supremacist standards
of immunity and privilege for Zionist lies and hoaxes, and for the Judaic
religion that holds one group of people superior to all others.
-
- While it is true that Arafat engaged in the requisite
armed resistance ("terrorism" when Muslims do it, "heroic
combat" when Judaic "partisans" perpetrated it during World
War II); that was part of the game too.
-
- Wise and humane western counselors who have had a role
in advising the Palestinians, such as Israel Shahak, have urged them to
use only the tactics of Gandhi against the Israelis: boycotts, strikes,
marches, protests, pickets. The tactic of kamikaze bombings and the Talmudic-like
identification of Israeli civilians as legitimate targets, has been a disaster
for Palestinians, in spite of the fact that Israeli terrorism has been
far more widespread and deadly by a ratio of three-to-one.
-
- Perhaps the root of the problem is in Islam's emphasis
on combat as an oppressed people's ultimate expression of self-defense
and masculinity. If for every Kalashnikov, the Palestinians were given
a Canon GL1 digital camcorder, and if for a bomb-making factory, the Palestinians
substituted a fortified iMac-Final Cut Pro-video production bunker, coordinating
the videotape that was being filmed of Israeli atrocities throughout the
occupied territories, the Zionists would be exposed today for perpetrating
a slow-motion holocaust, as only an independent media in an Internet age
can expose them. The Western Establishment media, no matter how "progressive,"
has not done it yet and is unlikely to do so at anytime in the near future.
-
- The Palestinians are foolish for waiting for Robert Fisk
or the Manchester Guardian newspaper to perform this exposure for them.
Most Leftist critics of Zionism--even the most radical among them-- refuse
to call Israeli atrocities a holocaust, and they either approve of or are
indifferent to the repression against revisionist doubters of the gas chambers,
while believing that orthodox Judaism and the Talmud are noble in their
essence, "when not 'distorted' by Zionism."
-
- These delusions are fatal to any movement seeking to
overcome the Judeo-masonic empire and its brilliant Hegelian chess play,
with its covert manipulation of antagonists and protagonists who often
bear a symbiotic relationship to one another, as Arafat did to the Israeli
leadership, and as Osama bin Laden does to George W. Bush.
-
- Revolution is an all-or-nothing proposition. It cannot
afford to incorporate the contradictions of a western petty bourgeoisie
still enamored of Judaism, the Talmud and the myths of Allied benevolence
in World War II. Such people carry a spiritual virus; all the while they
are allying themselves to the Palestinian cause.
-
- The genocide against the Palestinians should have long-ago
alerted the western intelligentsia to the exterminationist nature of Judaism
and Zionism.
-
- The true "clash of civilizations" is between
the remnant of actual followers of Jesus Christ, and the suzerainty of
the Pharisee creed of Judaism, which the modern West, be it Left or Right,
progressive or conservative, continues to appease, flatter and finance.
-
- When the new Saladin arrives on the scene, he will know
these truths and act on them. Until then, Arabs and Muslims will have for
their leaders ever more Kameradenpolizei, in the Arafat mold.
-
- http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire10.html
-
-
-
- Comment
- From JB Campbell
- 11-12-4
-
- This is a cheaply written piece. Using a loaded word
such as "kapo" is not justified by any evidence in the essay.
What is your evidence that Arafat was a "kapo," as you define
it?
-
- This is so typical of your potshots at leaders who aren't
as brave and pure as you are. "The source of Arafat's rise to power
is murky." What the hell does that mean, that you have no proof that
he was a "kapo?" What is "murky?" You used to be with
AP - that could be said to be murky, too.
-
- Big headline but you wander into other subjects that
have nothing to do with Arafat being a "kapo." He could have
gone into exile and lived on the Riviera if he were such a sellout as you
suggest. Instead, he spent the last two years of his life sitting in the
rubble of his offices, rubble created by Jewish shells and bulldozers.
His aids were shot around him and you, sitting in North Idaho, accuse him
of being a "kapo."
-
- You, an American Christian, presume to judge a Arab freedom-fighter
for not being as effective as you doubtless would be in his place. If you
can't say something positive about an enemy of Israel, then shut up. Otherwise,
you're just helping the Jews.
-
- JBC
-
-
-
- Muslim Objects To Hoffman's 'Arafat' Column
-
- Comment
From Hani Alayli
11-12-4
-
- Dear Michael
-
- The following statement is false, in an otherwise brilliant
article:
-
- "Perhaps the root of the problem is in Islam's emphasis
on combat as an oppressed people's ultimate expression of self-defense
and masculinity."
-
- There is no emphasis on "combat" in Islam.
Jihad is a religious/political struggle that could only be conducted under
certain circumstances & under the Khalifa-specific rule, and solely
by his armies, and for the benefit of the "Umma" (the people
or nation if you want).
-
- All this stopped since Potiers & Charles Martel 700
years ago. The Ottomans fought for Turkey, and not for Islam. There has
been no Umma, no Khalifa, and no Jihad (authentic Islamic war) since 1492,
as you well know. Islam doesn't require that we fight the Jews or the Christians.
However, it does call on us not to accept non-Muslim rule over Muslim people.
Jihad has its "legitimacy" in that.
-
- On the contrary, Islam lacks the aggression, the drive,
found in other religions in general, whether in warfare or internal organization.
Take the "spiritual exercises" of St. Ignatius of Loyola (founder
of the Jesuits), with their cold extremism, as a general exemple (and not
meaning any contempt toward my Christian brothers).
-
- Omar & Saladin were typical examples of Muslim warriors,
quick to conciliate and noble at the point where a massacre would have
more effectively served a long-term political goal, and would most cerainly
have been carried out happily by King Richard the Lionheart, or any Jewish
leader in particular. "Tuez les tous, Dieu reconnaitra les siens..."
- I prefer the conciliatory ways of Saladin and Omar; this what I would
have done, and I am sure this is what you would have done.
-
- Furthermore, there is no emphasis on "masculinity"
in Islam. This is rather found in pre and post-Islamic poetry, which is
often 180 degrees at variance with Islam. There is only a mild stipulation
for a second class status for women. It doesn't really suits me intellectually,
but then again Islam in this regard is at least on par with Judaism (though
a case can be made that Judaism is far more misognynist), and also with
Catholicism in its pre-Agioarnamento, pre-Vatican II traditions.
-
- Islam in its substance is the "acceptance."
It means, litterally, "submitting" to the One God of all. The
sign of this "giving in" is the organization of all your life,
society, family and marital relations, taxation, diet, your sleep and your
prayers toward this ideal. There is no other "territorial" imperative,
and Islam doesn't give a damn about ethnciity & nationality. There
is no Italy and France, "filles ainees de l'Eglise." To the Quaran
Saudi Arabia is about as relevant as Kamchatcha. (There are however two
pinpointed, sacred places on earth: Mecca and Jerusalem.)
-
- Even the most advanced Western scholars have a tough
time understanding how abstract, ideal, strong, and intellectually svelte
Islam is, in that regard. This Islamic ideal is based on the love of God
and his prophets that came to announce his existence as the one and only
Good Spirit Creator of the Universe and the most respected & notorious
ones, Jesus & Mahomet (both assassinated by Jews).
-
- For the rest of your essay, I agree 100% with your views,
whether regarding Arafat, or the uselesness of using force now, especially
against any civilian.
-
- With all due respect, yours truly, Hani
-
- HOFFMAN REPLIES:
-
- Anytime Muslims have disagreed with my writing they have
always done so in a courteous and generous manner, as Hani Alayli has done,
as opposed to the kind of vindictive rage exhibited by my Khazar detractors
and even by some "Christians." Now to his objections.
-
- To Mecca and Jeruslaem, I would add Medina to the list
of Muslim holy places on earth, making it three, rather than two.
-
- As for your general point, it seems to me only fair that
Islam should be judged not only in theory, upon its pure theology, and
but also on how those who are called Muslims have applied that theology.
I am indeed aware that by the same criterion Christianity can be said to
be defective, since so few of those who mouth the teachings of Jesus actually
practice them. However, in the case of the early American Republic for
example, an unprecedented level of individual freedom and free enterprise
flourished in that profoundly Christian milieu. One can also look to the
early medieval period of Saxon England for a similar "golden age."
Certainly the Gospel adage, "By their fruits ye shall know them"
applies in all cases, Christian or Muslim.
-
- When Christ remarked about His Second Coming, "When
the Son of Man returns will He find any faith on earth?" he was foretelling
a nearly universal apostasy and it would seem that He may have had in mind
not only George W. Bush, and the Jerry Falwells, the Franklin Grahams,
the Archbishop Chaputs and a Pontiff like John Paul II, along with the
multitude that follow them.
-
- Islam and Muslims ought to engage in the same soul-searching.
In the case of Muslims they should ask, what is it about us that permits
our pre-Islamic tribal culture (if that is indeed the source of the problem),
to trump the Islamic ideal? In the Old Testament Ishmael is described as
a wild man who will have his hand against all, and sometimes this is precisely
how those Arabs who lay claim to the mantle of Mohammed behave.
-
- There can be no two opinions about the courage of Arab
men and women or the degree to which their faith in an afterlife causes
them to embrace, rather than fear, death. When it comes to the perils of
Judaism, the Arabs are more on the alert than Westerners, though they often
mistake rabbis for the "People of the Book" (Old Testament),
when in fact only the tiny, despised sect of Karaites fits that description,
since the rabbis are the people of the book(s) that nullify the Old Testament:
the Talmud, Kabbalah, Midrash, Shulchan Aruch, Tanya, ad nauseum.
-
- As for the much-ballyhooed "Islamic oppression of
women," there is no ideology or religion that can compare with Judaism
for oppressing women, unless it would be some devil-cult, off in a jungle
somewhere. What is hilarious is that the New York Times and the other egghead
elite media, when reporting on the most oppressive of all the Judaic factions
in this regard (the Hasidim), paint the lives of degraded Hasidic women
in glowing colors of fulfillment and serenity, even as they lavish coverage
on Muslim women who rebel against Islamic fundamentalism. In the eyes of
the Establishment media in the West there are no such rebel Judaic women,
just a vast cross-section of profoundly fulfilled Judaic wives, mothers
and school girls. It is to laugh!
-
- For an example of this type of outlandish whitewash,
see Elsa Brenner, "A State-of-the-Sect Message," NY Times September
19, 2004: "Does a Lubavitcher woman assume a secondary role in the
family? Must she sit in the back seat of a car when her husband is driving,
as some people believe? Does she walk behind her husband on the street?
And is she by Jewish law tied down by a large brood of children? 'Nonsense!'
Mrs. Butman said in response to such questions. 'We're not subservient,
and we often hold down important jobs. In fact, we were liberated long
before the Women's Movement even began."
-
- Ha! Mrs. Butman should tell that that to Evelyn Kaye,
author of the landmark (and now largely forgotten) expose of Judaic misogyny,
"The Hole in the Sheet." Kaye's book is hard to find, but Amos
Gitai's 1999 movie, "Kadosh" is still available on DVD, with
its factual portrayal of the harrowing fate of orthodox Judaic women (this
film is rated R and is not for children or adolescents).
-
- Tell it to the Talmud, which permits the Talmud-worshipping
Hasidic husband to sodomize his wife to his heart's content, since Chazal
decree that she is not a entirely a human being, but rather a piece of
meat from a butcher-shop. Anal sex and every other imaginable perversion
is permissible to the Judaic husband because we are dealing here not with
a woman but with a piece of meat, exactly the designation feminists most
decry, and here is a religion that formally prescribes the label!
-
- In considering which marital practices are fitting for
the husband and wife, the Talmud states, concerning sexual relations with
the Judaic wife: "Meat which comes from the abattoir may be eaten
salted, roasted, cooked or boiled; so with fish from the fishmonger."
-
- What of Judaic women who are abandoned by their husbands
but can't remarry without their former spouse's permission? Until he gives
her the "get" (bill of divorce) she is in a legal limbo and often
he only grants the "get" after her family has paid him tens of
thousands of dollars (or more) in extortion. This horror is reported in
Anat Tsuria's superb documentary film, "Mekudeshet."
-
- Why is there such a high level of insanity among Judaics?
Consider what befalls a Judaic wife who fails to take a ritual bath (mikveh)
after menstruation and then engages in marital relations with her husband?
When she confesses this to the rabbi, weeks after the fact, he pushes his
chair over to his office wall and begins banging his head against it in
absolute rage and consternation and that's just the beginning. For that
one "failure" this woman will endure a lifetime of shame, disgrace
and fear. Who would like to be in this woman's shoes? (I have this testimony
on tape from a rebbetzin herself).
-
- Who cares about the tens of thousands of poor women in
so grievous a mental state? Her anguish? Who loves her enough to seek to
liberate her from a tyranny so immense? Hoffman, "the vicious anti-Semite."
The Zionist NY Times could not care less. The Times is too eager to gain
political and cultural advantage over Islam by contrasting the mythical
lofty status of Judaic women with the allegedly universally degraded status
of the Islamic woman.
-
- Remember, this anti-female tyranny reigns among educated
Judaic people living in a 2lst century western technological culture, as
compared with Pathan tribesmen in Afghanistan barely out of the neo-lithic
era. Laura Bush and the others patronize the Pathan women, announcing how
they are going to give them " liberation" while not raising a
finger to liberate any Judaic women in their own midst. First Lady Laura
Bush's authentic goal is not freedom for Afghan women but rather the decimation
of their racial stock through contraception, and the destruction of Islam
itself, by pretending that primitive, pre-Islamic tribal misogyny is the
core of Islamic belief. But it is in Judaism that oppression of women is
institutionalized and doctrinaire. The battered women's shelters in Jerusalem
are packed with orthodox Judaic wives pummeled by their orthodox husbands.
-
- This is how they treat and think about their own women,
who are compelled to wear their own version of "hijab"-a sheitel
(wig). What is the Judaic teaching about gentile women? Judaism teaches
that ALL gentile women (are you listening, Mrs. Bush?) are zona (whores).
In fact, let's recite the whole enchilada. According to orthodox Judaism,
ALL gentile women are "Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah and Zonah" (menstrual
filth, slaves, heathens and whores).
-
- This is why I have supreme contempt for all of these
Judeo-Churchian dodo birds running amok screaming about Muslim oppression
of women. They remind me of the little child at recess who discovers what
the playground director doesn't like and shouts the same disapproval to
the other children in order to win juvenile brownie points. This is the
function of anti-Muslim agitation in America today.
-
- It takes real courage (and love) to seek to liberate
the Judaic women of America, but I know of not one dodo bird doing it.
After all, O'Reilly and Hannity haven't authorized it, have they? Has Fox
News given its okay? How about Gary Bauer, Tim LaHaye or "Concerned
Women of America"?
-
- Westernized Muslim "intellectuals' have a real blind
spot in this regard too. They are the ones who should be throwing the Talmud's
misogyny back in the face of all these Carrie Nation crusading western
feminists. But they don't. They take the line that the Judaic religion
in its essence is completely benevolent and humane. The Swiss-Muslim Prof.
Tariq Ramadan is especially weak in this regard and many other influential
Muslims follow his lead. I continue to insist that Muslims fight the wrong
battles with the wrong weapons, squandering their courage and faith.
-
- I have the Talmud at my fingertips. I can quote a good
deal of it chapter and verse, and backing me is a braintrust of experts
on the Talmud and Kabbalah, consisting of Chuck, Craig, Wes and a Judaic
who shall remain anonymous. Together we function like a Rand corporation
think tank. Thus far not one Muslim intellectual, imam, mullah or journalist
has contacted us to learn what we know.
-
- Fore that matter, neither has a single Catholic priest
ever offered us the opportunity to address his parish on this subject.
The Protestants have done somewhat better (in this regard). Pastors Ted
Weiland and in particular Dave Barley have in the past more or less opened
their congregations and allowed me lecture at length on this subject. I
am also in regular correspondence with Protestant seminarians throughout
America and even a few of their seminary professors.
-
- The mission statement of Independent History and Research
is taken from a commencement poem by Richard Lattimore, the late, lamented
Greek scholar who wrote that we are all charged with making use "of
exacting material." In the case of my Talmud expertise, I find that
relatively few people are making use of it. This has nothing to do with
my own self-aggrandizement. Believe me, the Talmud is not my topic of choice!
-
- Studying it month after month is about as palatable as
dissecting a corpse. My passions are elsewhere. But the scholarly obligation
has fallen to me by default and I'll tell you why that is.
-
- First, because nothing can take the wind out of the sails
of the evil that oppresses the earth, like full and complete knowledge
of what Judaism actually teaches, apart from the enormous media front that
envelopes and succors it. Second, before my book "Judaism's Strange
Gods" was published in 2000, the Cryptocracy was seeding contradictory
nonsense to useful idiots, allegedly "on our side," who were
claiming instant Talmud mastery and then publishing in print and on the
Internet bastard texts filled with both authentic and completely spurious
Talmud attributions, which were then copied and reproduced by other sloppy
researchers.
-
- This mixed-up mess was then publicized and cited by the
rabbis and the university professors as proof that the anti-Talmudic polemic
was fallacious and that "Judaism is once again being libeled by rabidly
anti-Semitic hatemongers fantasizing age-old canards about the wise and
wonderful Talmud."
-
- It was a set-up, and with the notable exception of Charles
D. Provan and Herman Otten of the newspaper "Christian News,"
no one was doing a thing to correct it. The enemy was gaining significant
advantage from the confusion. But since my book came out, the Talmud polemic
has taken a completely different direction. The old disinformation is still
extant (especially in newspapers where rebuttal can be suprressed), but
online it's a different matter entirely, and the apologists for the Talmud
have had to concede certain realities, including the existence of hateful
and insane texts which only a few years ago they pretended did not exist.
-
- The ADL has had to attempt a pseudo-scholarly "refutation"
of my research, and thus far not one orthodox rabbi has been found with
the courage to debate with this writer on videotape before an audience
of my supporters and his.
-
- Thus far, we've sold about 20,000 copies of "Judaism's
Strange Gods." That number could be 200,00 were it not for the boycott
against this writer on the part of paleo-Conservatives, radical Leftists
and libertarians, Catholic traditionalist societies, and even my own circle
of revisionists. I could streak naked past Bush during his next presidential
press conference and none of the preceding factions would report a word
of it.
-
- So I must go over their heads, to God, the ultimate source
of all Veritas, and then to you, the independent thinkers and renegade
researchers. It is my dream to hold a revisionist seminar in the summer
of 2005, in north Idaho, on the subject of the religion of Judaism, with
each member of our think tank delivering a presentation followed by lengthy
question-and-answer sessions and brain-storming, all recorded on video
and DVD for posterity. It would also be an opportunity for those who support
this work to get together and meet. Who knows? From out of such a meeting
we may be able to forge a new movement that has but one goal: victory through
truth; maximizing whomever is in the forefront, without regard to petty
bickering, envy and sore toes.
-
- Well, I can dream can't I?
-
- Meanwhile, I am a soldier who risks his life, but fights
without a gun, as I wish the Muslims would fight; who goes to that battle
where he is most needed. Voila, for the present I am on the front lines
of the Talmud controversy, by default, because so many of my colleagues
who are in many cases more learned and intelligent than I, do not have
the sense of priority, the German work ethic ("arbeit macht frei")
or the Biblical horror at the waste of time, to accomplish the task. Hence,
they fail, in the words of Lattimore, "To cultivate what is difficult,
to put aside dreams of do-nothing paradises, to forgo our given luxuries
and spoiled senses; when asked for much, to give more."
-
- I close with a special thanks to Hani Alayli, for inspiring
me to sound off on these big themes!
-
- Best wishes in this Great Battle, Michael A. Hoffman
II
-
- Hoffman's books, tapes and newsletters are available
at: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?
-
- The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History
and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
-
- 24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/news.html
-
- Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com
-
- Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically
incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it.
We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman
Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the
views of advertisers or the transmitter.
-
- Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right. Responsible Dissent:
A contribution to understanding and dialogue.
-
-
- Comment
Alton Raines
11-12-4
Arafat was nothing more than a low-life criminal media pig who brought
more misery and suffering to his own people while lining his own pockets.
He had no desire for peace. He believed in the death of every Jew. He stalled
every peace plan with the ridiculous "right of return" policy
that everyone knows would basically destroy Israel -- he was unwilling
to deal with things realisitcally because he didn't care. He didn't have
to care. He just had to pretend he was a concerned, benevolent leader.
Give him an Oscar. There is no peace or rest for the wicked. None of this
is to suggest that his Israeli counterparts were any less wicked. They
were and are. But we need to call a spade a spade. He was scum.
|
