rense.com


Co-Existing With The
New World Religion

By Tom Mysiewicz
 12-31-5


In recent months there has been a major push in Europe and elsewhere to prosecute and jail "Holocaust Revisionists", i.e., individuals who assert that the "Holocaust of Six-Million European Jews" either did not happen or was grossly inflated. This view has even been taken up by the Iranian Government, probably because it recognizes that this "Holocaust" will be used as the justification for any potential Israeli nuclear strike on it. (A cynic might think the sudden blossoming of "Holocaust" prosecutions might also be a harbinger of a coming war.)
 
As both a journalist and former PR man, I've looked at the "Holocaust" for a number of years and think it's time revisionists and others recognize that the debate will never be settled--partially because it's illegal in many countries to be a "Holocaust Denier" or even a "Holocaust disbeliever". More importantly, the belief in the "Holocaust" represents a new religion that bridges traditional Judaism, Zionism and Christian Zionism. And perhaps that's why it receives so much protection.
 
In the U.S. this religion has taken on the dimensions of an (unconstitutional) state religion, with public funds going to various "Holocaust" memorials and public displays, and trillions of U.S. taxpayer dollars going to Israel in various forms on the basis of this cult.
 
And the "Holocaust" cult has grown in Israel ever since the 1961 trial and execution of Adolph Eichmann, serving as the justification of numerous atrocities and human-rights violations against the Palestinians and other Mid-Eastern peoples, who, nevertheless, had nothing to do with any "Holocaust" that did take place. (One Israeli writer describes the cult as a "mass pathology" in Israel that serves to distort the strategic thinking of both the government and general population.)
 
Revisionism has failed to have an impact on the new religion because disproof of strongly-held religious beliefs is a virtual impossibility--and thus denial is seen to be a form of persecution that serves to further popularize the religious belief. For instance, Jesus' miracle of he loaves and fishes is an impossibility by conventional scientific wisdom, yet hundreds of millions of people believe Jesus fed the multitude with just a few fish and loaves of bread.
 
Likewise, demonstrating that Hitler never had control of six-million Jews (4.5-million is probably more likely) and that some 2.5-million European Jews survived the war (including many of Israel's first citizens) will do nothing to dissuade the strongly held religious belief that "...six million perished". So also will the frequent revisions of casualty figures at different camps and the delisting of some camps as "death camps" do nothing to shake the religious conviction of hundreds of millions worldwide--and most of the citizens of today's Israel.
 
Further demonstrating the religious nature of "Holocaust" belief is the fact that the apparently sacrosanct "six million" figure was also used in World War I and its aftermath to justify Jewish demands for a promised homeland and more political power in Europe. The "First Holocaust"--which paved the way for the unfair Versailles Treaty that bankrupted Germany--is detailed by Don Heddesheimer in his book "The First Holocaust. Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with Holocaust Claims During and After World War I" (ISBN: 0967985676, Copyright 2003, Castle Hill Publishers, N.Y.C.)
 
Perhaps the best approach at this juncture is to treat the "Holocaust" believer with the same courtesy that one would treat the adherent of any other religion, recognizing that the subject matter of the religion is faith. However, the adherents of this religion must also understand that while Judaism may divide the world into Jew and Goyim, it does not follow that a Palestinian, Iraqi, Lebanese, Iranian or Syrian is guilty of a "Holocaust" allegedly committed by unrelated peoples more than half a century ago. Likewise, it does not follow that Poles are financially responsible for the "Holocaust" because their country--which was occupied by Germany and the Soviet Union at the time (and therefore NOT under their control)--may have been the site of "death camps".
 
Ultimately, however, accepting the unreasonable demands of this new religion may come to haunt citizens of the U.S., and U.K.: "Holocaust" groups have been discussing financial responsibility of these countries for the "Holocaust" because they did not come to the rescue of the Jews soon enough.
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros