- Hello to all email update members,
-
- I will be out of the United States on business for most
of the next three or four months, but will continue to send these email
updates during that time.
-
- It is a good sign that most people caught the metaphor
I used with the names LIDDY and LIBBY, but most did not suspect my reason
for doing so. Well, today you will learn why I used that simple metaphor
and connected the two men. They are indeed connected, if only by circumstance.
-
- Most refreshing was that over ninety per cent of readers
not only caught it, but then responded to me and pointed out that G. Gordon
Liddy and Lewis "Scooter" Libby are not related by blood. My
linking of these two was a metaphor insofar as each man thinks that doing
wrong for the office of the President of the United States is good and
honorable. That their names are so similar is only a coincidence, but
worthy of note. One believed that doing wrong for Richard Nixon was the
right thing to do, while the other apparently believing that doing wrong
for George W. Bush was the right thing to do. G. Gordon Liddy, the older
of the two, is a former intelligence agent and military man who believed
that Richard Nixon could do no wrong and that anything was permissible
to keep him in power. I. Lewis Libby, a "never put his life on the
line" PNAC co-founder, also apparently believes that any means, however
devious, justifies the end. He is a student of Wolfowitz and a Straussian
Troskyite rather than a true conservative. With Libby the game is about
empowerment of the Neocons, the Likudists, and the Troskyites who have
a world vision that I believe 99.999% of all Americans reject or would
reject if they knew the truth of the matter. Libby's loyalties might lie
more with Israel than the United States, just as they appear to lie with
Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and a host of other Neocons
whom George W. Bush has appointed to key administration positions.
-
- The LIDDY and LIBBY matter was also a pop quiz and the
class passed with all A's and B's for paying attention. The metaphor is
"like father, like son" and it applies to the Bush Family in
spades as you are about to learn. They cornered Liddy and Nixon went down,
now they have cornered Libby and I think the Bush Regime will fall in due
time.
-
- I also used the LIBBY and LIDDY metaphor to flush out
a few infiltrators into the email list. As predicted, some of them did
expose themselves and have been deleted from future email updates. There
was a huge difference in friendly emails that either questioned the LIDDY
and LIBBY spelling or that they are not related, and some who chose to
use what they thought was an opening to slap me around via emails like
many keyboard cowards do. The obvious bashers and trashers have been eliminated
and we move on.
-
- Our nation is supposedly one of laws, and those laws
apply to all, or should. However, for the past forty years many have worked
diligently to insulate the Office of President of the United States from
those very laws, but not for security reasons in the literal sense of physical
security. What those people fear is that American citizens will find out
the extent to which the Presidency has evolved into something it should
not be.
-
- One of the biggest problems in this nation is how the
Office of President of the United States has changed. It is now somewhat
like the position of the "Don" in the Mafia. The President is
now the head of a criminal cabal intent on plundering the U.S. Treasury
as if it were some entitlement of the office. That is why certain wealthy
élite donate up to $500 million to elect the next president, for
their "rate of return" is many times that amount if they are
in the inner circle. George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George Bush are
three clear examples of that phenomenon, and the following information
shows to what extent they have led the cabal in theft of funds totaling
into the hundreds of billions. That money went to an élite few rather
than to the common good.
-
- In Washington, D.C., people like Liddy and Libby are
a dime a dozen. They are the buffers around the "Don" POTUS
to protect the head thief from being held accountable. Massive amounts
of money were spent to get the president elected and there are some that
will do anything to see that the Head Thief does not get held accountable
for anything. They [Liddy and Libby] are more alike than their similar
names. Their sense of right and wrong is compromised when protecting something
that the laws were never intended to protect. They call it "executive
privilege" but in many instances it is merely a means to avoid criminal
prosecution for wrongful acts and covering up RICO activity at the highest
levels of our government. It is a deadly waltz between our government
and the special interests trying to compete for federal moneys and ways
to extract more from the American workforce and public treasury.
-
- That is in part what is wrong with Washington, D.C. Many
in power there have lost sight of what is good and honorable. They have
sold their souls, so to speak, and repeat the mantra that "greed is
good" for America and that the end justifies the means. They conduct
themselves in sleazy, dishonorable and illegal ways and then spin it so
that Americans will think they are working diligently to do what is best
for America. Sadly, far too many Americans trust their government implicitly
and believe far too much of what they hear and read from major media.
It is a function of chaos theory to keep the masses busy with trivia and
misdirection while they plunder at will.
-
- They have people like Liddy and Libby who will do anything,
right or wrong, for the President. Even if that means the complete devastation
of our health, our economic security and our freedom, that is okay with
the leaders in Washington and the wealthy élite who now rule through
an essentially "puppet" government. Our national destiny has
been taken over by Big Pharma, Big Defense and Big Oil, international banks,
Wall Street, and other powerful, interlocked interests. To hell with poor
and middle-class Americans! The scheme is all about profits, even if the
actions (the means) to get to an objective (the end) are blatantly illegal.
They honestly think that if they keep us doped up with enough easy credit
and money supply, they can steal whatever they wish. Some of them even
think keeping America doped with mind altering drugs and bogus news on
TV is okay, too. They view us regular Americans as a cash crop, whether
that production comes from real economic activity and growth or is generated
with national debt on our account, it profits them and their illegal schemes.
You must use your critical faculty and ponder a Bush administration that
has used taxpayer dollars to create entirely fictitious news stories to
mislead you and the rest of the world. Everything happens for a reason,
and in the capitol the goal is to deflect attention away from the massive
amounts of graft and corruption going on as business as usual.
-
- Those officials who are abusing government power know
that as long as citizens continue to quarrel over family values versus
liberal ideals-or over abortion, or gay marriage, or other distractions
du jour-they can continue to mislead us all while plundering the U.S. Treasury
and other important institutions. They have done it successfully for years
and will continue to do so until Americans stand up in the tens of millions
and put a stop to it.
-
- If you have a knot in your gut about this entire GWOT
[global war on terror], our "defense" and energy policies, our
misdirected priorities as a nation, and the endless veil of secrecy in
Washington on both sides of the aisle, please allow me to clue you in about
something. Homeland Security does not exist to protect this nation or
you from foreign terrorists. Homeland Security exists to protect this government
from the wrath of American citizens that are slowly waking up to the realities
of our government. They have not only declared war on Islam and oil bearing
nations, they have declared war on American citizens too.
-
- Ask yourself: when was the last time you saw legislation
or policy come out of Washington, D.C. that was not a rip-off, a scam,
or another "scandal-gate"? Our nation's capitol has become the
author of endless acts of brazen greed, travesties of justice, and an embarrassment
to all of us, We the People. Just at this moment in history, we have Tom
DeLay indicted under the racketeering statutes, Frist under criminal investigation
for stock fraud relating to a blind trust, Libby indicted on five felony
counts, Larry Franklin indicted for spying for a foreign power , AIPAC
under close scrutiny, and numerous others individuals and institutions
in the cross-hairs of Federal and State investigators. That the President's
men lied to us about Iraq is now so blatantly clear that even the party
faithful are beginning to awaken and voice their complaints.
-
- In the book I wrote, "One-Way Ticket to Crawford,
Texas", I laid out the case that the world's foremost financial terrorist
is the rogue government of the United States of America, backed by some
major corporations. Financial terrorism is the leading cause of all other
forms of terrorism, for it takes away hope and the ability to make a better
life for our own citizens and those of other nations. Elements of our
government and its intelligence apparati excel in that kind of terrorism,
and that is exactly why our nation is passionately hated in many parts
of the world. We take away hope in foreign lands, and now our government
is brazen enough to take away hope here within our own borders. It is
not the people of the United States that are hated: it is our rogue government,
its policies, and its wealthy élitist insiders that both foreigners
and we as citizens see as the perpetrators. Many Latin-American countries
are resisting the ratification of the FTAA because their people fear, due
to firsthand experience, the way our government and major corporations
collude to abuse other nations, purportedly in our name. That profitable,
illegal and immoral collusion is protected by an artful front at the expense
of anyone who gets in the way of the scam.
-
- Those in power seduce many in the electorate by offering
lower taxes and vague talk of "family values", but those things
are merely bait to get votes. On the other side of the aisle, those in
power shout about social injustices and civil liberties without realizing
that their own side of the aisle shares responsibility. If the republicans
or democrats are not certain they can get a majority in the Red State/Blue
State war, they think nothing of rigging the election to achieve their
ends. Hundreds of billions of dollars depend on those elections for the
enrichment and further empowerment of the élite masters. Many Americans
fear higher taxes, while the thing they should fear is the hundreds of
billions and trillions that are plundered while CNN and FOX News assure
us that our government is in charge and made up of trustworthy people.
Nothing could be further from the truth. We have watched while the prostrate
media hold up sleazy, corrupt politicians as if they were great Americans.
-
-
- In my last email update I made a reference to our national
debt. That is a huge political problem and a clear, undeniable example
of fiscal irresponsibility on the part of our elected government. It is
a problem of staggering proportions that our national leaders have not
had the guts to face and deal with at any time over the past twenty-five
years. They ignore it because the "right people" profit immensely
from entrenched policies and do not want to change the status quo. They
spend millions establishing those policies to benefit themselves, but the
process is a detriment to you, the tax-paying citizen.
-
- As indicated in the chart below, our national debt (on
balance sheet debt only, or reported debt) skyrocketed under Reagan from
slightly over $1 trillion dollars to about $2.4 trillion, or an increase
of about 240% in just 8 years. We may attribute part of that increase
to the extremely high interest rate costs that soared to over 14% on U.S.
Treasury bonds and during most of Reagan's first term averaged around 11%
to 12% on U.S. bonds and prime lending rates that went to above 21%. The
interest expense alone was large enough to put most nations under for good
financially. Another strategy, formulated and executed by Big Defense,
assured that hundreds of billions would flow to the right parties who had
helped Reagan into the presidency. Remember Star Wars, the economic warfare
we waged against Russia to precipitate the collapse of their economy?
Even in the high interest rate environment, our government launched an
economic war of defense spending and spent hundreds of billions to achieve
an dubious end. We got stuck with the tab. It was an example of economic
"growth" at the expense of the commonwealth, in the form of national
debt accruing to us, the taxpayers. That strategy lined certain pockets
richly. The $150 billion savings and loan bail out was a mere blip compared
to the total $1.4 trillion increase in our national debt.
-
- In fact, if you look closely at chart below (Figure 1:
Unites States National Debt), you will see that the Reagan administration
did a good job of keeping the growth of the GNP soundly proportional to
the growth of national debt and headed in the same direction even during
a period when interest rates and inflation were out of control. It was
only during the first Bush administration, and the Clinton and second Bush
administrations, that the growth of National Debt as a percentage of GNP
careened out of control. This is without factoring in the high interest
rates of the early 1980's or inflation. Clinton even did a reasonably
good job during his first term but during the second term matters got out
of control. Then along came George W. Bush.
-
- During the single-term George H.W. Bush administration,
the national debt escalated from around $2.4 trillion to $4.2 trillion,
or a $1.8 trillion increase in just four years in office. I have often
referred to that increase jokingly as proof that GHWB is dyslexic, since
the numbers merely reversed. However, the situation is more complicated
than that alone. If you are old enough to remember the first Bush administration,
recall that the pathetic domestic economic policies stood out above all
else. Americans were hurting financially and that administration did not
come up with a single idea or plan to alleviate that hurt. Why? Bush
was intent on a war with Iraq and many parties conspired literally to fabricate
that war because of the huge Big Defense spending it would create. Like
father, like son. The domestic economic policies of George W. Bush are
just as shoddy as those of his father's administration. I remember all
too well G.H.W. Bush urging us to "stay the course", while our
economy floundered and the Big Oil and Big Defense firms raked in cash
by the truckload while most of America was suffering.
-
- Then Bill Clinton came into office and cut back on Big
Defense spending and tried to address the runaway spending of Washington,
D.C. He targeted everything but "social" programs. If you completely
believe as a partisan Liberal or Progressive that Clinton lowered our National
Debt, you might not know that spending through debt under Clinton escalated
from about $4.2 trillion to just shy of $6 trillion during his 8 years
in office, or an increase in national debt of over 30%. That adds up to
another $1.8 trillion loaded onto the back of the taxpayer. The percentage
of national debt to GDP dipped only slightly due to one reason; the hyperactivity
of the IT boom, much of which is now known to have been based on rampant,
criminal fraud in U.S. corporations. The corporate fraud that reared its
head in the current Bush Administration started during the 1990s during
the Clinton Administration and was considerably aided by three acts taken
by Clinton and the then controlled Democratic Congress:
-
- . The 1994 Bankruptcy reform bill that eliminated shareholder
rights in the bankruptcy courts. That made tout schemes very profitable
for many, very damaging to many Americans; and . The elimination of RICO
as a remedy for treble damages and disgorgement of stolen property (stock
fraud cases) (i.e. - your hard earned money invested into an endless stream
of fraudulent companies and no way to force them to surrender it under
court order); and . The SEC accounting rule change where corporate fraud
could easily be covered up and any company could make any "tout"
to get your money so long as they put in the disclaimer statement at the
bottom of the "tout PR news release".
-
- The full force of these changes partly affected Clinton's
second term. In a nutshell, those changes in the law have sold us out to
the corporate and special interests and exposed us to their predatory moves.
Such changes have functionally legitimized the theft of billions of dollars
and left us, the taxpayers, dangerously vulnerable to criminal conduct
in the common markets. Now savvy thieves can steal all they want and in
most instances end up only with fines. They have removed the ability through
the courts to take back what was literally stolen from you. Witness the
no-bid contracts of Halliburton and other corporations, and the actions
of those who support them. That is the new "Rule of Law" and
makes us a nation with no regard for the law when it comes to concentration
of capital into the hands of an élite few malefactors.
-
- The purported $1.6 trillion surplus from the Clinton
administration was estimated using fabricated market numbers of fraudulent
companies; i.e. Enron, Global Crossing, Williams Communications Group,
WorldCom, Adelphia, Tyco, et cetera. These were the kind of companies
that drove the GNP numbers upon which the Clinton administration based
its rosy predictions. The fraud was eventually discovered to be a staggering
one: the huge Clinton surplus was illusory at best. Some would call such
accounting and projections to be smoke and mirrors. I call it knowledge
of a crime in progress. Doing nothing about it as the highest elected official
in this land is not far short of treason. Based on my firsthand experience
in these affairs over the past 15 years, I also maintain that what Clinton
and his circle did aided and abetted RICO, for that is exactly what it
was. Many millions of Americans are much poorer because of it. The alleged
$1.6 trillion surplus was more than snuffed out by the $1.8 trillion increase
in National Debt.
-
- Next we get Bush Junior, a man with an MBA that must
stand for "My Belligerent Administration" for it surely cannot
stand for anything related to higher education or understanding of fiscal
matters. Under this Bush administration the national debt has escalated
from approximately $5.8 trillion to $8 trillion and is projected to be
at $10 trillion by the time he leaves office. The rate of economic growth
fueled by our National Debt has escalated, as has the lining of the right
pockets. That the money is being concentrated into the hands of the few
is the problem. The growth depends solely if one is a Bush insider or
one of us regular Americans that are finding it harder every day to make
ends meet. Those figures represent an almost 30% increase in National
Debt in 4 years and by the time he leaves office a 40% increase. Combine
Bush I and Bush II we are talking about a 50% increase in National Debt
due to two failed presidencies. The $2.2 trillion that Bush has already
racked up is the largest single increase ever, and nothing is happening
as a result of it except just certain firms lining their pockets are our
expense. By the time Bush leaves office, this fiscally irresponsible person
will have increased our national debt by $4.2 trillion and far more than
his father and Clinton combined, and just like his father nothing to show
for it but National Debt.
-
- That this nation might choose another Bush in the form
of Jeb Bush with the prior track records of his father and brother is inconceivable.
When one clearly understands the real agenda of Bush & Company, one
sees that oil and defense spending will continue to rack up staggering
amounts of debt. In these administrations there is no hesitation to wage
wars based on false pretenses in order to escalate the growth of national
debt even faster.
|