- From Israel Shamir -
-
- "It is ironic that anti-racists
are willing to challenge the Jewish establishment's view of the holocaust
but not the issue of Jewish world domination", writes Bob Finch in
this second powerful essay.
-
- He goes well beyond our usual complaints.
He does not stop at his critique of Zionism, he is not being attracted
by the holocaust debate. He takes up the punch line of Shamir's Vampire
Killers: "it is not a myth which sustains the Jewish state - it is
Jewish global power. It is power which sustains myths".
-
- Bob Finch goes for jugular, for the absolutely
forbidden question of Jewish power from our non-racist position. While
good people bewail the multibillion subsidies provided by America to the
Jewish state, Bob Finch states unashamedly: "But these are not subsidies.
They are tribute payments that the vanquished pay to their conquerors."
He calls upon us to deal with this question of power instead of secondary
one, how it is used.
-
- It is also refreshing that Finch avoids
such cliché euphemism as "Israel Lobby" or "Israeli
influence", but refers us to the true culprit - the organised Jewry.
He concludes: "It has become absurd to believe that the JOS (Jews
Only State) is an American colony.
-
- On the contrary, America now resembles
a Jewish colony. America is not merely ruled by a Jewish elite, it has
become the biggest prize in the global Jewish empire." -
-
- -- Israel Shamir
-
- America Vanquished
-
- By Bob Finch
4-3-6
-
- Historically, holocaust denial has been
a political tactic used primarily by extreme right wing political parties.
However, a small number of anti-racists have gone beyond criticisms of
the racist policies of the Jews-Only state in Palestine (JOS) to question
various aspects of Jewish holocaust propaganda. These commentators believe
such propaganda is used politically to justify the oppression of Palestinians
so they hope that holocaust questioning might help to undermine this oppression.
Norman Finkelstein exposed the fabrications and extortionate practices
of what he's called the Jewish holocaust industry, `There's no business
like Shoah business'. Lenni Brenner has highlighted Zionist collaboration
with the Nazis in the mass slaughter of Jews during the second world war
(see `Zionism in the Age of the Dictators' and also `51 Documents: Zionist
Collaboration with the Nazis').
-
- Since Ariel Sharon became the JOS's prime
minister in 2001, the oppression of Palestinians has reached such heights
of obscenity that an increasing number of anti-racists have joined the
fray against Jewish holocaust propaganda. Some have raised questions about
particular facts believed to have taken place during the second world war.
Others have questioned the so-called Jewish holocaust on conceptual grounds
e.g. that the holocaust is a racist concept for focusing solely on the
slaughter of Jews. Some anti-racists have expressed doubts about the wisdom
of enshrining the establishment view of the Jewish holocaust in law and
then making it a criminal offence to challenge such a view. In 1963, Hannah
Arendt, one of the foremost scholars of totalitarianism, estimated in `Eichmann
in Jerusalem' that the Nazis killed between four and a half million to
six million Jews. If she was alive today and uttered such a view it is
possible she would be deemed a "holocaust denier" and even thrown
in prison. Arendt's punishment for expressing such a view in the mid-1960s
was condemnation, and then ostracism, by Jewish communities around the
world but only the most extreme Zionists would have doubted her historical
scholarship or thought she deserved imprisonment.
-
- There is no doubt the JOS has used holocaust
propaganda to legitimize its racist treatment of Palestinians. The Jewish
holocaust industry has exploited holocaust propaganda to extort huge sums
of money from European countries which were then used to fund racist causes
in the JOS. Anti-racists are rightly and justly raising questions about
the strong links between what happened during the age of totalitarianism
and what the JOS has been doing to Palestinians over the last sixty years.
-
- It is paradoxical, however, that whilst
some anti-racists are now willing to engage in holocaust questioning, the
one issue they do not address, the last remaining Jewish taboo, is Jewish
political power. The only well known anti-racist who has confronted this
issue is Ralph Nader, "The subservience of our congressional and White
House puppets to Israeli military policy has been consistent. They're almost
all puppets. There are two sets: Congressional puppets and White House
puppets. When the chief puppeteer (Sharon) comes to Washington, the puppets
prance." (Pat Buchanan `Ralph Nader: Conservatively Speaking' The
American Conservative http://www.amconmag.com/2004_06_21/cover.html June
21, 2004). Nader has never repeated this statement or elaborated upon it
or sought to use it as the basis for policies to counter such distortions
of political power. Perhaps the reason for this is that nobody came to
his defence when the Jewish lobby accused him of anti-semitism. It has
been quietly dumped into the dustbin of history. (But even Nader considers
Sharon, the PM of JOS, `the chief puppeteer' instead of seeing him as a
minor official in the bigger setup. ISH)
-
- Anti-racists, like virtually everyone
else in the western world, maintain that America is the world's hyper-power.
From this perspective, the JOS can be seen only as an American colony -
dependent on America's military, technological, and economic, support for
survival. Anti-racists are willing to risk being condemned as anti-semites
for challenging the racist nature of the JOS. They are willing to endure
condemnation for casting the merest conceptual or empirical shadow over
the establishment view of the so-called Jewish holocaust. But, they are
not willing to challenge the Jewish taboo over the idea of Jewish political
power in the western world, "It is an old canard that Jews control
America and American foreign policy," Foxman said. "During both
world wars, anti-semites said that Jews manipulated America into war."
(Jeffrey Blankfort `A War for Israel' http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html
April 2004). But what better way is there of camouflaging Jewish world
domination than behind such a hoary old canard? Indeed, the fact that this
taboo has become an accepted norm throughout the western world is yet one
more piece of evidence pointing to the existence of Jewish world domination.
It is ironic that anti-racists are willing to challenge the Jewish establishment's
view of the holocaust but not the issue of Jewish world domination even
though, politically, their reasons for doing the former also apply to the
latter.
-
- Andrew Winkler's article 'Deadly Chess
Game' is a classic of this genre. Winkler believes "Iran is also threatening
the moral and ideological base of Israel: the 'Holocaust Myth'." He
encourages the left to re-examine the propaganda of the Jewish holocaust
because he believes this would threaten the survival of the JOS. "If
world-opinion came to believe, as an increasing number of historians claim,
that the Holocaust was nothing but a propaganda lie, designed pre-dominantly
for the purpose of mounting support for the creation of a Jewish state
in Palestine, it would become impossible for the US government to continue
pumping billions of Dollars in military and financial aid into its de-facto
colony Israel and backup Israel's brutal oppression of the Palestinian
people through the ruthless abuse of its veto right in the UN Security
Council." (Andrew Winkler 'Deadly Chess Game' http://therebel.org/
Feb 16th 2006).
-
- Whilst Winkler is willing to engage in
holocaust questioning because it politically undermines the JOS he continues
to support the conventional idea of the JOS as an American colony. This
stance leads him to a somewhat distorted conclusion, "The Jewish State
wouldn't even exist, if it weren't for the combined effort of the Zionist
lobby, US government and Stalin, of making the world believe in the Holocaust."
The so-called Jewish holocaust is certainly used politically around the
world to evoke political sympathies for the JOS but it is not a myth which
sustains this apartheid regime - it is Jewish global power. It is power
which sustains myths. Without power myths cannot survive. The prevalence
of a myth is a pointer to the power which sustains it. Is it not a little
bizarre to believe that the "Zionist lobby" would spend time
and money promoting a myth in the hope of winning the world's approval
for the survival of the JOS, when it can manipulate America into providing
the JOS with military and political protection irrespective of world opinion?
-
- The idea of the JOS as a mere American
satellite or colony dates back to October 1973 when president Richard Nixon
airlifted military supplies to the beleaguered Jewish army to save it from
defeat by Arab armies. At the time, this rescue was commonly perceived
as America coming to the aid of an ally. It was this highly dramatic event
which led to the image of the JOS as an American colony. Since then this
view has become a commonly accepted opinion throughout the western world.
It has been given the seal of approval by western academia. Zionists love
the image because although it seems to demean the stature of the JOS, it
once again allows the JOS to present itself and, by proxy, Jews around
the world, as innocent victims.
-
- The best known intellectual exponent
of the proposition that JOS is an American colony is Noam Chomsky. His
promotion of this view helped to justify its acceptance by those on the
left, the anti-apartheid movement, the anti-war movement, and even by liberals.
Chomsky is the chief Rabbi of the left who absolves the JOS of guilt and
responsibility for its apartheid regime and its military belligerence against
neighbouring countries. The implication of seeing the JOS as an American
colony is that America has ordered the JOS to do everything for which it
has become despised, so all blame and all responsibility must be placed
on Americans not the JOS. Thus Chomskyism proposes that the American government
was to blame when Ariel Sharon invaded the Lebanon because it forced him
to fight a war he did not want to fight! The clever racist assumption that
Chomsky allows to fester here is that what he means by `America' is a country
ruled by White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASPs). Since he refuses to countenance
the idea of Jewish power in America, let alone Jews controlling American
politics, the only people who could be responsible for ordering Sharon
to engage in violence, terrorism, and warfare at every opportunity are
American WASPs!
-
- Given Chomsky's intellectual stature
and authority, few on the left have dared to challenge his preposterous,
immoral and racist, views. Jeffrey Blankfort is one of the few - see for
example `The Israel Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions' http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html
c.2004).
-
- See also Réseau Voltaire's interview
of Blankfort: `The Chomsky/Blankfort Polemic' http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs_TheChomskyBlankfortPolemic.php
February 20, 2006.
-
- According to Blankfort, Chomsky's "attempt
to portray the US-Israel relationship as mirroring that of Washington's
relations to its client regimes in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua,
has no basis in reality." Blankfort argues, "Also, there were
no Salvadoran, Nicaraguan or Guatemalan lobbies of any consequence in Washington
to lavish millions of dollars wooing or intimidating members of Congress;
no one in the House or Senate from any of those client countries with possible
dual- loyalties approving multi-billion dollar appropriations on an annual
basis; none owning major television networks, radio stations, newspapers
or movie studios, and no trade unions or state pension funds investing
billions of dollars in their respective economies. The closest thing in
the category of national lobbies is that of Miami's Cuban exiles, whose
existence and power the left is willing to acknowledge, even though its
political clout is miniscule compared to that of Israel's supporters."
(Jeffrey Blankfort `The Israel Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions' http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html
c.2004).
-
-
- It is ludicrous to regard the JOS as
if it was little different from a country like Honduras which is dominated
by an American multi-national corporation producing a single monocultural
crop. Hondurans do not own a substantial proportion of the American media
and pump out an endless stream of Honduran propaganda on behalf of national
interests of the Honduran state. They do not posses a hugely wealthy lobby
which bribes members of congress into passing legislation supporting Honduras's
foreign policies. There are not huge numbers of Honduran intellectuals
in America producing policy papers outlining new foreign policies for America
which, completely coincidentally, are the same as Honduras's foreign policies.
There are not large numbers of Hondurans serving in the Bush administration.
It has to be concluded that it is impossible to see the JOS as an American
colony.
-
- This is not the place to outline the
history of the Jewish takeover of American politics and the rise of Jewish
global domination. Suffice it to say the JOS has used its nuclear weapons
or military power to blackmail America into giving it whatever support
it needs and that the Jewish lobby has manipulated various American administrations
into fighting proxy Zionist wars. It was pointed out above that America's
airlifting of military supplies to the JOS during the October 1973 war
gave rise to the now commonly accepted view of the JOS as an American colony.
But this interpretation of the airlift is erroneous. Nixon was confronted
with the choice of protecting a country with no oil or an Arab world with
a super abundance of oil. To all those left wingers who have for decades
blithely insisted that America is interested in the Middle East solely
because of oil such a decision should have been a no-brainer.
-
-
- There is no conceivable reason based
on America's national interests why Nixon should have chosen to support
the JOS rather than the Arab world. (Please do not suggest that America
saw the JOS as essential because the Jews provided political and military
services for America it could not provide for itself. Any number of Arab
regimes could also have provided exactly the same services if asked. Saddam
Hussein was all too willing to carry out services for America - but when
he expected Americans to pay for these services they decimated his army).
-
- The most plausible reason for Nixon's
decision is that the JOS used its nuclear weapons to blackmail Nixon into
providing it with military assistance even though he knew such a decision
ran counter to America's interests.
-
- (See Israeli Thermonuclear Blackmail
Against The U.S. http://www.rense.com/general35/isrnuk.htm -ed)
-
- Nixon must have known the Arab world
would retaliate by establishing an oil embargo that would severely damage
America's economic and national interests. And this is precisely what happened.
The embargo pushed America and the global economy into an economic recession
that lasted nearly a decade. The JOS blackmailed Nixon into sacrificing
American interests for the sake of the interests of the JOS. "the
decision to give $2.2 billion in emergency military aid during the October
War triggered an Opec oil embargo that inflicted considerable damage on
Western economies." (John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt `The Israel
Lobby' http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd
2006). In other words, America spent $2.2 billion in military aid which
then cost it hundreds of billions of dollars in lost economic development.
This pattern of American sacrifice has been repeated ad nauseam ever since.
What the 1973 airlift really symbolizes is the JOS's power to extract whatever
it needs from America to boost its own interests even at America's expense.
-
- It is often mentioned that America provides
a huge annual subsidy to the JOS. Over the decades this has amounted to
something in the region of $150 billion. "Since the October War in
1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing that
given to any other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct
economic and military assistance since 1976, and is the largest recipient
in total since World War Two, to the tune of well over $140 billion (in
2004 dollars)." (John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt `The Israel Lobby'
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd 2006).
But these are not subsidies. They are tribute payments that the vanquished
pay to their conquerors.
-
- Since the October 1973 war Jewish power
in America has grown immensely. Jews now constitute America's ruling elite.
There is no longer any necessity for the JOS to use its nuclear weapons
or military power to blackmail America into fighting wars on its behalf.
Jewish political power in America is now so dominant it can politically
manipulate the country into wars for the benefit of the JOS - even if these
wars are contrary to America's national interests. Over the last decade
and a half, America's Jewish ruling elite has manipulated America into
two proxy Zionist wars. The first was to remove Saddam from Kuwait and
the second was the invasion of Iraq. A third one against Iran is pending
even though such a war could lead to the political, economic, and military,
collapse of the United States.
-
-
- "When a parasite invades, it hides
as long as it can, sucking the vital juices and draining the energy of
its host. Yet there is a limit to what the host can tolerate: eventually,
it either builds up an immunity to the depredations of its "guest,"
or it is sucked dry and exhausted to the point of near-death. Having used
up nearly all available military and economic resources in Iraq, the U.S.
has a choice: it can either build up an immunity to Israeli influence,
even a partial one, or it can let itself be turned into a dry husk, a casualty
of Tel Aviv's ambitions." (Justin Raimondo `Spy With a Heart of Gold?'
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8441 January 25, 2006). The JOS
and the Jewish lobby in America doesn't care how much it costs America
to fight proxy Zionist wars or how many American troops are injured or
killed as long as these wars boost the regional power of the JOS in the
Middle East.
-
- Over the last decade or so the Jewish
colonization of the American political system has been comprehensive. The
JOS's defence strategy has been adopted by America. Its foreign policies
have been adopted by America. The JOS's contempt for international institutions
and international law has become a critical part of American politics.
Its enemies have now become America's enemies even though they pose not
the slightest threat to America. The racism endemic in the JOS has now
become rife throughout American politics. This amazing political transformation
did not happen because a group of WASPs sat down and looked into a crystal
ball to determine which policies would maximize America's interests over
the long term. These policies were introduced by Jews living in America
who put the interests of the JOS first. They were then pushed through the
American political system by the combined weight of the Jewish lobby, the
Jewish dominated media, and the increasing proportion of Jews in successive
presidential administrations. "With the assault on Iraq," wrote
the distinguished historian, David Hirst, "the U.S. was not merely
adopting Israel's long-established methods - of initiative, offence and
pre-emption - ; it was also adopting Israel's adversaries as its own..."
(quoted in Jeffrey Blankfort `A War for Israel'
-
- http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html
April 2004).
-
- At its annual conference this year AIPAC
boasted that over the previous year it had managed to persuade the American
Congress into passing one hundred pieces of legislation for the JOS. "AIPAC
helps pass more than 100 pro-Israel legislative initiatives a year through
more than 2,000 meetings with members of the U.S. Congress, according to
AIPAC statistics." Despite the fact that two of AIPAC's most important
employees are currently on trial for treason against the United States,
America's politicians turned out in force to pay homage to their AIPAC
paymasters, "AIPAC's influence was underscored by the seeming multitude
of government leaders in attendance at the conference, the biggest in its
52-year history. This year, half the Senate, a quarter of the House and
many White House administration officials, including vice president Dick
Cheney, participated." (Denyse Tannenbaum `"European media is
questioning Israel's right to exist"' www.ejpress.org/article/6686
March 10th 2006).
-
- The JOS is a racist rogue state and,
over the last decade and a half, it has transformed America into a rogue
hyper-power with increasing racist tendencies. It has become absurd to
believe that the JOS is an American colony. On the contrary, America now
resembles a Jewish colony. America is not merely ruled by a Jewish elite,
it has become the biggest prize in the global Jewish empire. It is quite
true that the American military remains the world's only hyper-power but
it is America's ruling Jewish elite which controls America's military not
WASPs. Many of America's WASP military leaders are aghast at the idea of
being ordered to attack Iran and yet this is precisely the direction in
which the American military is being pushed by the Jewish dominated congress
and Bush administration.
-
- It is the Jewish elite's takeover of
the American political system and its ability to use America's military
hyper-power for the benefit of the JOS that gives rise to Jewish global
domination. However, Jewish world domination is far from complete. For
a time Russia was controlled by a Jewish elite with allegiance to the JOS
but Putin managed to wrestle back control of his country for the sake of
the Russian people although whether he'll be able to fight off the next
Jewish political assault is far from certain. In Britain, the ruling elite
is composed of Jews and the landowning aristocracy. The aristocrats own
much of the countryside whilst the Jewish elite owns much of the country's
high streets. Whilst the former dominates over domestic issues, the latter
dominates in foreign affairs.
-
- There is little evidence that Jews started
the second world war. But currently there are many Jewish commentators
trying to provoke world war three (or world war four depending on which
commentator you are listening to). During its lifetime, the JOS has created
millions of victims in Palestine, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq,
and it is about to create a whole lot more if it manages to manipulate
its American colony into a long war against Iran, Syria, and rest of the
Moslem world in the Middle East. Under these circumstances, it would be
folly for political commentators to spend so much time researching events
surrounding the racist Jewish holocaust that they fail to notice that Jewish
political power is promoting a new catastrophe not merely against six million
Palestinians but the Moslem world in the Middle East.
-
- It is almost certainly true that Jews
were nothing like as much victims of totalitarianism as the racist concept
of the Jewish holocaust suggests - after all roughly 20 million Russians
died during this time, far more than the number of Jews. If anti-racists
continue to focus on the so-called Jewish holocaust, albeit in the hope
of undermining legitimacy for the JOS, they will perpetuate the fixation
on Jews as victims - the scope of their argument being confined to determining
what sort of victim the Jews were. The Jewish people suffered terrible
losses during the second world war but, since then, the JOS has brought
about a huge loss of life and, given the chance, it will bring about even
greater losses in the future. It has to be suggested that stopping the
next world war is more important than dissecting the bowels of the last
world war.
-
- The way in which Jews have acquired economic,
media, and political, power in America and other western countries since
the end of the second world war until they are now able to push the world's
military hyperpower to the brink of a third world war, is an issue on which
almost no research has been done. (A new work on this issue has just been
published as this article was being written - John Mearsheimer and Stephen
Walt `The Israel Lobby' http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
March 23rd 2006). In comparison, the amount of research into the so-called
Jewish holocaust is huge. Surely ascertaining how Jews living in America
acquired political power in America, and what they are going to do with
it, is a more urgent priority than politically exploiting events that happened
60 years ago?
-
- By far and away the most important political
issue at present is Jewish world domination. What matters is not the second
world war brought about by the German master race but the third world war
currently being instigated by the Jewish master race. Times have changed.
The JOS is now far more powerful militarily than the nazis ever were. The
JOS is creating so many millions of victims it is drawing ever closer to
the total achieved by the nazis. Jews around the world currently agitating
for the third world war are just as much racist supremacists as the nazis
who provoked the second world war. Blair and Bush are modern day Chamberlains
giving succour to the world's new nazis - the Jewish master race.
-
- There are many facts and figures in the
works of Jeffrey Blankfort that could contribute towards making the case
for Jewish world domination. He does not use such a phrase - he talks only
of the Israelization of America's Middle East policies. His focus has been
primarily on the Jewish lobby in America so he has overlooked the critical
role of the JOS's nuclear and military blackmail in transforming America's
foreign policies. He has also failed to appreciate the role the JOS is
playing in fostering a Greater Kurdistan to help break the Arabs' grip
on the Middle East. But he has inadvertently raised an important issue
in any understanding of the nature of Jewish world domination. Is the world's
global Jewish elite so attached to capitalism and profiteering that it
has become entirely rootless with no political loyalties to any particular
country? Or is it so committed to Zionism that it would be willing to sacrifice
profits and perhaps even capitalism itself if this ensured the political
and military supremacy of the JOS in the Middle East and beyond?
-
-
- This issue bears upon whether there will
be a war against Iran. If the global Jewish elite is like the former then
it will avoid an attack on Iran because such a war could seriously damage
the global economic system. If, however, it is like the latter then it
will demand a war because no matter how much the world, or the capitalist
system, or America, might be damaged it would be a huge boost to Jewish
supremacism in the Middle East. "If there are truly elites who are
pulling the strings in Washington and control Tel Aviv, as we are often
told, there will be no attack because those elites would certainly be aware
of the consequences it will have for the free-market capitalist system
that they cherish.
-
-
- If there is an attack, it will be yet
another proof that Washington is Israel's most important occupied territory,
despite the efforts of a handful of brave individuals there to expose and
bring a halt to the Israelization of US Middle East policy. I don't like
the concept of elites, but I do not think there will be an attack and that
the drum beats are designed to scare Iran because there are no other realistic
options available. Nevertheless, beware the Ides of March." (Jeffrey
Blankfort `War within Range? Another Neocon beats the drums for war and
says it will happen in 10 weeks' jblankfort@earthlink.net c. Jan
7th 2006). In other words, does the Jewish global elite have a god-given
sanctuary in Palestine or does it not care about this Judaically sacrosanct
land?
-
- This article does not present the case
for Jewish world domination. It suggests the time has long since passed
when the idea of Jewish world domination should be deemed to be preposterous
or treated as morally abhorrent. There is plenty of evidence pointing in
the direction of Jewish world domination. For example: the willingness
of American politicians to criticize the president of the United States
but their total reluctance to criticize the JOS. Western governments' acceptance
of the JOS as a western, liberal, secular democracy rather than criticizing
it for being a racist state. It is more absurd to believe that America
is the world's hyperpower and that the JOS is just an American colony than
it is to believe in Jewish world domination. This article seeks to change
political priorities from the so-called Jewish holocaust of the past to
the Jewish inspired catastrophe of a third world war. The so-called war
against terrorism is a racist war initiated by Jewish supremacists designed
to boost Jewish world domination. We can either live in world that seeks
to combat racism or in a world where Jewish racism is accepted as a normal
part of everyday life. In the latter case, Jews would rule the world.
-
-
- Bob Finch
|
