- Simple logic and observation will prove considerable
image tampering has taken place when taking a closer look at the images
of the supposed Syrian reactor site. Like the vector analysis I did showing
advanced weapon damage to burn vehicles at the WTC event, no one seems
to ask the question were BOTH photos faked for the reactor location
showing the reactor site, before and after it was destroyed? Let's look
at both of these images using shadow vectors to learn more.
- The key here is to examine the shadows in the notated
images. Since this appears to be a daylight image, we can assume that the
Sun is the only light source. At times other than mid-day when the Sun
is directly overhead, objects can only cast ONE shadow since the Sun is
the only light source. Shadows must be on the opposite side of any object
on the ground. For large holes in the ground, the shadow must be down in
the bottom of the hole, on the side nearest the sun. We shall see that
the problems with these images is that there are shadows on BOTH sides
of structures and objects above the ground.
- * The large yellow arrow (right image, right edge) points
to a straight line shadow. This shadow does NOT match the curved contour
of the edge of this plateau just above it, as other shadows appear to match
their nearby objects. This alone damages the credibility of both images.
- * In the image on the left, the orange arrow is pointing
to the supposed building's shadow. This is in conflict with the yellow
arrows, which prove that a shadow cast by the building should be on the
OTHER SIDE of the building. The yellow arrows appear to show this is a
raised, plateau-like area as a result of these shadows. Even if this is
not a plateau area, other shadows are still in conflict with each other.
- * In the image on the right, I have added a blue arrow
(center of the image) pointing to what appears to be a hole in the ground
near the center of where the building was. Note the shadow at the top side
of the apparent hole (center blue arrow.) Now look at the yellow arrows
which seem to disagree with the shadow direction of this hole. At the top
of the image, blue arrows indicate the shadows which should be on the opposite
side. It's not necessary to know which shadows are right. Since these shadows
conflict with each other, neither can logically be considered correct since
there is no real point of reference.
- * If this is a hole in the ground (center blue arrow,
right) the shadow must appear on the side of the hole nearest the sun.
If this is a raised structure above the ground, the shadow must be on the
opposite side from the sun side. As this is supposed to be a site where
a reactor building was destroyed, then the center blue arrow (right image)
would probably be pointing to a hole in the ground. If this is true, the
shadow is on the WRONG side of the hole with respect to the yellow arrows.
No matter how you look at these images, the shadows are still wrong.
- * Another problem which is even more obvious, is that
this reactor building had no cooling tower or cooling pond. Reactors require
extensive dissipation of generated heat into the surrounding environment.
In the desert, this problem will be even more severe. Yet no means to cool
this supposed reactor is visible. A cooling pond, lake or tower surely
would have been constructed along with the building.
- In short, there are numerous shadow conflicts (also visible
among the yellow arrows) that tell us that BOTH of these images are FAKE.
Most likely, these are photos which were quickly put together from more
than one image, since the shadows are all wrong in both images.
- Uncle needs to employ better graphic artists.
- Ted Twietmeyer