- Imagine living next to a wealthy but
violent and volatile neighbor who took an enormous life insurance policy
out on his vibrant and healthy wife.
- The pugnacious husband--and his equally
violent brothers--had earlier published a manifesto describing the benefits
of murder and insurance fraud, called the PNAC.
- A week later the woman is found murdered.
Her blood is found inside the house and car. While investigators attempt
to search for more clues, the husband orders the car destroyed. Meanwhile
the house is cleaned, detectives are ordered off the case and local newspaper
reporters are forbidden to write investigative stories about the case"because
the wealthy local publisher is also an influential friend of the husband's.
- Indeed, powerful political friends of
the husband cast suspicion on distant relatives living several thousand
miles away. The security cameras inside the house offer no clues (because
the tapes all mysteriously disappeared) but a number of ID cards belonging
to distant relatives are scattered around the premises. The obviousness
of this planted evidence is ignored by normally objective persons.
- And in a remarkable twist, the husband
receives his massive insurance payout while the local mayor, also a friend
of the husband's, becomes a hero "Man Of The Year" -- for his
efforts to allay all the suspicious, unanswered questions of reporters,
first responders and bereaved family members.
- The WTC-7, the massive government building
housing branches of the SEC, Secret Service and CIA, was demolished under
extremely suspicious circumstances. The subsequent crime and cover up was
exactly like the scenario outlined above.
- Imagine the US Senate Building collapsing
and no official investigation conducted by the US government and none demanded
by the mainstream media. Those in charge, who benefited in a thousand different
ways, deliberately impeded any investigation of the crime but were instead
rewarded for their negligence or complicity.
- If that does not indicate guilt, I do
not know what does.
- But does a massive cover up (and mountains
of circumstantial evidence) indicate guilt?
- Yes. In civil cases and espionage cases
and fraud cases, such evidence would result in indictments and convictions.
Why not then, in the case of 911, where over 3,000 persons were executed?
- Branches of the US government, housed
in the massive 47 story WTC-7 "representing your government and mine"
were purposely destroyed. Those in charge of the crime scene, New York
mayor Giuliani ("Man Of The Year) for example, prohibited any investigation.
Instead the crime scene was quickly destroyed.
- Likewise, those entrusted with safekeeping
the nation that day were promoted. People like General Richard Myers. Those
entrusted with capturing the alleged culprits failed miserably. Like George
W. Bush, who was rewarded with reelection while OBL remained free. Those
responsible for the national security of the nation before 911 likewise
failed miserably. Like George Tenet and Condoleeza Rice. But, like the
others, Rice received a promotion and consolidated even more power while
Tenet got a $5 million dollar book deal.
- By contrast, those honest FBI officers
who asserted the 911 case was more complex and shadowy than the official
government version were threatened, passed over for promotion or labeled
troublemakers. Those who accepted the government version of events were
- And lastly, the guy who leased that government
building only weeks before it was purposely destroyed? He was rewarded
with hundreds of millions of dollars. How obvious does a crime have to
be before people can see it?
- But the greatest indicator of guilt lies
in the suspicious behavior of people after the crime. Convinced they have
"gotten away with the perfect crime, suspects lie, cheat and steal.
They plot vendettas against honest people, commit further crimes, create
increasingly intricate lies (WMD), threaten witnesses and waste their ill-gotten
fortunes (trillions), all the while becoming ever more vicious and greedy.
- Indeed, everything that has happened
before, during and after 911 indicates proof positive that the Neocons
committed the crime. And any objective court of law"if one truly existed"would
convict them in a New York minute.