Note - We received this from an aviation professional
who requested anonymity. -ed
In reference to your article, "what is this Batelle
plane spraying?", please refer to this webpage
for your answer. It is conducting atmospheric research
I have recently seen a C-130 aircraft operated by the
National Science Foundation here in Antigua. This aircraft was based here
for more than a month and was testing the "clean" atmosphere
on the windward side of Antigua (Leeward Islands of the Caribbean) to use
the data as a baseline measurement to compare to polluted areas. This aircraft
had identical instrument systems on the wings and fuselage to this Battelle
aircraft. I had a very close look and walked around the aircraft several
times during operations from the V.C. Bird International.
From Andrew Griffin
After seeing the photos on Rense and Infowars, Pat Carr
and I decided to e-mail Battelle's public relations officer, Katy Delaney
at the Battelle corporate offices in Ohio. Here was the reply:
Thanks for sending that link and giving me the opportunity
to correct the misinformation and inform you about the plane's research
The Gulfstream-1 pictured contains devices and probes
for aerosol and turbulence measurements. These are not devices for spraying;
they are for air intake and measurement.
The plane generally is involved in important environmental
studies, ranging from understanding atmospheric processes to determining
how long range transport of pollutants occurs.
Please contact me if you have any more questions.
- From J.T.
- Dear Jeff,
- I worked for an herbicide company for several years.
Most of the planes we used were regular crop duster planes.
- They had vessels on board to handle wet and pellet applications.
I see no vessels on this airplane. I also do not see any personal protective
equipment, or equipment for handling spills, fumes, gasses etc.
- These Venturi tubes would normally be mounted away from
the body to get an even distribution. They do not resemble any application
equipment we used.
- A spray applicator plane is basically an airborne water
tank. A computer might have found its way into the fuselage since I was
there, along with GPS, but this array of computer equipment is way over
what you would need to put down a chemical.
- Your other letter writer that indicates these are air-measuring
devices seems to be on the mark.
- From Bob Anderson
- So, the Battelle aircraft is NOT spraying anything? BULLSHIT!
- There is not a single device on that plane that looks
anything like an INTAKE apparatus for drawing in atmospheric samples. The
devices depicted on the exterior of the craft are clearly for INPUTTING
substances into the air.
- I can't imagine what kind of softheaded dudes would fall
for the Battelle line spewed by their Public Relations department -- that
Battelle is doing atmospheric "research" (i.e. sampling), to
assist in protecting the environment.
- These Battelle folks have been UP TO THEIR EARS in working
with the feds on an uncountable number of TOP SECRET PROJECTS --many emanating
from nearby Wright Patterson AFB for a HELL of a long time. Given the current
policies of the current US government aimed at WRECKING the global environment
to the greatest extent possible in the shortest amount of time, the chances
are extremely strong that Battelle is helping them do exactly that. And
as pointed out, WHERE are the INTAKE devices? Nowhere.
- Bob Anderson
- The recent post, with accompanying photos, claiming that
the engine shown in the Pentagon 9-11 aftermath was a Pratt & Whitney
JT8D is certainly not correct. Nor is the follow-up!
- All anyone with any real knowledge of modern aircraft
would have to do is compare the apparent size of the engine in the photo
with a real JT8D and it would be obvious that the engine in the photo is
much larger than the engine they claim it to be. The car provides a nice
- And while J. Kaplowitz is correct in his statement that
the JT8D was used on the 737... it was ONLY used on the first generation
(737-200). And Kaplowitz is again wrong regarding the 727 and the A3D Skywarrior.
The JT8D was used on ALL 727's ever built. Yes, it was progressively improved
but it remained the JT8D. And the A3D never used this engine at all. The
only engine it was ever equipped with was the P&W J75.
- From Tom Davis
- Re: This quote from Ms Delaney of Battelle -
- "The Gulfstream-1 pictured contains devices and
probes for aerosol and turbulence measurements. These are not devices for
spraying; they are for air intake and measurement."
- This poses the obvious question: What 'aerosol' measurements
are being taken? Someone is undoubtedly measuring and monitoring the chemtrail
spraying. This looks like the perfect platform to do so.
- From John Goldsmith
- I was curious what kind of air samples could be taken
when the instruments are so close to the engines.
- I know that the airspeed would cause a tunnel affect
but you would think the air would still be somewhat polluted by the exhaust.
- Airline Jet Mechanic Agrees On Engine Identification
- From: Name Protected
- Jon, I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I
- I can tell you - categorically - that the landing gear
IS from a 767. However, the engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence
uses CFM56s. Not enough power to lift a '67.
- Those engines on the street in New York did NOT come
off of a 767.