rense.com


Doyle Rebuts Smears,
False Data In
'Bird Flu Fiction'

From Patricia Doyle, PhD
dr_p_doyle@hotmail.com
3-7-6 
 
Hello Jeff -
 
It would seem that there is now an endless supply of false bird flu information circulating the internet, and many posts which include ad hominem attacks on me. The lastest is a post titled 'Bird Flu Fiction.' As the primary article is fowarded around the internet via email it has picked up even more slanderous accusations about me. Most importantly, the article, itself, is fatally-flawed. I attach it at the end bottom of this page.
 
First and for those who are either clueless or prone to buying into the trash on the net without checking to verify...
 
Although I have taken yearly USAMRIID Ft. Deterick seminars on chemical and biological terrorism preparedness, as have many other health professionals, I am NOT a government agent, have never been a CIA agent, NSA agent or a zionist backed 'infiltrator.' I am, however, an American citizen doing her best to stay current on all the data and inform honestly and accurately in this age of internet insanity -- which is precisely what genuine infiltrators and agents are trained to do.
 
As you know, I took these seminars to learn about preparing for a chemical/biological/nuclear event on our soil. I used the Army's information I obtained from the seminars for one reason: to help inform the American public to the very best of my ability on such events. I have spent the better part of a decade sharing information on this subject as well as emerging infectious diseases on your program and site, and my own emerging diseases message board. I firmly believe a well-informed public will be one that does NOT panic when an event, whether man-made or naturally-occurring, takes place. We all need to be armed with information. I have spent this time, even though quite ill, doing radio interviews and either authoring articles or fowarding articles written by others to you for your wonderful site.
 
I reprint below the latest article to arrive in my email box. The article entitled "Bird Flu Fiction" which has been circulating via email, and as it runs through the net grist mills, like a snowball, it has picked up various remarks accusing me of being a "zionist-backed disinformation agent," a "CIA agent and infiltrator" and other such mindless and contrived drivel.
 
Let us examine the article, on its merits or lack thereof, without the ad hominem reparte. The article, in my opinion is flawed.
 
I have stated over the past few years, that resurrecting H1N1 Spanish Flu was and is dangerous. I have also written commentary on and have vocalized on many of our programs, that:
 
1. There is a danger of escape of the 1918 pathogen from one of the countries often poorly-secured and operated bio labs, and, or danger of a release by a bioterrorist.
 
2. The BSL 4 level should be maintained - and it should NOT be downgraded to BSL3 simply because people think Tamiflu will 'save us.' It won't. My argument is that tamiflu and other antivirals are not paneceas for Spanish Flu or bird flu because, as we saw in Vietnam, influenza viruses DO mutate and develop antiviral resistant strains. And in the case of bird flu, can do so very quickly. We have already had both tamiflu and amantadine-resistant strains develop. I have warned about misuse, overuse and abuse of Tamiflu. I have also read aloud the ingredients in Tamiflu on your program.
 
Both Dr. Henry Niman and myself have spoken out firmly and repeatedly against the current research of a Bird Flu H5N1 vaccine. This research is based on the 2004 Vietnamese strain of bird flu. If the virus does mutate i.e. develop genes that enable it to spread easily between humans, via recombination and/or reassortment, it would be a VERY different virus than the 2004 Vietnamese strain. We could possibly have a recombination of H3N2 or H1N1 and H5N1. There could possibly be, in addition, an incorporation of genes that have reassorted or even genes from other influenza viruses. Note - Dr. Niman discovered WSN 33 genes in swine sequences in S. Korea...a major, serious discovery which went virtually unnoticed except on his site and your program.
 
AS BIRD FLU SPREADS IT PICKS UP MORE AND MORE MAMMALIAN GENES
 
Please refer to recombinomics.com and click on the "What's New" section where you will see various articles and commentary on the changes in the bird flu viral sequence. Also of interest, Astrakhan Mute Swan
(http://www.recombinomics.com/News/0226060
1/H5N1_Astrakhan_Human.html)
H5N1 Acquisiton of human sequences.
 
Normally, the first avian flu virus strains do not infect humans, but over time, and as the virus travels widely now and is on an unprecedented three continents, it picks up pieces of genetic material from other flu viruses, some of which may be human influenza. It then begins to infect a few people. As it further spreads and begins to pick up more and more material, it then infects more people. And on and on it goes. There is a legimate worry that the avian flu will infect the key intermediary animal species: swine. Swine are perfect mixing vessels. It is widely believed that H1N1 Spanish Flu was initially avian and jumped to swine. It is further theorized that the Spanish Flu jumped to humans from swine.
 
If you read some of the articles regarding the changes in the H5N1 virus on recombinomics.com "What's New" section, you will see that Henry discusses changes in the hemaglutinin (Ha.)
 
I would hope that the ugly remarks will cease and that open discussion on the issue of bird flu will continue. This is America where the individual is allowed absolute Freedom of Speech. It is far better to discuss the topic and not resort to name-calling and false accusations...which usually come from people who have little dignity or grace. It has also a given that people who have a weak arguments quickly and immediately resort to defamation and slander in debates. Unfortunately, this has become the standard fare. It would be far better for all of us if debaters simply stick to the issues and focus on the topic at hand.
 
Again, Jeff, and I don't need to tell you but let me again state for those who may have been duped and deceived by the misinformation pros and others who seem to be emotionally troubled that I am not in any government organizations, a zionist agent or dupe, nor am I an asset in any way shape or form of any US or foreign government intelligence or globalist organization. Further, I have never profited in any way from my ten years of work covering Bird Flu, Mad Cow, Foot and Mouth or any other disease issue on your program, site, or any other media outlet. Or, for presenting information on infectious or emerging diseases of any kind or the subject of bioterrorism itself. I have no books, videos, DVDs or audio materials to sell. I do this work because it is an honor to be a citizen of our nation and I am trying to repay my country for the wonderful life it has provided me and so many others. I am profoundly privileged to have earned the trust of so many people...citizens and health professionals and scientists alike. I am more than grateful for this.
 
Patricia Doyle, nee DOYLE
 
 
1918 Killer Flu 'Came From Birds'
 
BBC News
10-6-5
 
The Spanish flu virus that killed 50 million people in 1918-19 was probably a strain that originated in birds, research has shown. US scientists have found the 1918 virus shares genetic mutations with the bird flu virus now circulating in Asia.
 
Writing in Nature, they say their work underlines the threat the current strain poses to humans worldwide. A second paper in Science reveals another US team has successfully recreated the 1918 virus in mice. The virus is contained at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] under stringent safety conditions. It is hoped to carry out experiments to further understand the biological properties that made the virus so virulent.
 
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051003/full/437794a.html
 
The virus was recreated from data produced by painstaking research by a team from the US Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Working on virus samples from the remains of victims of the 1918 pandemic, the researchers were able to piece together the entire genetic sequence of the virus. They found the virus contained elements that were new to humans of the time, making it highly virulent. Analysis of the final 3 pieces of the virus' genetic code has revealed mutations that have striking similarities to those found in flu viruses found only in birds, such as the H5N1 strain currently found in south east Asia.
 
Many experts believe it is only a matter of time before H5N1, or a similar virus, causes many deaths in humans -- possibly after combining [reassorting genome segments] with a human flu strain. Crucially, the mutations identified by the US researchers were found in genes which control the virus' ability to replicate in host cells. The researchers say these mutations may have helped the 1918 virus replicate more efficiently.
 
At this stage, they say the H5N1 strain shares only some, and not all, of these mutations. But these mutations may be enough to increase the virulence of the virus, and give it the potential to cause serious human infection without first combining [reassorting genome segments] with a known human flu strain. The researchers believe the 2 other major flu pandemics of the 20th century -- in 1957 and 1968 -- were caused by human flu viruses which acquired 2 or 3 key genes from bird flu virus strains. But they believe the 1918 strain was probably entirely a bird flu virus that adapted to function in humans.
 
Julie Gerberding, director of the US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), said: "By unmasking the 1918 virus we are revealing some of the secrets that will help us predict and prepare for the next pandemic." Dr Jeffery Taubenberger, lead researcher of the Nature study, said: "Determining whether pandemic influenza virus strains can emerge via different pathways will affect the scope and focus of surveillance and prevention efforts."
 
Warning
 
Professor John Oxford, an expert in virology at Queen Mary College, London, said the suggestion that the virus had the potential to jump between humans without first combining [reassorting] with a human virus made it even more of a threat. "This study gives us an extra warning that H5N1 needs to be taken even more seriously than it has been up to now," he said. Dr Terrence Tumpey, of the US CDC, defended the decision to recreate the 1918 flu virus. He said: "We felt we had to recreate the virus and run these experiments to understand the biological properties that made the 1918 virus so exceptionally deadly. "We wanted to identify the specific genes responsible for its virulence, with the hope of designing antivirals or other interventions that would work against virulent pandemic or epidemic influenza viruses."
 
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051003/full/437794a.html
 
ProMED-mail promed@promedmail.org
 
The Nature paper is published in the 5 Oct 2005 online edition and is entitled: "Large-scale sequencing of human influenza reveals the dynamic nature of viral genome evolution. The authors are: Elodie Ghedin1, Naomi A. Sengamalay1, Martin Shumway1, Jennifer Zaborsky1, Tamara Feldblyum1, Vik Subbu1, David J. Spiro1, Jeff Sitz1, Hean Koo1, Pavel Bolotov2, Dmitry Dernovoy2, Tatiana Tatusova2, Yiming Bao2, Kirsten St George3, Jill Taylor3, David J. Lipman2, Claire M. Fraser1, Jeffery K. Taubenberger4 and Steven L. Salzberg1,5. (At 1 The Institute for Genomic Research, 9712 Medical Center Dr., Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA ; 2 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA2; 3 Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201, USA ; 4 Department of Molecular Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA 5 Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.)
 
The Introduction reads as follows: "Influenza viruses are remarkably adept at surviving in the human population over a long time-scale. The human influenza A virus continues to thrive even among populations with widespread access to vaccines, and continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The virus mutates from year to year, making the existing vaccines ineffective on a regular basis, and requiring that new strains be chosen for a new vaccine. Less-frequent major changes, known as antigenic shift, create new strains against which the human population has little protective immunity, thereby causing worldwide pandemics. The most recent pandemics include the 1918 'Spanish' flu, one of the most deadly outbreaks in recorded history, which killed 30-50 million people worldwide, the 1957 'Asian' flu, and the 1968 'Hong Kong' flu (3).
 
Motivated by the need for a better understanding of influenza evolution, we have developed flexible protocols that make it possible to apply large-scale sequencing techniques to the highly variable influenza genome. Here we report the results of sequencing 209 complete genomes of the human influenza A virus, encompassing a total of 2 821 103 nucleotides. In addition to increasing markedly the number of publicly available, complete influenza virus genomes, we have discovered several anomalies in these first 209 genomes that demonstrate the dynamic nature of influenza transmission and evolution. This new, large-scale sequencing effort promises to provide a more comprehensive picture of the evolution of influenza viruses and of their pattern of transmission through human and animal populations. All data from this project are being deposited, without delay, in public archives." - Mod.CP]
 
 
For Your Information:
EXCHANGE OF GENETIC MATERIAL
 
RECOMBINATION
 
Exchange of genetic information between two genomes.
 
REASSORTMENT
 
If a virus has a segmented genome and if two variants of that virus infect a single cell, progeny virions can result with some segments from one parent, some from the other.
 
"CLASSIC" RECOMBINATION
 
This involves breaking of covalent bonds within the nucleic acid, exchange of genetic information, and reforming of covalent bonds.
 
This kind of break/join recombination is common in DNA viruses or those RNA viruses which have a DNA phase (retroviruses). The host cell has recombination systems for DNA.
 
Recombination of this type is very rare in RNA viruses (there are probably no host enzymes for RNA recombination). Picornaviruses show a form of very low efficiency recombination. The mechanism is not identical to the standard DNA mechanism, and is probably a "copy choice" kind of mechanism (figure 1) in which the polymerase switches templates while copying the RNA.
 
Figure 2 Marker rescue Recombination is also common in the coronaviruses - again the mechanism is different from the situation with DNA and probably is a consequence of the unusual way in which RNA is synthesized in this virus.
 
So far, there is no evidence for recombination in the negative stranded RNA viruses giving rise to viable viruses (In these viruses, the genomic RNA is packaged in nucleocapsids and is not readily available for base pairing).
 
Various uses for recombination techniques
 
a) Mapping genomes (the further apart two genes are, the more likely it is that there will be a recombination event between them).
 
b) Marker rescue - DNA fragments from wild type virus can recombine with mutant virus to generate wild type virus - this provides a means to assign a gene function to a particular region of the genome. This also provides a means to insert foreign material into a gene (figure 2).
 
Recombination enables a virus to pick up genetic information from viruses of the same type and occasionally from unrelated viruses or even the host genome (as occurs in some retroviruses
 
REASSORTMENT
 
If a virus has a segmented genome and if two variants of that virus infect a single cell, progeny virions can result with some segments from one parent, some from the other.
 
This is an efficient process - but is limited to viruses with segmented genomes - so far the only human viruses characterized with segmented genomes are RNA viruses e.g. orthomyxoviruses, reoviruses, arenaviruses, bunya viruses.
 
Reassortment may play an important role in nature in generating novel reassortants and has also been useful in laboratory experiments (figure 3). It has also been exploited in assigning functions to different segments of the genome. For example, in a reassorted virus if one segment comes from virus A and the rest from virus B, we can see which properties resemble virus A and which virus B.
 
Reassortment is a non-classical kind of recombination
 
PHENOTYPIC MIXING
 
If two different viruses infect a cell, progeny viruses may contain coat components derived from both parents and so they will have coat properties of both parents. This is called phenotypic mixing (figure 5). IT INVOLVES NO ALTERATION IN GENETIC MATERIAL, the progeny of such virions will be determined by which parental genome is packaged and not by the nature of the envelope.
 
Phenotypic mixing may occur between related viruses, e.g. different members of the Picornavirus family, or between genetically unrelated viruses, e.g. Rhabdo- and Paramyxo- viruses. In the latter case the two viruses involved are usually enveloped since it seems there are fewer restraints on packaging nucleocapsids in other viruses' envelopes than on packaging nucleic acids in other viruses' icosahedral capsids.
 
 
Figure 6 Phenotypic mixing to form a pseudotype We can also get the situation where a coat is entirely that of another virus, e.g. a retrovirus nucleocapsid in a rhabdovirus envelope. This kind of phenotypic mixing is sometimes referred to as pseudotype (pseudovirion) formation (figure 6). The pseudotype described above will show the adsorption-penetration-surface antigenicity characteristics of the rhabdovirus and will then, upon infection, behave as a retrovirus and produce progeny retroviruses. This results in pseudotypes having an altered host range/tissue tropism on a temporary basis
 
Reassortant Viruses
 
Description - Viruses containing two or more pieces of nucleic acid (segmented genome) from different parents. Such viruses are produced in cells coinfected with different strains of a given virus.
 
ANTIGENIC DRIFT AND ANTIGENIC SHIFT
 
Influenza viruses can change in two different ways.
 
One is called "antigenic drift." These are small changes in the virus that happen continually over time. Antigenic drift produces new virus strains that may not be recognized by the body's immune system. This process works as follows: a person infected with a particular flu virus strain develops antibody against that virus. As newer virus strains appear, the antibodies against the older strains no longer recognize the "newer" virus, and reinfection can occur. This is one of the main reasons why people can get the flu more than one time. In most years, one or two of the three virus strains in the influenza vaccine are updated to keep up with the changes in the circulating flu viruses. So, people who want to be protected from flu need to get a flu shot every year.
 
The other type of change is called "antigenic shift." Antigenic shift is an abrupt, major change in the influenza A viruses, resulting in new hemagglutinin and/or new hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins in influenza viruses that infect humans. Shift results in a new influenza A subtype. When shift happens, most people have little or no protection against the new virus. While influenza viruses are changing by antigenic drift all the time, antigenic shift happens only occasionally. Type A viruses undergo both kinds of changes; influenza type B viruses change only by the more gradual process of antigenic drift.
 
Flu is a difficult disease to prevent and control because the virus is able to disguise itself and fool the body,s immune system into thinking that it has never encountered the infection before. The virus mutates quickly and regularly to produce new strains through antigenic shift and drift.1.
 
Genetic Re-assortment of Influenza A Viruses
 
Immunity against Influenza viruses
 
A host is infected with a particular influenza virus strain. Antibodies are formed against that strain. The antibodies formed protect the host against re-infection by the same virus strain. The Emergence of "New Viruses through Antigenic Shift and Drift
 
On the influenza virus, the surface proteins haemagglutinin and neuraminidase are important in inducing the formation of antibodies.
 
Changes in the surface proteins result in antigenic changes in the virus. The immune system no longer recognizes the virus strain and the host is susceptible to re-infection.
 
Influenza viruses can change in two different ways.
 
Antigenic Drift
 
Gradual changes in an already circulating virus Eventually the virus changes enough so that most of the population is susceptible to re-infection. There is then an influenza epidemic. Size and severity of the epidemic is dependent on the degree to which the virus is different from those already experienced by the population. Influenza viruses are constantly changing by antigenic drift Type A and Type B influenza viruses undergo changes by antigenic drift. The WHO Global Influenza Programme monitors antigenic changes and the adjustments required in influenza vaccines
 
Antigenic Shift
 
The sudden emergence of new antigenically different influenza A sub-type. The host population has no immunity against the new sub-type and an influenza pandemic follows. Antigenic shift only occurs occasionally Only Type A Influenza viruses change by antigenic shift Antigenic shift is of public health concern as subtypes from different species may then be able to infect humans. Mechanisms of Antigenic shift
 
Antigenic shift in man probably occurs through one of these mechanisms:
 
Direct transfer of a virus from another species.
 
 
Genetic re-assortment of avian and human influenza viruses infecting the same host. Believed to take place in pigs. See swine influenza. New evidence indicates that it may also take place in humans. The new virus that emerges may be an avian virus containing enough human influenza genes to allow human to human transmission.
 
 
Re-emergence of a virus that may have caused an epidemic years earlier. For more information see: The Center for Disease control and prevention, Influenza information.
 
 
The term antigenic variation refers to the mechanism in which an infectious organism alters its surface proteins in order to evade a host immune response. This change in antigenic profile may occur as the pathogen passes through a host population (also called "antigenic diversity") or may take place in the originally infected host.
 
Antigenic variation can occur through three broadly defined genetic processes: gene mutation, recombination, and switching. In all cases, antigenic variation results in pathogens that are immunologically distinct from the parental strains.
 
Viruses
 
The process of antigenic variation occurring in viruses is categorized as either antigenic drift or antigenic shift. Antigenic drift, which is exhibited by a wide range of viruses, is a result of genetic point mutations accumulated by the viral genome over an extended period of time. This drift produces small antigenic changes in the pathogen population which ultimately reduce the efficacy of B and T cell memory during the host immune response.
 
Antigenic drift has been well characterized in the influenza virus, and is becoming more and more evident in the rapid evolution of rhinoviruses and enteroviruses. The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) exhibits antigenic drift within the particular host due to its high rate of replication.
 
Antigenic shift refers to a more immediate and extensive change in genetic information. This can occur when two strains of the pathogen recombine, a process exemplified by Influenza A. In this instance of genetic recombination, whole segments of the virus genomes are swapped when human and avian strains dually infect a single host. The immunological challenges posed by the newly produced influenza strain are the cause for widespread influenza epidemics.
 
 
Question: How exactly does influenza evolve into new strains so often?
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jan2000/947803959.Vi.r.html
 
Influenza virus has a number of factors going for it in regards to its ability to evolve into new strains.
 
 
Historical Background Influenza viruses were probably a major cause of disease in ancient times; retrospective tracing has dated the occurrence of influenza epidemics back to at least 1173. There is a nearly continuous record of epidemics, which are periodically interspersed with extensive pandemics (i.e. world-wide epidemics). During the past century, serologic testing of samples from elderly persons has permitted a more certain assessment of epidemic disease. In 1889, a pandemic occurred with a type A virus containing an H3-like hemagglutinin and an equine-like neuraminidase. Little is known of influenza in the intervening years preceding the devastating pandemic of 1918, which was caused by a H1N1 (formerly called swine flu) virus. During that epidemic about 20 million people died worldwide with approx. 500,000 people dying in the United States.
 
The modern history of influenza began with its isolation from humans in 1933. This virus was later shown to be antigenically related to a virus isolated in swine two years earlier. In 1940, a second antigenically distinct human virus was isolated and it was designated influenza B, to distinguish it from the earlier virus which was then designated influenza A. Finally, a third antigenically distinct virus, influenza C virus, was isolated in 1949. We will concentrate on influenza A & B viruses in this lecture.
 
Structure
 
 
The influenza viruses are characterized by a segmented genome, that is located within a helical nucleocapsid. The nucleocapsid and matrix proteins are surrounded by an envelope that is composed of a lipid bilayer. Protruding from the envelope are the antigenic viral surface glycoproteins: the hemaglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). The genome of the influenza A & B viruses is composed of 8 segments of RNA. Each of the segments code for at least one polypeptide. The structural proteins of the virion are encoded by separate gene segments and include: 3 viral RNA polymerases, nucleoprotein, matrix, and the HA and NA surface glycoproteins. Another segment codes for 2 non-structural proteins, whose functions are not well known.
 
Classification
 
Influenza viruses are placed within their proper type (A, B, or C) by antigenic similarities among their internal nucleocapsid and matrix proteins. Within the type A viruses, subtypes can be distinguished by antigenic differences among their HA & NA glycoproteins. New influenza subtypes are detected by major antigenic changes within the HA and/or NA glycoprotein subtypes ("antigenic shift). These changes are believed to occur due to re-assortment with animal influenza A viruses. Finally, within the type A subtypes, variants can be detected by antigenic divergence of the HA & NA proteins ("antigenic drift). These new variants are generated by an accumulation of point mutations in these proteins. Viral subtypes have not been seen in type B virus, but antigenic variants have been detected. The lack of major antigenic change in type B is probably due to the lack of its circulation in animal species.
 
Generation of new influenza viruses infectious for humans
 
As mentioned above, the influenza viruses are divided into three types (A, B, and C) based on reactogenicity of their internal antigens. I will limit the remainder of my answer to influenza type A viruses, since they show the most genetic variation.
 
Influenza A viruses are classified and divided into subtypes based on their surface glycoprotein antigens: 14 subtypes of hemagglutinin (HA or H) H1-H14 and 9 types of neuraminidase (NA or N) N1-N9. These influenza type A viruses are able to infect a number of different species including: humans, swine, horses birds, and aquatic mammals. All 14 subtypes of HA have been isolated from birds, 3 of them in humans, two in pigs, horses, seals and whales, and one in mink. The NA antigens show a similar species distribution. Therefore, a large number of non-crossreactive influenza antigens are always circulating in nature. Antibodies produced against HA and NA antigens are responsible for protection against re-infection by the identical virus subtype.
 
Major evolutionary changes (emergence of new viruses) in the influenza type A viruses occur by the mixing or re-assorting of their genetic material causing changes in their external surface HA and NA antigens. This phenomenon is known as "antigenic shift. The genetic material or genomes of influenza viruses occur in eight separate molecules or segments. If two different subtypes of influenza A virus infect the same cell, their genetic segments are able to reassort and produce a new influenza virus with segments from both infecting viruses. As an example, if a H3N5 virus and a H2N2 virus infect the same cell the following offspring viruses can be produced: H3N5, H2N2, H3N2, and H2N5. This re- assortment can occur between human and animal isolates. Therefore, new viruses can be produced which can replicate in humans, but have new subtypes of animal HA and NA antigens. There are no protective antibodies to these antigens in the human population, so the new virus can spread very rapidly around the world.
 
The virus subtypes that have been so far been known to infect humans are H1N1, H2N2, and H3N2. The H1N1 viruses circulated from the beginning of the century through the 1950,s. In 1957, a new H2N2 virus appeared, known as the "Asian Flu, and rapidly spread around the world. This virus had both a new HA and a new NA. In 1968, another new virus appeared a H3N2 virus, known as the "Hong Kong Flu. This virus was not as severe as the H2N2 virus, since it only varied in the HA antigen. The H1N1 virus also reappeared in 1977. Currently, both the H3N2 and H1N1 viruses are circulating through the human population. The major question is what new virus (H?N?) will emerge in the future and cause the next major world-wide epidemic.
 
You may then ask, "Why then do people get sick with the flu every couple of years, when there has been no major change in the HA or NA antigens?
 
Well, between major changes in the HA and NA antigens, point mutations can occur on the HA and NA molecules and these mutations may help the virus to avoid the protective antibodies and produce an illness. This phenomenon is known as "antigenic drift. The H3N2 virus has been able to successfully drift from its initial appearance in 1968 and still produce infections in 1999.
 
Additional information about influenza viruses and their evolution can be found at the following websites:
 
Flu Viruses at the Centers for Disease Control
Influenza (National Foundation for Infectious Diseases)
Influenza Information at the World Health Organization
Flu News and Info
Influenzanews
Flu101
Ed Balkovic, PhD
The views and opinions expressed here are my own and may not reflect those of my employer.
 
-----------------------
 
A protein which forms a rod-shaped spike on the surface of influenza virus. The name haemagglutinin is given because the spikes are capable of adhering to red blood cells, causing them to be agglutinated (clumped). Definitions of haemagglutinin on the Web:
 
A protein which forms a rod-shaped spike on the surface of influenza virus. The name haemagglutinin is given because the spikes are capable of adhering to red blood cells, causing them to be agglutinated (clumped).
www.science.org.au/nova/014/014glo.htm
 
Hemagglutinin (HA) is an antigenic glycoprotein found on the surface of the Influenza virus and is responsible for binding the virus to the cell that is being infected. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haemagglutinin
 
Suggest this website:
 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&
db=PubMed&list_uids=7464906&dopt=Citation
Definitions of neuraminidase on the Web:
 
An enzyme which forms a mushroom-shaped projection on the surface of an influenza virus particle. The enzyme assists in the release of newly-formed virus particles from the surface of an infected cell.
www.science.org.au/nova/014/014glo.htm
 
An important surface structure protein of the influenza virus, an essential enzyme for the spread of the virus throughout the respiratory tract, enables the virus to escape the host cell and infect new cells.
 
www.tqnyc.org/NYC051528/FINAL%20DONE/plagues%20vocabulary.htm
 
Neuramidase is an antigenic glycoprotein enzyme found on the surface of the Influenza virus. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuraminidase
 
Related phrases: hemagglutinin-neuraminidase
 
Neuraminidase information Neuraminidase is a critical protein on the surface membrane of the influenza virus1,2 Enables the replicated influenza virus to bud from host cell Helps the virus to pass through mucous between cells in the entire respiratory tract Common to both influenza type A and type B Inhibition of viral neuraminidase prevents newly formed influenza virus from escaping infected cells, therefore interrupting the spread of infection between cells1,3 Amantadine and rimantadine are M2 ion channel blockers indicated for the treatment of type A influenza1
 
Tamiflu is a neuraminidase inhibitor
 
Definition of Neuraminidase inhibitor Neuraminidase inhibitor: A drug that inhibits the enzyme called neuraminidase.
 
For example, oseltamivir (Tamiflu), an antiinfluenza agent, acts by inhibiting the neuraminidase enzyme on the surface of the influenza virus. This prevents the virus from leaving the cell and spreading to others.
 
THE ABOVE IS REBUTTAL TO THE ARTICLE BELOW-
 
The article has been circulating via email and has picked up various false accustions against me, such as I am a CIA agent, zionist backed disinformation agent and infiltrator. There is also another article circulating, Bird Flu Hoax. I also find that article to be highly flawed.
 
Patricia Doyle, nee DOYLE
 
Now, here is the latest piece of TRUE disinformation:
 
BIRD FLU FICTION
 
Thanks Harvey. Excellant report on the Bird Flu by Marshall Smith. We know that our "black op spooks" have broken into the graves of persons who were infected by the great flu epidemic of 1918. They then genetically modified it to become a man made biological agent of mass destruction. Then, by infecting migratory birds with it, they could be assured that it would travel all over the world in a rapid dispersal. These guys are pure evil!!!
 
Regards,
 
Subject: a must read
 
 
THE BIRD FLU PANDEMIC FICTION
Another Case of the CIA Disinformation Program
 
Today's Top Story contains the statement "Scientists say H5N1 is mutating steadily and may eventually acquire the changes it needs to be easily transmitted from human to human."
 
That part of the news story is complete fiction. Viruses are NOT alive and do not mutate. Bird Flu only infects birds, not humans. All influenza comes only from birds, and from the ancient bird precursors, the dinosaurs. It is very easy for viruses to be generated among "cold-blooded" animals such as reptiles and birds. Since, they cannot produce fevers to stop viral replication in their bodies. Sometimes pigs can "catch" the bird viruses if they are raised living together. Humans can "catch" pig influenza, because of the extreme similarity in the cell tissue types. But that process is NOT mutation of the virus, only a change in the outer coating of the virus. What keeps mammals from getting reptile or bird viruses is the difference in the outer coating of the virus.
 
The greatest danger of the current prevalent H5N1 virus is it gets changed to have an outer coating of a human or pig virus. The creation of the pig virus is very rare. If a pig sick with pig influenza is sneezed on by a bird sick with bird virus, then the bird virus can enter a damaged lung cell caused by the pig influenza. With millions of pigs and ducks raised together in eastern China this still only occurs several times each year. It is extremely rare.
 
The current "pandemic" of H5N1 among birds is properly called an Epizootic or Panzootic since it only occurs among animals. For it to be a Pandemic among humans the outer coating of the H5N1 would need to be changed to the human form. Will that ever happen? It has already happened months ago in the Labs of the CDC.
 
The CDC has already made samples of the "live" human form of the H5N1. The CDC said they did this to help in the manufacture and testing of a future H5N1 vaccine. See: The recent statements by CDC head Dr. Gerberding. If there is a human pandemic of the H5N1 Bird Flu, it will not come from birds. It will come straight from the Labs at the CDC.
 
The CDC has already sent "live" samples of the man-made Human H5N1 virus to many labs around the world for testing. The virus could escape from anywhere. This is biological and economic warfare and terrorism at its worst. The human samples were manufactured and man-made in the US. What the Chinese. or terrorist groups, decide to do with their samples is up to them. (See: 'The Tamiflu Myth' on the BroJon front page)
 
 
Marshall Smith
 
Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette
newseditor@brojon.com
 
 
 
Patricia A. Doyle, DVM, PhD- Bus Admin, Tropical Agricultural Economics
Please visit my "Emerging Diseases" message board at: http://www.clickitnews.com/ubbthreads/postlist.php?
Cat=&Board=emergingdiseases
Also my new website:
http://drpdoyle.tripod.com/
Zhan le Devlesa tai sastimasa
Go with God and in Good Health
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros