- Actions speak. Words lie. Action follows motive. Motivation
is a microscope. must think like a spook in order to understand the totality
of these crimes. This report will challenge you to focus like a genius
intelligence operative, to look a few moves ahead...and behind.
-
- We've been caught in a web of deceit, so intricate, so
devious, so arrogant and dark that there may actually be no escape. If
"we the people" don't make those responsible for Treasongate
pay for their sins against this country, we deserve everything they've
got planned for us down the road to perdition.
-
- ANATOMY OF THE ALLEGED "SMEAR CAMPAIGN"
-
- For the last two years, we've all heard about "the
smear campaign" hurled upon Joe Wilson by the Bush administration
to punish him for writing the New York Times oped concerning the fake Niger
documents. Revenge and political payback is the motivation universally
attributed to the Bush syndicate.
-
- It's bullshit. Joe Wilson was not smeared. He went from
relative obscurity to national fame, book deals, talk show circuit, hero
status accepting, freedom fighting, whistleblowing, saintly coronation.
None of it is deserved.
-
- Joe Wilson is in cahoots with the Bush Administration
along with David Corn, Bob Novak and Valerie Plame Wilson, a cast of spooks
who have only just been outed with the writing of this article. They've
carefully scripted this entire affair to shield themselves from prosecution
for monolithic treasons against US citizens and our military. Treasongate,
Rovegate, Leakgate, whatever you want to call it, is, in reality, an intricate
version of hide and seek where the "perpetraitors" have been
controlling both sides of the game.
-
- Regardless of the crimes committed by this and past administrations,
as long as their spin can divide the people on political lines, justice,
true justice, will never be served. If the crime can be given a political
spin, the perps can literally get away with any crime, even Treason. They've
carefully crafted both sides of this national debate to give both liberal
and conservative pundits enough ammunition to keep a heated firefight going
in the media. The smokescreen generated by this firefight has diverted
our attention from examining:
-
- 1. The controlling laws applicable to these facts.
-
- 2. The motivations of the Bush administration, Joe Wilson
and his wife, and the two news villains responsible for initiating this
ruse; Bob Novak, and David Corn.
-
- 3. The damage to our natio for writing the New York Times
oped concerning the fake Niger documents. Revenge and political payback
is the motivation universally attributed to the Bush syndicate.
-
- It's bullshit. Joe Wilson was not smeared. He went from
relative obscurity to national fame, book deals, talk show circuit, hero
status accepting, freedom fighting, whistleblowing, saintly coronation.
None of it is deserved.
-
- Joe Wilson is in cahoots with the Bush Administration
along with David Corn, Bob Novak and Valerie Plame Wilson, a cast of spooks
who have only just been outed with the writing of this article. They've
carefully scripted this entire affair to shield themselves from prosecution
for monolithic treasons against US citizens and our military. Treasongate,
Rovegate, Leakgate, whatever you want to call it, is, in reality, an intricate
version of hide and seek where the "perpetraitors" have been
controlling both sides of the game.
-
- Regardless of the crimes committed by this and past administrations,
as long as their spin can divide the people on political lines, justice,
true justice, will never be served. If the crime can be given a political
spin, the perps can literally get away with any crime, even Treason. They've
carefully crafted both sides of this national debate to give both liberal
and conservative pundits enough ammunition to keep a heated firefight going
in the media. The smokescreen generated by this firefight has diverted
our attention from examining:
-
- Their media ruse has, so far, been a complete success.
Not one major publication has examined the controlling laws, Espionage
statutes found in 18 USC 793 and 794. They've steered the country away
from analyzing Plame's outing as espionage by repeating ad nauseam that
the motivation for the leak was "political payback." This has
enabled them to divide and conquer "we the people" along party
lines.
-
- Political payback can be spun, espionage cannot. This
is why Joe Wilson, David Corn and all of the liberal media have steered
wide of calling this leak exactly what it is, Treason:
-
- THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, JOSEPH WILSON, ROBERT NOVAK,
DAVID CORN,VALERIE PLAME ET ALS HAVE CONSPIRED TO EXPOSE NETWORKS OF GENUINE
INTELLIGENCE AGENTS AND THEIR SOURCES WHO WERE CLOSING IN ON TREASONOUS
ACTS PERPETRATED BY THE WHITE HOUSE TO FURTHER AN INSIDIOUS AGENDA OF EMPIRE
EXPANSION THROUGH STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM DESIGNED TO CREATE A THIRST
FOR REVENGE AND JUSTICE IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
-
- The meticulous outing of Plame and the media circus that
ensued was designed as a smokescreen to cloud the truth and the law while
they exposed CIA networks operating to stop WMD proliferation. Genuine
agents and sources were left out in the cold while targets were warned
and allowed to escape.
-
- This is not easy to comprehend. So it's imperative to
suspend judgment while you examine this. You must be an impartial juror.
Listen objectively to the facts. Analyze the application of those facts
to the law. Consider the motives of those involved and then look for MO
to back it up.
-
- WHAT LAWS ARE INVOLVED AND WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES?
-
- The one law everybody has heard of regarding this matter
is the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (IIPA). In my two
part series, TREASONGATE: The Controlling Law Part
1 Part
2, I explained that, despite the media feeding frenzy involved with
analyzing the IIPA, it is totally irrelevant with regards to the Plame
leak.
-
- [I strongly urge the reader to carefully study my previous
reports explaining these laws before continuing here.]
-
- The IIPA is an intricate piece of work that has a ton
of wiggle room while Title 18 of our United States Code, particularly 18
USC 793 and more importantly 794, the Espionage statutes, have virtually
no wiggle room for the perpetraitors responsible for leaking Plame's identity
(Novak) and her covert status (Corn).
-
- Ever since July 16th 2003, when David Corn first discussed
the applicability of the IIPA to these facts, the IIPA has been the sole
focus of discussion in the main stream media and the blogosphere.
-
- The concept that all of these spook perpetraitors put
their faith in was that if Joe Wilson was talking about the IIPA as the
controlling law, then the IIPA would be accepted, by the media and the
people, as the controlling law, since Joe Wilson, more than anybody, would
want to see the evil Bush administration put away for outing his CIA wife.
And when Joe Wilson issued statements to the effect that conviction under
the IIPA was probably not going to happen, the rest of us could just let
this blow over while a few Bush operatives were given slaps on the wrist.
-
- All the while, Joe Wilson was running protection for
the leakers because Wilson and his wife are Bush administration double
agent operatives who have something to hide, something big, something towering.
-
- THE LAW
-
- Let me give a short recap for those readers who are not
aware of the analysis
for 18 USC 794(b)
-
- 18 USC 794(b) carries a maximum penalty of death or life
in prison.
-
- 18 USC 794(b) mandates prosecution of anybody who, in
time of war, intentionally communicates information relating to the public
defense which might be useful to the enemy.
-
- Question 1: Were we in a time of war when CIA operative
Valerie Plame Wilson was outed?
-
- Answer: Yes. Despite recent attempts by the Bush administration
to shift the policy lingo from GWOT, "global war on terror",
to GSAVE,"global struggle against violent extremism", we were
"in time of war" back in June/July 2003. And our soldiers are
still dying on the same battlefield today. We are still "in time of
war". If you have any doubt, just ask the families of our soldiers
who died that battlefield. Ask them if we were/are in a time of war. Next
question.
-
- Question 2: Was information that related to the public
defense communicated?
-
- Answer: The information communicated to Bob Novak outed
a CIA operative who coordinated covert agents working on WMD proliferation
issues. Nothing could be more related to the "public defense".
The answer is yes.
-
- Question 3: Was the information intentionally communicated
to the enemy?
-
- Answer: Federal case law has consistently held that there
is no difference, for purposes of proving "intent", between communicating
the relevant information to a spy and communicating it to the press, since
the whole world will be notified of the information upon publication. The
answer is yes.
-
- Question 4: "Might" the information be useful
to the enemy?
-
- Answer: A CIA operative involved with WMD proliferation
and the name of a CIA front company used for such intelligence purposes
were exposed. This law does not require that the information communicated...
must be useful... to the enemy, 18 USC 794(b) only requires that the information...
might be useful... to the enemy. The answer is yes, the information might
be useful to the enemy.
-
- Question 5: Who is the enemy?
-
- Answer: The terrorists.
-
- Please note that the statute does not require the perp
to communicate directly to the enemy, 794(b) only requires that the perp
intends for the information to be communicated to the enemy.
-
- There's no wiggle room. Everybody in the Government who
holds a security clearance had to sign a on-disclosure
agreement which warns that they can be prosecuted under 18 USC 794
if they violate that agreement. Not that 794(b) requires the information
communicated to be classified, it doesn't.
-
- The non-disclosure agreement warns about violating 794(b),
so let's not pretend it's an obscure law. Everybody involved was aware
of it. This is the United States Code, federal law of the land.
-
- Once you understand 18 USC 794(b), air tight convictions
for the Plame leakers become apparent. There's nothing to argue about.
There's no wiggle room. The law was drafted to stop espionage, to stop
people from exposing our intelligence assets. Maybe you're familiar with
them; the CIA, NSA, FBI, departments of our Government we the people pay
hundreds of billions for, to protect us from being attacked here at home,
and to protect our soldiers abroad.
-
- 18 USC 794 has been used to put traitors away for life.
-
- It's the law of the land.
-
- Their ruse involved spinning the Plame leak as revenge
and political payback connecting it to the decision to go to war thereby
causing "we the people" to become divided. Then they threw a
complicated statute into the mix, the IIPA, which allows convincing arguments,
both for and against conviction under these facts, so the political smokescreen
expanded to an opaque impenetrable thickness.
-
- The national debate that went into the IIPA was intense.
Focus that same amount of media energy on 794(b), and there will be a genuine
revolution in this country. Imagine the talking head pundits stuck for
words, silenced by facts, unable to divide an educated population. Most
Americans, spanning the entire political spectrum, are capable of understanding
that these controlling federal laws, 18 USC 793 and 794, have been broken,
if those laws were sufficiently explained to them.
-
- Following such a national debate, US citizens will demand
to know why the Bush administration risked prosecution under such punishing
laws. And they will also demand to know why Joe Wilson hasn't been calling
for prosecution under these laws.
-
- Once we the people start asking the right questions,
the Government and media spin trance fails, they lose control of our minds,
and we begin to think for ourselves, to use our minds instead of allowing
our minds be used by the enemy.
-
- They created "wiggle room" where there was
no wiggle room by guiding your attention, from both liberal and conservative
media sources, to the irrelevant Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
-
- Violation of 18 USC 794(b) can lead to the death penalty
or life in prison, a much greater punishment than under the IIPA. So you
would expect that those involved with outing a CIA operative and a CIA
front company might think twice about breaking this law. And this leads
to the following questions about motivation which really get to the heart
of this intricate ruse:
-
- 1. WOULD THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION VIOLATE 18 USC 794 KNOWING
SUCH A VIOLATION COULD LEAD TO DEATH OR LIFE IN PRISON JUST TO "SMEAR"
JOE WILSON?
-
- No. They aren't' that stupid. These are intelligent people
who have procured the Executive Branch of the US Government. 18 USC 794
has put people like Aldrich Ames away for life. This is a very serious
law. Nobody in the Bush administration was going to break it just to bitch
slap Joe Wilson. That's the fecal toast Joe Wilson and David Corn originally
served over two years ago, a meal that has been uniformly consumed by America,
so please don't eat it anymore. It's a lie, and a rather bad one at that.
-
- Focus on the penalty; death or life in prison. The motivation
of a bitch slap does not fit the crime. The Bush administration must have
had a greater motivation to risk prosecution under 794(b).
-
- Furthermore, they had to know they were turning Joe Wilson
into a star the liberal media would canonize. They did no harm to Joe Wilson,
and they did no harm to his wife. This so called "outing" scandal
is actually cover for their conspiratorial treason, the betrayal of her
network and the work it was doing.
-
- Valerie Plame Wilson = Double Agent
-
- Plame and Wilson are double agents in the "Intelligence
war" going on between the treasonous Bush administration and divisions
of US Intelligence and the military.
-
- The Plame/Wilson double agent status becomes obvious
when you examine Joe Wilson's actions under the electron microscope of
motivation:
-
- 2. WHAT IS JOE WILSON'S MOTIVATION FOR NOT RAISING THE
ISSUE OF 18 USC 794?
-
- "Naming her this way would have compromised every
operation, every relationship, every network with which she had been associated
in her entire career. This is the stuff of Kim Philby and Aldrich Ames."
-
- That is a direct quote given by Joseph Wilson to David
Corn for the infamous (and treasonous) report
published on July 16, 2003,in The Nation; wherein Corn leaked Plame's "undercover"
status as a CIA officer.
-
- "This is the stuff of...Aldrich Ames."
-
- It's really quite an amazing quote which history may
record as being the smoking dung gun that toppled this administration and
put Joe Wilson and the other co-conspirators behind bars.
-
- USA, you've been hoodwinked big time.
-
- Aldrich Ames is serving life in prison for his violation
of 18 USC 794. He leaked the identity of several NOC CIA Officers to the
Soviets. So, Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV, if you are so outraged at the
Bush administration, why aren't you screaming for a prosecution of the
people responsible for outing your wife under the same statute? You've
compared the crimes of Aldrich Ames to those involved with the outing of
your wife, so why aren't you pounding your fist for the special prosecutor
to invoke the same law which put Ames away for life? You've never even
mentioned it.
-
- MOTIVATION
-
- Wilson certainly can't claim ignorance of the law. He's
issued detailed analysis of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act,
on the record, during a public Q&A at one of his glorious book signings,
recorded
by William Kaminsky, wherein Wilson discussed the intricacies of the IIPA
and explained in great detail that convictions under that act were unlikely.
He exhibited a great knowledge of that law while forwarding the diversionary
spin started by his pal, David Corn. From Kaminsky's
blog
-
-
- "Meeting Joe Wilson (Part 1 of 2)
-
- On Thursday night, the venerable and most definitely
left-leaning Harvard Book Store held a lecture/question and answer session/book
signing event with Ambassador Joseph Wilson...
-
- First of all, Ambassador Wilson has every confidence
in the dedication and prosecutorial skills of Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald.
-
- However, Wilson concedes a point many of the Administration's
defenders make: it will be extremely hard to convict anyone of violating
the most serious (and most often discussed) of the applicable laws, namely
the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 (United States Code,
Title 50, Sections 421-426). Rather, Wilson thought that a prosecutor wanting
a winnable case would have to settle for the weaker charge of disclosure
of classified information (United States Code, Title 18, Section 798)...While
technically disclosure of classified information can be a felony carrying
the same maximum penalty of a fine and 10 years imprisonment as violation
of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, it apparently can also be
prosecuted as a misdemeanor charge, and this is what Wilson thought likely..."
-
- Hey Joe, you're quick on your feet whipping out that
18 USC 798 softball law along with the IIPA, so why don't you flip a few
sections back to 793 and 794?
-
- Wilson might answer, "Well Spook, thing is, this
was a smear, I tell ya. I was shmeered, Spook. They shmeered me, man. They
wanted to hurt me and my CIA wife real bad because I'm an award winning
courageous patriot who stood up to their forgeries and told the world from
the beacon of the New York Times. It's not espionage. It's a smear campaign.
I don't think we really need to distract the population with the Espionage
act Spook, do we?"
-
- Well, Joe, I think we do need to distract the population.
I mean, after all, you told David Corn that one of our "star"
intelligence assets was outed thereby crippling many operations, scattering
agents to the four winds and possibly the grim reaper's door, crushing
national security. "This is the stuff of Aldrich Ames". Sorry
Joe, but motive, while an excellent tool of analysis, is irrelevant to
the determination of whether the Espionage laws were broken. The law doesn't
give a rats ass what the Bush administration's motive was for breaking
the law.
-
- The law does not provide a motive defense. They can tell
the judge and jury at trial, "Yeah, so we outed her network, but we
did it to shmeer Joe Wilson, not to cause damage to national security."
But the cold hard fact remains,18 USC 794 doesn't care. There's no "motive"
requirement. Sorry Joe, this is treason. You said it yourself, "This
is the stuff of Aldrich Ames". What an amazing quote.
-
- The cold, made of steel, unbendable law, 18 USC 794,
is the reason Wilson has been guiding American attention spans to the IIPA.
As long as we were focused on the IIPA, convictions would be very hard
to come by.
-
- Wilson was running protection.
-
- Back to Kaminsky's report on Wilson's book signing:
-
- "Wilson offered two reasons for his pessimism:
-
- 1. The Intelligence Identities Protection Act explicitly
says that it is a valid defense versus prosecution to claim an operative's
identity has previously been revealed...
-
- It is clear that the Administration's defenders intend
to use this defense...
-
- But anyways, when all is said and done, this isn't the
main reason why Ambassador Wilson is pessimistic about the prospects of
a successful prosecution under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
Instead, his main reason is:
-
- 2. Right at its outset, the Act qualifies that disclosing
a covert operative's identity is illegal only if it is done intentionally
and in the knowledge that the government is still actively maintaining
a cover for operative...
-
- Wilson said he believed that anyone accused under the
Act thus could successfully mount the defense that he or she knew only
that Valerie Plame was employed by the CIA and not that the CIA actively
maintained a cover (or covers) for her as a operative in the Clandestine
Service who was active in the last 5 years."
-
- Look at Wilson go. He's got that spin down pat. On the
one hand, he's literally crying in public over the outing of his CIA wife,
"If I could give you back your anonymity....", while on the other
hand, he creates the Bush admin defense all in one gasp of legal puke.
He exhibits a knowledge of various US Code as well as a perfect analysis
of the IIPA, while steering the entire country away from the controlling
law, 18 USC 794 and 793.
-
- Have a look at Joe Wilson's book, "The Politics
of Truth", and look for any mention of 18 USC 793 or 794. It's not
there.
-
- His books starts with a section called, "Anatomy
Of A Smear":
-
- "...a vindictive government has used the press in
order to try to destroy an opponent." (page 2)
-
- The Plame leak only made the Bush administration appear
guilty as sin regarding the Niger documents and the fraudulent reasons
for going to war, and I submit to you that this is exactly what the Bush
administration and its operatives intended. The decision to go to war was
a political issue, and the country is divided along party lines, so it's
safe for them to risk the appearance of guilt by "outing" Wilson's
wife and looking guilty as long as Wilson, Corn and everybody else repeats
the mantra that it was done for revenge, political payback, etc. But the
true motivation was to stop the agents she was working with from gathering
evidence of mass murder; past present and future.
-
- To smear Wilson is ridiculous considering the possible
penalty for Treason, and to smear him knowing it makes you look guilty
of fixing the intelligence is even more insane unless that's exactly what
you were trying to do...look insane.
-
- To out Plame and smear Wilson as a smokescreen for a
greater sin, a greater Treason, a Treason of past and future murder of
innocent citizens...now that is a motivation that warranted risking their
violation of 18 USC 794.
-
- Their gambit was centered on Wilson controlling the media
circus, steering everybody towards the IIPA, and away from 18 USC 794.
-
- If Wilson, cast in the starring role as the husband filled
with anger for the damage and danger put on his wife, was talking about
the IIPA, well then, who could argue with him? Who had more motivation
for wanting the leakers put away than Joe Wilson?
-
- Nobody,...if you believe this crap.
-
- And Joe Wilson not only took the baton from David Corn
regarding the IIPA, but he further protected the Bush leakers even from
prosecution under that irrelevant law by stating his opinion that convictions
were unlikely due to the "wiggle room" written into the IIPA.
-
- Mr. Wilson, you brought up the name Aldrich Ames, so
why don't you bring up the law he was convicted under? In the two plus
years this script (and that is exactly what he's reading from) has been
played out, you haven't mentioned the controlling law, 18 USC 794 and 793.
You haven't called for the people responsible for outing your wife and
her entire CIA network to be thrown in jail with Aldrich Ames for life.
No, instead you've conspired to fool the country into burying its head
in your smokescreen.
-
- Chris Matthews told Joe Wilson that Karl Rove said, "Wilson's
wife is fair game."
-
- From Wilson's book, page 1:
-
- " ' Wilson's wife is fair game.' Those are fighting
words for any man..."
-
- And you fight back with the lame Intelligence Identities
Protection Act, Mr. Wilson? Your actions don't back up your words. Your
motivation must be lacking since you could have responded in kind with
your own fighting words. Had you responded as follows, perhaps we could
believe you, Joe Wilson. Here's what Citizen Spook would have said:
-
- "The people who outed my wife are traitors, no different
than Aldrich Ames who was convicted under 18 USC 794. They deserve to be
put away for life in the same cell block for Treason."
-
- But you didn't say that Mr. Wilson. And if I'm wrong
about you and your wife, let's see you start saying it. Get in your Jaguar
and ride, bang the drums for Treason, Treason that exposed your wife endangering
her life and the lives of her network. Your family was cast in the spotlight
by the Bush administration who exposed your loved ones to dangerous covert
agents the world over. Why aren't you demanding justice and prosecutions
under 18 USC 794(b) for such a dastardly deed?
-
- Wilson's book references the IIPA on pages; xxxviii-xxxix,
xl, 4, 346, 349, 350-351, 358-360, 384-385, 388, 395-396, and 445. Do you
know how many times 18 USC 793 and 794 are mentioned? None, nada, zero.
Why do you think that is? Because Wilson never heard of these laws? No.
This CIA couple know the law inside out. And they know the carnage that
outing her caused to the operations and operatives she was overseeing,
people that trusted her whose lives were in her hands.
-
- From page 446 of Wilson's book:
-
- "We worry about our personal security, but there
is little we can do."
-
- But nobody dared publish a photo of Plame...until she
posed with her husband for the January '94 issue of Vanity Fair. Wasn't
it bad enough that her name got out, that her front company was exposed?
Why would she follow through by mugging for the camera in Vanity Fair?
Isn't that just putting her in more jeopardy? Isn't that making it even
easier for enemy agents both here and in foreign lands to reconcile her
likeness?
-
- You'd think, out of respect for her fellow agents she'd
lay low and stay out of the spotlight, but "Valerie was always a star
in her profession". (page 446)
-
- Now more than ever.
-
- It's open season on the NOCS she supervised, the NOCS
out there in the field gathering evidence on who?
-
- Who do you think?
-
- From page 447 of Wilson's book:
-
- "We had assumed that on the day the Novak article
appeared, every intelligence office in Washington, and probably all those
around the world, were running Valerie's name through their databases.
Foreign intelligence services would not attack us, but they might as well
threaten any contacts Valerie might have made in their countries, and they
would certainly be eager to unearth operations she might have been involved
in.
-
- International terrorist organizations were a different
story, however. There was a history of international terrorists attacking
exposed officers."
-
- So they go on the cover of Vanity Fair like this was
a bad episode of Jane Bond.
-
- And Wilson goes on the Daily Show for jokes with Jon
Stewart. From page 358:
-
- "Jon was so humorous that I found myself laughing
heartily right along with the audience..."
-
- From page 384:
-
- "An officer had been exposed, an act that threatened
many intelligence professionals." It's hilarious, isn't it, Mr. Wilson?
-
- In "The CIA at War", by Ronald Kessler, the
Vanity Fair photo was discussed on pages 344-345:
-
- "Their claims to have been victimized by the Bush
white house were destroyed when they agreed to be photographed sitting
in their Jaguar for the January issue of Vanity Fair. Wilson claimed that
the fact that his forty-year old wife wore sunglasses and a scarf disguised
her. But anyone she dealt with overseas could clearly recognize her..."
-
- " 'They risked undermining any possible prosecution
by their public statements and appearances,' said John L. Martin who, as
Chief of the Justice Department's counterespionage section, was in charge
of supervising leak investigations. 'The scarf and the sunglasses worn
in the Vanity Fair picture was a sham.' "
-
|
