rense.com

Fresh Young Blood A Gallon
Of Blood For A Gallon Of Oil

 By Jerry L. Gardner
12-29-6

"Decider" G.W. Bush is calling for more warm blood to spill on foreign lands, specifically Iraq (20,000 to 40,000 additional troops which will no doubt become the building blocks into Iran) and as usual, having listened over time to all the government "doublespeak" (translation = more lies) which seems to be the current Washington mode of communication, understood only by combined political Neocon schemers on both side of the isle, better known as "RepubliC[rats]", I am totally confused. Here's why. From time to time we have read, or seen on the evening "controlled" news (if one could call it news) where our illegal "graduated tax dollars" which are robbed from us here at home and purposely designed by communist factions to destroy nations, especially America, are being spent by the billions on more sophisticated and deadlier toys for the boys: Excerpt from Ten Planks Of Communist Manifesto; 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".
 
If we only look at the latest posted numbers of young Americans slaughtered on the alter of weapons manufacturers and corporate greed, which is unofficially 2983 souls as of 2006, that would be a cost of 4474.5 gallons of American blood. This blood is going to be on our collective hands, but even more so on the hands of those who without any apparent conscience feed this monster of greed.
 
The calculation is based on 6 quarts or 5.6 liters/human being, or 6 qts / 4 qts = 1.5 gallons/person.
 
blood, fluid pumped by the heart that circulates throughout the body via the arteries, veins, and capillaries
(see http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0812296.html
circulatory system;
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0823118.html
heart).
An adult male of average size normally has about 6 quarts (5.6 liters) of blood.
 
For more shocking statistics see: 
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/
Casualties in Iraq - 2006 on the web
 
 
All types and configurations of "Smart Weapons " have been developed to use in combat, ostensibly to reduce the number of young impressionable souls needed to sacrifice on the alter of greed. If America has these "Smart Weapons" then why is Bush, or any of the Pentagon killers advocating a larger Mercenary (voluntary killers) American force? I've even heard rumors recently that our "leaders" (Bush in particular) may even solicit "foreign blood (bodies)" to wage our wars. I can't begin to elucidate the inherent dangers in this proposal. Think about "foreign nationals" potentially using arms eventually against Americans in a NWO setting, Americans who have the right to dissent, and might dissent on issues (if we still have such a right in the near future). Foreign nationals would not hesitate to kill or incarcerate Americans at the order of a traitorous president.
It is long past time for American families to stop supplying these war mongers in Washington our most precious asset, our children, as poorly paid Mercenaries to spill their blood in the sands of a country, any country, which hasn't even bothered Americans at all, or to die for oil and/or Israel. If indeed America is attacked by some actual (not politically contrived, or set up foreign enemy) I feel certain our men and women would rise to the challenge, however, it is time to stop being played for suckers and pawns in the hands of greedy politicians and corporate rulers who drive the "corporate war machine." It is time to stop allowing one man (or woman) to have the power to singularly commit thousands of American kids to die at their discretion and without Congressional oversight and approval. We (in America) are bordering on a dictatorship, and this is frightening.
When are we, as parents, grand parents, brothers, sisters, husbands, wives, sons and daughters going to finally say no to supplying the blood of our children to corporate money wars? War seems to have become so "normal" that we Americans now look upon them as a necessary part of life. We do body counts and then look no further. We disassociate ourselves from the reality of the planned and organized wars, especially if it cost us nothing, such as a family member, or we're making big bucks working for the manufacturers of war goods. We don't (in most instances) look at the whole sordid, cruel, destructive picture. We don't consider the non dead, what could better be termed as the "living dead," the fortunate young men and women who are lucky enough to return home alive, but with parts missing, most with severe psychological problems. When I look at past wars and consider the dead and wounded Americans, plus all of the millions of innocent civilians, I have to wonder; "what has changed where we shed American blood?" "Who actually won the war(s) when American tax dollars go to rebuild the destroyed and burned out countries we destroyed?" "What is different in Viet Nam that wouldn't be there had America not sacrificed over 500,000 lives on the bloody alter of war?" We could ask the same questions about Japan and Germany. A more realistic and graphic picture would be, 500,000 X 1.5 Gallons of blood/individual American, equals 750,000 gallons of precious American blood laid waste in the jungles and rice paddies of Viet Nam alone. I shudder to calculate the loss of blood during WW2.
Maybe we should stop looking at "just" body counts, this is too easily smoothed over by political war spin. We should ask (besides losing our precious sons and daughters) what will 20,000 to 40,000 more bodies translate to in the possible loss of blood? If we only consider the next 20,000 additional troops, that would be a potential of 30,000 gallons of precious blood to spill on the barren sands of a country that has done the US absolutely no harm, and posed no foreseeable risk. Each human being has six quarts, or 5.6 liters of blood coursing through their body, so 6 quarts = 1.5 gallons X 20,000 additional souls equals 30,000 gallons of the most precious liquid on the planet to be placed at risk.
 
An interesting side note: We are told in Revelation that the quantity of blood shed during the battle of Armageddon would be up to the horses bridle (approximately 4 feet deep) and run for two hundred miles. This boggles the imagination, and to think that we could be initiating that at the present time.
 
Revelation 14:20  And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs.(Approximately 200 miles), that is a tremendous amount of dying and unimaginable blood shed. Are we ready to set this horror in motion? Seems as though we are. All the players are certainly in the picture. War becomes very real when we translate lives into precious blood, along with the loss of loved ones.
Personally, I would like to see Bush, Cheney and their daughters in uniform and in the mix, then, and only then does he have the moral right to sentence our young men and women to death on the field of corporate greed. Of course I am not naive, it will be no different with Hillary Clinton, or any other of the Neo-Con Israeli/NWO bought politicians in Washington. I believe many Americans are awakening to the fact now that America's prime duty as far as Washington is concerned is to serve Israel's interest. Or it would certainly appear so when Israel seems to be behind most or all of the Mideast trouble, if we can believe the news reports. I say a resounding NO, not one more American child to shed blood for oil! Teach Bush how to use a hand weapon, let him do it; he loves that macho image so well. He has things in Iraq so screwed up America will be lucky to get out without serious humiliation on a worldwide scale. There is an old saying, the more one stirs dung the worse the smell. We need to stop stirring it in Iraq. The sands are already soaked with the blood of our sons and daughters, not counting the thousands of innocent Iraqis who are still suffering and dying from being tortured, killed, outright murdered, and subjected to DU. DU, the gift that keeps on giving and giving, killing and maiming, in Iraq, back here at home in our military families, and around the planet on our air currents.
I still can't understand how America shifted from Osama in Afghanistan to Saddam in Iraq when there was obviously no connection. How Osama went from public enemy #1 to a non-issue figure, especially when G.W. Bush declared him to be the evil behind 9/11 (almost instantly by the way, very strange, almost as quickly as naming Lee Harvey Oswald as the "evil one" in 1963). Are Americans super malleable or what? This (invasion of Iraq) is one of the greatest political sleight of hand tricks perpetrated on the American public in many years.
Let me share with you how government thinks, and this will shed some light on Bush's thinking(??). Read carefully and you'll see I have a valid point. First, some background is necessary:
When I was in the military we rotated to Germany as a part of our over all mission to support our military fighters in Europe. We performed what most Air Force types will know as "reflex duty." One group of support refueling tankers (aircraft) from State side bases would spend like seventeen days in their support rolls, sometimes more, sometimes less, and then be relieved by another group from the States who would then carry on the mission. The first thing we would do upon arriving for duty was to get our aircraft in commission and refuel and service them to be placed on alert status as promptly as possible. It was on one such assignment that the government mentality became extremely clear to me, as occurred in the following example:
I was a Flight Engineer on these tankers and after arriving on one mission in Germany I went straight to our base ops. I had to return to my aircraft to retrieve something and noticed a crew servicing fuel on one of our birds. Our specific aircraft had an eighty-five fuel capacity with a fifteen percent expansion space in the tanks, and vent holes in the fuselage for fumes to escape during servicing and expansion, as well as for fuel over flow in the event of overfill, (I had to lay the ground work for my point on government thinking, which always goes to excess on anything), such as, if tight as you can turn it is good, then turn it one more revolution.
This ground crew was servicing fuel on this particular aircraft as I mentioned, with a Technical Sergeant supervising. Fuel is serviced with power on the aircraft and a ground power unit running, this is SPR or single point refueling. I happened to notice as I approached the aircraft that fuel was running from the under-wing fuselage vent onto the parking ramp. I immediately shouted out to the Tech Sergeant that he was pumping fuel onto the ramp, an extremely dangerous situation. So, what would you expect a government type to do? Yep, the refueling supervisor instead of stopping immediately, yelled to the fuel truck (POL) driver to give him "more" pressure (think 20,000 ­ 40,000 more troops here). I persuaded the guy to shut down operations immediately and notify the fire department for a wash down truck and possible fire coverage. Once things were under control, I asked the refueling supervisor why he had called for "more" pressure instead of shutting down with a major fuel spill? Here is where it gets good. His reply to me was, he had computed the load he needed to put on the aircraft and hadn't reached his computed amount yet, (again, think Iraq, if 140,000 can't fix the mess, send in 40,000 more), so he was determined to get his figured load on the aircraft, never mind that he had made a serious mistake in calculating his load requirement and had created a very dangerous situation, he wasn't going to be wrong (can we see any similarities in Iraq here)?
This is the same type of government/political thinking I see in Iraq. Never mind that we should never have attacked them to begin with, we're not going to be wrong even if we have to send one hundred million souls there to shed blood and try to clean up our mess, like sending a dollar to chase a dime. The most dangerous man on earth is the man who will never admit he is wrong or made a mistake. It takes a real leader to admit either or both. I say America should count her losses (which to date are many) in Iraq and get out before we are in real serious trouble, even bordering on Armageddon in that region. My primary fear is, those idiots in Washington will continue to stir this deadly pot in the Mideast until it actually does spill over into our towns and cities here at home. Hate has a way of growing like a serious all consuming plague. And those nuts in Washington actually are talking about "Hate Crimes" bills to shut down free speech and the right of dissent there at home, when they can't even control their own hatred for other nations and peoples? What hypocrites. What a message to send to our youngsters, "0" tolerance for hate here at home but open season on all non-Americans, open season on the world.
America! What a paradox. War and killing, America's most loved and perfected art forms. We project more hatred, hostility, killing and raw sex over our televisions, through our children's games, and via our movie industry straight into our homes than probably any other nation, yet we'll arrest and convict a four year old with a plastic water pistol, or accidentally touching some teacher's butt as part of our so called "O" violence policy, yet we are the righteous deliverers of morality and democracy to the rest of the world, whether they want it or not. We rule by confusion and fear. Just say STOP THE MADNESS!
Jerry L. Gardner


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros