rense.com


It's Time To
Re-Think David Duke

By Israel Shamir
 12-28-5

The great wizard and magician Rabbi Eliezer knew all about sorcery, as Sanhedrin members, the original Elders of Zion, were supposed to (Talmud, Tosefta Sanhedrin 11:5). He taught Rabbi Akiba all he knew about it, what is permitted and what is forbidden. But after long studies, Akiba said: Rabbi Eliezer explained everything, but I learned from him but two things: one does a trick and is liable, another one does a trick and he is exempt.
 
A similar thing takes place in our discourse. One preaches national exclusivity, and is liable; another preaches national exclusivity, and is exempt. Consider the case of David Duke. He is supposed to be the Devil incarnate; just a reference to his name makes one defiled for seven years. But I doubt he is morally worse than an average Jewish nationalist, a Sharon supporter.
 
No doubt, Ku Klux Klan stinks. Stinks exactly as bad as the bunch of Jewish settlers in Hebron. The White Nationalists' stand against what they call 'intermarriage', as if we do not belong to one kind of humans, is morally unacceptable. But this expletive fits equally well David Duke and Debora Lipstadt, famous American fighter against 'disappearance of Jews through intermarriage."
 
Past membership in any Jewish nationalist organisation does not defile. Indeed, ex-Jewish Defence League member Yossi Klein Halevi became a sought-after journalist and writes for the New Republic. But David Duke, who was a member of KKK at the ripe age of 20, many years ago, still is usually described as 'Ku-Klux-Klan man'.
 
David Duke, whatever were his positions in the past, became a man many Americans listen to. His is a clear and unequivocal voice against the criminal invasion of Iraq, against criminal plans of Washington and Tel Aviv to attack Syria and Iran. Duke cleaned his act re American Blacks; he befriended Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, the Black Nationalists. His appearance in Damascus was impressive. He spoke clearly and with vision.
 
We should pay heed to Duke; not necessarily by giving him kosher certificate ­ he did not ask for it and we can't provide it, either. But we may be tolerant to people on the cutting edge of resistance to the Judaeo-American Empire, be it Duke, Hamas, Iranian President or whatever. The world needs people who do not apologise to Jews. They do not have to be a Mr Nice Guy, though soft-spoken and somewhat effeminate Duke is a far cry from a Nazi Storm Trooper of Hollywood.
 
Duke is not enough to overcome the flood of Judaic propaganda, to restore the balance between Yin and Yang. But he should be allowed into discourse, unless we all want to follow in footsteps of David Irving into jail for upsetting Jewish sensibilities. These sensibilities grow daily, and there is nothing like David Duke to roll them back a bit.
 
We can't afford being over-fastidious. Our adversaries gave their full support to the Italian fascist Fini, they turned the Butcher of Sabra and Shatila into a candidate for Nobel Peace Prise. This challenge has to be met. It won't be met by your average peace fighter like Sue Blackwell, who describes herself 'a shiksa socialist' and is in a constant search for nice Jews to keep the company of. 
 
Again, we are not into racism. Eugene Weixel who replied the Jew-obsessed shiksa in his blog, our Gilad Atzmon, our Joh Domingo are proving it. But this word is not going to send us, in tears, to cling to the skirts of Jewish overseers of the leftist discourse. 
 
You will find below a short compilation of recent Duke for your reading. It is taken from hostile sites, so the definitions are theirs, not mine.
 
1)
 
Following are excerpts from an interview with American white nationalist David Duke, which aired on Syrian TV on November 21, 2005. 
 
Interviewer: How do you read the ongoing US-led escalation against Syria within the context of re-mapping the Middle East?
 
David Duke: Well, you must understand that the chief architects of the war were Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearl, Daniel Feith, Mr. Warmser, Elliot Abrams, in the United States. They were the architects of this war. Mr. Pearl, as well as Mr. Warmser and Feith, wrote a paper called "A Clean Break: Securing the Realm," a paper for Israel, for Benjamin Netanyahu. That paper said that the way to Damascus was through Baghdad.
 
I believe that this is part of the ongoing Zionist effort, in their control of American foreign policy, to dominate the entire Middle East, and I believe, dominate the world. I think America is occupied in many ways the way the Golan Heights is occupied, the way the West Bank of Palestine is occupied
 
Interviewer: Dr. Duke, what impact has the worsening situation of the occupying forces in Iraq and the daily shipment of body-bags of US and allied soldiers to the USA and elsewhere, on Bush's ability to plunge into another quagmire?
 
Duke: This war is a disaster for the United States, and I think that this has to put pause in some of the Zionist neo-cons about going into a new war. But the one wild card is that these neo-cons are crazy. They are insane people.
[...].
 
They are Jewish fanatics, extremists, they are not normal people.The people who are pushing Jewish supremacism, Zionism - they are absolute evil and they are crazy. All they know is more power, and so there is a real danger, I should say, for Syria, and a danger for Iran at this point.
[...]
 
Interviewer: How different is the Syria that you have seen for the first time from that portrayed by US and other Western media outlets?
 
Duke: I have defended Syria for a long time, so I was admiring Syria, I have admired your president very much. I hope at some point to be able to meet him and shake his hand. I think he is the greatest man in a very difficult period, and especially with what's going on right now, in terms of Lebanon and its relations with Syria. But absolutely, even from my perspective, and it shows you how the Zionist media around the world controls and affects all of us. Even those of us who are aware of it - it's subtly affecting.
 
Interviewer: How badly, can you tell our viewers, is the policy making process hijacked by those neo-cons?
 
Duke: Well, as a patriotic American - and I come here not as a Syrian partisan, but as an American patriot - it's more shocking for me than it should be for you, because our sons and daughters are being killed in Iraq, are being wounded, innocent Iraqis have died, America is being hurt, and yet we have this policy which is only for Israel. This war is completely about Israel, and I would like to suggest to people in the Middle East... Sometimes I believe that the Zionists run a mystification on us. I find, with some of the leftists around the world who say this is a war for oil or this is an American imperialist war - No, this is a case of the Zionists using America to fight their war with our blood and our money.
 
[...]
 
Interviewer: Now, Dr. Duke, is there room for other than the Jewish extremist supremacists to actively engage in the changing of this pro-Zionist hegemony in the US, and how?
 
Duke: Well, first off, I think we have to understand that there are certainly some Jews who oppose the Zionists. There is no question about that. But it also must be understood that every major Jewish organization in the United States, including the Council of Presidents of Jewish Organizations, supports this Iraq war. The largest and most powerful lobby in the United States government is the Israel lobby. Now as an American citizen, I find it pretty strange that a foreign country would have the most powerful lobby in our government.
 
So I think... My book is dedicated to Israel Shahak, who is in fact a Jewish person. I don't consider myself anti-Semitic. But I am aware of the fact that I think more Jews need to stand up against the extremist dominance within their faith, within their nation. And until that happens, we cannot continue that road. But even more importantly, we - not only in America and Europe, but also in the Middle East - we must stand up and start telling the truth. If we don't talk about some of the realities of this conflict... You know, Israel is really an apartheid state in many ways.
 
And Israel is a state... that we wouldn't tolerate actions of the American people. The New York Times is all against... It's all for intermarriage in the United States of America. But the New York Times supports Israel, where a marriage of Jewish person and a non-Jew is illegal, where a Jew who is a member of the Cohanim, which is the elite element of the Jewish tradition - they cannot even marry a Jewish person, a person who is a full-fledged Jew, of the Jewish faith, who has one drop of (non) Jewish blood. I mean, these people... Israel makes the Nazi state look very moderate in terms of its views.
 
Interviewer: How have you been treated by American media since you have been taken this stance?
 
Duke: Very bad. I would say that I'm treated about as bad as Saddam Hussein.
 
[...]
 
The number one problem, political, economic, and social on this planet now is what we call Zionism and more specifically, Jewish supremacism. These radical, extremist Jewish elements such as Ariel Sharon, such as the neo-cons in Washington, believe this strange (idea) that they have a right to control the world - not just Palestine, not just Syria, Iraq, and Iran and the rest of the Middle East, but also London, New York, and Toronto. All over the world you see the same pattern of control over the media, the same pattern of influence.
 
[...]
 
Interviewer: You've mentioned London. London's mayor, Ken Livingstone, whom I suppose that you know or have heard of...
 
Duke: Yeah, I admire him...
 
Interviewer: ...has actually described Sharon as a war criminal, and said Sharon should be tried at the Hague.
 
Duke: Of course, if anyone should be tried for war crimes, it's Ariel Sharon. The idea that the president of my country sits down and breaks bread and shares wine with Ariel Sharon, to me is amazing. I mean...
 
Interviewer: And he described him... Bush described him as a man of peace.
 
Duke: Exactly. I mean, Bush is totally... Bush is not a very smart man, and he is totally under the thumb of the Jewish supremacists. The president of Canada said it very well. He said that Bush is like a puppet. He knows what he has to say to get the support of the media, and political support. I think right now, they dangled him, they created...
 
The Zionists created the lies of this war. In fact, Steven Cohen was the CIA person who manufactured the evidence... Even Israel's CIA, even Israel's Mossad actually put forward evidence to the United States about weapons of mass destruction. Israel itself basically (knows) that they lied, they know Bush knows that he lied, so now they say to Bush: OK, either you continue on with this program, with securing the realm, with this war, either you continue on with this or we will have you impeached.
 
[...]
 
It's interesting. This is something the Arab community also is not aware of. The neo-cons, the people who founded this were actually Trotskyite communists originally. This is not well known... Interviewer: Trotskyites? Duke: Trotskyites. Yes, exactly. Russia has worked to free itself from the Jewish supremacist Bolshevists.
 
[...]
 
Interviewer: On last week's talk show, a senior Angelican Syro-Lebanese clergyman cited on this show that there is a biblical background to what the world in general, and the Middle East in particular, is witnessing nowadays. What is your input on that? He was talking about the Old Testament and the process through which Jesus Christ was tried by the Jews and the way now they are treating (figures) like the Syrian leaders.
 
Duke: I may not be the most popular person for saying what I think needs to be said, but many people in the Middle East distinguish between Zionism and Judaism. As you know from reading my book, the evidence is overwhelming: Judaism at its core - not all Jews, but Judaism at its core - is a racist religion, a supremacist religion, and non-Jews are considered not even of human caliber. It's not all of the Jews, but it is certainly something that is strong in it... 
 
"die jüdische" 04.12.2005 00:20  
 
 
 
 
CNN: Why Blitzer's Hysteria Over David Duke?
News/Comment; Posted on: 2005-12-04 09:20:16
Wolf Blitzer attacks David Duke on CNN; Dr. Duke responds.
 
 
by David Duke
 
 
WOLF BLITZER'S attack on me is a clear display of Zionist media bias. Look at CNN's caption in this screen shot: "Former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke Blasts U.S...."
 
 
"Former Representative David Duke" is my proper and appropriate title.
 
Robert Byrd is not captioned as "Former Klansman Robert Byrd."
 
George W. Bush is not captioned as "Former cokehead George Bush."
 
And as far as "Blasts U.S." is concerned, nothing could be further from the truth. In actual fact, I defended the American people in Syria, gave Syrians a good image of Americans -- and blasted Israel as the true terrorist nation, a nation which has made terrorist attacks against America.
 
 
Blitzer, an extreme Zionist, attacked
my trip to Syria on his CNN television program and called me a "White supremacist and wannabe politician." He is really reaching.
Jewish supremacists are the real supremacists. I denounce racial, ethnic, or religious supremacism. I believe in the right of all people and all nations to run their own affairs and
preserve their own heritage.
 
Such a belief is the opposite of racial supremacism.
 
It is the Zionists who are trying to control the policies of other nations. As usual, they accuse everyone else of what they themselves are doing.
 
(For new readers of
davidduke.com, please read my book, Jewish Supremacism (available on my site), wherein I have provided a mountain of quotes from mainstream Jewish sources to prove that they are the world's ultimate supremacists.)
 
 
As for the statement that I am a "wannabe politician" -- what a cheap shot. I wouldn't say that someone who has been elected to two different public offices and who received a majority of the European-American vote in major campaigns for U.S. Senate and Governor -- as well as higher vote totals in Presidential primaries than did many sitting U.S. Senators -- is a "wannabe politician."
 
 
And Blitzer is incorrect for another reason: I would like to think that I am far more of a statesman in the tradition of the American republic than other office holders, as I have never sacrificed my honor for political gain, as do most politicians who sell out on everything to get elected. I could have said what was popular, and perhaps been a Bill Clinton -- but I chose instead to tell the whole truth and be David Duke!
 
A politician is perceived as someone who simply wants to be elected; I am someone who has a Cause and uses politics to advance it.
 
 
CNN also labels me a "former Klansman," but for some reason or other the media don't label George Bush as a "former cokehead," or Teddy Kennedy as "the hero of Chappaquiddick," or Sen. Robert Byrd as "former Klansman," or some of the members of the Black caucus as "former Black Panthers" -- though all of that is undeniably true.
 
 
They don't call Ariel Sharon "the Butcher of Beirut" or Nelson Mandela a "former terrorist."
 
They make sure never to give my proper title of Dr. David Duke, but they almost always give the "Dr." title in discussing "Dr. Martin Luther King." Yet, by any standard, my doctoral degree is more legitimate than his.
 
When they don't like you, they can pull out all the stops.
 
 
Blitzer even has the gall to criticize the media in the Mideast for not calling me a "former Klansman," "White supremacist," or "tax offender."
 
 
Could you imagine them ending a news piece on Bush saying: "The media in Britain didn't mention the fact that Bush once was a habitual user of cocaine." Or "The media there didn't point out that Bush, who lied American soldiers into war, himself avoided Viet Nam with a cushy job back home. " Or "The media didn't mention that George Bush has authorized mass torture of suspects and stripping away of fundamental American rights with the Patriot Act."
 
 
Get the picture?
 
 
Such is the power of our Jewish-dominated media.
 
 
 
But now, through my response, you can see how they manipulate the American people.
 
 
In addition, they even try to bias their watchers by their caption in the news report: "Former Klansman Blasts U.S." In fact, I never blasted the U.S. I repeatedly stated in every public appearance that I was an American patriot, even an American partisan. I said that the American people don't want war and want friendship with all, and that it is only the Zionists and their servants who want war and therefore must, with lies, manipulate the American people into war.
 
 
I pointed out that the only Mideast nation that has made terroristic attacks upon America was Israel. Israel made terroristic firebomb attacks against American installations in Egypt in the Lavon Affair and the surprise, murderous attack on the USS Liberty. Israel recently awarded -- and called "heroes" -- the Jewish terrorists who attacked American facilities in Egypt.
 
 
I also pointed out that there have been no agents of Mideast governments except Israel convicted of
major spying against the U.S. and
doing great damage to the U.S. -- while Israel lauds their spy who did so harm America,
Jonathan Pollard. I pointed out the current espionage cases involving AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee). I pointed out the terrible harm done to America and the Mideast in the Iraq War, a war orchestrated by the neocons for the benefit of Israel.
 
 
It was generally accepted by everyone present who was quoted on the subject of my speech in Syria that my speech helped lessen anti-American feeling in the Mideast by showing that the American people, in contrast to the Zionist-controlled politicians, want friendship and peace with the world.
 
 
The fact that the entire non-Jewish Mideast media were completely supportive of my visit and uttered not a negative word -- that they just simply reported the news as it happened -- should be encouraging to us. For if the media in these countries is free of Jewish extremist control, think of the opportunities we have to educate hundreds of millions of people on the real dangers of Jewish supremacism, something that will certainly rebound back into White countries. Many world scholars, leaders, and media personalities are beginning to express the ideas and facts found in my books.
 
 
Read Jewish Supremacism again; read the last two chapters on Jewish-led immigration policies and the Jewish worldwide threat. If this becomes common knowledge across the world, a great blow will have been struck not only in the battle of these independent nations against Jewish supremacy, but also in our own homelands.
 
 
The world is changing, my friends!
 
 
The leading journalist in the Mideast said:
 
 
"Israel has always wanted to deflect anger from themselves to America and others. Dr. Duke's presence focuses attention on the true danger to both European-Americans and Arabs -- Jewish Extremism.
 
 
"David Duke's message here makes all Americans wherever they are sleep safer and easier. His exemplary courage in speaking out against Zionism has done more for the American image in the Arab world than any other American I can name. And his book, Jewish Supremacism, is by far the best book on the subject from either an Arab or Occidental source. If American foreign policy wasn't run by Israeli partisans, they would appoint him as America's ambassador at large to heal the anti-American sentiment growing around the world."
 
 
Of course, the Jewish supremacists don't want the anger of the people of the Mideast to be directed away from America to where it rightfully belongs: the Jewish supremacist State of Israel and their partisans who have so much influence in American and European media and government.
 
 
The Zionists at CNN such as Wolf Blitzer would much rather see Americans suffer from violent attacks rather than Israel. In fact, they routinely cover up the mischief and damage Israel does to America. For instance they constantly lie and say in almost these exact words 'We are so thankful for Israel, our only friend in the Mideast.' The damning truth is that before America became manipulated to support Israel, America had not even one enemy in the Middle East.
 
 
And what kind of "friend of America" commits terrorist acts against us, spies on us, and leads us into bloody, expensive wars not in our true interests?
 
 
So this CNN report by a pro-Israel extremist has inadvertently revealed the biased reporting that I speak about every day.
 
 
I did not blast the United States. I love my country -- unlike the Jewish supremacists who will harm my country for the sake of Israel.
 
 
I did not blast the United States. I blasted the traitors who send Americans to die or be maimed for Jewish neocon lies rather than for the true interests and security of America.
 
 
I did not blast the United States. I spoke the truth that it is not just the Golan Heights or Palestine that is occupied by the Zionist extremists -- they also occupy far too much of the American media and far too much of the American government.
 
 
CNN attack video
 
 
 
 
An Open Letter to The University of Toronto Friends, Faculty Members, Students at the University of Toronto:
 
Read this fantastic letter from a brave student at the University of Toronto on the outrageous attempt to suppress non-violent freedom of political speech and to imprison students and faculty who excercise their freedom of speech and conscience. This letter is a classic which should be used as a perfect outline for students in addressing freedom of speech issues. I salute the courageous students who stand up for the truth against the blatant suppression and intimidation of Jewish supremacism! This is one of the most well-written and most powerful letters I have ever read. -- David Duke
 
To the Faculty and Students at the University of Toronto:
 
I and a small group of my fellow students have dared to distribute a little piece of paper that dares to expose Jewish supremacism. In it we dare to quote from from outspoken, former American elected official, Dr. David Duke, who has written a book called Jewish Supremacism. Dr. Duke has been one of Americas most persistent and eloquent foes of the Iraq War and American Israeli policy. Jewish Supremacism is not an anti-Semitic book. In fact, it is dedicated to a Jew, the late Dr. Israel Shahak, a survivor of the concentration camps during WWII and a leader of the Israeli Peace Movement. People can read parts of the book for themselves on Dr. Duke's website, www.davidduke.com , and see clearly that it is not anti-Semitic but simply opposes the extremist Jewish supremacism that drives the Israeli state and its supporters around the world. Merely calling someone anti-Semitic doesn't make it so.
 
At the University of Toronto we are free. We have free speech. We are free to expose and condemn White people for mistreatment of Indians, for White Colonialism around the world. We are free to accuse White people and the White establishment of racism real and imagined. We are free to condemn any person who says being straight is better than being gay. We can do these things without threat of being expelled from the university, without the possibility of the police coming and getting us in the middle of the night and throwing us into jail for months or years.
 
But, if we dare to expose elements of Jewish supremacism, for instance the Jewish supremacism that exists in Israel and that is being advanced by extremist Jews around the world who support the extremist Jewish state, we will find ourselves the criminal. Expose the open anti-Gentile, anti-Christian hatred of extremist Jews in Canada or the United States and we may well find ourselves charged with hatred and face expulsion and even years of imprisonment!
 
Why is it that exposing elements of racial or religious hatred among extremist Christians deserves praise but exposing it among Jews deserves jail?
 
Why is exposing White extremism called "love" but exposing Jewish extremism is called "hate?"
 
Why is it called hate to expose the fact that Israel is a Jewish supremacist, Apartheid nation of segregation of Jews from non-Jews? Why is it called hatred to expose the fact that in Israel marriage between a Jew and Gentile is against the law?" Why is it called hatred to expose the fact that Israel is a Jewish supremacist nation that limits immigration only to Jews? Why is it called hatred to expose the fact that Israel routinely tortures thousands of Palestinians each year but will never do so to a Jew, for any crime?
 
Why is called hatred to expose the fact that Jews in Israel have stolen huge swaths of Palestinian land and oppressed, tortured, and murdered thousands of Palestinians in the occupied territories? Why is it called hatred to point out that Jewish supremacist Neocons such as Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Wurmser and Libby lied to the world about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and have led the efforts for the murderous Iraq War resulting in the deaths of at least 100,000 and a rise in world terrorism and hate?
 
Why is it called hatred to tell the obvious truth that the Iraq War is a war conceived and driven by Jewish supremacists - a war for Israel? Why is it hatred to point out that Jewish Neocons seek to exacerbate relations between the Christian and Islamic world and wash the world in blood in what they call proudly World War IV? Canada oh Canada, fellow students and faculty, where is the freedom of our fathers?
 
Where has gone the most important of human rights, Free Speech, the right upon which all other rights are hinged?
 
Who has taken these rights from you?
 
It is not we who put our ideas on a small pieces of paper who should be investigated by the police. You should investigate the authorities and groups who promote these laws against free speech, free thought and free conscience!
 
You will find they are most vigorously promoted by the same Jewish Supremacist organizations, such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, who are desperate for you not to learn of their own supremacism. These organizations support the Apartheid State of Israel, a state that routinely tortures thousands of Palestinians each year, but never will torture a Jew for any offense no matter how heinous. They support Israel which is a state that is based primarily on genetics, more so than religion. A person of Jewish descent who is an atheist from anywhere in the world can immigrate to Israel while a Palestinian who was born there cannot! And, the Canadian Jewish Congress works desperately to stop intermarriage of Jews and Gentiles in Canada, an act by itself which would be universally condemned if any White Canadian group did so!
 
Why is the Canadian Jewish Congress afraid of free speech? Is it not afraid that free speech would expose its own hypocrisy, its own supremacist theology? What truth is so weak that it must imprison human beings who dare to question it?
 
What's happening at this university is no different than the darkest chapters of human suppression. In the middle ages the masters of intolerance called those who loved science and truth "heretics," and by that label imprisoned them. In modern times the masters of intolerance call those who expose Jewish extremism, "anti-Semites" or "haters," and by that label imprison them.
 
I and my fellow student and faculty free speechers are opposed to supremacism wherever it exists. We are opposed to supremacism and hatred whether it be White, Black, or multi-hued, whether it is Christian or Jewish, gay or straight, male or female. But, unlike the Canadian Jewish Congress and this supine administration, we believe the way to oppose supremacism is through discussion and debate not with imprisonment worthy of some tin-pot dictatorship.
 
The truth is that those who seek to hunt down like criminals, to expel and imprison those who have dared to express their freedom of conscience, thought, opinion and speech are the true enemies of diversity and tolerance.
 
They are the ones who should be prosecuted for violations of human rights. They are the enemies of freedom. None our fellow students and faculty who courageously oppose Jewish supremacism support jail for those who support free speech in the Jewish Apartheid State. But, those who conspire to imprison people for daring to utter an opinion, no matter how unpopular, are guilty of the real human rights violations. Many officials have been tried in the World Court for imprisoning people who exercises their freedom of speech.
 
The efforts of the University head to expel and imprison we who expressed our freedom of speech is a REAL human rights violation!
 
With all due respect, I must respectfully report that the head of our esteemed university should be the one investigated. Maybe Amnesty International will do it?
 
I urge all other students whether or not they agree with the substance of our arguments to support the rights of their fellow students and faculty to our human right of free speech.

 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros