- There are various versions of History. There is the Establishment
type, that comes out about the time of a current event. Then, the "powers
that be" in books supposedly detailing the period have their say.
-
- And then, there is the non-Ruling Class report condemned
at first, but later believed. Such as after one or two participants, with
direct knowledge, have their Diaries or Memoirs published after they are
too old to care or are already dead.
-
- So for the use of the peons, the press reports that in
March, 2005, there was a meeting of the Judicial Conference of the United
States. They dealt with a current growing problem, so the press whores
told us. The gathering of Judges dealt with the growing number of attacks
on Judges or their families.
-
- Naturally, such a conference would deal with supposed
remedies. None of the press fakers, however, would dare raise questions:
-
- Such as, have the American Secret Political Police orchestreated
some, if not all, of these happenings to falsely shape U.S. domestic policies?
And if so, then, WHY? The "for sale" pundits are silent, acting
as mere stenographers on behalf of those who rule us without the consent
of those governed.
-
- So, at the selfsame Judicial Conference, the high priests
of jurisprudence met behind closed doors. Even under such circumstances,
they did not for the entire group, divulge what was REALLY on their mind.
For the real purpose, they met before, during, and after the meeting
in very small, hushed groups, pledged to the utmost secrecy, their ideas
not to be in any way divulged or hinted at in their later press blurb.
-
- What was it that was troubling these lawless heavyweights
of the Bench? Some examples:
-
- [1] With a sneer, the Bench and the Bar refer to a class
of persons, that to the high and mighty, are considered lowlifes, in their
real world, not worthy of attention. This category is labeled "pro
se litigants". Referred to are persons who come to the courthouse
without a lawyer, just representing themselves.
-
- The spy-riddled, oil-soaked, massive tax-cheating Monopoly
Press do not see fit to remind us of the history of this land and nation.
In the Colonial period, the Lawyers and the Judges were generally pledged
to uphold and support the Crown, the certifiably-insane Monarchy in London.
-
- When the mercantile class in the Colonies rebelled---"No
Taxation Without Representation"---they painted black the chimneys
of the Crown's colonial Judges and Lawyers, who fled to Canada. Even in
the colonial period, and thereafter, it was perfectly alright for a would-be
litigant to have a trusted non-lawyer present the claim or defend the litigrant,
such as a spouse, another family member, a friend, or business associate.
-
- Plainly, lawyers were the enemy, loyal to the Crown and
their Judges who, on occasion, delayed remedies, if at all, twenty years
and more.
- [See, "the long Train of Abuses and Usurpations",
in the "Declaration of Independence".]
-
- The idea of having a mouthpiece, a Lawyer, became prevalent
in the latter decades of the 19th Century.
-
- To further isolate laymen and business associates from
being able to speak for themselves, the Anglo-American aristocracy introduced
the idea of Corporations. And arbitrary, hide-bound laws were passed that
Corporations can only be in Court by way of a Lawyer. Even corporations
consisting of only a husband and a wife as corporate officials, MUST hire
an attorney to speak for their business.
-
- Certainly, this promoted the welfare of the Attorneys
Unemployment Bureau.
-
- [2] What has been upsetting the Lords of the Bench, is
that they are faced with exposure of their criminality at the hands of
a growing squad of laymen, non-lawyers, some quite astute at digging out
the stinking dirt of America's corruptible, corrupted Federal Judiciary.
-
- The liars and whores of the press particularly protect
the Federal Judges from being scandalized. Why? First, because such Judges
are considered as part of the "Holy of Holies". The Federal Judiciary
protects Big Business. When you carefully examine what such Judges are
linked to, plainly they are not routine Traffic Court Judges.
- Secondly, the really important Federal Judges we call
Banker-Judges.
-
- For example, in Chicago sits the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the 7th Circuit (appeals from U.S. District Courts in Illinois, Indiana,
and Wisconsin).
-
- There have been sitting three judges originating from
Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School. 7th Circuit Judges Richard
A. Posner [(312) 435-5806 ] and his virtual shadow, Frank H. Easterbrook
[(312) 435-5808], formerly professors at the Law School; and Circuit Judge
Diane P. Wood [(312) 435-5521 ], formerly the Dean of the Law School.
-
- The three of them have ostensibly perjured themselves
by not revealing financial links as required in their mandatory annual
Judicial financial disclosure form. On the bench, they reportedly represent
the several Billion Dollar stock and investment portfolio of Rockefeller's
University of Chicago. They do NOT disqualify themselves when the businesses
in the portfolio are litigants in their Court. Guess who wins?
-
- In the same reputed perjured situation is U.S. Supreme
Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia likewise a former professor of the
same Law School, and likewise, on the bench representing the selfsame portfolio
and not disclosing the same as required by law.
-
- Scalia is one of five judges on the U.S. Supreme Court
corrupted by clandestine funds from Coca-Cola and others, in Bush versus
Gore, December 2000, arbitrarily and corruptly installing George W. Bush
as the occupant and resident of the Oval Office.
-
- [Visit Home page links <http://www.skolnicksreport.com/>www.skolnicksreport.com
as to parts 9, 10, 14, 15, and 16, of series, attaching sent-to-be-court-filed
documents relating to the High Court corruption suppressed by the FBI and
Homeland Security, the American Gestapo, "Coca-Cola, CIA, and the
Courts".]
-
- [3] The Judges are concerned that thoughout the nation,
particularly in the Federal Courts, are examples of Federal Court corruption
dared to be put into the court records by "pro se litigants".
-
- Without seeming to brag, we must point out a fact. Most
all the judges ever sent to jail for bribery in the history of the nation,
were prosecuted and jailed as a result of our work as a court-reform group
over the last four decades.
-
- [4] So a small, secret panel of the Judicial Conference,
pledged to denial if now revealed, are setting about to institute the following
"remedies" to be used against "pro se litigants", that
is, would-be whistle-blowers who are not members of the Bench and the Bar:
-
- (A) "Pro se litigants", starting at some not
too far off future date, will not be allowed directly into the federal
courthouses. Such persons must show up at a separate facility, not the
courthouse, to be first of all "screened". "Star-Chamber"
like examiners will grill such would-be litigants:
-
- (B) Are such "pro se" types of "sound
mind" (and HOW is THAT defined?);
-
- (C) Can such would-be "pro se litigants" be
shown to be "cranks", "malcontents", with "frivolous"
claims or defenses?
-
- (D) Are such would-be "pro se litigants" supposedly
"without a basis" digging into possible corruption of Federal
Judges and would confront such Judges in the court records? Have such "pro
se-ers" already accused federal judges of specific wrong-doing, such
as Judges issuing rulings where the judges perpetrate a fraud upon their
own Court by inserting fairy tales instead of actual undisputed court-record
facts?
-
- (E) Have such :"pro se litigants" in the past
embarassed federal judges by pointing to big law firms arbitrarily winning
rulings at the hands of a federal judge whose immediate relatives hold
partnerships and other positions with the large law firm? And in the past,
have such "pro se litigants" refused to shut up when the federal
judge told them to regarding such issue?
-
- (F) Such panel "screening" the "pro se
litigant" is to determine that instead of permitting such litigant
or would-be litigant into the federal courthouse, that such person instead
be sent to a mental health facility to determine if they are "criminally
insane". The federal courts already have such a facility in Springfield,
Missouri, where inmates are shot up with thorazine and other mind-numbing
chemicals to make them listless and "peaceful".
-
- [5] In this series on Overthrow, we have given the rationale
for what is happening. So the secret panel of Judges, linked to the finance,
clout, and power necessary to carry out their commands, designates themselves,
at least in secret, as sitting ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION and BILL OF RIGHTS.
Their excuse, bluntly put, is that America has too great a population to
have everyone guaranteed the rights in those documents which they, by their
actions to come, declare to be obsolete. And that the fundamental documents
of this nation were designed for a relatively tiny population in the 18th
Century and not useful in the 21st Century.
-
- Thus cancelled in secret and such orders carried out,
relate to the following:
-
- Up to now forbidden is "abridging... the right of
the people... to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".
Since the federal judiciary has already lawlessly taken upon themselves
to be a super-Legislature passing laws, the First Amendment prohibition
applies to both Congress and the Federal Courts. How can you pursue your
claims or defense in the Federal Courts, if, because you are a "pro
se litigant", you are not permitted to go into the Federal Courthouse
in your District or Federal Appeal Circuit?
-
- Are the High Priests of the Federal Courts reacting to
emergencies about which they are in a position to know the truth?
-
- ARE THE ATTACKS UPON JUDGES AND THEIR FAMILIES ORCHESTRATED
BY HITLER AMERICA'S SECRET POLITiCAL POLICE, FBI, CIA, and HOMELAND SECURITY,
forming a Gestapo?
-
- More coming. Stay tuned.
- =====
-
- Mr. Skolnick's Reports are posted and archived at www.skolnicksreport.com
Together with his co-authored The Middle-Finger News, they are posted
and archived through
- www.rense.com/Datapages/skolnickdatapage.html
- also posted and archived through
- www.cloakanddagger.ca
-
- Skolnick is co-host with Lenny Bloom on a growing, popular
maximum power Internet radio program, FM-quality worldwide, ON-LINE LIVE
and ARCHIVED at www.cloakanddagger.ca CHECK SCHEDULE for time it is on.
-
- Recently published, the book, "Ahead of the Parade"
by Sherman H. Skolnick, A Who's Who of Treason & High Crimes---Exclusive
Details of Fraud & Corruption of the Monopoly Press, the Banks, the
Bench and the Bar, & the Secret Political Police.
-
- Can be ordered U.S./Canada 1-800-861-7899.
-
- Can also supposedly be ordered through amazon.com HOWEVER
recently they blockaded their own marketing and sales of this controversial
book by demanding twice the listed price.
-
- About once a year is published a heavy packet of printed
stories by Skolnick. To get a copy, send $5.00 (U.S. FUNDS ONLY) plus a
stamped, self-addressed BUSINESS size envelope [ # 10 envelope, 4-1/8 x
9-1/2 ] WITH THREE U.S. FIRST CLASS STAMPS ON IT, to Citizen's Committee
To Clean Up The Courts, Sherman H. Skolnick, Chairman, 9800 So. Oglesby
Ave., Chicago IL 60617-4870.
-
- Want to get on Skolnick's e-mail list to get, soon as
issued, Skolnick'S Reports, and The Middle-Finger News, or to stay on the
e-mail list if you are already there? To find out how, contact skolnick@ameritech.net
BE SURE TO PUT IN SUBJECT LINE OF E-MAIL, "I want to get on e-mail
list".
|
