- Leading
Gay Site Covers Sinclair Story
- http://www.gaywired.com/article.cfm?ArticlePage=2&Section=67&id=18245
-
-
- Allegations YouTube Suppressing Sinclair Video Popularity
http://deathby1000papercuts.blogspot.com/2008/02/larry-sinclairs-obama-allegations-msm.html
-
-
- WND Poll - Majority Suspicious Of Demagogue Obama
http://poll.worldnetdaily.com/polls/index.asp?VIEW_RESULTS=Y
-
-
- Sinclair Allegations In Columbia Journalism
Review
- adikiller
- Tue 19 Feb 2008 12:23 AM
-
- When some obscure doctor came up with unsubstantiated
accusations that Sen. George Allen made racist remarks thirty years ago...
The MSM and CJR were tripping over themselves to tank his reelection to
the Senate... (Not to mention Paul McLeary's "blockbuster" story
of the outing of Allen's "jewishness")
-
- And this was merely a Senatorial election.
-
- But a specific individual (Larry Sinclair) has publicly
accused Obama for the last month (in a YouTube video that has been watched
hundreds of thousands of times) of exchanging gay sex for crack concaine
in two specific places (a limo and in a specific hotel) on two specific
occasions in 1999... And not a peep about it in MSM or here on CJR... We
don't see a horde of fledgling "professional journalists" beating
the streets on this story...
-
- Now, you let the MSM get caught with its hand in the
cookie jar (a la Rathergate) and CJR has one of its "watchdogs"
on the first plane to Texas in a quixotic search of mythogical typewriters
to vindicate the offending cookie snatchers...
-
- But specific allegations against a rising Dem?... Hands
off!..
- Go figure...
-
- It almost seems like some sort of a bias thing might
me going on...
- You think?
-
- http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/obama_sells_his_narrative_1.php
-
-
-
- SmokingGun.com Rails Against Sinclair
- http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0214081obama1.html
-
-
-
- Sinclair Story In London Times Blog
- From Times Online
- 2-20-8
-
- Clinton Could Turn Toxic As Options Dry Up
-
- The Wisconsin defeat for Hillary Clinton means that she
has to win big on March 4 - and may campaign more negatively
-
- Okay everyone! Let's hear it! Unleash you tirade about
Obama. We've heard them all before.
-
- There are just problems with them:
-
- One: These have been the same rants since Iowa, and despite
an increasingly bright light being shown on Rezko, Larry Sinclair, and
Wordsgate, the candidate KEEPS WINNING STATES BY IMPRESSIVE MARGINS.
-
- Two: That Obama has now tapped into some of that voting
block he will need to win an election.
-
- Three: What is it in his vetting that detrators hope
the press will find?And if there were a real dragon in Obama's past, shouldn't
the Clinton campaign have found it by now?
-
- Last: Isn't it just a little arrogant to assume that
Obama supporters are this stupid little heard of sheep, and that opposing
his candidacy (which ideologically isn't far different from any other Democrats)
makes you somehow better than the majority of voters.
-
- Maybe he's winning simply because he's a better candidate
the Clinton.
-
- Food for thought, eh?
-
- Thomas , Dallas, TX,
|
