- The size and duration of this X-class flare is almost
unprecedented. I have been monitoring the sun daily for about 12 years
now, using these charts originally from NOAA below. NASA operates and controls
these satellites for NOAA.
-
- All images below were captured on January 15th 2005.
The proton flux chart you see below has marked "Jan 14" labeled
on the X axis. On this data you see normal radiation levels typical of
our sun. It appears something unusual is happening now as illustrated in
the ongoing, upward trend in these charts.
-
-
-
-
-
- The X-ray intensity chart below also has a space station
impact. Although we hear deafening silence from NASA, it is well known
that extended space station irradiation also has a large impact for those
onboard the station. Astronauts cannot venture outside the protection module
on the station for any length of time, if at all. Doing so could result
in harmful doses of gamma radiation. Almost all space station modules afford
almost no radiation protection, except for one specially designed protection
module.
-
- Note the long spike in the curve, has repeated with greater
intensity. This is also extremely unusual. It appears another upward trend
is developing:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- In the white light spectrum, massive sun spots are safely
visible only for those with properly filtered telescopes. These sunspots
are the size of hundreds of earths across, and are far larger than they
appear below. The two small sunspots are the normal size of visible light
spots. The massive, concentrated cluster near the center of the image is
somewhat unusual:
-
-
-
-
-
- Our sun is supposedly a highly chaotic and random process.
Yet we see events this taking place. This repetition makes these events
highly unusual. Is this the result of outside tampering? Considering that
"solar max" was *supposedly* over more than two years ago. Since
excessive solar activity has not subsided, perhaps experiments or tampering
using advanced technology is indeed the case:
-
- www.data4science.net
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
-
-
-
- From Ted Twietmeyer
- 1-17-5
-
- Jeff -
-
- To begin with, I'd like to point out an important fact
about the proton chart shown in the post up above. The green plot line
represents 100 MILLION volt level particles. This green plot line (which
always has a noise factor always present in it) very RARELY leaves the
baseline on the chart. Even though the red and blue lines may elevate from
the baseline for a period of time. This is because so few particles are
detected by the satellite at that high energy level.
-
- UPDATE
-
- Below is a new image, posted late today (1/16/05) by
NASA. It is of our sun, taken at 30.4nm (nanometers.) This up near the
X-ray spectrum, and above ultraviolet. (To help you compare this to visible
light, Lasic eye corrective surgery uses 100nm. laser light, which is in
the far ultraviolet. It cannot be seen by the eye at all, and will not
pass through the lens of the eye to protect rod receptors.)
-
- What I find most interesting are the data dropouts. A
dropout (black block) at the top of the image is visible, but not impossible.
It could have easily been corrected. The statistic probability of two dropouts
resulting in two parallel bars, is beyond words. Further, having observed
these images for many years such dropouts in images are VERY rare. And
yet this happens during a time of intense flare activity. Some people will
argue this is because of interference from the sun, corrupting data transmission.
There are many problems with that argument. Data that you see in all these
satellite images, are STORED in satellite processor memory before transmission.
This is similar to what the Mars Rovers do to send images to earth.
-
- When errors and dropouts occur, ground controllers can
simply direct any of these satellites to RE-TRANSMIT the image as many
times as required, to fill in missing blocks. I know from my previous work
with NASA that even back in the late 90's, 50+ megabit/second data rates
were not uncommon. Such an image would require only a fraction of a second
to re-transmit and correct. Remember these are all gray scale images, with
false color added later.
-
- I've previously chronicled how these convenient "data
dropouts" were used several months ago in the fall of 2004. I've found
them in several panoramic images from the Mars Rovers, and you can see
them here on my website at http://www.data4science.net/mars/marsgallery.php?query=&page=2
-
- So the question remains- just what is it we were not
supposed to see? Perhaps the excitation source of the excessive solar activity
is taking place at this wavelength and would appear in the image?
-
- Posted late on 1/16/05 by NASA, taken at 30.4nm.
-
-
-
-
-
- Below is another image posted late today by NASA at 28.4
nm. Note the interesting flag-like RECTANGULAR area in the upper left part
of the sun. In the middle of this zone, is a tiny white horizontal line
one pixel thick. If this were a dropout, it would be a black line (like
the stellar background.) It is unclear what this white zone actually represents
here. It may be sensor saturation. This large, dark flag-like area also
appears in other NASA images taken at 17.1nm. and 19.5nm. It is also faintly
visible in the above image (30.4nm.) which has the missing data.
-
- Posted late on 1/16/05 by NASA, taken at 28.4 nm
-
-
-
-
- The X-class flare event has now been degraded to an M-class
flare. I will continue to monitor this long event for other changes.
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
-
-
-
- Comment
- Jim Mortellaro
- 1-17-5
-
- The Solar Cycle of eleven years was both unique as well
as interesting in this last cycle. First, the activity during the Solar
Maximum was very large, with an unprecedented number of severe solar storms,
each one deadlier (potentially) than the last. However what was most interesting
is that the Solar Maximum ended abruptly rather than taper off as is normal.
-
- The solar maximum should still be somewhat active based
on previous maximum's but as we can see, it literally turned itself off
just a few short months ago. This particular storm is, therefore, not exactly
unprecedented but it is unusual, occurring alone on an otherwise peaceful
surface of the sun.
-
- Solar activity of this nature (likely less severe than
this particular event) is to be expected. It is not necessarily a portent
of something other than a very large sunspot during a time when the sun
should be more active than it is at this present time. If the reader has
been following sunspot activity, then the reader will know that this past
summer and fall gave us sunspots and solar activity which was very severe.
But it is not unusual for random events like this one to take place.
-
- Further, the Solar Maximum does not always just turn
off. And, the Solar Maximum was not over two years ago. As stated, the
maximum most often tapers off slowly. That this recent Solar Maximum was
not in the mainstream, that this particular and recent lack of activity
is also not mainstream, that this particular large class event is also
not mainstream, are all quite true, however.
-
- I do not believe that any government has as much power
as to cause the type of solar flare we've just witnessed.
-
-
- Reply
- Ted Twietmeyer
- 1-17-5
-
- THE SUN AND EARTH ARE A COUPLED SYSTEM
-
- As an aside, it was well known that whenever nuclear
tests took place on earth, sunspots activity followed. Underground nuclear
tests caused earthquakes [1] not just where the detonation took place,
but also on the other side of the globe near India. What was not publicly
disclosed are the effects on spacetime by nuclear detonations. Nuclear
explosions must couple into zero point energy (ZPE) and subsequently the
related component of time. Those who have built devices that tapped into
ZPE, have found changes in both gravity and the flow of time. It's conceivable
that such a ripple in time could travel tremendous distances out into the
universe. Such a ZPE ripple could be perceived as a pain wave by some species
that are sensitive to it. From some air force circles, this is why nuclear
testing was stopped.
-
- With this limited public historical proof, it would be
foolish indeed to think that no technology could exist to disturb the sun.
Just 20 years ago, mentioning weather control in a conversation would result
in snickers and laughter. Not anymore, as it has quietly entered mainstream
thinking. In fact, back in the 90's the military stated they will control
the weather. HAARP would be one of the tools to do it. Chemtrails are another
related tool. What is not clear, is how weather control might affect the
sun. The earth and the sun work together as a system [3], therefore affecting
one may very affect the other.
-
- The military uses "acceptable risk" in developing
weapons technologies. That is, risk to the public from using any given
technology should something go wrong, or in evalutating "collateral
damage." This had been the case in the past, but depleted uranium
proves they don't care anymore. It would not surprise me that they may
have already rationally explained away that a new weapon that creates solar
activity of the type we see (intentional or not) is "acceptable."
-
- Public knowledge of the workings of gravity are sketchy
at best. As pointed out in the above paragraph, nuclear weapons do indeed
affect the earth and sun. Perhaps military and other research has found
what component of an explosion affects the sun, and a means to generate
that component has been created.
-
- Such a weapon would be the worst ever created, with unforseen
effects reaching into the far future. A theory to explain the effects on
the sun from nuclear explosions, may be found in the Richard Hoagland's
Hyperdimensional Physics theory on the enterprisemission.com website. Indeed,
there are many things out in space that are only now begining to be understood,
such as Magnetars [2].
-
- [1] Whiteford, Gary: "Nuclear Bomb Tests and Earthquakes:
Dangerous Patterns and Trends", Pulse of the Planet 2:10-21 Fall 1989.
-
- [2] Magnetars - http://solomon.as.utexas.edu/magnetar.html
-
- [3] Magnetospheric physics - http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/Educatcc/Sconct20.htm
-
- Comment
- Ted Twietmeyer
- 1-18-5
-
- Most likely origin of Texas lights:
-
- Yes, these are lights for real sure - and most likely
the cause of four consecutive flares from the sun over the past few days.
I've written about this recently at http://www.rense.com/general61/ussun.htm
-
-
-
-
-
- An X class, an M class, an X class and now today, another
M class.
-
- The chart above is average over several days, so the
four different flare events are not clearly shown.The Kp index on this
NOAA chart has been up near the top of the chart. In simple terms this
means that the sun's aurora (normally only visible at the pole) can now
reach down into the southern regions of the US. I've seen it myself here
in western NY in the past. It often manifests as waves of faint, pink light
sweeping through the night sky, although a localized manifestation of a
different type is certainly possible as was seen in Texas. It would be
nice to capture just a tiny part of this energy. Located high up in the
ionosphere, it has been estimated to generate billions of watts of electrical
power.
-
- If it wasn't for a few of days of snow here, we would
certainly be seeing it here again. Imagine being on the space station right
now - forced to stay in one of only two safe areas that are "radiation
proof" (or so they tell the astronauts.) The astronauts will find
out in a few months or years, when they see their doctor about some unexpected
bleeding just how well it worked. But we'll never hear about it.
-
- Personally, give me the earth's magnetic field for protection
or 6" of lead sheeting, instead of the station's charged aluminum
plates !
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
|
