- First, Unocal...
-
- The US has a little known entity that can reject the
Chinese interest and intent regarding Unocal on national security/interest
grounds. Remember that the beneficiary of the current Unocal deal is Chevron
(NWO).
-
- What you need to think about first is whether China wants
the NWO to have this entity reject the overture.
-
- If you think about it for a moment, China WANTS the US
to reject it. Why? BY rejecting it the NWO affords China totally validity
in doing what it wants to do: reject future NWO enmeshment via purchase
of Chinese enterprise! China will broaden the doctrine and of course will
not object to the US broadening it as well. What is the national security
interest is within the pale of definition by the respective country. What
is important to China is for the US to set up is the principle, which it
will do openly now in rejecting China's interest in outbidding Chevron.
-
- What if the deal is allowed to go through? China doesn't
mind. Then it will resort to the contention that the US had the discretion
to reject it or not. That it did not reject it does not limit China from
applying it on a more stringent standard for its own interests.
-
- Conclusion: China has everything to gain and nothing
to lose in pursuing Unocal. It is again a brilliant Chinese maneuver. What
it does is bring up the issue that the US can if it wants reject it. Thus,
China cannot be faulted from applying the same standard as it deems best
for the interests of its own country.
-
- Now, look at the Iranian elections...
-
- Did the NWO want the extremist candidate to win or lose?
-
- It wanted Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to win to open the portal
for Israel to attack Iran.
-
- Look at our analysis the other day...
-
- Start -
-
- TEHRAN -- Moderate conservative
presidential candidate Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjanihas promised to hand ordinary
Iranians billions of dollars instockoptions and benefits in a last ditch
bid to win their votes awayfromhardliner Mahmood Ahmadinejad. Rafsanjani,
facing a run-off against the far right-winger on Friday, said he would
give "every Iranian family 100 million rials (around 11,000 dollars)
in shares of state companies to be privatised." Official figures show
there are 14 million families in Iran, meaning the offer represents 155
billion dollars. Rafsanjani said in a campaign broadcast that the shares
would have to be reimbursed over 10 years. He also said that every month
the unemployed will receive between 800,000 and 1.5million rials (90-165
dollars), while women heads of households would be given 700,000 rials
(80 dollars). Rafsanjani also pledged to "prioritise the poorer classes".
-
- Comment: When he says state companies to be privatized
THERE IS ONLYONE BENEFICIARY: THE NWO. Thus, Iran's religious clerics will
now do everything to make sure that he does not win.
-
- End
-
- The result was a landslide victory for Ahmadinejad.
-
- An official at the Guardian Council, which must approve
the electionresults, said that out of 24.8 million voted counted, Ahmadinejad
hadwon 61.7 percent of ballots cast, defying pre-poll predictions of atight
race.The official said turnout was 26 million, or 56 percent, down on the
63 percent of Iran's 46.7 million eligible voters who cast ballots in an
inconclusive first round on June 17."It's over, we accept that we've
lost," a close Rafsanjani aide, who asked not to be identified, told
Reuters.
-
- Now, what happens just before the predictable election
results come in:
-
- Fri Jun 24,11:19 AM ET
-
- WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President
Bush will deliver a major address to U.S. troops and the nation about Iraq
on Tuesday night from the U.S. military base at Fort Bragg, NorthCarolina,
the White House said.
-
- "This is a critical moment in Iraq," White
House spokesman Scott McClellan said on Friday in announcing the speech.
"This is a real time of testing."
-
- McClellan said the speech would be delivered at 8 p.m.,
and that the White House has asked U.S. television networks to air the
address live.
-
- Bush is expected to use the prime time speech to outline
his strategy in Iraq amid increasing public doubts about the war.
-
- Conclusion:
-
- The Unocal analysis shows you that every act of China
is cast with the intent that regardless of the outcome China improves its
position. The Iranian election analysis shows you that what the NWO wants
is not always apparent from what it says it wants. The fact that Bush is
going to speak live from a military base announced hours before the election
results asking live television coverage when we all know he has little
to say positive about Iraq means that he is setting the stage to probably
defend an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites, the probability being
near 100% that Israel will justify a strike on such sites now based on
the Ahmadinejad win and the record of his statements anti-West and anti-Israel.
-
- So, China pursues Unocal with its own agenda and Bush
adds big bucks to the ante by pursuing Iran. Bush says his strategy will
assure that China proves itself the paper tiger and Bush will have Iran
and once having Iran he will explain that it abates most of all opposition
in Iraq, thus proving important for US troops and US interests. Bush will
further explain that Syria once Iran "loses it nuclear threat capability"
will also prove of no consequence to US troops and interests in Iraq. Of
course reinterpreted it means the NWO will move for control of oil in both
Iraq and Iran and neutralize Syria which will mean Bush will complete his
mission as per <www.senderberl.com/BMI.pdf.
-
- What are the chances of this unfolding on Tuesday: 50%,
which is very high for such an extreme war scenario. It means Israel must
attack, Israel must be somehow injured to allow US troops in Iraq to move
in Iran to protect Israel. It also serves as an excuse for China not to
intervene against US intervention for "injured" Israel.
-
- A more important dynamic is what are the chances of the
scenario (or something similar) unfolding in the foreseeable future? Answer:
80%. The NWO is arguing that the new Iranian leadership can only result
in making the NWO position in Iraq totally untenable. Thus, the only conclusion
per 9-11 is that it wanted Ahmadinejad to win because he was the sine qua
non for the NWO to push through for the US and Israel the inevitable need
to quash the nuclear sites and in doing so open the portal for US troops
to enter Iran. This of course suggests some plan to effectuate a successful
response/counterattack on Israel.
-
- Thus, while one could argue that the market slid 300
points in two days because it was anticipating the Ahmadinejad victory,
the real reason for the slide is that it portends the attack on Iran.
-
- What will we say if an attack soon launches against Iranian
nuclear sites by Israel? Not that we were on target about the launch and
the true reasons therefor but that we were on target that we have entered
the very dark period we have been fearing and that truly dangerous times
will thereafter unfold for all of us.
-
- The White House knows that Tuesday's address is intended
to historical. What can I say that I hope that this E-mail helps act against
it proving historical. They really believe China will not have any response
and that they will get away with it as explained in previous E-mails playing
the game from where they sit to see themselves occupying both Iraq and
Iran. Similar to a previous time, if you see Bush smiling that he got away
with it, he and the NWO are discounting the then forthcoming response from
China and others strongly opposed from NWO control of Iraq and Iranian
oil and the evil mindset that pushed through the occupation and control.
Israel thinking that it played its cards correctly, getting the NWO to
now support it rather than shift to the Arab/Islamic block, will find out
it made for sure the biggest mistake in its entire history.
-
- This leads to one other important point in this very
serious analysis...
-
- The most difficult question I was recently asked is how
do I think the NWO will respond to China's taking over the dominant global
leadership role. Since the NWO will not allow it, how will the NWO offset
China?
-
- Read the following very slowly and carefully please...
-
- Preparing for the Next Pandemic
by Michael T. Osterholm
May 25, 2005
-
- Excerpt from the forthcoming essay in the July/August
issue
-
- Michael T. Osterholm is Director of the Center for Infectious
Disease Research and Policy, Associate Director of the Department of Homeland
Security's National Center for Food Protection and Defense, and Professor
at the University of Minnesota's School of Public Health.
-
- What should the industrialized world be doing to prepare
for the next pandemic? The simple answer: far more. So far, the World Health
Organization and several countries have finalized or drafted useful but
overly general plans. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
has increased research on influenza-vaccine production and availability.
These efforts are commendable, but what is needed is a detailed operational
blueprint for how to get a population through one to three years of a pandemic.
Such a plan must involve all the key components of society. In the private
sector, the plan must coordinate the responses of the medical community,
medical suppliers, food providers, and the transportation system. In the
government sector, the plan should take into account officials from public
health, law enforcement, and emergency management at the international,
federal, state, and local levels.
-
- At the same time, it must be acknowledged that such master
blueprints may have their drawbacks, too. Berkeley's Aaron Wildavsky persuasively
argued that resilience is the real key to crisis management-overly rigid
plans can do more harm than good. Still, planning is enormously useful.
It gives government officials, private-sector partners, and the community
the opportunity to meet, think through potential dilemmas, purchase necessary
equipment, and set up organizational structures for a 12- to 36-month response.
A blueprint forces leaders to rehearse their response to a crisis, preparing
emotionally and intellectually so that when disaster strikes the community
can face it.
-
- Influenza-vaccine production deserves special attention.
An initiative to provide vaccine for the entire world must be developed,
with a well-defined schedule to ensure progress. It is laudable that countries
such as the United States and Vietnam are pursuing programs with long-term
goals to develop and produce H5N1 vaccine for their respective populations.
But if the rest of the world lacks supplies, even the vaccinated will be
devastated when the global economy comes to an abrupt halt. Pandemic-influenza
preparedness is by nature an international issue. No one can truly be isolated
from a pandemic.
-
- The pandemic-related collapse of worldwide trade and
its ripple effect throughout industrialized and developing countries would
represent the first real test of the resiliency of the modern global delivery
system. Given the extent to which modern commerce relies on the precise
and readily available international trade of goods and services, a shutdown
of the global economic system would dramatically harm the world's ability
to meet the surging demand for essential commodities such as food and medicine
during a crisis. The business community can no longer afford to play a
minor role in planning the response to a pandemic. For the world to have
critical goods and services during a pandemic, industry heads must stockpile
raw materials for production and preplan distribution and transportation
support. Every company's senior managers need to be ready to respond rapidly
to changes in the availability, production, distribution, and inventory
management of their products. There is no model for how to revive the current
global economy were it to be devastated.
-
- To truly be complete, all planning on international,
regional, national, and local levels must consider three different scenarios:
What if the pandemic begins tonight? What if it starts one year from now?
What if the world is so fortunate as to have an entire decade to prepare?
All are possible, but none is certain.
-
- Ehrlich: The NWO has taken Zemin's SARS agenda and turned
it now against China by asserting that it would entertain a global pandemic
that would undermine global trade for an extended period TO UNDERMINE CHINA
AND ITS EMERGING GLOBAL LEADERSHIP ROLE POLITICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY.
-
- Sorry but allowing these crazy people to get away with
9-11 allowed them to go on and now wage a 9-11 course against the country
they help build up: China.
-
- My point is that for these nuts the weapon of choice
for the future is not nuclear but from where I sit custom designed microbes.
Their problem is that if China takes a bunch of people into a room and
sees that it kills off only Chinese or Asians and no other group then you
have nuclear war. Moreover, from where I sit, any such designed microbe
can mutate in any event and thus can kill off even the NWO who think they
sit there immune from it either by design or having the antidote to it
which they cannot disclose without taking responsibility for it. Thus for
those NWO nuts with the antidote, I say that you will not have it for the
mutated form of the microbe and I can tell you right now, the nuts that
you are, that it is likely to mutate quickly in a real time environment
as against the structured one tested for mutation qualities.
-
- It's pretty pathetic. The goal as I long expressed is
to have stopped them early on. Now, you can see that they are crazy and
intend to not allow China to prevail as I always feared would be the case.
Thus, I am left with begging Israel not to attack Iran, to reject the NWO,
since their ultimate agenda is to eviscerate Israel from the nation it
was intended to be (having done a darn good job already of it), and that
by following the correct path Israel can get G-d to intervene for it is
only He that can get rid of our true global pandemic: the NWO.
-
- Joseph Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
June 26, 2005
-
- Recommended Read in connection with the above:
-
- http://www.arcticbeacon.com
- /articles/ article/1518131/28031.htm
|