- According to the European edition of
the Wall Street Journal (11-19-05), Jean-Marie Le Pen (pictured at youth
rally, right) of the Front National has become a major factor in French
politics. Unlike the corrupt, compromised politicians at the helm of France's
Judeo-liberal state, Le Pen stands alone in arguing that the quasi-insurrection
of immigrant "youth" was the logical offshoot of thirty years
of misguided immigration policy -- which has allowed millions of Third
World peoples to colonize the European heartland. And though he has repeatedly
made these claims in the past, today all France is listening, as he puts
the entire social-political system on notice. In a series of recent declarations,
he has condemned the country's political class not just for its pathetic
response to the racial anarchy that threatened the nation's life for more
than three weeks, but for creating a situation in which a hostile, alien
force was allowed a free hand to attack and vilify the French in their
own land. If elected president in 2007, he promises "everything will
change."
-
-
- Against an Establishment which understands
the recent street violence in terms of alienation, poverty, and exclusion
(all of which are implicitly assumed to be the fault of French Whites),
Le Pen minces no words in denouncing the danger posed by immigration. This
danger, he says, threatens the very existence of Europe insofar as the
anti-White forces represented by these immigrants seek nothing less than
the abolition of all that distinguishes Europe from the impoverished, mismanaged
lands from which they originate. Le Pen thus predicts even greater and
more threatening disturbances, for the integration schemes the political
class now plans for France promise to generate even greater discontent
and violence.
-
- But more than stressing the political,
cultural, religious, and civilizational danger these immigrants pose, Le
Pen makes the untimely observation that they don't even serve an economic
purpose. The state's own statistics show that legal immigration grew by
nearly 3% in 2004 and that only 5% of these new immigrants hold jobs --
which means the remaining 95% are supported by French taxpayers, who have
to foot the bill for their housing, unemployment benefits, and medical
care. According to the economist Yves-Marie Laulan, every immigrant entering
France ends up costing the country 100,000 euros per year. It is of course
politically incorrect to note the correlation between these statistics
and what happened in the burning suburbs. But these figures (which don't
include illegal immigration) cannot but announce even greater troubles.
-
- The soothing discourse coming from
the established powers, as might be expected, are little more than a criminal
scam. For what these powers refuse to acknowledge is that the North- and
West African Muslim hordes settled on the outskirts of France's major metropolitan
centers are not just the Third World's pitiful refuse, they are a force
that blights the face of Marianne, pollutes her environment, assaults her
cultural patrimony, and endangers the most mundane realms of her daily
life. Their ugly, ill mannered, and repugnant behaviors stand, in fact,
as a living refutation of all multiculturalist claims to their enriching
effects. Any effort to assimilate them into the national body can only
come at the cost of destroying everything the nation represents. But however
negative their effect, in themselves the immigrants are not the principal
danger to French survival: For numerous and rebellious as they may be,
the threat they pose can be easily enough taken care of once the will arises.
For the moment Europeans re-learn to be themselves again, the aliens will
simply be repatriated back to the god-forsaken places from which they came.
-
- The chief danger to the survival
of the White North, as Le Pen makes crystal clear, is the reigning political
class, which has been instrumental in imposing an American-style regime
of money on Europe and using it to ruin the human quality of Europe's incomparable
patrimony. This New Class of bought-off politicians and deculturated managers
beholden to international financial interests is, indeed, the real architect
of Europe's Third Worldization. Naively believing in the positive value
of multiracialism, multiculturalism, and world citizenship, this class
has sought to make patriotism old-fashioned, relativize the law's legitimacy,
obscure the horrific realities of multiculturalism, and distort all statistics
and evidence contradicting its harebrained schemes.
-
- The destructive effects of the situation
it has created cannot, in fact, even be discussed (which, as I argued in
an earlier article, is a contributing factor to the system's growing dysfunctionality).
As Hélène Carrière d'Encausse, a distinguished historian
of Soviet Russia and member of the prestigious Académie française,
recently told a Russian TV station: "French television [and she implies
the French public sphere as a whole] is so politically correct that it
is a nightmare. We have laws that even Stalin couldn't have imagined. You
can go to jail for simply pointing out that there are five Jews or ten
Blacks on TV. It's prohibited to express an opinion on ethnic groups, on
the Second World War, and on numerous other issues."
-
- That the recent implosion of French
society was the work of the very politicians responsible for the present
immigration policies, and not the immigrants themselves, is further evidenced
by Chirac's national TV address of 11-14, when, after affirming the "enriching"
effects of diversity, called on the French to further empty their pocketbooks
for the sake of the "disadvantaged youth," proposing new schemes
to support the government's egalitarian utopia. In this spirit, Chirac
promises more strenuous anti-discrimination laws and better representation
of ethnic minorities in French media and politics. He remains thus totally
clueless as to the nature of the recent riots. But this is not simply a
French problem. The European Parliament recently refused to discuss the
quasi-insurrectional riots -- for the EU's immigration policies are no
less responsible for the racial-civilizational wars that are bound to scar
Europe's future.
-
- In any case, Le Pen has begun the
counter-attack. For the first time in six decades, since the extra-European
conquest of the European Continent, the White man is openly and publicly
mobilizing against the aliens' rule. "Only the defense of our identity,
our territory, our prosperity, waged in opposition to the globalist ideology
of all who favor the unrestricted circulation of goods, capital, and people"
will, he insists, preserve France's national existence.
-
- If the France of Le Pen succeeds
in reconquering her lands, this will undoubtedly prepare the way for the
rest of Europe . Already, the majority of the French working class (the
first to suffer the disastrous consequences of globalization) and an ever-growing
section of the middle class support him. As outnumbered and outgunned by
the totalitarian forces of the Judeo-liberal regime, the heritage Le Pen
represents refuses to be silenced. If this heritage should ever be restored
by a Le Pen presidency (and his standing in the polls has shot up everywhere
across France), there is little doubt that "everything will change."
-
- Michael O'Meara, Ph.D., studied social
theory at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes in Sciences Sociales and modern European
history at the University of California. He is the author of New Culture,
New Right: Anti-Liberalism in Postmodern Europe (2004)
-
- http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vie
wArticle&code=LAN20041222&articleId=338
|
