- Excerpted from The Rockefeller File (1976), Chapter 10
-
- The People Planners
-
- The Rockefellers learned nearly a century ago that there
are two standard ways for one of their companies to absorb another corporation.
If the firm to be acquired is much smaller, a "take over" is
the simplest procedure: buy em out.
-
- But if the competitor is more your equal, a merger- "must
be arranged".
-
- The same principles hold true among nations. No matter
how much this country sends abroad as foreign aid, technical assistance,
loans that are never repai4. or other largesse, there is simply no way
another country -or even a bloc of countries- can be made powerful enough
to take us over.
-
- Recognizing this political fact of life, the master planners
devised the strategy of a merger - a Great Merger - among nations.
-
- But before such a merger can be consummated, and the
United States becomes just another province in a New World Order, there
must at least be the semblance of parity among the senior partners in the
deal
-
- How does one make the nations of the world more nearly
equal?
-
- The Insiders determined that a twoprong approach was
needed, use American money and know-how to build up your competitors, while
at the same time use every devious strategy you can devise to weaken and
impoverish this country. The goal is not to bankrupt the United States,
we must emphasize. Rather, it is to reduce our productive might, and therefore
our standard of living, to the meager subsistence level of the socialized
nations of the world.
-
- Only a fascist-socialist dictatorship would have the
power to accomplish such a " redistribution." Notice that the
plan is not to bring the standard of living in less developed countries
up to our level, but to bring ours down to meet theirs coming up.
-
- You may be assured, however, that the Rockefellers and
their allies are not talking about reducing their own quality of life.
It is your standard of living which must be sacrificed on the altar of
the New World Order.
-
- The Rockefeller game plan is to use population, energy,
food, and financial controls as a method of people control which will lead,
steadily and deliberately, into the Great Merger. Much of the spade work
for setting up this ploy is being done by Henry Kissinger, who was a personal
employee of Nelson Rockefeller for a decade before Rocky placed him in
the Nixon Administration. On numerous occasions Herr Kissinger has declared
that his goal is to create a "New World Order." Syndicated Washington
columnist Paul Scott reveals:
-
- "It is Kissinger's belief, according to his aides,
that by controlling food, one can control people, and by controlling energy,
especially oil, one can control nations and their -financial systems. By
placing food and oil under international control along with the world's
monetary system, Kissinger is convinced a loosely knit world government
operating, under the frame-work of the United Nations can become a reality
before 1980."
-
- Common sense tells us that a Rockefeller hireling such
as Kissinger would not be setting up an "international control"
system which takes assets from the Rockefellers and gives them to someone
else. Obviously, the game plan is to take other people's assets and put
them under the umbrella of a Rockefeller-controlled World Government.
-
- This new strategy may be termed the " crisis route"
to World Order. It runs parallel to and eventually will converge with the
Atlantic Union treaty and regional government approach to the Universal
State. Washington columnist Paul Scott calls this "the new strategy
change from the direct to the indirect approach to bring about world government."
-
- The plan, as publicly stated by the CFR's [Council on
Foreign Relations-founded by the Rockefellers] Richard Gardner, part-time
State Department functionary and Columbia University Professor of Law and
International Organization, amounts to this:
-
- Instead of trying to make the UN a complete world dictatorship
immediately, the Establishment will identify different problems in different
countries. Then they will propose a "solution," which can only
be achieved by some kind of international agency, so that each country
concerned will be forced to surrender another segment of its national independence.
Gardner considers this piecemeal approach the practical road to the end
of nationhood.
-
- We are likely to do better by building our "house
of world order - from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will
look like a great - booming, buzzing confusion" to use William James'
facetious description of reality; but an end run around national sovereignty,
eroding it piece by piece, is likely to get us to world order faster than
the old-fashioned frontal assault.
-
- So this is what the Rockefeller gang, working through
agents like Kissinger and Gardner, have in mindan "end run around
national sovereignty." Gardner continues, with obvious glee:
-
- "The hopeful aspect of the present situation is
that even as nations resist appeals for' world government'and 'the surrender
of sovereignty,' technological, economic and political interests are forcing
them to establish more and more far-ranging institutions to manage their
mutual interdependence."
-
- One of the most obvious back-door approaches to World
Order is through the control of food [and water..Ken] . The ploy is to
establish a World Food Bank, with the necessary goodies supplied (naturally)
by the United States. The concept was proposed at the International Monetary
Fund Conference in Nairobi by long-time Rockefeller front man Robert S
McNamara (CFR). R. StrangeMcNamara (yes, that really is his middle name)
was made president of the World Bank after he had successfully completed
his earlier assignment of crippling this country's military might [Johnson
Administration during Vietnam War]. McNamara advocated the food-producing
nations of the world surrender their surpluses to a " world authority,"
which would then take charge of redistributing the bounty to the 'have-not"
nations. The topic was to be discussed at the UN's World Food Conference
in Rome in November 1974. Between the time of the original proposal and
the Rome conference, Richard Nixon was shuftIed into an early retirement
and was replaced by a compliant Gerald Ford:
-
- One of Ford's first official acts was to go before the
UN General Assembly and assure the international flotsam gathered there
that the voice of the Rockefeller's Charlie McCarthy, Henry Kissinger,
was the very voice of America in all matters pertaining to international
relations. Later, Ford announced that the Secretary of State would appear
as keynote speaker on behalf of the United States at the upcoming World
Food Conference, superseding the more logical choice, Secretary of Agriculture
Earl Butz, who was the official head of the US delegation. Of the hundreds
of political commentators around the country, only Paul Scott had the courage
to assess the implications ofFord's actions:
-
- "Whether he fully realizes it or not, President
Ford has put his stamp of approval on Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's
grand design foreign policy for the establishment of a loosely knit world
government before the end of the 1970s.
-
- By calling for the development of a global strategy and
policy for food and oil within the structure of the United Nations, the
President clearly signaled his acceptance of the 'new international order'
being sought by Kissinger."
-
- Scott went on to point out that instead of using this
nation's enormous food production as a weapon of US foreign policy, to
promote the expansion of freedom throughout the world, Ford accepted Kissinger's
plan of passing policy control over US food surpluses, "and eventually
all US food " to a national food bank.
-
- Herr Henry made no bones about the fact that all of this
is designed to further the New World Order. He told the delegates at Rome:
"We are faced not just with the problem of food but with the accelerating
momentum of our interdependence." And our-man in Rome went even further;
he declared we should "make global cooperation in food a model, for
our response to other challenges of an interdependent world - energy, inflation,
population, protection of the environment."
-
- Agriculture Secretary Earl Butz admitted of the proposed
food bank that "in the end it will be the American taxpayer who pays
for it." Who else? And the fact that worldwide distribution of our
food will inevitably create food shortages and skyrocketing prices in America
has not been overlooked by the Rockefeller conspirators. That is part of
the plan.
-
- And before you conclude that any such program would be
emphatically rejected by an angry American electorate, remember this: by
the time the plan is implemented, the UN will have an army to back up its
looting of America! [called the "MJTF", Multi-Joint Task
Force, and "PFP", Partnership for Peace. that is insinuated with
the American military and Police Departemnts throughout America..Ken].
Doubtless the clan's minions in the bureaucracy and the media will refer
to the planned food shortage as a mandatory national diet program.
-
- The whole thrust of the Rome gathering was that it is
the obligation of the United States-which means you, the worker and taxpayer
-to feed the world. This, despite the fact that for years America has supplied
more than 80 % of the food given to foreign countries. It is such American
giveaways that in recent years have provided over $25 billion in foodstuffs
to such ingrates as Marxist India, now a dictatorship openly allied with
the Soviet Union, where the bulk of our grains winds up feeding rats, not
hungry people.
-
- * While US reserves of food and feed grains are already
being depleted, Russia and Communist China have quietly been using part
of their massive purchases of bargain-priced American grain to build up
their stockpiles. Crews of US and foreign ships carrying US grain to Russian
and Chinese ports have been told by Communist dock workers that every third
or fourth shipment of US grain is being placed in permanent storage facilities
as part of those countries 'national reserves'.
-
- At least $200 billion in such aid has been similarly
squandered to more than 125 nations-including more millions now going to
members of the OPEC cartel, which has quadrupled oil prices. To pay for
all of these giveaways, the Insiders who run the show have used printing
press inflation money to add hundreds of billions of dollars to our National
Debt. This, coupled with the consequent reduction of domestic supplies,
has sent our own food prices out of sight.
-
- But, at least in the past, our stupidity was of our own
doing and under our own control. Informed Americans could have stopped
it-and could still stop it today-by throwing the Congressmen who voted
for the giveaways out of office. In the future, when the Rockefeller Kissinger
plan for the international authority over food is implemented, our food
supply will no longer be under our control. What then?
-
- Increasingly we hear plaintive bleats from the Rockefellers'
sheep in the media, calling for Americans to make increased sacrifices
to feed the rest of the world. Incredible as it may seem, the truth-twisters
of the airwaves and press are attempting to make us feel guilty that we
are not starving.
-
- None of these Rockefeller lackeys dares suggest, of course,
that the difference between American agricultural production and the poverty
levels of the so-called -have not- nations is the difference between individualism
[true free enterprise-with competition-and private entrepreneurship], with
its reliance on private property and free enterprise, and feudalism-fascismsocialism-collectivism.
It is the difference between incentives and a planned economy; between
efficiency and wasteful boondoggles; between a million salesmen pushing
the "too much" - and a million ration clerks dividing up the
"too little."
-
- This is not to say America's agricultural system is perfect.
To the extent that we have instituted price supports and subsidies, paying
men not to grow food, we have suffered. Nevertheless, the success of American
agriculture under freedom is a model the rest of the world should be encouraged
to copy.
-
- But if more nations achieved independence in food production,
much of the impetus for world government would disappear faster than a
freeloader when the check arrives. In order for the Rockefellers to achieve
their New World Order, first they must create famines and the fear of further
suffering [this is where the Doom & Gloomers like <http://educate-yourself.org/cn/stevequayleendtimespromo07jan06.shtml>Steve
Quayle or <http://educate-yourself.org/lte/amitakhsethramtha11oct06.shtml>Amitakh
Stanford or <http://educate-yourself.org/cn/sorchafaalpracticalguidetosurvive07jan06.shtml>Sorcha
Faal or Art Bell for that matter, serve the NWO agenda..Ken]
-
- All that is required to create a famine is to put all
agriculture under control of government bureaucracy, then wait awhile.
The bigger the bureaucracy, the shorter the wait, and international bureaucracy
is the best at producing red tape, instead of wheat.
-
- Intertwined with the food production grab is the push
for <http://educate-yourself.org/ga/nwopopcontrol.shtml>population
control. People planning are an important tool in building the net that
will drag us fishes into the New World Order. The 'population bomb' real
or exaggerated, is being used in conjunction with food, energy, and international
money 'problems' as part of the One-Big-Brother snare.
-
- Coinciding with the UN-sponsored conferences in Nairobi
and Rome, the United Nations sponsored the World Population Conference
at Bucharest, Romania in August 1974. Headlining the program was none other
than John D. Rockefeller III, who proclaimed: "I come to Bucharest
with an urgent call for a deep and probing reappraisal of all that has
been done in the population field. I have changed my mind and now believe
family planning alone is not adequate. "
-
- An Associated Press report explained:
-
- "- Rockefeller ... has for years been one of the
world's leading advocates of family planning. He donated millions of dollars
toward population research and is founder and chairman of the Population
Council, a private US organization funded [millions of dollars] largely
by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations."
-
- The wire service continued:
-
- "His speech reflected the viewpoint voiced at this
conference by many members of the Third World and Socialist [that is, Communist]
countries."
-
- John D. III obviously felt right at home behind the Iron
Curtain, as he called for a redistribution of wealth and piously proclaimed
that modem development should emphasize "inequitable distribution
of the fruits of progress."
-
- In his remarks to the gathering of people planners, the
eldest of the Royal Rockefellers made three main points:
-
- First, he echoed the Communist line that the rich must
give their wealth to the 'poor'.
-
- Second, he asserted that voluntary family planning is
inadequate and called for Big Brother to start dictating whether or not
a couple is permitted to have a baby.
-
- Third, in calling for -moderate levels of consumption-
in advanced nations, Rockefeller advocated that Americans voluntarily reduce
their standard of living.
-
- The fact that it is a little incongruous-not to say hypocritical-for
a man whose family is worth uncounted millions, who has thousands of servants,
hundreds of luxurious homes and lives in an opulence unknown by the oriental
potentates of yore, to ask the rest of his fellow citizens to scale down
their living standards, went unnoticed in the New York Times. But to belabor
the obvious, whose wealth do you think Rockefeller wants 'to share', yours
or his?
-
- Going along with the call by Rockefeller (who claimed
the 'United Nations is the world's highest authority' for governmental
control over people), the conference set in motion the machinery to institutionalize
the totalitarian demands of the Stop the Storkers.
-
- The Washington Post ,a chief Establishment mouthpiece,
has discussed the Nazi like policies being advocated by the people planners:
-
- "The day may be approaching when couples will have
to prove eligibility and demonstrate qualifications before they are permitted
to become parents."
-
- Or there may be baby ration cards for couples, group
marriages, mass distribution of anti-fertility drugs, parent licensing,
legal Polygamy, abortions on demand, more varied life options for women
and more restricted ones for men-such as forced paternity leave for new
fathers.
-
- Understand that such enforced infertility is not planned
for India or Senegal, but for the United States, where zero population
growth is already a fact.
-
- All this, despite the provable fact that there is ample
room on earth for all of us-in fact if every man woman and child in the
entire world moved to the State of Washington, (twentieth in size of all
the states), each would have 490 square feet of space.
-
- But we are being led to believe that unless we give Big
Brother total power over people's rights to have children, we will all
be ankle deep in human beings within a decade. Such august organizations
as the National Academy of Sciences are helping to hawk this Rockefeller
line, with doomsday messages such as:
-
- "There can be no doubt concerning the long-term
prognosis. Either the birth rate of the world must come down or the death
rate must go up."
-
- This is not to discount the possibility that overpopulation,
particularly in backward nations, cannot be a genuine problem. But, if
the Rockefellers were truly interested in curbing population growth without
enslaving everybody, there is a much better solution. When a country's
standard of living goes up, the birth rate goes down-voluntarily. Assist
nations such as India and Red China to benefit by the adoption of free
market, private property principles, and the abundance produced by such
newly free peoples would astound the world. The Rockefellers, however,
are interested in more controls, not fewer problems.
-
- The specious Rockefeller argument that the world must
accept Mao-style people control or perish is so phony that it is amazing
the conspirators have gotten anyone to buy it. As Reverend R. J. Rushdoony
points out in his excellent book, The Myth of Overpopulation:
-
- "Socialism always creates ultimately an imbalance
between the number of people living and their food supply, which results
in hunger or famine. There is in this sense therefore always a problem
of overpopulation under socialism. Socialism, moreover, affects both the
food supplies, by limiting it, and also the population, by both expanding
it at one stage and limiting it at another."
-
- To the Rockefellers, socialism is not a system for redistributing
wealth - especially not for redistributing their wealth -but a system to
control people and competitors. Socialism puts power in the hands of the
government. And since the Rockefellers control the government, government
control means Rockefeller control. You may not have known this, but you
can be sure they do!
-
- When the Rockefellers join the UN's WorId Population
Conference in calling for the promotion
-
- "of a new economic order by eradicating the cause
of worId poverty, by ensuring the equitable distribution of the world resources,
by eliminating the injustices of existing world trade systems and exploitation
perpetrated by capitalistic ... corporations, "
-
- something smells as fishy as an unwashed tuna boat.
-
- Curbing population growth is just part of the Rockefeller
war on the American family. Abortion is another. According to John H. Knowles,
president of the Rockefeller Foundation and one of America's foremost promoters
of the slaughter of the unborn, the goal of the FoundatIon is to achieve
the capacity in America for 1.8 million abortions every year.
-
- Not coincidentally, it was John D. Rockefeller III who
was appointed by Richard Nixon as chairman of the newly created Commission
on Population Growth and the American Future. In accepting the appointment,
John D III pontificated:
-
-
- " The average citizen doesn't appreciate the social
and economic implications of population growth and what it does to the
quality of all our lives. Rather than think of popuhition control as a
negative thing, we should see that it can be enriching. "
-
- One of the early reports of the Rockefeller Commission
recommended:
-
- "... that present state laws restricting abortion
be liberalized along the lines of the New York State Statute, such abortions
to be performed on request by duly licensed physicians under conditions
of medical safety."
-
- And the Commisssion further suggested that federal, state,
and local governments make funds available to support abortion services
in states with liberalized statutes. 'Rockefeller is so callous about individual
beliefs that he would forcibly extract money from Catholic taxpayers, among
others, to fmance what their religion teaches is the murder of the unborn.
Tough rocks, says the Rock:"Religious preconceptions must be overcome.
"
-
- The New York model abortion law which chairman John enthusiastically
applauded was passed, of course, under the leadership of brother Nelson
Rockefeller. During the Vice Presidential confirmation hearings, Dr. Charles
Rice, Professor of Law at the Notre Dame Law School, characterized Nelson
as "the incarnate symbol of the anti-life movement" and said
that Mr. Rockefeller "is perhaps the leading proponent of permissive
abortion in the United States."
-
- The Rockefellers have even financed the establishment
of an abortion mill. In the summer of 1971, Planned Parenthood in New York
City opened its first large scale abortion center, a prototype for the
development of additional centers throughout the city, state, and nation.
The center was originally designed to perform more than 10 000 abortions
a year for an average fee of $80, with funds provided in many cases by
Medicaid. The initial funds to establish the abortion mill came from a
$200,000 pledge from The Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
-
- The past three generations of Rockefellers have not been
notoriously considerate of other people's feelings and beliefs. When a
group of pro-life activists picketed a speech by Nelson Rockefellerin Nebraska,
the loveable old politician told a 15 year old girl: "Don't knock
it [abortion], girl, you might need one someday."
-
- In all wars this nation has fought, from the battle of
Lexington in 1776 through the last fatality in Vietnam, American combat
deaths totaled 668, 226 men. Yet, in just the single year of 1972, 700,000
innocent babies were killed in this country, legally, befure they could
draw their first breath. (Current estimates are that this figure could
increase to 1.6 million abortions a year.)
-
- That is the price of the Rockefellers' promotion of easy
abortion in the United States. But it is just part of the price all of
us will pay (and pay, and pay), if the people planners succeed in herding
all of us into their New World Order.
-
- Yes, the Rockefellers are planners. As John D.'s aide,
Fred Gates, once confessed: "In our dreams we have limitless resources
and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands."
-
- Now, thanks to the taxpayers, the Rockefellers have almost
limitless funds. As a result, faceless bureaucrats in Washington whom you
did not hire and whom you cannot fire -now tell you how to run your business,
whom you may hire, where your children will be bussed to school, what products
you can purchase, and even what foods you can (and cannot) eat. It is only
a matter of time until the dictocrats tell you how many children you are
permitted to have.
-
- There is nothing wrong with planning. The question is
who is doing it. Our Founding Fathers believed people should be free to
plan their own lives. The Rockefellers believe their agents in the federal
government must plan your life for you. It is a simple choice: Will you
run your own life, or will you be forced to obey the dictates ofbureaucrats,
social workers, college professors, sociologists, psychologists, and others
who are fronting for the House of Rockefeller?
-
- Nelson is very candid about it. In an October 1975 interview
in Playboy magazine, Rocky admitted:
-
- "I'm a great believer in planning. Economic, social,
political, military, total world planning." (Emphasis added. )
-
- When Big Brother arrives, he may well be wearing horn-rimmed
glasses.
-
- Gary Allen
-
-
- Epilogue to the book, The Rockefeller File (Pub.1976)
- by Gary Allen
-
- Now you have read the most important contents in The
Rockefeller File. The assembled evidence is almost overwhelming, isn't
it? And yet we have left out reams of important material.
-
- This book was originally targeted for 144 pages. But
we wound up with over 260 pages -even after omitting a great deal of explosive
material. In order to keep the cost from climbing through the ceiling,
we settled for the size you are reading. If we have not convinced you of
the dangerous power of the House of Rockefeller in 200 pages, you probably
would not believe another 200 pages anyway.
-
- We deeply regret not using the voluminous files of research,
all on very important subjects, which were gathered for this book. Several
volumes could be written on Rockefeller efforts to involve America in World
War I, World War II, Korea and Vietnam -and the profits they made from
those conflicts. The alliance between Nazi Germany and the Rockefellers
is truly shocking. (Hitler's Luftwaffe ran on Standard Oil petrol, and
the Rockefellers were partners in I. G. Farben Industries, whose thousands
of war products included the poison gas used in Nazi death camps.) The
no-win war in Vietnam was almost totally engineered, from its foolish beginning
to its disastrous conclusion, by CFR minions.
-
- Nothing has been said about Nelson's tenure as Governor
of New York. We did not relate how he quadrupled state spending; We did
not cover his campaign promises not to raise taxes-which were always followed
by increases- after he was elected. Neither have we touched upon Rocky's
edifice complex, such as the $1.5 billion Albany Mall or his creation of
"moral obligation bonds" to finance projects the voters had rejected.
-
- Lack of space prevents us from discussing the Rockefeller
power-play behind the myriad regional government plans, which would abolish
city, county and state lines thus destroying traditional local government
and putting the citizens at the mercy of un elected (and unremovable) federal
bureaucrats. The Family is also the prime mover behind the push for "land
use" controls which would allow the government to dictate to you what
you can or cannot do with your own property.
-
- But all of these stories will have to wait for another
book. We can summarize all of those bulging files of research material
by saying that the Rockefellers want federal control of everything. Since
they intend to control the federal government, either directly or from
behind the scenes, this means that they will control everything. And when
they control everything, they will control everybody.
-
- We have shown that the House of Rockefeller is worth
billions of dollars -and has considerable leverage over hundreds of billions
more, through influence over the mega-banks, financial institutions, manufacturing
and petroleum production.
-
- The Family has used foundations to preserve and multiply
their wealth, and to mold public opinion through education, the media and
religion. Through their Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] they have extended
their influence in government, the Federal Reserve, communications and
education. An unquenched, ruthless. psychopathic lust for monopolistic
power has motivated three generations of Rockefellers. Because America
is a large, diverse and decentralized nation, it has taken them a hundred
years to complete the scaffold which would strangle freedom. Now they are
ready to put the rope around our necks and trip the lever.
-
- The question is: Can we cut the rope before the Rockefellers
drop the trap door? The most honest and realistic answer is: Perhaps.
-
- Let's not kid ourselves; resisting the power arrayed
against us won't be easy. Many persons who have read this far won't even
try-they will decide that it is hopeless and simply return to their business
interests or their bridge games. Others might decide that their best course
is to support the House of Rockefeller! Switching sides and joining with
your oppressors is as old as war. But if you haven't already been tapped,
you are probably too late. The House of Rockefeller doesn't need you. (Sorry,
Charlie!)
-
- Unfortunately, some newly awakened patriots will go off
on wild, impractical schemes. They may want to haul the Rockefellers before
the courts in an attempt to put them in jail for their crimes and strip
them of their power. But, let's face it, this is not going to happen. And
such ill conceived crusades end up hurting the cause of freedom far more
than they help. There is, however, an Achilles heel in the Rockefeller
plan for world dictatorship. It is that a Rockefeller triumph depends on
their continued control of the US government. If their influence in the
federal government were removed, all of their Hitlerian dreams for world
conquest would collapse. (Not that Nelson and David would spend the rest
of their lives in rags, but at least you wouldn't either.)
-
- Rockefeller control over the Executive branch of our
government is deeply entrenched. The voters, for example, cannot fIre the
State Department bureaucracy. But there is a solution.
-
- If a buzz saw suddenly went berserk and was ripping your
house to pieces, what would you do? You would pull the plug, of course.
The same thing must be done to the Rockefeller conspirators.The way to
pull the plug on them is to gain control of the House of Representatives.
All government spending bills must originate in the House. And Congress
could refuse to pass any law pushing us further into World Government.
We need 225 Congressmen who have the guts to say NO to the Rockefellers.
-
- The Rockefellers can control key bureaucrats; they can
buy and intimidate too many Senators. But a member of the House with enough
character and enough support can remain independent of the Rockefeller
Family.
-
- The problem is that too many citizens listen to what
a candidate says during the campaign, and then promptly forget about the
issues-and what he does about them after the election. A Congressman may
go to Washington with good intentions, but succumb to the Rockefellers'
siren song after he gets there. The pressures are tremendous. He is told
that in order to get along, he must go along. If he goes along, his district
gets fat government grants and contracts. If he doesn't go along, a Rockefeller-supported
demagogue may defeat him in the next election.
-
- What we must have is a "Truth In Advertising"
standard for politicians. If you buy a product to do a specifIc job you
expect it to do that job. Why should you expect less from elected politicians?
We believe it is time to end the "vote and hope" system of elections,
where you hope the new Congressman votes in the interest of his country
after he gets to Washington. The usual result is that the constituency
gets sold down the river. (A prime example is the confirmation of Nelson
Rockefeller for the Vice Presidency when Congressional mail ran 24 to 1
against approval.)
-
- We think any candidate worth supporting should sign an
elementary contract before you agree to contribute to his campaign or otherwise
support him.
-
- '76 PRESS has prepared such a contract, a copy of which
appears on the next page. Any political candidate who will hem, haw, double-talk
or waffle in an effort to weasel out of signing such a "Truth In Politics"
contract will surely not stand up to the blandishments of the Rockefellers
once he is elected. Forget him. Be especially leery of the smiling, glad-handing,
all- things - to-all- people moderate type of candidate [for example, the
media-ballyhooed and well-funded promotional appearances of U.S. Senator
Barack Obama ...] . Such a "middle of the roader" will often
compromise on the key issues and still manage to get re-elected time and
time again. He is the most dangerous of all politicians.
-
- The diabolical designs of the Rockefellers - their push
for fascism- socialism at home and an international World Government must
become the key issue of the next election.
|
