rense.com


Global Dimming - Hidden
Chemtrail Connection?
 
By Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net|
2-14-6
 
For many years scientists have noticed that the intensity of sunlight around the globe has been decreasing. Studies have quietly proved this is happening to our beautiful blue marble. To date, not one study has been publicized which connects the dimming problem with high altitude chemtrail spraying. Such a study is not likely, since no researcher will bite the hand that feeds them. Yet, many researchers must already be aware of the connection if they performed good science, and looked at causes for the problem. But we'll take another look at this issue and include other factors.
 
THE SATELLITE THAT WAS NEVER LAUNCHED
 
Scientists wanted a stationary satellite to monitor the dimming problem in order to obtain accurate data. Collected data from space will be free from numerous errors and problems inherent in ground-based observations. Such a satellite was planned for launch in 2001, but along came that terrible day in September which caused a postponement. The new bird would be called the Deep Space Climate Observatory, and it was first proposed back in the 1990s by Al Gore. It was planned to be a geostationary satellite which would monitor the entire side of the earth illuminated by the sun. [1]
 
When Columbia was destroyed, it further delayed the program.
 
The observatory project was finally finished off with a stroke of a pen when NASA cancelled the satellite project in early 2006 "for priorities and budget reasons". The pen is mightier than the sword, and it apparently carries more power than common sense.
The dimming of sunlight will create food chain problems, crop failures and water supply and weather problems as less water is evaporated from the oceans. But apparently to NASA this issue isn't important.
 
NOAA and NASA SILENT
 
One would also think that NOAA would sit up and take notice. NOAA stands for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. If any branch of the government should be speaking out, it should be them. Yet all we hear from them is silence.
 
As of this writing, on noaa.gov we see "NOAA REPORTS RECORD WARM JANUARY ACROSS THE U.S. WARMER TEMPERATURES RESULT IN LOWER RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DEMAND" as their big headline. One doesn't need to be a scientist to make that discovery. In the north-central and north-east United States, people are now burdened by whopping utility bills that have increased their price per cubic ft. of natural gas about 40% - even though many of these utilities take gas straight out of the ground and were never affected by Katrina.
 
Someone must ask the question - "How do utilities get away with this?" What are the complex implications of global dimming?
According to one Chinese study, 3.7 watts of energy were lost per square yard in China in the past 50 years. Five hundred ground based instruments across that country were used to collect data for the long term study. This is probably happening globally as well.
 
FROM THE A-BOMB CO-FATHER: YET ANOTHER BRIGHT IDEA?
 
The infamous Teller paper in 1997 titled "Global Warming and the Ice Ages: Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change" was also published in the Wall Street Journal as the article "The Planet Needs a Sunscreen." [2] It theorized that scattering high altitude metallic particles such as aluminum oxide or barium oxide would help reflect sunlight back into space to slow global warming. (More details about heavy metals can be found at [3].)
 
Is it merely a coincidence that heavy metals are found in chemtrails today? Internet photos and data about chemtrails date back more than 10 years. Clifford Carnicom has gathered more data on this subject, than perhaps any other researcher.
 
Would the Chinese be thrilled to find out that American-made chemtrails are accelerating their dimming problem? And if the Chinese are having this problem, it follows that the remainder of the world to a greater or lesser degree. Could it be possible that the satellite program was cancelled because it would expose the impact of chemtrail spraying on the entire planet?
 
Can it all just be a coincidence - or are there forces at work to keep a lid on chemtrail creation for weather control purposes? If military-owned weather control technology is supposedly for the global good - then why are government agencies so tight-lipped about this illegitimate program?
 
_____
 
A frequent contributor, Ted Twietmeyer is an inventor, patent holder and engineer who has worked in defense and NASA projects for more than 20 years. He also has written a  startling new book about Mars which can be found at http://www.data4science.net/book
 
REFERENCES:
[1] http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=1566139
[2] http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/waynehall.html
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metals

 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros