- EVIDENCE OF A SOLID SOLAR SURFACE, AND NOT PLASMA SPHERE
-
- Several days ago a strange right angled darkened area
appeared on the sun. This odd shape is visible at various shorter wavelengths
of radiation, and not visible light. Although not quite as distinct as
it was two days ago, the angled dark area is still quite visible. It is
moving toward the "right" each day with solar rotation, yet staying
relatively intact. If the sun is supposed to be the "boiling, chaotic
seething mass" everyone thinks it is, it should be impossible for
this shape to remain. But in this case, pictures don't lie.
-
-
-
- An image above taken at 19.5 nm on August 16
2005. This is a wavelength near the border between ultraviolet and gamma
rays.
-
-
-
- A past article about strange solar patterns [1]
written on June 28th 2005. It included the above notated image taken at
28.4nm.
-
-
- THEORIES ABOUT THE SUN'S REAL STRUCTURE
-
- There are recent theories that the sun is not a massive
sphere composed of superheated plasma, but is instead made of ferrite.
Ferrite is a form of iron, and is naturally black in color. Transformers
and coils in electronics for higher frequencies are made from pressed powder
of this material. For a lengthy and detailed paper on ferrite solar theory
see [2].
-
- Considerable evidence exists that our sun is "alive",
and gives off life-sustaining energy [3]. If both the life-force and ferrite
theories are true, we may have the infant beginnings of an understanding
about how the life force is generated. Neither of these theories conflicts
with the other. One theory is physical, and the other is based on energy.
-
- From the last century, Russian scientists learned how
to combine ferrite and magnet segments into a ring shape to create torsion
fields. When spun, a torsion vortex field is generated. (Note - these fields
can have detrimental health effects according to researchers, as well as
the possibility of injury if not constructed properly. The spinning field
generated by such devices has a negative effect on the life force of human
beings. The field of an ordinary permanent magnet not in motion has no
negative effects and can heal broken bones.)
-
- Despite other evidence about our star's actual structure,
mainstream physics continues to teach that current detailed theory about
the star's structure is a fact. [4] Even without a known way to prove it!
At the moment, the ferrite theory is out in front with the best visual
evidence to back it up. By superimposing many images together from the
sun's shorter wavelengths and using doppler radar, patterns of the actual
sun's surface have emerged. See paper [2] for more details and images about
ferrite theory.
-
-
- http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/9905/horsehead_noao_big.jpg
-
-
-
-
- Horsehead Nebula, taken by Hubble
-
-
- If the ferrite theory is true, then the images from Hubble
showing star formation are not what they appear to be. We are millions
of light years from the Horsehead Nebula [5]. This massive collection of
dust and gas is often referred to as a star factory by many astronomers.
From this distance, it is not possible to prove the ferrite theory with
any known technology. Remote viewing might verify it, but it is not considered
as a real science discipline. Therefore, it would not be accepted.
-
- FERRITE THEORY PLACES FUSION ENERGY PROGRAMS IN PERIL
-
- There is a far reaching negative effect caused by the
ferrite theory. ALL of the fusion reactor research taking place on earth
today is squarely based on a classical star model. More and more evidence
is emerging that physicists are WRONG about the sun's mechanism. Even outside
of the fact that self-sustaining fusion has not yet taken place. The implications
for this are massive - it could bring to a halt all fusion research taking
place today - even reactor designs slated for future research and research.
Billions of dollars of funding would vanish with it. The truth about science
research is that it has always been about money. Though few scientists
will admit it.
-
- It is unlikely that an entire planet of full physicists
will admit they were wrong since the beginning of physics, more than two
centuries ago. This would do serious damage to their arrogant reputation
as always being right. And, this new model may finally explain why fusion
on earth could never be accomplished. Many of us have already known it
would be ridiculous to attempt to create a tiny sun on earth using the
superheated plasma model. Some compare fusion containment to standing on
beach ball without falling off, or squeezing a handful of Jello. The plasma
will always find an imperfection in the containment field, and with it
a way out.
-
- Changing the solar theory will take an icon in the physics
field such as Michio Kaku or Steven Hawking (not likely.) These people
may be able to advance and successfully promote theory toward a real solar
model. However, we can be certain that those whose research dollars (and
careers) are in peril will fight the ferrite theory most vigorously. No
matter how good the evidence is.
-
- To those people who stand by their unproven, classical
stellar model I say this: "Show us your working, self-sustaining reactor
based on classic solar theory."
-
- They cannot, despite more than 50 years of building endless
multi-billion dollar toys.
-
- Perhaps physicists should be modeling their next reactor
on a ferrite model...
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
-
-
-
- [1] - http://www.rense.com/general66/sunc.htm
- [2] - http://www.etwebsite.com/TheSurfaceOfTheSun.pdf
- [3] - http://www.rense.com/general67/sun.htm
- [4] - http://solar.physics.montana.edu/YPOP/Spotlight/SunInfo/Structure.html
- [5] - http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990519.html
-
- http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/2001/12/
|
