rense.com


NM Bills To Ban
Neurotoxic Carcinogenic
Aspartame Advance

From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum
Bettym19@mindspring.com
From Stephen Fox
stephen@santafefineart.com
1-19-5

Bills to ban Neurotoxic Carcinogenic Artificial Sweetener Aspartame Advance in New Mexico Legislature, the bills that will precipitate a new era of Consumer Protection in the USA!
 
The Honorable Irvin Harrison introduced House Bill 202, and the Senate version, as yet unnumbered, was introduced by the Honorable Gerald Ortiz y Pino
 
Albuquerque Democrat, Ortiz y Pino, and Gallup Navajo Democrat, Irvin Harrison, have introduced legislation that clearly moves New Mexico forward in terms of protecting citizens' health from this neurodegenerative sweetener, resulting from the complete breakdown in sound approval functions at the US FDA going back to 1981 and 1983, no more clearly exemplified than in the case artificial sweetener, Aspartame.
 
Regulatory mechanisms at the state level have largely failed, been postponed and even ignored, due to corporate pressure and manipulation, largely by Ajinomoto of Japan, the world's largest Aspartame and Monosodium Glutamate manufacturers. The eventual and inevitable New Mexico ban through legislative means is a vital national and international precedent, one that could precipitate a new era of consumer protection in the United States and in other nations.
 
I believe that these bills are within the conceptual matrix not only of Governor Richardson's Year of the Child and Healthy Kids legislative initiatives, but also they are consistent within a deeper philosophical context of the Governor's views that because the FDA "isn't doing anything," every state needs to take back and to exercise some of the power ceded earlier to the Federal level, going back to the creation of the Food and Drug Administration in the Roosevelt era.
 
State statutes on protecting Health, and statutes regarding poisonous and deleterious food additives in the New Mexico Food Act are completely consistent with the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as numerous US Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals decisions in related matters. Many U.S. Court of Appeals decisions confirm that in health matters, federal and state jurisdictions need not be competitive or exclusionary, since the goal of both is to protect health.
 
Soft drink companies would be smarter not to fight efforts to achieve freedom from neurotoxic multipotentially carcinogenic sweetener additives, and just immediately switch to a non-toxic harmless natural sweetener like Stevia. Indeed, conversations between Coca Cola's lobbyist and Vice President of New Mexico operations and me occurred January 17, in which I recommended precisely such a course of action to the CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board of Coca Cola, relayed by the lobbyist to them.
 
We could (but won't) write the predictable Coca Cola advertisement: "America, we have been listening to your concerns for health, and for those reasons, we are switching the sweetener in our "diet" products to Stevia, starting in 2006." By doing so, Coca Cola (or whichever manufacturer implements this bright idea first) would make billions of dollars and win millions of new Patrons.
 
This evolving possibility and inevitability of soft drink companies to get rid of aspartame, acesulfame K, and sucralose by the world's largest soft drink manufacturers, of course, does nothing to remove, obviate or conceal some other forgotten neurotoxicities in that product, like that of Coke's major ingredient, phosphoric acid, which is also used to prime unfinished steel before it is painted. New Mexicans might wonder "What does phosphoric acid due to one's chromosomes, if it can do that to raw steel?"
 
Hoping to hide behind their product's FDA approval, industry lobbyists and corporate lawyers will bitterly complain to legislative committees that any state action to ban an incontrovertibly proven neurotoxic multipotential carcinogen like aspartame is automatically preempted by the Supremacy Clause and the Interstate Commerce Clause in the Constitution. They would like us to believe that such action is therefore impossible, and this argument, accompanied by non-credible threats of litigation, worked in 2005 to postpone the EIB's scheduled 5-day hearings on Aspartame in July 2006 until January 2007. Such considerations are incorporated in the Legislative intent sections of the two bills.
 
Corporate lobbyists are already working against these bills, even having contacted numerous members of the NM Senate to ask them to not sign the bill as co-sponsors! We expect these same corporate minions to bring fat stacks of legal arguments to committee members similar to those already submitted to Mr. Trigg, Chief of Administrative Division in the Attorney General's office, by one of several lawyers working for the world's largest Aspartame and Monosodium Glutamate manufacturer, Ajinomoto of Japan, with the hope of overwhelming and intimidating committee members, as they have so far successfully done in many other states.
 
However, those corporate theories will be soundly refuted by more compelling stacks of medical commentaries by leading physicians, and of legal arguments by, for example, Jim Turner of the Washington D.C. law firm of Swankin and Turner, the consumer lawyer whose efforts precipitated President Nixon's 1969 order to the Commissioner of the FDA to rescind the approval for CYCLAMATES, yet another neurotoxic carcinogenic artificial sweetener. Turner is co-author of The Chemical Feast (1970).
 
For Molecular Biologist Professor at University of Chicago's comments on aspartame: http://www.wnho.net/molecular_biologists_aspartame_commentary.htm
 
Lobbyists will fight this legislation right up to the ink drying as (we hope) they are signed by Governor Richardson. For much more detailed information on corporate efforts to ruin pro child health and nutrition legislation that cites specific examples of what lobbyists have done and where and when, revealing their vicious tactics in toto, please read the extraordinary compilations thereof by Hastings College of Health Policy Law Professor Michele Simon, for example:
 
http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/coke.cfm and
http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/coke.cfm
http://www.wnho.net/consumer_protection_advocates.htm
http://www.wnho.net/megacorporate_interests.htm\
 
Some of Coca Cola's actions have resulted in their products being banned by Universities in New York and in Michigan: http://www.killercoke.org/crimes.htm For the very best analysis on how aspartame violates both federal and state statutes on adulteration, by Dr. Betty Martini, Honorary Doctor of Humanities, please go to: http://www.rense.com/general67/aspar.htm
 
For more information on the Ramazzini Foundation for Oncology study proving carcinogenicity, go to the website for the United States National Institute of Health, where it has been posted since mid-November 2005, with seemingly little comprehension of this in any branch of government.
 
Other key documents are located at the extensive website for the World Natural Health Organization, www.wnho.net, click on aspartame. Particularly noteworthy are the medical texts and commentaries by H.J.Roberts, M.D., Author of Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, as well as his article, Aspartame Disease: An FDA Approved Epidemic.
 
If you have ingested aspartame in "diet" beverages, "sugarless" gum, blue packet of Equal, "low fat" yogurt, and at least 6000 other food products, or in hundreds of pharmaceutical preparations, vitamins, aspirin, and if you want to begin the long process of detoxifying, at the www.wnho.net site, please read Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock's article "What to do if you have used Aspartame." Blaylock is also author of Excitotoxins: the Taste that Kills.
 
To learn more of the Governor's thinking on these matters, please contact
Billy Sparks, Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications, at
billy.sparks@state.nm.us.
 
To learn about possible Congressional action regarding the FDA rescinding
its approval of Aspartame, not only in food but also in hundreds of
pharmaceutical preparations for children and for adults, please contact:
U.S. Congressman Tom Udall, (202) 225-6190
U.S. Congressman Lane Evans, Chairman of House Veterans Committee
Voice - (202) 225-5905
lane.evans@mail.house.gov
U.S. Senator Jeff Bingaman Toll-free (in NM): 1-800-443-8658 DC:
(202) 224-5521 senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov
____________________
 
The New Mexico Senate version of the bill to ban aspartame will be filed today; for more information or to obtain the bill number, please contact the Senate Clerk at (505) 986-4714.
 
[We owe Senator Ortiz y Pino and Representative Irvin Harrison a tremendous debt of gratitude for their insights and courage. Irvin was the sponsor of last year's Nutrition Council bill in the House, as House Bill 721, which was also President Pro Tem Senator Ben Altamirano's Senate Bill 525.]
 
USE THIS ENTIRE SEARCH TERM
to read the identical text in both House and Senate versions
 
http://legis.state.nm.us/lcs/_session.asp?
chamber=H&type=++&number=202&Submit=Search&year=06
 
Media Inquiries: Senator: Gerald Ortiz y Pino District: 12
County(s): Bernalillo
Capitol Office Phone: 986-4380
email: jortizyp@aol.com
Representative: Irvin Harrison
District: 5
County(s): McKinley & San Juan
Capitol Office Phone: 986-4464
email: irv4u@cnetco.com
 
Stephen Fox
stephen@santafefineart.com
 
To keep up-to-date with what is going on in New Mexico you can join the aspartame information list on www.wnho.net front page banner, click on aspartame for other recent reports. Also check out www.dorway.com on aspartame.
 
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder,
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
www.wnho.net
www.dorway.com
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
See how aspartame was approved, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros