- Bill Engdahl is a leading researcher, economist and analyst
of the New World Order who's written on issues of energy, politics and
economics for over 30 years. He contributes regularly to publications like
Japan's Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Foresight magazine, Grant's Investor.com,
European Banker and Business Banker International. He's also a frequent
speaker at geopolitical, economic and energy related international conferences
and is a distinguished Research Associate of the Centre for Research on
Globalization where he's a regular contributor.
- Engdahl also wrote two important books - "A Century
of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order" in 2004.
It's an essential history of geopolitics and the importance of oil. Engdahl
explains that America's post-WW II dominance rests on two pillars and one
commodity - unchallengeable military power and the dollar as the world's
reserve currency combined with the quest to control global oil and other
- Engdahl's newest book is just out from the Centre for
Research on Globalization. It's a sequel to his first one called "Seeds
of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" and subject
of this review. It's the diabolical story of how Washington and four Anglo-American
agribusiness giants plan world domination by patenting life forms to gain
worldwide control of our food supply and why that prospect is chilling.
The book's compelling contents are reviewed below in-depth so readers will
know the type future Henry Kissinger had in mind in 1970 when he said:
"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control
- Remember also, this cabal is one of many interconnected
ones with fearsome power and ruthless intent to use it - Big Banks controlling
the Federal Reserve and our money, Big Oil our world energy resources,
Big Media our information, Big Pharma our health, Big Technology our state-of-the-art
everything and watching us, Big Defense our wars, Big Pentagon waging them,
and other corporate predators exploiting our lives for profit. Engdahl's
book focuses brilliantly on one of them. To fully cover its vital contents,
this review will be in three parts for more detail and to make it easily
- Part I of "Seeds of Destruction"
- In 2003, Jeffrey Smith's "Seeds of Deception"
was published. It exposed the dangers of untested and unregulated genetically
engineered foods most people eat every day with no knowledge of the potential
health risks. Efforts to inform the public have been quashed, reliable
science has been buried, and consider what happened to two distinguished
- One was Ignatio Chapela, a microbial ecologist at the
University of California, Berkeley. In September, 2001, he was invited
to a carefully staged meeting with Fernando Ortiz Monasterio, Mexico's
Director of the Commission of Biosafety in Mexico City. The experience
left Chapela shaken and angry as he explained. Monasterio attacked him
for over an hour. "First he trashed me. He let me know how damaging
to the country and how problematic my information was to be."
- Chapela referred to what he and a UC Berkeley graduate
student, David Quist, discovered in 2000 about genetically engineered contamination
of Mexican corn in violation of a government ban on these crops in 1998.
Corn is sacred in Mexico, the country is home to hundreds of indigenous
varieties that crossbreed naturally, and GM contamination is permanent
and unthinkable - but it happened by design.
- Chapela and Quist tested corn varieties in more than
a dozen state of Oaxaca communities and discovered 6% of the plants contaminated
with GM corn. Oaxaca is in the country's far South so Chapela knew if contamination
spread there, it was widespread throughout Mexico. It's unavoidable because
NAFTA allows imported US corn with 30% of it at the time genetically modified.
Now it's heading for nearly double that amount, and if not contained, it
soon could be all of it.
- The prestigious journal Nature agreed to publish Chapela's
findings, Monasterio wanted them quashed, but Chapela refused to comply.
As a result, he was intimidated not to do it and threatened with being
held responsible for all damages to Mexican agriculture and its economy.
- He went ahead, nonetheless, and when his article appeared
in the publication on November 29, 2001 the smear campaign against him
began and intensified. It was later learned that Monsanto was behind it,
and the Washington-based Bivings Group PR firm was hired to discredit his
findings and get them retracted.
- It worked because the campaign didn't focus on Chapela's
contamination discovery, but on a second research conclusion even more
serious. He learned the contaminated GM corn had as many as eight fragments
of the CaMV promoter that creates an unstable "hotspot." It can
cause plant genes to fragment, scatter throughout the plant's genome, and,
if proved conclusively, would wreck efforts to introduce GM crops in the
country. Without further evidence, there was still room for doubt if the
second finding was valid, however, and the anti-Chapela campaign hammered
him on it.
- Because of the pressure, Nature took an unprecedented
action in its 133 year history. It upheld Chapela's central finding but
retracted the other one. That was all it took, and the major media pounced
on it. They denounced Chapela's incompetence and tried to discredit everything
he learned including his verified findings. They weren't reported, his
vilification was highlighted, and Monsanto and the Mexican government scored
a big victory.
- Ironically, on April 18, 2002, two weeks after Nature's
partial retraction, the Mexican government announced there was massive
genetic contamination of traditional corn varieties in Oaxaca and the neighboring
state of Puebla. It was horrifying as up to 95% of tested crops were genetically
polluted and "at a speed never before predicted." The news made
headlines in Europe and Mexico. It was ignored in the US and Canada.
- The fallout for Chapela was UC Berkeley denied him tenure
in 2003 because of his article and for criticizing university ties to the
biotech industry. He then filed suit in April, 2004 asking remuneration
for lost wages, earnings and benefits, compensatory damages for humiliation,
mental anguish, emotional distress and coverage of attorney fees and costs
for his action. He won in May, 2005 but not in court when the university
reversed its decision, granted him tenure and agreed to include retroactive
pay back to 2003. The damage, however, was done and is an example of what's
at stake when anyone dares challenge a powerful company like Monsanto.
- The other man attacked was the world's leading lectins
and plant genetic modification expert, UK-based Arpad Pusztai. He was vilified
and fired from his research position at Scotland's Rowett Research Institute
for publishing industry-unfriendly data he was commissioned to produce
on the safety of GMO foods.
- His Rowett Research study was the first ever independent
one conducted on them anywhere. He undertook it believing in their promise
but became alarmed by his findings. The Clinton and Blair governments were
determined to suppress them because Washington was spending billions promoting
GMO crops and a future biotech revolution. It wasn't about to let even
the world's foremost expert in the field derail the effort. His results
were startling and consider the implications for humans eating genetically
- Rats fed GMO potatoes had smaller livers, hearts, testicles
and brains, damaged immune systems, and showed structural changes in their
white blood cells making them more vulnerable to infection and disease
compared to other rats fed non-GMO potatoes. It got worse. Thymus and spleen
damage showed up; enlarged tissues, including the pancreas and intestines;
and there were cases of liver atrophy as well as significant proliferation
of stomach and intestines cells that could be a sign of greater future
risk of cancer. Equally alarming - this all happened after 10 days of testing,
and the changes persisted after 110 days that's the human equivalent of
- GM foods today saturate our diet. Over 80% of all supermarket
processed foods contain them. Others include grains like rice, corn and
wheat; legumes like soybeans and soy products; vegetable oils; soft drinks;
salad dressings; vegetables and fruits; dairy products including eggs;
meat and other animal products; and even infant formula plus a vast array
of hidden additives and ingredients in processed foods (like in tomato
sauce, ice cream and peanut butter). They're unrevealed to consumers because
labeling is prohibited yet the more of them we eat, the greater the potential
threat to our health.
- Today, we're all lab rats in an uncontrolled, unregulated
mass human experiment the results of which are unknown. The risks from
it are beyond measure, it will take many years to learn them, and when
they're finally revealed it will be too late to reverse the damage if it's
proved GM products harm human health as independent experts strongly believe.
Once GM seeds are introduced to an area, the genie is out of the bottle
- Despite the enormous risks, however, Washington and growing
numbers of governments around the world in parts of Europe, Asia, Latin
America and Africa now allow these products to be grown in their soil or
imported. They're produced and sold to consumers because agribusiness giants
like Monsanto, DuPont, Dow AgriSciences and Cargill have enormous clout
to demand it and a potent partner supporting them - the US government and
its agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture and State, FDA,
EPA and even the defense establishment. World Trade Organization (WTO)
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) patent rules
also back them along with industry-friendly WTO rulings like the February
7, 2006 one.
- It favored a US challenge against European GMO regulatory
policies in spite of strong consumer sentiment against these foods and
ingredients on the continent. It also violated the Biosafety Protocol that
should let nations regulate these products in the public interest, but
it doesn't because WTO trade rules sabotaged it. Nonetheless, anti-GMO
activism persists, consumers still have a say, and there are hundreds of
GMO-free zones around the world, including in the US. That and more is
needed to take on the agribusiness giants that so far have everything going
- In "Seeds of Deception," Jeffrey Smith did
a masterful job explaining the dangers of GM foods and ingredients. Engdahl
explains them as well but goes much further brilliantly in his blockbuster
book on this topic. It's the story of a powerful family and a "small
socio-political American elite (that) seeks to establish control over the
very basis of human survival" - future life through the food we eat.
The book's introduction says it "reads (like) a crime story."
It's also a nightmare but one that's very real and threatening.
- This review covers the book in-depth because of its importance.
It's an extraordinary work that "reveals a diabolical World of profit-driven
political intrigue (and) government corruption and coercion" that's
part of a decades-long global scheme for total world dominance. The book
deserves vast exposure and must be read in full for the whole disturbing
story. It's hoped the material below will encourage readers to do it in
their own self-interest and to marshal mass consumer actions to place food
safety above corporate profits.
- Engdahl's book supplies the ammunition to do it and is
also a sequel to his earlier one on war, oil politics and The New World
Order and follows naturally from it. It covers the roots of the strategy
to control "global food security" that goes back to the 1930s
and the plans of a handful of American families to preserve their wealth
and power. But it centers on one in particular that above the others "came
to symbolize the hubris and arrogance of the emerging American century"
that blossomed post-WW II. Its patriarch began in oil and then dominated
it in his powerful Oil Trust. It was only the beginning as the family expanded
into "education of youth, medicine and psychology," US foreign
policy, and "the very science of life itself, biology, and its applications"
in plants and agriculture.
- The family's name is Rockefeller. The patriarch was John
D., and four powerful later-generation brothers followed him - David, Nelson,
Laurance, and John D. III. Engdahl says the GMO story covers "the
evolution of power in the hands of an elite (led by this family), determined
(above all) to bring the entire world under their sway." They and
other elites already control most of it, including the nation's energy,
the US Federal Reserve, and other key world central banks. Today, three
brothers are gone, David alone remains, and he's still a force at age 92
although he no longer runs the family bank, JP Morgan Chase. He's active
in family enterprises, however, including the Rockefeller Foundation to
be discussed in Part II of this review.
- Washington Launches the GMO Revolution
- The roots of the story go back decades, but Engdahl explains
the science of "biological and genetic-modification of plants and
other life forms first" came out of US research labs in the 1970s
when no one noticed. They soon would because the Reagan administration
was determined to make America dominant in this emerging field. The biotech
agribusiness industry was especially favored, and companies in the early
1980s raced to develop GMO plants, livestock and GMO-based animal drugs.
Washington made it easy for them with an unregulated, business-friendly
climate that persisted ever since under Republicans and Democrats alike.
- Food safety and public health issues aren't considered
vital if they conflict with profits. So the entire population is being
used as lab rats for these completely new, untested and potentially hazardous
products. And leading the effort to develop them is a company with a "long
record of fraud, cover-up, bribery," deceit and disdain for the public
interest - Monsanto.
- Its first product was saccharin that was later proved
to be a carcinogen. It then got into chemicals, plastics and became notorious
for Agent Orange that was used to defoliate Vietnam jungles in the 1960s
and 1970s and exposed hundreds of thousands of civilians and US troops
to deadly dioxin, one of the most toxic of all known compounds.
- Along with others in the industry, Monsanto is also a
shameless polluter. It has a history of secretly dumping some of the most
lethal substances known in water and soil and getting away with it. Today
on its web site, however, the company ignores its record and calls itself
"an agricultural company (applying) innovation and technology to help
farmers around the world be successful, produce healthier foods, better
animal feeds and more fiber, while also reducing agriculture's impact on
our environment." Engdahl proves otherwise in his thorough research
that's covered below in detail.
- In spite of its past, Monsanto and other GMO giants got
unregulated free rein in the 1980s and especially after George HW Bush
became president in 1989. His administration opened "Pandora's Box"
so no "unnecessary regulations would hamper them. Thereafter, "not
one single new regulatory law governing biotech or GMO products was passed
then or later (despite all the) unknown risks and possible health dangers."
- In a totally unfettered marketplace, foxes now guard
the henhouse because the system was made self-regulatory. An elder Bush
Executive Order assured it. It ruled GMO plants and foods were "substantially
equivalent" to ordinary ones of the same variety like corn, wheat
or rice. This established the principle of "substantial equivalence"
as the "lynchpin of the whole GMO revolution." It was pseudo-scientific
mumbo jumbo, but was now law, and Engdahl equated it to a potential biologically
catastrophic "Andromeda Strain," no longer the world of science
- Monsanto chose milk as its first GMO product, genetically
manipulated it with recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH), and marketed
it under the trade name, Posilac. In 1993, the Clinton FDA declared it
safe and approved it for sale before any consumer use information was available.
It's now sold in every state and promoted as a way cows can produce up
to 30% more milk. Problems, however, soon appeared. Farmers reported their
stock burned out up to two years sooner than usual, serious infections
developed, and some animals couldn't walk. Other problems included the
udder inflammation mastitis as well as deformed calves being born.
- The information was suppressed, and rBGH milk is unlabeled
so there's no way consumers can know. They also weren't told this hormone
causes leukemia and tumors in rats, and a European Commission committee
concluded humans drinking rBGH milk risk breast and prostate cancer. The
EU thus banned the product, but not the US. Despite clear safety issues,
the FDA failed to act and allows hazardous milk to be sold below the radar.
It was just the beginning.
- The Fox Guards the Henhouse
- Engdahl reviewed the Pusztai affair, the toll it took
on his health, and the modest vindication he finally got. Already out of
a job, the 300-year old British Royal Society attacked him in 1999 and
claimed his research was "flawed in many aspects of design, execution
and analysis and that no conclusions should be drawn from it." It
was another blow to a distinguished man who deserved better than what Engdahl
called a "recognizable political smear" that also tarnished the
Royal Society's credibility for making it. It had no basis in fact and
was done because Pusztai's bombshell threatened to derail Britain's hugely
profitable GMO industry and do the same thing to its US counterpart.
- As for Pusztai, after five years, several heart attacks,
and a ruined career, he finally learned what happened after he announced
his findings. Monsanto was the culprit. The company complained to Clinton
who, in turn, alerted Tony Blair. Pusztai's findings had to be quashed
and he discredited for making them. He was nonetheless able to reply with
the help of the highly respected British scientific journal, The Lancet.
In spite of Royal Society threats against him, it's editor published his
article, but at a cost. After publication, the Society and biotech industry
attacked The Lancet for its action. It was a further shameless act.
- As a footnote, Pusztai now lectures around the world
on his GMO research and is a consultant to start-up groups researching
the health effects of these foods. Along with him and his wife, his co-author,
Professor Stanley Ewen, also suffered. He lost his position at the University
of Aberdeen, and Engdahl notes that the practice of suppressing unwanted
truths and punishing whistleblowers is the rule, not the exception. Industry
demands are powerful, especially when they affect the bottom line.
- The Blair government went even further. It commissioned
the private firm, Grainseed, to conduct a three-year study to prove GMO
food safety. London's Observer newspaper later got UK Ministry of Agriculture
documents on it that showed tests were rigged and produced "some strange
science." At least one Grainseed researcher manipulated the data to
"make certain seeds in the trials appear to perform better than they
- Nonetheless, the Ministry recommended a GMO corn variety
be certified, and the Blair government issued a new code of conduct under
which "any employee of a state-funded research institute who dared
to speak out on (the) findings into GMO plants could face dismissal, be
sued for breach of contract or face a court injunction." In other
words, whisleblowing was now illegal even if public health was at stake.
Nothing would be allowed to stop the agribusiness juggernaut from proceeding
- The Rockefeller Plan - "Tricky" Dick Nixon
and Trickier Rockefellers
- Richard Nixon took office at a time of national crisis.
Along with the Vietnam morass, the economy was in trouble after the "golden
age of capitalism" peaked in 1965 and corporate profits were declining.
The globalization phenomenon began at this time when American companies
and the nation's wealthiest families found investing abroad more profitable
than at home because more opportunities were available outside the country.
- Food was one of them and was about to be renamed "agribusiness."
Engdahl called it "a paradigm shift" with one man having the
most decisive role - former New York governor Nelson Rockefeller "who
deeply wanted to be President" but had to settle for number two under
- He and his brothers ran the family's Rockefeller Foundation
and various other tax-exempt entities like the Rockefeller Brothers Trust.
Nelson and David were the most influential figures, and their power center
was the exclusive New York Council on Foreign Relations. Engdahl states:
"In the 1960s the Rockefellers were at the power center of the US
establishment (and) Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (was) their hand-picked
protege." It was a marriage made in hell.
- Enter the "crisis of democracy" or as right
wing Harvard professor, Samuel Huntington, called it, an "excess of
democracy" at a time masses of ordinary citizens protested their government's
policies. It captured media attention, posed a threat to the country's
establishment, and had to be addressed. In 1973 it was at a meeting of
300 influential, hand-picked Rockefeller friends from North America, Europe
and Japan. They founded a powerful new organization called the Trilateral
Commission with easily recognizable member names.
- Zbigniew Brzezinski was its first Executive Director,
and other charter members included Jimmy Carter (who became David Rockefeller's
favored 1976 presidential candidate over Gerald Ford), George HW Bush,
Paul Volker (Carter's Fed Chairman) and Alan Greenspan who was then a Wall
Street investment banker.
- The new organization "laid the basis for a new global
strategy for a network of interlinked international elites," many
of whom were Rockefeller business partners. Combined, their financial,
economic and political clout was unmatched. So was their ambition that
George HW Bush later called a "new world order." Trilateralists
laid the foundation for today's globalization. They also followed Huntington's
advice about democracy's unreliability that had to be checked by "some
measure of (public) apathy and non-involvement (combined with) secrecy
- The Commission further advocated privatizing public enterprises
along with deregulating industry. Trilateralist Jimmy Carter embraced the
dogma enthusiastically as President. He began the process that Ronald Reagan
continued in the 1980s almost without noticing its originator or placing
blame where it's due.
- In 1973, Nixon was in office with Kissinger his Svengali.
One observer described him at the time as "like sludge out of a swamp
without a spark of life....no soul, a slip of life, a kind of ghoul (and)
a sort of lubricant (to keep the ship of state running)." So he did
by "tak(ing) complete control (of) US foreign policy" as both
Secretary of State and National Security Advisor. Further, he "was
to make food a centerpiece of his diplomacy along with oil geopolitics."
- In the Cold War era, food became a strategic weapon by
masquerading as "Food for Peace." It was cover for US agriculture
to engineer the transformation of family farming into global agribusiness
with food the tool and small farmers eliminated so it could be used most
effectively. World agriculture domination was to be "one of the central
pillars of post-war Washington policy, along with (controlling) world oil
markets and non-communist world defense sales." The defining 1973
event was a world food crisis.
