rense.com



Investigators Seeking
Reasons For Levee Breaches
Corps Critics Want Probe To Be Independent

By John McQuaid and Bob Marshall
Staff Writers - The Times Picayune
10-2-5
 
As the Army Corps of Engineers begins an investigation into the causes of concrete floodwall breaches that swamped large portions of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, the stakes could not be higher.
 
If the failures are ultimately traced to flaws in design or construction, it would mean that a significant portion of Katrina's flooding could be blamed on human error. That could in turn spark a rush to hold individuals, institutions, and companies accountable; to file multibillion-dollar lawsuits from affected residents and businesses; and to make political recriminations.
 
Some Corps critics already are questioning whether the Corps - with its reputation and billions of dollars in financing on the line - has a conflict of interest in investigating itself.
 
"It will have no credibility. If I were the Corps of Engineers I wouldn't want the job. You would want to have the best and most independent analysis of something like this," said Steve Ellis, vice president for programs at Taxpayers for Common Sense, an advocacy group that has often criticized the Corps' big projects as wasteful.
 
Ivor van Heerden, the deputy director of the LSU Hurricane Center who is studying the levee breaches with other LSU scientists, says the Corps already has compromised some evidence with its temporary fixes and should not conduct a completely internal investigation. "That would be the worst thing they could do," he said.
 
Hurricane Katrina's storm surge overwhelmed hurricane levees to the east of the city and in the Industrial Canal. But further west along the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain, the floodwaters were lower. It's not clear whether the surge topped floodwalls in the 17th Street and London Avenue areas. If the walls were not topped but failed anyway, engineers say that could point to a problem in the design, construction or maintenance of the structures.
 
The only way to conclusively determine what happened is to conduct a forensic investigation, which involves collecting evidence and documents and making a detailed analysis of what led to the failures. The Corps has announced it's doing that, but has offered no details. Corps officials did not respond Thursday to requests for more information on the probe.
 
The issue raises a serious concern for residents returning to New Orleans. If there are structural flaws in other floodwalls, they could pose a risk in another storm.
 
The investigation has been slow to start. Corps officials have been dealing with more urgent problems, such as pumping water out of the city and repairing the breaches. Some of those activities could pose problems for the investigation, LSU researchers say.
 
Temporary berms built by the Corps at the sites of levee breaks have covered, and may have destroyed, evidence crucial to the investigation, Van Heerden said.
 
"Some of the critical evidence to finding out what went wrong so we can make sure this doesn't happen again - evidence we saw on our first inspections - is under that berm, or it may already have been taken away," van Heerden said after inspecting the levee breaks this week. He said he has inspected the breaks 10 times since Katrina battered New Orleans on Aug. 29, including five trips on foot.
 
Engineers say such an investigation of the levee failures probably will try to reconstruct the history of the affected floodwalls from the choice of design through the construction process and the rise of Katrina's storm surge. That will entail examining documents, and the deployment of engineering experts in soil compaction, steel and concrete construction and fluid dynamics.
 
"It's a terribly interesting, difficult forensic enterprise," said Gerald Galloway, a professor of engineering at the University of Maryland and former Corps brigadier general. "They will need to look at all the remainder of the walls that were there, doing a complete analysis of everything that could have been a factor or compounding this ... They will build some hypotheses and test them. It's a question of patience."
 
Galloway, who chaired a commission that investigated the causes of the 1993 Midwest floods, said such an investigation might take six to eight months.
 
But critics say if the evidence points to human error, it may be difficult for the Corps to point the finger at itself or contractors it employed. The Corps and its contractors can be sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act, said Mark Dombroff, a Washington lawyer and former chief of the torts branch of the Justice Department who defended the Corps in court actions.
 
The Corps also has often been criticized by a number of impartial government studies for tweaking the numbers in economic impact studies to facilitate its projects.
 
"They found the corps manipulated data, used outdated engineering and economic tools, and one colonel ordered a subordinate to change a number he didn't like," said Scott Faber, a lawyer with the group Environmental Defense, who monitors the Corps. "There is no doubt in my mind that the Corps will not find itself at all responsible for the failure of the levees. It is ludicrous for the administration or Congress to expect the agency to review its own conduct."
 
The Corps may not be completely alone.
 
Already, a number of investigations are under way, but it's not clear how detailed some will be. A House select committee on the Katrina disasters intends to investigate the breaches, a spokesman said. The Senate Homeland Security Committee will dispatch investigators to the city next week to examine the levee breaches and other issues. The American Society of Civil Engineers is assembling a team of forensic experts to inspect the affected sites.
 
Faber said that congressional committees - whose members may have Corps projects in their districts - may also be reluctant to make the agency look bad.
 
Faber, Ellis and van Heerden all said they would like to see some sort of independent federally authorized commission look into the levee breaches, in addition to the Corps.
 
"This investigation should include the Corps, but it also must be totally independent to ensure there is accountability but also public acceptance for whatever it discovers and recommends," van Heerden said.
 
http://www.nola.com
 

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros