- Seemingly endless reports on UFOs are filed every year.
Endless "lights in the sky." Yet somehow the most important issues
for humanity appear to be controlled and intentionally kept just out of
reach. This is like trying to reach out and catch a pigeon or duck standing
near you in a park. In every sci-fi film or television show, there is the
standard eyewitness. The character will attempt to file a report or notify
authorities about it. Witnesses are treated with skepticism every time,
which often includes chuckling, ridicule and sometimes laughter. Such was
the case of witness treatment in the film "Fire In The Sky" Those
that witnessed the event but were not abducted as Travis Walton was, were
nearly charged with murder by a skeptical police investigator. We will
look at this real-life mindset in some detail and how it came about. It
is a mindset that allows the government to still retain tight control about
an issue more far reaching than any war between two countries on earth.
The sovereignty of the entire planet is truly at stake, and apparently
few seem to take notice.
-
- Standard UFO eyewitness ridicule in television and movies
also happens to people in real-life. It seems that mandatory skepticism
of a UFO witness is a well-established part of society. This has deep origins
in US government policy, the purpose of which is to ridicule and discredit
witnesses. This philosophy filters down into the rank of file of your local
police. Any road for a UFO witness is pre-destined to be a rocky one, complete
with washed-out bridges. It still applies, even if more than one witness
is involved. We can thank the Brookings think tank report which issued
shortly after Roswell, for creating this problematic paradigm. A pathetic
eyewitness chuckle-and-ridicule mindset has filtered into every aspect
of society, and has even taken place inside families. Thankfully this mindset
is now changing, as countless people have had close encounters. Sometimes
these are of the third kind, which are most often extremely unpleasant.
Abductions can be brought on when someone unwittingly volunteers to be
a lab rat, by sending out mental images of wanting a close encounter.
There are those "out there" that can pick this up, and act upon
it. See [1] for more thoughts on lethal medical hazards on this subject.
-
- A story about a real visual encounter that occurred with
a family member and three other witnesses will serve as a good example.
This is a good example of what will happen when you see a UFO and attempt
to file a report with authorities as any good citizen would do.
-
- This is an account of the story as it was told to me
on the very night it happened. This event involved a close family member
of ours. We shall call him John to protect his identity, who was in his
20's at the time. John was not a lone eyewitness to the sighting - there
were three friends with him. Today I confirmed the following details with
John. His account today closely matches his account of the same events
he stated 10 years ago.
-
- WHAT HAPPENED - FAR MORE THAN JUST A LIGHT IN THE SKY
-
- The event took place in the mid 1990s on a summer evening
in western NY state, about 20 miles south of Rochester. John was riding
with his friends northbound in a van on a local trip about 9PM. The four
were out in a rural farmland area about 5 miles from home, when all of
them sighted the object in the distance. This sighting took place on a
section of road without homes and a clear view to the northern horizon.
John described a very large craft, circular in nature. It appeared to have
evenly spaced dark "portholes" or "windows" on the
side. But it was the unusual confirmed large size of 1,500ft+ that is most
amazing.
-
- A second independent witness account confirms the size
estimate as I'll explain. We shall call this other witness observer B for
reasons of clarity. Observer B witnessed it from directly underneath the
vehicle, 8 miles north. This contributes an important second dimension
into this sighting for triangulation. Observer B noted the vehicle was
radiating the same green glowing light John and his group observed. The
likelihood that two different vehicles were sighted on the same night,
in the same area and both with the same green glow is mathematically very
small.
-
- Note that Observer B was standing directly underneath
the vehicle, at the very same time John and his friends saw the vehicle
8 miles away! The following morning observer B called local radio station
WCMF in Rochester and stated her observations on the air. This is how we
learned about observer B. The DJ was almost speechless. Although 8 miles
away, John and his friends could still make out an overall disc shape with
a dome-like structure on top. They also saw dark, round structures on the
side which he describes as similar to "portholes." To be visible
from that distance the size of the object must be very, very large as estimated
above. These "porthole" structures would need to be about the
height of a 5 story building, to be visible that far away. It is not known
if observer B could see these structures from underneath the vehicle.
-
- The overall size for detailed observation from a confirmed
distance of 8 miles away, would require a vehicle diameter larger than
1,500ft. The vehicle was also surrounded by a peculiar greenish glow which
observer B also noted standing under it. After a while it ascended higher
into the clouds. It then flew off horizontally out of sight towards the
southwest at a high rate of speed. [4]
-
- John and his friends noted the effect the vehicle had
on the overhead clouds. He noted it was similar to the high voltage, high
altitude atmospheric discharges that are displayed in pictures of the Aurora
in the Arctic. John noted his cell phone and those of the others became
non-functional during this event. No cell signal was displayed. This is
one of the reasons they became alarmed and drove to Rochester. Later their
phones became operational again. At that time, there were far fewer cell
towers than present today, and cell users depended on a tower located near
the area where the vehicle was hovering.
-
- John came to our home around 11PM that night to tell
us what they observed, and of their three attempts made in person to report
the sighting to authorities. I immediately asked him about any missing
time. In this instance it did not happen. All of the minutes of their trip
were readily accounted for. The group first attempted to file a police
report. Police told them the US Weather Service handled those matters.
The group then turned around and drove to Rochester, about 35 miles NW
to where the local US government weather station is located. As expected,
"nothing was observed on radar" according to them. They also
attempted to report it to the FAA controllers at the airport, but they
weren't interested. Or at least openly the FAA appeared not to care about
it. (End of John's testimony.)
-
-
- This apparent lack of interest by the FAA should be a
concern to all people everywhere. There have been other instances around
the USA, where non-aircraft type vehicles are flying in FAA airspace and
landing/takeoff approach corridors. In John's story, that particular vehicle
was sighted hovering near one of the ILS (Instrument Landing System) flight
corridors for the Rochester NY airport. When it flew off to the southwest,
it crossed at least one approach corridor. At the time of the sighting,
there were late evening flights and some early morning air traffic, often
called "taking the red-eye." (The latter nick-name refers to
the blood-shot eyes of business people that fly on them.) These flights
often came through that landing corridor, about the same time this sighting
took place. And with daily regularity.
-
- One would reasonably expect authorities to be concerned
about ANYTHING illegally flying in an FAA flight corridor. Even if it will
not show up on radar, it still represents a serious navigation hazard.
This raises another unanswered question - how many airliner crashes have
been blamed on mechanical failure or collision with a small plane, when
perhaps a mid-air collision with an unidentified object was the real cause?
And who determines the cause of airliner crashes?
-
- The NTSB of course - yet another part of the federal
government. Did you know that since 1962, there have been more than 140,000
air accidents? If we were to use a conservative average of 200 people per
flight, that results in 2.8 MILLION injured or dead. And we're still told
that driving in a car is more dangerous? Consider that almost no one ever
walks away from an jumbo crash or small plane crash. Most jumbos seat up
to 400 passengers, making 2.8 million a very conservative, reasonable estimate.
And almost all of these 2.8 MILLION people are probably dead. See [2] for
government database details. We will probably never know how many "accidents"
have been caused by collisions with vehicles in the airspace that simply
are not conventional aircraft. These vehicles probably didn't appear on
radar, as is the case with many of UFO sightings.
-
- WHY DIDN'T THE FAA APPEAR TO CARE?
-
- Let's look at this from another point of view. First,
there is little doubt that FAA trainees are taught that vehicles are flying
in FAA airspace without transponders, federal authorization or flight plans.
Some of these are "ours," and some of these belong to "them."
"Them" represents black ops and shadow government vehicles, as
well as alien vehicles. Certainly none of these pilots file a flight plan!
The FAA trainee must be taught how to respond to such a sighting on radar.
-
- A management trainee who may need to interface with the
public, will be taught how to cover up (lie) to handle any such sightings.
They may even be in the employ of the military, even though working for
the FAA. Their function is to help cover up illegal flights. A flight
controller cannot sit motionless with his eyes fixed and dilated, as a
"bogie" zips across his radar screen, appearing and disappearing
with unexplainable speed. An entire FAA control center cannot be thrown
into pandemonium just because a black ops or ET flight enters controlled
airspace without a flight plan or authorization. Safeguards are place to
prevent this.
-
- POLICE OFFICER BRAINWASHING
-
- Then there is the matter of the police mindset (brainwashing)
instilled at the academy. Certainly a minority of police officers already
know these vehicles exist. Rarely will they discuss any unusual observations
or beliefs they have, openly for other officers to hear. Openly discussing
this can be a ticket to a free, career advancement threatening mental examination
and endless ridicule from other officers. Yet despite the mountain of evidence
these vehicles exist and are very real, no one questions the party line
on the matter.
-
- FACILITATORS TO CONTROL THE MASSES
-
- Let's look at one example of a facilitator and how they
work. Government trained facilitators attend school board meetings, and
often are on school boards. These people are also quietly on the federal
government payroll and live in the community. Their function is to help
"steer" (expedite) school district policies in pre-planned federal
government directions. Dr. Stan Monteith has had these people on his wonderful
radio show, Radio Liberty. They have described their job function as solely
to promote certain government policies. Most people would call that social
engineering.
-
- Facilitators are one major reason why a child can graduate
from high school and yet be functionally illiterate, unable to read and
write. No child left behind? Instead, since all children are left behind
scholastically, their twisted logic is "no child was left behind."
So much for those helpful "facilitators." It's similar to a comedy
device, where the commander barks out "all volunteers take one step
forward." Instead, most of the members of the platoon take one step
backward together, leaving other dupes standing out front who instantly
become the "volunteers."
-
- To maintain control of the UFO ridicule mindset, a facilitator
would need to be present in most every police department training facilities
throughout the country. Whether a visiting "consultant" or resident,
they maintain status-quo brainwashing to keep skepticism and ridicule of
unusual UFO events as standard practice. Their apparent methodology is
to discredit the witness (or witnesses) so they will not alarm anyone and
call attention to the sighting.
-
- However, a fascinating counter-philosophy from the government
also exists. It is the FEMA fire department manual. Chapter 13 deals with
handling crashed UFOs, and states among other things that such vehicles
must be treated as toxic material. There are scanned-in copies of the Chapter
13 section about UFOs in numerous places on the web. [3]
-
- "BECAUSE WE'VE ALWAYS DONE IT THAT WAY" MINDSET
-
- As a former defense contractor, I can tell you that
only the intelligence people have the latest of everything in facilities,
technology and mindset. Those employees have the equivalent of a stadium
box seat. Even most NASA offices, built in the 1960's (as most of them
were) STILL look like 1960. Right down to the old wood or heavy grey steel
desks, pea-green file cabinets, two-tone wall painting scheme, oscillating
black metal fans similar to those seen in movies, the use of an typewriter
to hammer out contracts, and a big 50 year old AC powered clock on the
wall humming away.
-
- I'm sure it certainly sounds like a B movie script, but
this is fact. And this was all still present at NASA back in the 1990s.
You cannot comprehend how depressing that is until you see how nothing
really changes, even in how they deal with contractors. There exists a
mindset all through most of the US government that "you can't change
that, because we've always done it that way" philosophy. Or the classic
"don't rock the boat." I've heard government employees mutter
all those words myself on more than one occasion. And I've seen the dismal
results of that thinking.
-
- NASA'S MINDSET IS FROZEN IN TIME
-
- Forget the glitzy NASA "panel of experts,"
seated at long tables attempting to answer science reporter questions.
I've been inside most of the different NASA facilities around the country
on business. They all LOOK the same, SMELL the same and THINK the same.
That's why they still use a first generation 100 MHz 32 bit processor on
the Mars rovers - because according to them "it works" as their
experts will tell you. Forget advancements in chip technology. Never mind
the untested bug-ridden Java code they uploaded and the subsequent freeze-up
that almost cost NASA the mission early on. They actually pulled former
NASA engineers out of retirement to save the mission. This was stated by
them in one of their press conferences. When you're in a NASA facility,
you almost expect to see Werner VonBraun (former Nazi scientist) with his
long coat draped over his shoulders European style, complete with his Nazi
entourage marching down the hall.
-
- Even down at Kennedy Space Flight Center, there are numerous
buildings that haven't seen the business end of a paintbrush since they
were built. The dead giveaway? Paint peeling off buildings in large sheets.
I point all this out here to show the no-change mindset that permeates
all through government. People just want to continue receiving their paychecks,
and go farther up the GS rating salary ladder just by remaining employed
with the government. That's an employee gravy train that industry will
have no part of. The federal employees are terrified of change and want
to stay on the gravy train. If covering up the UFO problem is part of that
requirement, so be it.
-
- This mentality of "no change" permeates the
US government in many other ways. A "we've always done it that way"
mindset is useful to keep everyone in the dark as long as possible, thus
preserving the all-important "status-quo." Don't think that for
one second, NASA isn't afraid of technology they didn't cook up or invent.
They are, and the last thing they want is for someone from "out there"
to appear with super-advanced technology. It's a job security issue, plain
and simple. But I digress here...
-
- LOCAL POLICE ARE TRANSFORMED INTO RENT-A-COPS WHEN A
UFO CRASH OCCURS
-
- When an "unconventional" technology (non-airplane
or non-helicopter) vehicle crashes, a government task force shows up and
immediately takes over. Response usually takes an hour or less. Upon arrival
they immediately swear the local police into secrecy. They are effectively
told that whatever it was they saw, that they haven't seen anything. And
never discuss what they *think* they saw with anyone for reasons of "national
security." Yes, that cute catch-all phrase. The police officers are
then relegated to serve as nothing more than security guards around the
crash site perimeter. Meanwhile government scientists and other military
slaves make certain that every tiny scrap of material is collected and
carted away. No longer will artifacts be left behind for people to take
home as souvenirs to sell, have them analyzed or take photos to post on
the web.
-
- The government learned a great deal from Roswell and
other crashes, and has taken serious no-expense-spared steps to prevent
repeating those mistakes. The government covets crash material far more
than a 10 year old child given a new radio controlled tank toy and a new
carton of D cell batteries for it. When particulate matter or radiation
is present, a dump truck, bulldozer and backhoe are brought in ASAP and
the top few feet of earth are scraped off and hauled away. One such example
of this was when there was a close encounter on a rural road some years
ago by a mother and her daughter. Several hundred feet of asphalt roadway
were ripped up, hauled away and the road repaved. The two witnesses had
red burn marks on their faces, reminiscent of radiation burns that took
weeks to heal. Long term DNA effects have not been made public.
-
- Accounts of these "un-fun black ops fed teams"
are always the same. At Kecksburg, PA, a crash took place a few years ago.
The government came in and took over as fast as they could get there. They
hauled the tarp covered bell shaped object down main street on a flat bed
trailer off into the night, never to be seen again. Much was learned from
Roswell when a damage control program wasn't yet in place, and the world
learned of a crashed disk. A magic disk, which somehow transformed itself
into a weather balloon overnight. How do I know? Because the government
said so. So it must be true, right?
-
- So do you really think your report to the local police
department will do anything?
-
- If you want to file a report with authorities, you can
try if you want. You can also try to climb Mt. Everest without arms and
legs, although the climber may have more success than making a police officer
take you seriously. See [5] for reporting agencies.
-
- Please read the reference notes shown at the end of this
essay for further information.
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
- www.data4science.net
-
-
- REFERENCES
-
- [1] - BOTCHED EXAMINATIONS
- No one has addressed the issue of what happens to abductees
who suffer from botched examinations - such as when the large intestine
is punctured or torn from a misguided probe, and they begin to bleed to
death. There is also the life threatening problem of bacteria entering
the abdominal cavity. Are the abductees returned to their beds at home
to lay there, bleed out and die ? If they make it to an emergency room,
NO ONE will believe how the trauma happened. No one. They will be accused
of some twisted self-action and will be helpless to convince any psychiatrist
that someone "up there" did that to them. It could also cause
them to be institutionalized. If the abductee isn't returned home, will
they become someone's meal "up there" or salvaged as material
for DNA cloning? These are questions that have never been addressed. What
diseases are being spread through the use of these probes? It only requires
one microscopic particle to cause AIDS as Don Scott (retired professor
of microbiology, Toronto) has proven.
-
- And how easy can CJD be spread? A simple tonometer probe
tip optometrists use is as a good example. Used externally, it is gently
pressed against the eyeball to measure eye pressure. The optometrist performs
this test during a standard eye examination to check for glaucoma. Some
doctors use a newer instrument, which employs a short burst of compressed
air to eliminate patient contact. But not all use this method yet. The
probe tip MUST be cleaned after every patient. Yet published research in
the UK in recent years has shown that CJD IS DETECTABLE on such a device
after contacting an infected patient. This indicates CJD could be transmitted
to another patient on this device into another patient's eye, subsequently
infecting them.
-
- A survey in the UK discovered that the probe tip is not
always cleaned by office staff after every exam, as proper healthcare practice
dictate. When you use a shared instrument of any kind in a doctor's office,
sterilization MUST be one of your paramount concerns. The author has learned
first hand from a brain surgeon this past week when discussing neurological
research, that the only currently known effective sterilization process
to kill CJD is hydrogen peroxide plasma. This will kill CJD prions without
destroying the instruments.
-
- [2] - Federal government air accident database access:
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp
-
- [3] - Excerpt from chapter 13 of the FEMA manual about
UFOs - http://www.ufos-unbound.com/ufos/firefighters.htm
- This text has been reproduced on many websites.
-
- [4] - It may be possible that the vehicle sighted is
a collection vehicle for abductees. The author has found that time travel
is often involved in abductions, with abductees gone for a day or more.
They are then mind-wiped and returned to the time very close to when they
were taken, to erase most evidence it ever took place.
-
- [5] - REPORTING AGENCIES:
-
- If you want to file a report, write down the details
of the event as soon as possible and go to the National UFO Reporting Center
site at UFOCenter.com. There is a convenient online reporting form to
use.
-
- Here are the primary investigators in North America:
-
- National UFO Reporting Center
- Peter Davenport
- 206 722-3000
- www.ufocenter.com
-
- HBCC UFO Research
- Brian Vike
- http://www.hbccufo.com
-
- George A. Filer
- Majorstar@aol.co
- MUFON Eastern Director
- MUFON Skywatch Investigations
- 609 654-0020
-
- MUFON 800 UFO-2166
- www.mufon.com
|