- For those of you that know that Jon Carlson
of Chicago and I are not the same person you will be relieved to know that
both of us are still investigating 9-11. There have been some disinformation
people like Stew Webb and Daryl Bradford Smith trying to spread the rumor
that Jon is me and I am Jon but that simply is not true. Some have
even alleged that we write exactly alike but that is not true either.
- Jon and I have collaborated on two things
the fact that no 757 hit the Pentagon and the fact that 737 jets
were used to hit the WTC towers, not the much larger 767 jets from Boston
Logan. There was in fact a 737 jet engine laying on the street at
the intersection of Church and Vessey Streets just northeast of the twin
towers complex. That jet engine originated from the plane that hit
the South Tower.
- Our approach to 9-11 has been like approaching
a trial. If one can prove that any part of the Official 9-11 Story
is a lie, the entire US Government story can be dismissed and not considered
as evidence. They even make such instructions to juries regarding
witnesses who have been impeached during examination and cross-examination.
- Most of you probably remember my recent
statement that al Zarqawi is dead and has been for about three years. This
news item recently hit the Washington Post when someone in the Pentagon
admitted to fabricating the myth to generate support for the Global War
on Terror. It is just more faux news from this lying Bush Administration
and our government in general.
- I am not clairvoyant; just do not buy
off on government spun BS and propaganda. When they say "BOO!"
I do not flinch, blink or cower. I especially do not become one of
the Church of the Quivering Brethren.
- It was this collaborative approach that
led Jon and I to conclude that no 757 hit the Pentagon so we looked for
alternatives. The only plane that made sense was either a 737 or
an A3 Skywarrior, both of which can use the same types of jet engines up
to a point.
- The wing span of most 737 jets fall into
the range of between 93.0 ft and 112.6 ft which is still 19 feet to 38
feet of wing that cannot be accounted for in impacting the face of the
Pentagon before it mysteriously disappeared. When the absence of
surface impacts and the size of a 737 including height of the tail are
weighed, it is probable that a smaller plane was used to affect the attack
on the Pentagon.
- I defy anyone to find an A3 Skywarrior
in the hands of any Arab terrorist on 9-11 or any other day. There
are only three sources of those jets: 1.) a few (3 to 6) remaining in USAF
inventory; or 2.) Davis Monthan AFB where many jets are stored due to lack
of humidity; or 3.) the fleet of 12-15 once owned by Hughes and now controlled
by Raytheon after that corporation acquired Hughes.
- There is an outside chance it might have
been a 737 but it does not appear as likely as something that would easily
be mistaken as a 737 or 757. The underneath of an A3 would be hard
for a non-expert to distinguish from other types of two jet engine planes
mounted under the wings. See drawing below.
- Once we had identified the jet engine
on the street in NYC another 9-11 investigator named Deborah and I kept
digging and she found a video that was taken from Battery Park City to
the south and southwest of the Twin Towers. That video is also very
revealing because what was seen on CNN that morning and what really hit
the South Tower are two different planes.
- Once that video was in hand we had it
analyzed by two video labs to verify that it was authentic and it had not
been altered in any manner. Deborah focused on tracking down the
video, getting a copy and then tracking down the person who shot the video
on the morning of 9-11 and just happened to have captured excellent footage
of the second plane. Once I had the copy of the video, I focused
on getting the images de-interlaced and obtained 37 clear photos of the
jet that hit the South Tower.
- They say a picture is worth a thousand
words and Jon Carlson came up with a photograph of the Pentagon that is
very revealing. As you look at the photograph dismiss the rubble
and the fact that people died in that part of the building. Pay attention
to the left hand side, especially at the roof and the corner of the building
on the left hand side of the collapsed area.
- I will explain below the photograph what
you are looking at.
- That clean break on the left hand side
occurred along what they call an expansion joint or a construction joint
by some. All buildings have them because all buildings expand with
heat and contract in cold. How did those wily Arabs know to hit the
Pentagon at one of its weakest points? That absolutely clean break
is telling and so is the width of the opening.
- Jon Carlson and I are convinced that
the plane used to attack the Pentagon is an old USAF / Navy plane designated
as the A3 Skywarrior.
- Eyewitnesses that saw the bottom of the
plane that hit the Pentagon would have to be pretty observant and knowledgeable
in the different types of jets to not mistake the drawing on the right
for a 737 or 757.
- The wingspan of an A3 is 74 feet and
in the Navy version the wings were designed to fold up for storage on an
aircraft carrier (visible on the drawing above). At a distance, painted
like an American Airlines plane, this plane would easily be mistaken for
a 737, 757, 767 type of aircraft because the two engines hang under the
wing but are of far smaller dimensions than the 9 foot diameter jets on
a 757 that not only hang under the wing but also hang lower than the bottom
of the fuselage.
- That is an important point because there
were no marks on the Pentagon lawn of those two jet engines dragging the
ground and they would have based on how low the Pentagon was hit.
Said another way, forget about the fuselage dragging on the ground. The
engines of a 757 would have been plowing the Pentagon lawn but that did
- The wingspan of a 757 is 124 feet 10
inches. The width of the overall opening, even what is visible as
possible wing marks slamming into the face of the building is closer to
74 feet than it is 124 feet 10 inches. In short, there is 50 feet
missing to substantiate the Official Lie put out by Washington, DC as to
what hit the Pentagon. Said another way, there is 25 feet on each
side of the centerline of the strike point (that 14-16 foot hole left in
the side of the Pentagon) that left no evidence of a wider wing span 757
hitting the building.
- They also cannot (or more appropriately
will not) explain what happened to the two 9 foot diameter engines that
mysteriously disappeared. Some official government sources claim
that the fire was so hot it melted the engines to nothing, yet they claim
they found DNA of the passengers. That math does not compute, or
the science either.
- They will not explain the lack of luggage
at the crash scene or the absence of the many seats that are on a 757.
The A-3 only had three seats for most configurations. We have
interior photos of one that was modified to have a small table for 4 to
meet and expanded the capacity to 6. Sort of a corporate jet for
- Look at that photo again if the
fire was hot enough to make steel and cobalt engine parts (very high melting
point) vaporize, all of the materials collapsed into that opening would
have been reduce to ash.
- It is a simple matter that the fire did
not burn hot enough for a long enough period of time to vaporize a 757
and leave no evidence. That is especially true of the jet engine
components that are made of cobalt to withstand high heat and has a melting
point of 1495 °C (2723 °F). Burning jet fuel cannot reach
that temperature. However, it is not enough to just melt it.
To disappear the large 757 jet engines to fit the Official Lie it would
have to get hot enough for a sustained period to reach the boiling point
of 2927 °C (5301 °F). Those temperatures are way above, by
over 3,000 degrees, what burning jet fuel can generate. Temperature
that high would have reduced to ash everything you see in the photo in
the collapsed area yet there are steel columns and beams that did not melt
or even deflect noticeably from heat.
- I remember the first conversation I had
with Karen Kwiatkowski, a retired Lieutenant Colonel who was in the Pentagon
that day. She is the lady that went public about the Office of Special
Plans where they were falsifying the intelligence regarding Iraq. She
vividly remembers being downstairs and around the corner in about 10 minutes
to help get people out and the FBI agents were at the CITGO station confiscating
the video tapes of what hit the Pentagon.
- Other eyewitnesses have stated that they
smelled explosives such as cordite, not burning jet fuel. Those were
military witnesses that know that exploded ordnance smells like.
- What little video evidence there is does
show a white trail of smoke before the Pentagon explosion. Jet fuel
burns dark at sea level and jets do not leave white contrails at sea level.
What does leave a white trail of smoke at all elevations is the solid
fuel of a rocket, Thiokol in most rockets being the type of solid fuel.
- A3 Skywarriors are configured to carry
and launch rockets. 757 commercial jets are not. To this very
day, Raytheon Hughes uses a fleet of A3 Skywarriors to test fire
rockets and Hughes is one of the manufacturers of air-to-air and air-to-ground
missiles used in our military arsenal. One of their A3 jets is shown
above launching a missile made by Hughes.
- The Official Story will not stand up
under close scrutiny of a real 9-11 Commission or a court of law.
- Some in our government have much to answer
for and have yet to be asked the right questions under oath.
- Who would do such a thing and why would
they do it?
- If you caught the last episode of "24"
that aired Monday night, April 17, 2006 that story line disclosed their
objective but coming at it as a conspiracy to take over the Caspian Basin
oil and they murdered the President because he intended to put a stop to
- Bridas Corporation, Trans-Afghanistan
Pipeline, landlocked Caspian Basin oil, billions invested by Big Oil and
could not get the oil to the ocean and money out of your pockets. Any
of this ringing a bell?
- Best regards,
- Jon reminded me of some links readers
need to see regarding the CFM56 737 engine in the NYC street and the JT8D
fan hub assembly at the Pentagon NOT from a 757:
- Jack White backs the JT8D research and
the A3 connection:
- George Nelson on the Pentagon hole:
- The attached photo of the A3 will give
readers a better realization of its similarity to a 757 or 737.