rense.com


The State Of Addiction

By Judith Moriarty
noahshouse@adelphia.net
2-3-6
 
President Bush used the term 'addicted' in reference to America's dependence on oil. And just whose fault might that be? The various political policies in this nation, are feeding the 'addictive' greed of oil, gas, coal, utilities, timber, and the pharmaceutical companies. Citizens pay billions in tax dollars,   and elect representatives, (appoint regulators) to see to the economic and environmental health of their nation ­ amongst other things.
 
Let's talk about these multi- national industry addicts. Exxon Mobil Corp. reported the highest profit in U.S. history: $10.71 billion for the fourth quarter of 2005 and $36 billion for the entire year.
 
Addiction: the condition of being habitually or compulsively occupied with or involved in something ­ an instance of this: the self centered, egotistical, narcissist, megalomaniac, multi- national gas and oil companies, have an 'addiction' to mammon; in their all consuming insatiable greed that is fixated on  plundering the planet  and bringing it to ruination  seeking that next high! It's not about money ­ really after the first billion, what's left to buy? It's malignant greed and power on crack!
 
Exxon is the world's largest publicly traded oil company. The company is massive in their spoiling of the earth. They operate in almost 200 countries and territories; there are more than 13,000 Exxon Mobil service stations in the United State. Last week, Chevron Corp, reported that its fourth-quarter profit was up 20% from the year before. Also last week, ConocoPhillips reported a 51% increase in fourth ­ quarter profit and Marathon Oil Corp, said that its fourth quarter profit nearly tripled.
 
Little wonder that citizens cannot afford fuel to get to their Wal-Mart Greeter, Home Depot Associate, Prison, or Casino jobs; with lawmakers having no problem in some states ( like NH), thinking that $5.15 an hour is a livable wage! With war costing (all borrowed) approximately 7 billion a week ­ one would think that the hogs at the trough (oil ­ gas ­ coal ­ utilities ­ pharmaceuticals) might cut back on their slurping from the public trough. Instead ­ citizens (receiving no dividend checks) keep these hogs living the high life by subsidizing them. The energy bill, instead of addressing responsible and creative ways to deal with our crisis, instead gave these oil companies some $14.5 billion in tax breaks. Multi ­ billions in profits weren't enough.
 
This energy  bill allows oil and gas producers to  drill to depths of 400 meters or more in the Gulf of Mexico (no wonder there's no fish) to avoid paying government royalties. Utilities (citizens paying their stranded costs - not enough) are slated to get some of the biggest tax benefits. American Transmission which owns 8,900 miles of high ­ voltage lines in Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois, will gain from a provision allowing them to write off those assets over 15 years instead of 20. Other utilities will also benefit from the change.  Utilities will get eight years to pay taxes on gains from the sale of transmission lines to federally approved independent transmission operators.
 
Tax credits for coal ­ fired power plants total $2.9 billion. They include incentives for coal ­ burning utilities,  to add pollution (ha) controls,  and tax breaks on investments in advanced coal technologies. Archer Daniel Midland, the world's largest ethanol producer, will be helped by a provision in the bill requiring oil companies to put 7.5 billion gallons of the corn ­ based additive into gasoline annually by 2012, up from 4 billion this year.
 
Worried about your poisoned water due to the additive MTBE ­ tough luck, the bill makes sure that industry will be shielded from all liabilities.  Too bad that people are stuck in the Republican/Democrat mode on issues (which Washington loves). Government, if people would wake up; is of ­ for ­ and by the interests of the multi - national corporations. We pay ­ and they all play. Citizens cannot afford gas, fuel, medicines, housing, hospital care, food, insurance etc - working two or three service sector jobs.  Corporations in partnership with politicians have made it quite profitable to move American companies to foreign lands. It's a race to the bottom in wages. Even Mexico with its wages of a few dollars an hour was too much for these insatiable hogs to pay ­ they're off to China, Korea, etc. When President Bush refers to the U.S.A, competing in this global economy,  I fear he's been too long removed from the real work a day world! One doesn't 'compete' in a world in a world of treaties, that lowers the standard of living, health, and environmental protections for all countries involved. One doesn't compete against wages that pay from .29 cents to $1.50 an hour in third world countries. One doesn't compete against countries with no health insurance, no job safety, and zero environmental regulations.
 
 
 
 
 
One doesn't compete in a global marketplace, when grants to educate ones children ($12.5 billion), are cut to pay for the various billions in tax subsidies for these multi ­ nationals. In the political world of lucrative paychecks, expense accounts, travel allowances, full health coverage, (taxpayer subsidized), exotic vacations, called 'fact finding missions', yearly cost of living raises and obscene pensions ­ well, it just might be hard,  for the Foggy Bottom Club in Washington;  to connect with rusted mills ­ shuttered plants ­ and rising prices in the real world !  Rest assured that the toasty marbled halls of Congress, and the White House, aren't worrying over increased electric and fuel bills. They're certainly not worried over that next prescription or hospital stay or having to choose between heat and food!  
 
 
Once more, we see the victims of government's ineptness, incompetence, and indifference being blamed. We see citizens being blamed for their "addiction to oil", not those sucking the planet out of money and resources! These malignant corporate vampires don't use a straw ­ they use mammoth hoses, pipes, drills, explosive charges, et al. There is no plausible - rational reason - that America shouldn't be leading the world in energy efficiency, and creative alternative fuels. We would be if the oil ­ gas ­ utility and coal folks weren't keeping a stranglehold, on new innovative, cost saving inventions. Gosh, it might cut into their profits and most certainly their lucrative subsidies. The ENRON debacle lives on with the President telling folks not to be "anxious" that war does that to a people. No ­ a closed factory, no food, unaffordable medicine, shut off, and eviction notices is the 'terror' that Americans fear. One can only imagine if we'd targeted 7 billion a week (instead of war) towards a sane medical plan, housing, or innovative alternative fuels where we'd be? I'm sorry a handful of 'wood chips' and a clump of 'switch grass' in the tank is not too innovative! Honestly ­ it reminds me of our disaster plan of duct tape and a roll of plastic! It speaks to   the politicians in NH, dealing with the pollution of dioxins, by telling a few poor folks to stop their burn barrels; while coal plants and incinerators continued spewing out tons of toxins! It's always easier to attack and blame the victims- especially those without money. These satiated hogs don't care because they don't have to ­ it's that simple.  All of this posturing of supposedly caring for one's neighbor, the environmental health of the nation, etc, is pure hokum. Corporate hucksters and their political partners in plunder are incapable of empathy or compassion. One has to possess a soul for these qualities.  Any wringing of hands or a condescending tsk tsk is all mimed ­ and goes no deeper than the coating on a piece of M&M candy.
 
President Bush certainly isn't setting a good example in the conservation of fuel. According to the Daily News, Feb 1, 06, the first thing that President Bush did to sell his idea of breaking the nation's oil 'addition',  was to burn up thousands  of gallons of jet fuel and hundreds of gallons of gasoline. But hey, he's not paying, which leaves him oblivious to what ordinary citizens are going through.
 
Air Force One, a 747, gets less than the equivalent of a mile per gallon. The President usually travels with a backup 747 as well as a huge C-17 aircraft packed with the presidential limo and the Marine One helicopter, which flies Bush from the White House to Andrews Air Force Base and around destination cities.  The C-17 gets even worse mileage than the 747s, and the chopper's mileage is pegged at .014 miles per gallon. According to the Daily News, once on the ground, the President travels in a gas ­ gulping convoy. At the heart of that convoy are two Cadillac limos and several Chevy SUVs. Even without the bulletproof shields and other special protective measures (unlike vehicles in Iraq), the limos get 18 miles per gallon in the city. The SUVs get 15 miles per gallon, but that too is without the bullet and blast ­ proofing and the communications gear the Secret Service and military travel with.  Bush's 700 mile trip to give his State of the Union encore speech in Nashville cost $19,594.25 in fuel alone just for Air Force One. He will carry his message (that was on TV) over the next few days to Maplewood, Minn.  Albuquerque and Dallas before heading back to Washington. That's another 4,341 miles.
 
And so, as our politicians luxuriate in their mosaic health club, dine at the heavy laden tables of food in their Capitol dining room, or check in for some health needs, at their on site medical clinic ­ it's easy to understand how they can get disconnected from  the real world. They don't call it Foggy Bottom for nothing. If people would come out of their red and blue bubble worlds ­ they'd see that a few  are doing very well  in our new military industrial society ­ with  the rest of us  pretty much on our own. Ask folks in the Gulf Region ­ they'll tell you first hand how much help they've received in our nation's worst natural catastrophe. Besides having no energy policy, it appears we have no credible disaster plan?  What President Bush should have announced at his State of the Union address was: Due to conserving energy ­ " The light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off."  
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros