 Just finished reading all about Hitlery's hilariously
named 'book deal' from Simon and Schuster ($8 Million) -for a book of which
the outline is still non-existent. Yet all too existent is S&S's parent
company, Viacom, which is sure to have legislation before the Senate. Oh,
gee. Sound familiar? Whereas before, it was 'cattle futures', or U.S. hi-tech
for Chinese commie blood money, now it is just SOP, standard operating
procedure. Buying off a Senator or president is not even done behind closed
doors anymore, but as before, (as they have shown us time after time after
time, it is their pattern) right in our faces! So much for the ending of
the Clinton regime.
-
- Have they no shame? Well, now that I think about it,
I guess not, otherwise why would she promise to write a book about their
dirty laundry? Are these people so caught up in their own lives, they believe
we find their lapses of judgment and character and morals too interesting
to pass up reading even more about? And, paying for it to boot? Haven't
we already paid enough? Hasn't America suffered more than enough in the
eyes of the world as a result of their pubescent egocentric and self-serving
poor behaviour?
-
- Is it because they have such control of the propaganda
machine we laughingly refer to as 'mainstream' media that they get away
with spinning this as acceptable, tell us that she is "not yet a Senator"
and not bound by the ethics and rules of the Senate? They are really telling
us that we are idiots, aren't they?
-
- And they are also showing us that nothing will change.
Just as their bamboozling over the word 'is', now timing, in this case,
the moments before swearing in, are just fine and dandy to get all the
moneyed ducks in a row. Step right up, pay yer fee and we'll sell you the
legislation that will make you potential billions. Just as was done with
the paltry million or so from Bernie Schwartz to the DNC which has turned
into potential billions in development of telecommunications in China,
now more quid pro quos will appear as if by magic. Gee, whatta coincidence.
-
- Perhaps we should keep an eye on the pharmaceutical industry
and the way they set up free clinics in schools, buy legislators and hence
legislation giving the school money for each child 'at risk' (read here,
not learning up to standards and more than likely because of a teacher
who is not really a gifted teacher and sometimes even an idiot to boot
who could not pass an 8th grade exam themselves) and you have a ready made
market for all the drugs that will accompany that youth into adulthood.
In the case of Senator Hillary, what mischief will be done with ethics
non-existent?
-
- How come the "appearance", as Janet Reno said,
"of impropriety" is worthy of investigation, yet it also seems
it's only a matter of concern if it is on the GOP side of the aisle. Oh,
I get it. If you actually commit the felony, it is okay, but if someone
thinks you might have had a thought, or their might be a faint whiff of
impropriety, oh, well, then it's "Off with their conservative heads!"
-
- I remember what David (tea and sympathy buddy to commie
Daniel Ortega) Bonior did when there was the accusation of taint in the
Gingrich book deal he went ballistic. Bonior trumped up enough charges,
screamed the word "ethics" as though he invented it (clearly
not having had determined its meaning yet) over and over to any leftist
media outlet that would give him a microphone until Gingrich was seriously
damaged and to the tune of a $300,000 insult to add to this injury. Where
are these guardians of virtue now? How is Newt's book deal any different
than Hillary's?
-
- What did Newt eventually do? He tried to do the right
thing, abide the letter of the law-all in the face of a baseless accusation.
The final outcome, Newt's acquittal in this non-trial was that Newt was
blameless. But, as was once said by another man savaged by the democommie
spin, where does one go to get back a reputation? Chances are, if you don't
read the truth on line or the Washington Times, you would never have known
that after all was said and done, Newt did nothing wrong. But, lest we
forget, it is only the appearance by a republican that gets any notice,
right?
-
- And now we have the Missus herself, flaunting her special
status to be above the law, any law and I call this her 'let them eat cake
attitude'. This is how I recognize a limousine liberal. They will use anyone
or anything, usually in the name of 'the children', to make sure there
is a law for me and a law for them. Their law is no law. Their law is any
means to an end, and I do mean any. They are just so far above us who actually
make our way in the world, despite all their taxes, who make the world
for them to toy with and claim as their own labours harvest. They make
millions to squirrel away in their off shore accounts while se are reduced
to accepting that which we think we cannot change. Ah, but we can change
things and, in reality, things are changing already. We have had enough
placed in front of us by the last eight years that the next few will be
very much watched and, certainly, written about.
-
-
-
- MainPage
http://www.rense.com
-
-
-
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|