rense.com

Owners Who Lost Pets
Likely To Get Little
From Suits

From Patricia Doyle, PhD
4-2-7

Hello Jeff - Money would not replace my beloved pet and believe me, I still grieve for my deceased pets. A big problem is that a good number of animals, especially those with health problems, probably died and were not counted in the pet food cases. Early in the beginning, a vet would have to be looking for the effects of the poison if not, the pet was simply a victim of either age or succumbed to health problem.
 
I think most of the pet owners who were victimized would be satisfied to see Menu execs and food company execs sitting down to dinner with a plate of their own recalled products followed by 20 to 50 years in prison. That would suit me.
 
Patty
 
From Animal Net
AFX Asia Profeed
 
 
ALBANY, NY -- Experts were cited as saying that pet owners are not likely to get much compensation if they individually sue pet food-maker Menu Foods over the death of a dog or cat, although they might fare better if they joined forces in a class action suit.
 
Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, was cited as saying that state laws consider animals -- even beloved pets -- to be only personal property, and that means that even for the loss of a faithful family companion, a successful civil lawsuit would not likely produce much reward, adding, "With animals, all you get is the value of the property. There are no emotional damages."
 
The story says that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has received more than 8,000 complaints while the company has fielded 300,000 calls from consumers. The company has only confirmed the deaths of 15 cats and one dog. There is no central database tracking pet deaths in the United States
 
Numerous pet owners around the country have sued or are considering legal action against Menu Foods. Some are seeking class action status.
 
Brenda Hitchcock of Tampa, Fla. Was quoted as saying, "I would love to find an attorney to take on this company," adding that she racked up $4,000 in veterinarian bills trying to save her 5-year-old cat 'S.S.' to no avail. She said she still has two pouches of the recalled food to prove her case.
 
Ontario-based Menu Foods has taken a low-key approach to the recall, expressing concern for people who have lost pets and offering to pay veterinary bills if a pet's illness or death can be directly linked to the food, but admitting no wrongdoing.
 
Jack Hall, a product liability lawyer from Pittsburgh, said the owner of a dog or cat used for breeding or of a specially trained animal could argue for higher compensation on the basis of lost potential earnings.
 
 
 
Patricia A. Doyle DVM, PhD
Bus Admin, Tropical Agricultural Economics
Univ of West Indies
 
Please visit my "Emerging Diseases" message board at:
http://www.emergingdisease.org/phpbb/index.php
Also my new website:
http://drpdoyle.tripod.com/
Zhan le Devlesa tai sastimasa
Go with God and in Good Health
 


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros