- Increasingly, the wall of continuous propaganda engineered
by the journalistic control that is exercised over the so-called "American"
free and independent press by Zionist America and Israel, is beginning
to crumble and fall away. As Israel-first Jews and Christian Fundamentalists
continue their campaigns of misinformation, disinformation, and no information
at all, their un-American bias as well as their un-American agenda are
being recognized and reviled. Revealed and reviled Zionism is being
exposed for the threat it is not only to America, but to the security and
well-being of the entire world as well.
-
- As I offered in the preceding segment, Zionism is no
longer manifested by the Jewish state alone; it now includes the parasitic
and ever-ongoing destruction of our once very free and very wealthy nation.
We are a nation that is rapidly deteriorating on both counts. Israel,
America's parasite, continues to suck the lifeblood out of our once-great
nation in the form of foreign aid, additional financial support for its
military, and in terms of maneuvering American politicians to deploy our
youth and nation's future fighting wars dictated by Israel. But to criticize
Israel is the height of treason insofar as fraudulent "Americans"
are concerned, "Americans" who identify with either Christian
Fundamentalism or "Jewish" Zionism. To be sure, there are many
Jewish people both here and in Israel who oppose Israel's aggressive and
terrorist-based militaristic imperialism.
-
- William L. Shirer offered that the German people, prior
to World War II, embraced Hitler and his Nazis because they were "unorganized
and unarmed." Of course, the primary driver used to terrorize and
persuade Germans and Jews to be subjugated by Nazi authoritarianism was
the hijacking of the "Jewish media" by the Nazis to brainwash
the populace. The German media had formerly been dominated by "Jewish"
interests that supported communism. Hitler quickly marginalized the German
press to press forward with his agenda of National Socialism. He transformed
the German press away from its former form of "Jewish intellectualism"
[Professor Kevin MacDonald] to his own propaganda machine. This too, however,
was clearly an abuse of journalism, Shirer's chosen vocation. And it parallels
the current condition identifiable to the "American" press today.
-
- How conveniently Shirer failed to either observe or trumpet
these glaring journalistic anomalies. But the other two failures of a
society about to be enslaved by authoritarian, despotic government are
almost of equal importance, especially the failure assured by a disorganized
approach. To be sure, since heavy Zionist funding played a central role
in financing Hitler and his Nazis, isn't it now ironic that no one agonizes
more about the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis against the Jews than
highly organized Zionists themselves? And can there be any louder protest
and hand wringing than that from Abraham Foxman and his Anti-Defamation
League? I'm not sure that contributions to the ADL are tax-deductible,
but certainly contributions to AIPAC and the ACLU are! These are the high-powered
tips of the powerful Zionist iceberg, an iceberg poised to sink our ship
of state every bit as much as the Israeli-intended sinking of the U.S.S.
Liberty.
-
- These are highly effective, disciplined and structured
"Jewish" organizations are better described as being, in reality,
Zionist organizations. It was an orthodox rabbi that described these entities
to me as "organized Jewry." And these Zionist organizations
are very generously funded, even by such means as American taxpayer dollars
channeled back from Israel to fund the lobbying of American politicians,
providing funding to Israel-sympathetic politicians' campaigns, and to
launch marketing and other campaigns and events favorable to Israel. Zionists
also obtain funding from tax-sheltered foundations and from highly successful
yet misguided wealthy Jews who understandably wish to support the nation
that most aggressively asserts their Jewish faith.
-
- Some of American taxpayer funds transferred to Israel,
the number one nation receiving our American foreign aid, even provide
direct financial aid in support of synagogues and other "Jewish"
religious institutions. In combination with the Zionist control of the
news and entertainment media, any form of meaningful opposition to organized
Zionism is virtually futile. Our nation is being sacrificed for the Zionist
agenda that is Israel and its immoral territorial expansion. The resultant
destruction of both our society and our nation is part and parcel of that
Zionist agenda.
-
- American foreign policy is, of course, not solely based
upon the financial and military support of Israel. It combines with the
quest for total control of the world's richest oil and gas deposits. The
establishment of the state of Israel serves both American and British interests
and plants a solid Western footprint in the Middle East. This was the
obvious initial intention. Israel was to be the West's Middle East outpost
and justification assuring British and American hegemony to prevent Cold
War communism from intruding in that part of the world. My, how far we've
digressed from our original intentions regarding Israel. Our present day
obeisance to Israel is a total reversal of the very interests that gave
Israel birth. This is now more of a factor than is the observation that
defines our non-representatives in government as merely being idiots.
-
- As Justin Raimondo points out ["Israel, Alone"]
<<http://antiwar.com/justin/>http://antiwar.com/justin/>>,
the neoconservative/Zionist "Clean Break" agenda was developed
and implemented by members of the White House and Pentagon to give the
Zionist state total freedom from domination by the West. Raimondo makes
clear that Israeli Prime Minister Olmert's slip of the tongue acknowledging
for the first time officially that Israel has nuclear capability, and coming
after denying that very same capability only a week earlier, can clearly
be interpreted as a "hands off!" threat to the West. As with
our own politicians, anything Israeli politicians say initially should
also be written off as lies. First deny, then justify when caught!
-
- But whether it is Israel that is under attack, or our
own corrupt politicians that always support Israeli atrocities against
the Palestinians, criticism of either is always vigorously and ruthlessly
blocked by the astonishing power of the Zionist network. Even former President
Jimmy Carter has now been targeted by the network, along with Professors
John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. Zionist smear-and-slime artist and
Harvard shyster, Alan Dershowitz, postured himself once again in his Israel-first/America-last
stance by attacking the former President of the United States for daring
to question Israel and its Zionist network's key lobbying organization.
Dershowitz has once again crawled out from underneath his slimy rock after
smearing Mearsheimer and Walt for daring to discuss the most powerful lobby
in America, AIPAC, and has now attacked former President Carter for his
new book calling for a more balanced approach towards the Middle Eastconundrum
of our own creation..
-
- Until one personally experiences the smear and accusation
of "anti-Semite," nothing will bring you closer to appreciating
Hester Prynne's agony and anguish than Zionism's designated scarlet letter
"A." You become marked, and no one will invest too much time
and effort to examine whether or not the charges are fact-based or true.
The brand converts you as an "untouchable"; you become a pariah.
You do not wish to challenge your accusers, for the more you defend yourself,
the more you become stuck to the "tar baby." Clearly, I speak
from experience.
-
- Any individual that believes they are observing "anti-Semitic"
behavior, is, of course, encouraged to contact the ADL. After all, that
is their sole role and function: defaming any and all who question the
foreign nation-state of Israel. Their methods are indignation, outrage,
and then accusation. No one questions either their sources or qualifications
when such accusations are being made. It explains why Rush Limbaugh and
other so-called "conservatives" including Hannity, Coulter and
Guy Smiley O'Reilly, continue to be terrified of "liberals."
There's a "bad guy" out there somewhere, but we can't mention
his real name. They all need a scapegoat for Bush's insane policies, so
the enemy is "liberal" and the "liberal" media. To
them, even a tiny hint of criticism directed at the criminal Bush regime
by the media ignores totally the fabulous support and protection the corporate
establishment mainstreamers provide to the Bush crime machine. The term
"Zionist" simply isn't in their vocabulary!
-
- In yet another incident in my life that can be attributed
to an eerie redundancy of inexplicable synchronicity, the editor in my
local paper advised me of the severe restrictions to be placed upon my
weekly column. It coincided and dovetailed into a similar incident in
which Professor Anthony Judt was targeted and successfully silenced by
the Zionist network. In his October 9, 2006 article entitled, "In
N.Y., Sparks Fly Over Israel," Michael Powell, writing for the Washington
Post, begins, "Two major American Jewish organizations helped block
a prominent New York University historian from speaking at the Polish consulate
here last week, saying that the academic was too critical of Israel and
American Jewry."
-
- "Too critical?" "Israel and American
Jewry?" Are we being advised that Judaism and Israel are one and
the same thing? I'm not buying any of that for a moment. As I've
mentioned earlier, I happen to know that there are many Jews both here
and in Israel that oppose the horrors the Israeli government is imposing
on Arabs, Muslims, Palestinians and Christians. And before ever hearing
Professor Judt's speech, and before ever allowing him to comment, the Zionist
network struck and silenced him. And who gets to decide what is "too
critical?" Would that be the Sultan of Smear, Abraham the Foxman,
or is it Dirty Dershowitz?
-
- Here's Powell again: "The historian, Tony Judt,
is Jewish and directs New York University's Remarque Institute, which promotes
the study of Europe. Judt was scheduled to talk on Oct. 4 to a nonprofit
organization that rents space from the consulate. Judt's subject was the
Israel lobby in the United States, and he planned to argue that this lobby
has often stifled honest debate." Ironic, no? The subject of Jewish
Professor Judt's presentation was amply proven to be true by this very
incident. But is it merely a lobby that stifles speech, or was it the
powerful and heavily funded Zionist network?
-
- Along with the attacks and smears upon former President
Jimmy Carter, Professors Mearsheimer and Walt for their paper written under
the auspices of the Harvard School of Government, we now have a Jewish
historian and scholar smeared by "two American (sic) Jewish organizations."
The organizations are [the envelope, please!] the Fox Man's ADL and the
"American" Jewish Committee. My goodness, these gangsters, fascists,
and/or communists seem to have no problem getting their chance to speak
seeking redress of alleged grievances. When do real Americans like Judt
get a chance for their day in a public forum? As they stifle everyone
else's freedom of speech and expression, they reserve those God-given rights
for only themselves. They are demonstrating for all to see the fact-based
accuracy of the points made as concerns the stifling of open, honest and
balanced debate as pointed out by the smears against Carter, Mearsheimer,
Walt and now Judt.
-
- In response to an "inquiring photographer"
type column in my local paper, a woman queried as to her opinion on the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict offered that she was completely uninformed
about it. It was my decision to disallow any reader of a paper I write
for to be uninformed, especially when the dumbing-down of such people originates
with the media division of the Zionist network. I was brutally frank and
employed fact-based input and cited credible references, including the
article cited by the Reverend Ted Pike from National Geographic. I had
in fact written a previous article concerning Israel when the fascist nation-state
attackedLebanon and murdered innocent Christian civilians there. The article
I wrote to answer the woman was structured as a two-part column like this
one.
-
- The first solitary column came under immediate attack
by a member/user of the Zionist network. The individual felt sufficiently
superior "to go it alone." No escalation may even have been
attempted in enlisting the power of the higher echelons of the Zionist
network. The individual threatened my editor by offering to "pull"
advertising from the paper the individual didn't have any advertising
space in the paper and my editor knew it. But after the two-part column
motivated by and responding to an uninformed reader, the Zionist gang swung
into action. In all probability, my Zionist attacker was acting alone;
but, there's always the feeling and realization that somewhere in the background
lurk the higher echelons of the Zionist network ready to pounce and smear
and destroy. The attacker seemingly forwarded to my newspaper's publisher
a copy of an e-mail he had originally sent to me.
-
- The Zionist smearer ostensibly magnified his efficacy
by not only sending copies of his nasty e-mail to the newspaper's publisher,
but also to the mayor, a councilman, a civic leader, a police officer,
and a list of other group "IDs" to indicate a wide distribution
of the aggrieved condition which I had caused him by writing the truth.
Perhaps the Zionist only indicated wide distribution, but then copied
no one! Perhaps he did AND threatened to sue using the vast and unlimited
resources of the higher echelons of the Zionist network. It is easy to
see how the publisher would just simply inform my editor to cease and desist
in allowing me to write articles of an international, national, state and
county nature, and stick to local township issues as the Zionist slime
ball dictated and offering this only "if I was qualified."
-
- When on a previous occasion, having opened up and launched
a website, I wrote on Israel, another Zionist called my webmaster and threatened
him and his wife. The poor computer techie was very concerned, considering
the threats the cowardly creep made to him and his wife using foul and
obscene language. The attacker found my associate's name and address from
the website registration. The couple has three small children. I sent
nasty e-mails back to the creep and notified the police.
-
- I will never rise to the stature of such notables as
Carter, Mearsheimer, Walt or Judt; but my personal experience must be documented.
I know that it has happened to others at my level who dared to speak out
against Israel and the Zionist network organized to advance only the interests
of Israel and to silence and stifle criticism of that fascist nation's
continued atrocities against Mankind. I had been in a quandary as to what
to do the accusation and smear, as unfounded and loathsome as its
originator, was nevertheless, a very hurtful experience for me. I have
contacted my lawyer.
-
- Again, considering the more elevated amongst US that
have been smeared and defamed as "anti-Semitic," there is yet
another case as was reported on Rense.com onNovember 24th. It involved
a Professor David Noble of York University. The article, entitled, "Jewish
Prof Sues Organized Jewry," [<<<http://www.rense.com/general74/sues.htm>http://www.rense.com/general74/sues.htm>>]
relates how Professor Noble initiated "a $25 million suit against
various Jewish organizations for defamation for labeling him an 'anti Semite.'"
-
- Wait a minute run this by me again! A Jewish professor
has been marginalized once again by the Zionist network, but this time
being accused directly as being an "anti-Semite." If "anti-Semitism,"
acknowledging its inherently incorrect racist inference when used to smear
those of other than the Jewish faith and described basically as "Untermenchen"
by the Talmud, is now being deployed to smear those of the Jewish faith
as well, why shouldn't a Jew be allowed to sue for defamation of character?
For that matter, why shouldn't anyone be allowed to sue AND SUCCEED against
this horrific disabling defamation perpetrated to silence criticism and
opposition to a foreign nation-state that has proven itself an enemy of
our society and our national interests? Why should freedom of speech
and thought be denied to anyone who doesn't accept the Zionist agenda?
Way to go Professor Noble! Perhaps Professor Judt should do the same!
-
- In fact, it is my belief that in all likelihood, thousands,
and perhaps even tens of thousands of Americans, have been sandbagged,
intimidated and smeared by the secret criminal Zionist network. It's time
to not only hold them accountable, but to take them to court and to get
our American taxpayer dollars back into American hands once again. They've
certainly got deep enough pockets!
-
- Lawsuits would serve to provide an even more beneficial
service: that of exposing the Zionists secretive and back room/closed door
back-stabbing and bring it into the sun-bleached daylight of public awareness.
The Zionist network and its vile ranks attack and smear publicly, but
when challenged, desire always to make amends in the darkness of secrecy.
Think of an errant loudmouth who publicly accuses you of wrongdoing at
a town hall meeting, but after challenge in that venue, apologizes and
tries to settle differences quietly and privately. That describes Zionists
to a tee!
-
- After smearing Professor Judt, Foxman invited Judt, and
fellow academics who protested his treatment, to his office for a "private"
meeting. This is the Network's method: accuse and smear publicly, apologize
and smooth things out privately and quietly. But finally, about 100 academics
have had enough of the ADL'sterrorist tactics and then went public with
a letter of rebuke sent to Foxman. The entire letter and signatures can
be found at [<<http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19550>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19550>].
The last two paragraphs in the academics' letter of protest says it all:
"In a democracy, there is only one appropriate response to a lecture,
article, or book one does not agree with. It is to give another lecture,
write another article, or publish another book. For much of its hundred-year
history your organization worked side by side with other Americans who
wanted to guarantee that freedom for all, and your mission statement still
declares: 'the goal remains the same: to stand up for the core values of
America against those who seek to undermine them through word or deed.'
-
- Though we, the undersigned, have many disagreements about
political matters, foreign and domestic, we are united in believing that
a climate of intimidation is inconsistent with fundamental principles of
debate in a democracy. The Polish Consulate is not obliged to promote
free speech. But the rules of the game inAmerica oblige citizens to encourage
rather than stifle public debate. We who have signed this letter are dismayed
that the ADL did not choose to play a more constructive role in promoting
liberty."
-
- As the academics point out, Foxman and his ADL have violated
their own organization's primary reason for its creation, and continue
to violate the reasons the American people formed this government; namely,
to escape religious repression and to acquire and enjoy freedom of speech
and thought. My detractor, considering his well written letter, could
have challenged me in a letter to the editor, or by simply writing a guest
article opposing my viewpoint. Foxman could have allowed Judt to speak,
and then afterwards could have written an article, given an opposing speech,
or challenged him to a debate. As the academics pointed out, this is the
"democratic way." Obviously, this is not the way of the underhanded
Zionist network.
-
- And apparently Professor David Noble is onto their act
as well! In initiating his lawsuit, the Rense.com article continues: "Defendants
include the private corporate entity York University Foundation, pro-Israel
lobbying and fundraising organizations, Hillel of Greater Toronto, the
United Jewish Appeal Federation of Greater Toronto, and the Canadian Jewish
Congress, Ontario, and their agents.
-
- They are accused of trying to intimate Noble because
of his critical investigation into external influences on Canada's third-largest
public university. In 2004, he distributed a short report entitled 'The
Tail that Wags the Dog' which showed the connections between members of
the York Foundation, a fundraising body, and pro-Israel lobbyists.
-
- As a result Jewish student activists red flagged him
for implying 'Jews controlled York University' and singling out fundraisers
by their racial identity." The article ends saying, "Noble,
an expert in the History of Technology, says he has lost family in the
Holocaust and finds the charge of 'anti Semitism' both 'hurtful and offensive.'
Earlier this year a Jewish York University grad student was suspended
for three years for protesting the death of Rachel Corrie. He has sued
the university for $850.000."
-
- It is within the power of all Americans smeared by the
agents and proxies of a foreign government to seek protection and legal
relief through the courts. Yes, the Zionist network is rich and powerful,
but they are also very wrong and vulnerable. My Zionist antagonist can
continue to enjoy the power and invulnerability of anonymity, but only
until that point in time that it can be proven that I have a case. And
if and when a lawsuit can be initiated, the advantage of anonymity will
evaporate and public exposure of the underhanded methods of the Zionist
network will be exposed.
-
- If members/users and leaders/principals of the Zionist
network use their freedom of speech and thought to silence the freedom
of speech and thought of others, how can their actions in any way, shape
or form conform to the American ideals of democracy and freedom we so cherish?
Why do our so-called elected representatives kowtow to such un-American
organizations as AIPAC and the ADL? Why does AIPAC, which initiates espionage
against our government and nation, continue to enjoy tax-exempt status?
And why is this exemption allowed to continue even after a Zogby poll
offered that over 80 percent of Americans want AIPAC's tax-exempt status
yanked? And where does "our" Congress stand on this, and where
are they on all the other critical problems confronting our nation, the
most critical of which were caused primarily by the Israel lobby that Dershowitz
and Foxman don't want US to question? When will America be restored to
the American people?
-
- © THEODORE E. LANG 12/15/06 All rights reserved
-
- Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.
-
|
