- The globalist took the election in France because the
French opposition was divided by an array of Kucinich-Perot candidates,
ensuring the victory of the candidate of Zionist Jewish global domination. Having
money taken out of the control of their governments with an unaccountable
European monetary system based on the "Euro", Europeans are now
headed for government taken out of the control of their national populations.
(See what is coming for us in the North American Union -- do you
really think the proud Frenchman or the Moselms living in France wanted
that for themselves.) I wrote again and again that Le Pen was the last
hope of France -- and I was right -- now there is Sarkozy and there is
no more France, it is gone forever.
-
- Dick Eastman
- Yakima, Washington
-
- _____
-
- Sarko Wins One For The Global Elite
- By Kurt Nimmo
- 5-7-7
-
-
- Now that Nicolas Sarkozy has won the French election
and appears to be the favorite of the French people-who are apparently
as easily brainwashed as Americans, but of course with typical if oft satirized
arrogant French élan-we can expect the idea of a supranational Europe,
previously rejected by the people of France, to take center stage.
-
- "One thing that both candidates recognize is that
Europe needs to be united to be influential on the world stage. The French
referendum on the EU constitution produced a shocking 'no' in a nation
that has always supported EU integration," opines Germany's Deutsche
Welle. "It is a top priority to get the European bicycle rolling
again, according to Pierre Lellouche, Sarkozy's foreign policy advisor.
The differences between the candidates is more one of approach rather than
substance, with Sarkozy being the better strategist." According to
Lellouche, even the top dog socialists in France "admit they'll vote
for Sarkozy," as their primary focus is globalization. Ségolène
Royal's big mistake, obviously, was her election campaign promise to seek
a referendum on selling France and Europe out to the one-worlders.
-
- In 2005, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso
described the French rejection as "a very serious problem," while
insisting it was premature to say "the treaty is dead." Indeed,
Sarko in France, in league with Merkel in Germany and the European Commission,
will keep pushing until the globalist "super state" is firmly
and irrevocably in place.
-
- In hindsight, it was really quite stupid to allow the
French and Dutch people to vote on the dismantlement of their national
sovereignty. In North America, slipping in world government by stealth
is all the craze, mostly notably with the hush-hush creation of the "Security
and Prosperity Partnership of North America" in 2005, a much less
burdensome process than the European experience, as the people are methodically
excluded.
-
- In fact, to this day, if you make noise about this exclusionary,
indeed totalitarian process of world government by drib and drab under
cover of stealth, you're considered a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy nut,
never mind the very real existence of the so-called NAFTA highway currently
under construction in Texas and a flurry of "white papers" and
"recommendations" on creating under the cover of darkness a "North
America Community" issued by the likes of the Council on Foreign Relations,
the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the Independent Task Force on
the Future of North America, the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales,
and other conspirators lurking in the shadows.
-
- Sarkozy's immediate task will be to make sure there are
no more silly mistakes and one world globalization remains unflinchingly
on track. "The European Commission believes that rightist Sarkozy
offers a better plan for the revival of the European Constitution, which
would be placed for voting in the Parliament, while Segolene Royal wants
to update the constitutional accord and hold another referendum which causes
a risk that the constitution will not pass the referendum voting,"
Javno explains.
"Critics of Segolene Royal consider she did not manage to adequately
present her program and that she is not feisty enough to become the future
president of France, while on the other hand Sarkozy has showed more edge
and feistiness, and his program was more substantial."
-
- In other words, Sarko was more effective than Royal at
insisting France be rolled into the EU-never mind the opposition of a few
million French citizens-and that's why he was selected to "win"
by the transnational business elite, the international bankers, the kings
and queens and princes, and all their bought or compromised chancellors,
prime ministers, ambassadors, secretaries of state, ad nauseam.
-
- It certainly helps, as well, that enough people in France
were bamboozled-as the Americans were bamboozled twice running-to put a
dull shine of legitimacy on this phase of what will soon enough become
one world tyranny and global slavery.
-
- http://kurtnimmo.com/
|
