- Note - Sylvia Stolz is the defense attorney who
was recently sentenced to three-and-a-half years behind bars for defending
Ernst Zundel. She is engaged to Horst MAHLER, one of Germany's high profile
"Holocaust Denier" dissidents. Mahler is a brilliant but controversial
attorney, disbarred in Germany for his politically incorrect views.
-
-
- UPDATE -
-
- Sylvia Stolz and Breakthrough on the Holocaust Front
-
- Translated by Prof James Damon
-
- Greetings from Horst Mahler:
-
- This is a quick report on the latest developments here
in Germany.
-
- The weekend before Sylvia was jailed, we received a letter
from Potsdam court that caused Sylvia to exclaim, "This is a bomb!"
meaning that it was smashing good news. She was right -- in fact, her exclamation
was actually an understatement. It is actually a "super bomb"
that has already been "fused," and I have the other end of that
fuse in my hand!
-
- On 17 December last year, when the outcome of Sylvia's
Mannheim trial was already obvious to everyone, I received notice of a
ruling by the Staatsschutzkammer of "Staschu" (State Security
Agency) of Potsdam District Court to the effect that they were dropping
the six most serious charges against me, including 21 separate counts of
denying [the] "Holocaust." Now they are saying that the statutes
of limitations have expired.
-
-
- The basis for this ruling is obviously in error
technically,
-
- at least for some of the counts. This basis for the court
ruling has also been "zurechtgezimmert" (tailored or bent) by
ignoring certain changes in the regional press laws that had been rammed
through by the Central Jewish Council. Through these changes, the relatively
short statute of limitations for the alleged publishing crime of denying
[the] "Holocaust," which had been six months, was increased to
at least three years. This three-year limitation for the separate counts
in the indictment has expired in just a few instances.
-
- It is obvious that the court in Potsdam has deliberately
allowed the statutes of limitation to expire. As early as October 2006,
and using the same rationale, a different court of the same district had
dropped an indictment against me for "disparagement of the state,"
for which Rigolf Hennig was imprisoned for nine months. I was not even
aware of this at first. By Mannheim District Court standards, the counts
in that indictment (21 separate counts each with a sentence of 5 years)
would have been a life sentence for me in view of my age, since the maximum
would have been 15 years.
-
- All this is just the tip of the iceberg! The Federal
judiciary's "quiet revolt" against "Holocaust" prosecutions
is now in full swing.
-
- Other judges in Stuttgart, Mühlhausen, Berlin, Bernau,
Brandenburg, Potsdam and Lüneburg' who have been putting "Holocaust"
trials of at least five other Revisionists "on ice," will now
be carried along with the stream of events. From now on, Mannheim will
be known as "Holonkenheim" ("home of scoundrels" --
a play of words on Halunkenheim.)
-
- At least two dozen prosecutors and judges will soon be
facing charges of "evading punishment while in office," and the
Central Jewish Council with its attack dogs will be cracking the whip.
These trials are going to split the judicial establishment. They are going
to throw it into total turmoil. The correct defense will have to be that
no evasion of punishment has taken place. No conviction is possible under
Section 130 III, 90a, and 86a of Penal Code, therefore the defendants must
be exonerated. With no convictions there can obviously be no evasion of
punishment.
-
- I would never have dreamed that I would be the recipient
of such highly unlikely favoritism by the judiciary of the Federal Republic.
The law normally works to the disadvantage of German-minded Germans, rather
than protecting their "guaranteed freedoms." However, the whole
thing becomes quite plausible when you "add 2 and 2 together."
-
- By her heroic conduct, Sylvia has succeeded in unmasking
the disgusting fraud of "Holocaust" justice. On basis of the
courts' verdicts and rulings, all of which we have in hand, she has exposed
and demonstrated the short and simple formula for "Holocaust"
prosecutions. It goes like this: "If Defendant A, who is charged with
lying and must therefore be punished, presents evidence that he has told
the truth, he is punished a second time, and this time his attorney is
punished for defending him."
-
-
- The institution of "Holocaust" prosecution
has destroyed itself by acting in such an obviously despotic manner. The
"Holocaust" judges should never have allowed their "secret"
to be so openly depicted! Sylvia has struck at the very heart of the foreign
domination of Germany! Now that her accomplishment is clear for all to
see, fewer and fewer prosecutors and judges will be willing to support
those judicial atrocities of "Holocaust" prosecutions.
-
- There are signs that entire groups of prosecutors are
now hesitating to sign their names to "Holocaust" indictments,
knowing that they will be faced with defendants who follow Sylvia's example.
Sylvia has very effectively demonstrated how to scandalize these show trials,
to convert the role of accused into that of accuser and to function as
prosecutor in these courts of foreign inquisition. We have to consider
the whole phenomenon in its larger context. The jurists, who have now been
exponiert ("raised to a higher level") by Sylvia's defense, are
legally required by their office to read my works. I can assume that even
if the jurists are not convinced by my arguments, they are at least aware
of them. (...)
|
