- In 1906, a congressional inquiry into the criminal activities
involving United States citizens in white slavery was stopped in its tracks.
The news magazine that had investigated the white slave traffic of hapless
young females was prepared to release a series of articles informing both
the Congress and the American public of those criminal activities. The
inquiry was attacked and silenced. Only the first article of the series
made it out the rest of the articles in the series, vital in terms
of both informing the public and in ending these horrific crimes, were
silenced. The behind-the-scenes power brokers who silenced the press and
sabotaged the congressional inquiry were all Jewish.
-
- The reason powerful Jews blocked the inquiry and sabotaged
the conduct of due process of law was because powerful and wealthy Jews
were directly involved and would have been exposed. As a direct result
of this near domestic "holocaust," the powerful Jews involved
formed a new organization: the American Jewish Committee.
-
- It may be recalled that the American Jewish Committee
was just recently in the news. This time, crucial information vital to
the public interest alerting American citizens of the domination of their
government by the Zionist American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or
AIPAC, was silenced. Jewish professor Anthony Judt, of New York University,
had two speaking engagements cancelled by two so-called "Jewish"
organizations: the American Jewish Committee and Abraham Foxman's Anti-Defamation
League. The AJC blocked the exposé of white slavery in 1906; and
now, 100 years later, prevented a speaking engagement by a Jewish professor
last October, to be given by a Jew who merely sought to amplify the findings
of Professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer. He had intended to offer
commentary on the Harvard School of Government paper, "The Israel
Lobby." Over 100 academics from colleges and universities across
the country wrote a letter of protest and signed it.
-
- Consider the unbelievable damage that could result had
Judt been allowed his right to speak and think freely. It would seriously
bring into focus the continuing attacks upon these rights which would preclude
exchanging ideas with other thinking human beings. And Foxman and his
ADL just couldn't tolerate that, especially when the attacks are coming
from "another" Jew. But Foxman is not just "another"
Jew he's a criminal and a traitor!
-
- Intimidating Americans and stifling their constitutional
rights is a crime, and not permitting an American to speak against the
agents of a foreign government is a crime. Those agents of a foreign nation-state,
a state which has committed acts of war against US, has committed numerous
acts of espionage against US, and may even have been involved with the
9/11 terrorist act against US, should be exposed and investigated as well.
Please recall the high-fiving five, surreptitiously detained and then
released to return to Israel.
-
- Foxman derives his power not from law, but by selecting
those individuals he wishes to defame and smear. And of course those smeared
have the right to sue; but Foxman can offer that he only acted in the self-interests
of "American Jewry and Israel." And Foxman and his ADL command
much wealth and legions of lawyers to bury litigants in legal fees and
the courts for years. In fact, that was indeed the method deployed to
silence Professor Judt. Who was smeared? Who was defamed? Yet the mere
fact that Judt was silenced and targeted by these two "Jewish"
groups can be shown to be, and sufficiently represented as, smears and
defamation. Who really was the "aggressor"; was it the "anti-Semite"
or the Semite? Clearly, the mission of Foxman and the ADL is to smear
and defame in order to silence critics of Israel and its tax-exempt foreign
agent lobby. Their power, "status" and wealth shield them legally.
-
- But smearing, defaming, and silencing aren't Foxman and
the ADL's only tactics. One may recall the last-minute pardoning frenzy
of former President Bill Clinton. In a sermon given by Rabbi Barry H.
Block on April 27, 2001, and posted on the Internet here, http://www.beth-elsa.org/be_s0427.htm
Rabbi Block writes: "The leaders of this New Square community are
unfortunately not as honest as their neighbors. Four of them had been
'convicted of robbing the government of $11,000,000, by setting up a fictitious
yeshiva to receive federal student aid money.' The school did not even
exist. The convicts and their attorneys justified their actions 'on the
grounds that . . . the funds were channeled back into the community [,
and not] for personal gain.' [Yoffie]"
-
- Rabbi Block's sermon, entitled "Clinton Pardons
Jewish Disgrace," then goes on to quote another rabbi, Rabbi
Eric Yoffie. "Rabbi Eric Yoffie, President of our Union of American
Hebrew Congregations, has written that, 'for Jews, this is not simply another
case of fraud and embezzlement. This is a case of religious people inventing
an imaginary Torah institution to steal from the government, using the
funds for other activities of their religious community, and then defending
their actions on the ground that the money did not go into their own pockets.
There is an implication that in some way, [their actions were] religiously
acceptable. But of course [they were] not. Their actions are nothing short
of a hillul Hashem, a desecration of God's name. Jews who break the law
in God's name and turn [the] Torah into an instrument of thievery are bringing
Judaism into disrepute.'"
-
- Rabbi Block continues: "Were these commutations
explicitly bought with votes? Probably not. Did these thieves receive
special treatment because of their town's overwhelming numbers of ballots
for Senator Clinton? Perhaps. Did President Clinton think he was being
a friend to the Jewish people when he commuted these sentences? Probably.
-
- We can be certain, though, that the Torah does not permit
thievery, even for the sake of a community. Our Rabbis teach us that committing
a crime in the name of God shames the Jewish people, dishonors the Torah,
and desecrates the Name of God. Though President Clinton surely intended
no harm to the Jewish people, he did us no favors when he publicized the
crime by granting pardon to the unrepentant sinners of New Square, New
York."
-
- Then Rabbi Block expounds on the pardon of Mark Rich.
"The case of Marc Rich is much better known. In some ways, it may
seem to be less of a Jewish problem, per se. Rich's alleged crimes, tax
evasion and breaking an embargo against Iran, are shocking. Unlike the
crimes of New Square, though, Rich's actions were not committed in the
name of Judaism, God, or the Jewish people. Bill Clinton is the one most
often charged with wrongdoing in the matter of the Rich pardon, not the
Jewish people.
-
- And yet, the pardon of Marc Rich had a very great deal
to do with the Children of Israel.
-
- Ehud Barak, then-Prime Minister of Israel, intervened
on Rich's behalf by calling Clinton twice. Rabbi Irving Greenberg, Chairman
of the Holocaust Memorial Council, pled for the Presidential pardon in
a letter written on the stationery of the sacred organization he heads.
Calls went out to Clinton from Mayor Ehud Olmert of Jerusalem; from Abraham
Foxman, head of the Anti Defamation League; and from dozens of other Jewish
and Israeli leaders and philanthropists.
-
- Why did all these Jewish leaders ask the President of
the United States to pardon Marc Rich? In the words of Rabbi Yoffie, 'the
answer is plain and simple: they were bought. Mr. Rich contributed generously
to Jewish causes and charities around the world, and then, in a carefully
orchestrated campaign, called in favors to put pressure on the President.
. . . Beneficiaries of his largesse responded with calls and letters.'"
-
- True to the combined character of Foxman and his ADL,
and considering as well the diverse nature of the morality and religious
honor of Judaism cited, religion itself is neither the issue nor the focus.
It is morality and the lack thereof that are contrasted by Rabbi Block's
sermon. Foxman is purely a political manipulator, whether it's to get
a Jewish criminal off the hook with bought-and-paid-for political fixes
and favors, or to silence a Jewish professor who merely wishes to speak
the truth. When rabbis distance themselves from criminals, which include
the likes of Abraham Foxman, the latter showing little or no devotion to
Judaism as we can likewise conclude is the case with Clinton, it should
be clear we are dealing with an evil individual and a dangerous political
faction that threatens all our freedoms. Foxman and his evil ADL must
be stopped.
-
- The dangerous and un-American faction represented by
Foxman and his ADL would surely cause President James Madison to rethink
his Federalist Paper No. 10. Our large and diverse nation does not
have the capability of cleansing itself by a myriad of conflicting interests.
Lobbies and influence peddling, especially considering the astonishing
and towering level of power of AIPAC and the ADL, are threatening and destroying
the very foundations of freedom this nation was built upon.
-
- Write to your representatives in Congress. Let them
know that neither the ADL nor AIPAC are elected representatives for America
or of the American people. Write right now! Don't put it off. These
dangerous factions work quickly, secretly and behind closed doors, and
are attempting to eliminate our society because it threatens their agenda
of a New World Order. Considering the power they already wield, why is
it that we should be the ones saddled with "hate crimes" legislation
they're trying to ram through Congress?
-
- © THEODORE E. LANG 1/4/07 All rights reserved
-
-
-
- Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.
-
-
|
