- There's a recent article by one Bruce Bower at the hijacked
mainstream's *science*-shill *ScienceSnooze.org* site. It raises, yet
again, that tired old fable of "Sleep Paralysis" as the bee's
knees explanation for an abduction phenomenon steadfastly refusing to go
away, still... ...hence Bower's re-raising of the tedious "Sleep Paralysis"
canard, at all... it would seem.
-
- http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050709/bob9.asp
-
- ...Slickly appointed, and well larded with seemingly
bulletproof citations from ostensibly conclusive references, the smothering
cowl of insipient sentience and insentient *science* is dragged over our
lay sensibilities once again. Do these canted trolls ~never~ tire, reader?
-
- ...And the ready answer is: No. They can't tire... they
can't afford to! Why? Because they live an uneasy hell of having to be
right ~every~ single time, even if they have to dissemble, obfuscate, and
mislead to do so. Alien Abduction proponents only have to be right ~once~,
remember ... and it seems likely, to this writer, that they have been right...
already... many, many times. Bower ponderously effects to sow that obligatory
seed of doubt, yet again.
-
- In his aforementioned plodding charade of egregious explication
Bower is blithely ~unctuous~, reader, with regard to his predicted prosecution
of the patent, plain, and portentously prosaic. Then he dismisses in one
indiscriminate paragraph, very explicably ~without~ the glib citation used
elsewhere, the serious work of one man in the field decidedly contrary
to his sophomoric suppositions and deleterious dissertations.
-
- That man is the late Doctor John Mack.
-
- Bower's ~insult~ to the braver man's honor and memory
in unconscionable... forgetting the preponderance of 6 levels of evidence
near ~dictating~ an otherwise nearer ~certainty~ of ufological reality...
and some ~truth~, in this writer's opinion, to many of Dr. Mack's considered
observations ...
-
- It REMAINS, reader, that Bower didn't use ~any~ of the
quality abduction literature in his one-sided research... in his trite
and otherwise hackneyed article... ...Not Jacobs, not Hopkins, and most
assuredly, ~not~ Dr. Mack... among others.
-
- Moreover, a study of the references actually used in
Bowers' tediously written mechanism of cant, bias, and denial ~plainly~
shows a prejudice for a reflection of citations that are not really talking
about the same subject, that are ignoring peer reviewed works decidedly
contrary to Bower's self-fulfilling theme, and insouciantly contriving
to impose a back-stepping spin on the subject of Dr. Mack's ~much~ braver
study... a spin as unbalanced as it is duplicitous... a spin as uninformed
as it was cowardly.
-
- Susan Clancy? Didn't she just open her mouth, insert
her foot, and then echo her abundant cluelessness... ...her ~sullen~ ignorance
and ~uninformed~ intransigence... ...all over the known universe via the
Larry King show? ~This~ was a quality reference?
-
- Mr. Bower, it would seem, is no more than a full tilt
facilitation of imperfect pedantry and a max zoom bionic ~dweeb~ of fatuous
credulity... He gives real science a bad name... and eats his ~own~ foot...you
know? On reflection, for all the flash and dazzle of the mainstream push
behind him? In the opinion of this writer, he handily invalidates himself
and the science he would pretend to champion... only.
-
- Verily, reader... This is science? No, give me a whole
~roomful~ of dodgy guys named "George," a hell on Earth in its
own right, but preferable to Bower's two steps back and a step to the side
of shined-on and simplistic sophistry...
-
- Consider... a sizable proportion of innocent persons
affected by an abduction scenario are affected from a ...wide awake...
state, Sir or Madam, in broad daylight... while the intrepid Mr. Bower
would pretend all these persons were just confused about mere night terrors
and bad dreams. Credulity, indeed, reigns at "ScienceSnooze"...
eh, reader?
-
- Feh!
-
- alienview@adelphia.net
- www.AlienView.net
|