- The shortage of grain staples along with the first of
two 1970s oil shocks advanced a "significant new Washington policy
turn." Oil and grains were rising three to fourfold in price when
the US was the world's largest food surplus producer with the most power
over prices and supply. It was an ideal time for a new alliance between
US-based grain trading companies and the government. It "laid the
groundwork for the later gene revolution."
- Enter what Engdahl called the "great train robbery"
with Kissinger the culprit. He decided US agriculture policy was "too
important to be left in the hands of the Agriculture Department" so
he took control of it himself. The world desperately needed grain, America
had the greatest supply, and the scheme was to use this power to "radically
change world food markets and food trade." The big winners were grain
traders like Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and Continental Grain
that were helped by Kissinger's "new food diplomacy (to create) a
global agriculture market for the first time." Food would "reward
friends and punish enemies," and ties between Washington and business
lay at the heart of the strategy.
- The global food market was being reorganized, corporate
interests were favored, political advantage was exploited, and the 1990s
"gene revolution" groundwork was laid. Rockefeller interests
and its Foundation were to play the decisive role as events unfolded over
the next two decades. It began under Nixon as the cornerstone of his farm
policy, free trade was the mantra, corporate grain traders were the beneficiaries,
and family farms had to go so agribusiness giants could take over.
- Bankrupting them was the plan to remove an "excess
(of) human resources." Engdahl called it a "thinly veiled form
of food imperialism" as part of a scheme for the US to become "the
world granary." The family farm was to become the "factory farm,"
and agriculture was to be "agribusiness" to be dominated by a
few corporate giants with incestuous ties to Washington.
- Dollar devaluation was also part of the scheme under
Nixon's New Economic Plan (NEP) that included closing the gold window in
1971 to let the currency float freely. Developing nations were targeted
as well with the idea that they forget about being food-sufficient in grains
and beef, rely on America for key commodities, and concentrate instead
on small fruits, sugar and vegetables for export. Earned foreign exchange
could then buy US imports and repay IMF and World Bank loans that create
a never-ending cycle of debt slavery. GATT was also used and later the
WTO with corporate-written rules for their own bottom line interests.
- A Secret National Security Memo
- In the midst of a worldwide drought and stock market
collapse, consider Henry Kissinger's classified memo in April, 1974. It
was on a secret project called National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM
200) that was shaped by Rockefeller interests and aimed to adopt a "world
population plan of action" for drastic global population control -
meaning to reduce it. The US led the effort, and it worked like this -
it made birth control in developing countries a prerequisite for US aid.
Engdahl summed it up in blunt terms: "if these inferior races get
in the way of our securing ample, cheap raw materials, then we must find
ways to get rid of them."
- Kissinger's scheme was "simpler contraceptive methods
through bio-medical research" that almost sounds like DuPont's old
slogan, "Better things for better living through chemistry."
Later on, DuPont dropped "through chemistry" as evidence mounted
on their toxic effects and a changing company in 1999 began using "The
Miracles of Science" in their advertising. The Nazis also aimed big
and sought control. Population culling was part of it that for them was
called "eugenics" and their scheme was to target "inferior"
races to preserve the "superior" one.
- NSSM 200 was along the same idea and was tied to the
agribusiness agenda that began with the 1950s and 1960s "Green Revolution"
to control food production in targeted Latin American, Asian and African
countries. Kissinger's plan had two aims - securing new US grain markets
and population control with 13 "unlucky" countries chosen. Among
them were India, Brazil, Nigeria, Mexico and Indonesia, and exploiting
their resources depended on drastic population reductions to reduce homegrown
- The scheme was ugly and pure Kissinger. It recommended
forced population control and other measures to ensure strategic US aims.
Kissinger wanted global numbers reduced by 500 million by the year 2000
and argued for doubling the 10 million annual death rate to 20 million
going forward. Engdahl called it "genocide" according to the
strict definition of the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide statute that defines this crime legally. Kissinger
was guilty under it for wanting to withhold food aid to "people who
can't or won't control their population growth." In other words, if
they won't do it, we'll do it for them.
- The strategy included fertility control called "family
planning" that was linked to the availability of key resources. The
Rockefeller family backed it, Kissinger was their "hired hand,"
and he was well-rewarded for his efforts. It included keeping him from
being prosecuted where he's wanted as a war criminal and could be arrested
overseas like Pinochet was in the UK when he was placed under house arrest
- Besides his better-known crimes, consider what he did
to poor Brazilian women through a policy of mass sterilization under NSSM
200. After 14 years of the program, the Brazilian Health Ministry discovered
shocking reports of an estimated 44% of all Brazilian women between ages
14 and 55 permanently sterilized. Organizations like the International
Planned Parenthood Federation and Family Health International were involved,
and USAID directed the program. It has a long disturbing history backing
US imperialism while claiming on its web site it extends "a helping
hand to those people overseas struggling to make a better life, recover
from a disaster or striving to live in a free and democratic country."
- Even more disturbing was an estimated 90% of Brazilian
women of African descent sterilized in a nation with a black population
second only to Nigeria's. Powerful figures backed the scheme but none more
influential than the Rockefellers with John D. III having the most clout
on population policy. Nixon appointed him head of the Commission on Population
Growth and the American Future in 1969. Its earlier work laid the ground
for Kissinger's NSSM 200 and its policy of extermination through subterfuge
that was based on a "decades old effort to breed human traits"
by the Nazi "Eugenics" process.
- The Brotherhood of Death
- Long before Kissinger (and his assistant Brent Scowcroft)
made population reduction official US foreign policy, the Rockefellers
were experimenting on humans. JD III led the effort. In the 1950s, while
Nelson exploited cheap Puerto Rican labor in New York and on the island,
brother JD III conducted mass sterilization experiments on their women.
By the mid-1960s, Puerto Rico's Public Health Department estimated the
toll - one-third or more of them of child-bearing age (unsuspecting poor
women) were permanently sterilized.
- JD III expressed his views in a 1961 UN Food and Agriculture
Organization lecture: "To my mind, population growth (and its reduction)
is second only to control of atomic weapons as the paramount problem of
the day." He meant, of course, its unwanted parts to preserve valuable
resources for the privileged. He was also influenced by eugenicists, race
theorists and Malthusians at the Rockefeller Foundation who believed they
had the right to decide who lives or dies.
- Powerful figures were behind the effort as well as leading
American business families. So were notables in the UK then and earlier
like Winston Churchill, John Maynard Keynes and others. Alan Gregg was
as well as Rockefeller Foundation Medical Division chief for 34 years.
Consider his views. He said "people pollute, so eliminate pollution
by eliminating (undesirable) people." He compared city slums to cancerous
tumors and called them "offensive to decency and beauty." Better
to remove them and cleanse the landscape.
- This was policy, and it was "key to understanding
(the Foundation's later efforts) in the revolution in biotechnology and
plant genetics." Its mission from inception was to "(cull) the
herd, or systematically (reduce) populations of 'inferior breeds.' "
The problem for supremacists is too many of a lesser element spells trouble
when they demand more of what the privileged want for themselves. Solution
- remove them with lots of ways to do it from birth control to sterilization
to starvation to wars of extermination.
- These ideas were American, they took root 100 years ago,
noted names backed it like Rockefeller, Carnegie and Harriman, and they
later influenced the Nazis. Hitler praised the practice in his 1924 book,
"Mein Kampf," then used it as Fuhrer to breed a "master
race." Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes also supported
it, and consider his 1927 decision in Buck v. Bell. He ruled Virginia's
forced sterilization program was constitutional and wrote: "It is
better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring
for crime....society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing
their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough." This from
a noted Supreme Court Justice that would have horrific consequences still
in play. It "opened the floodgates" for sterilizing many thousands
of women considered "subhuman" detritus and in the way.
- JD III was right in step with this thinking. He was nurtured
on Malthusian pseudo-science and embraced the dogma. He joined the family
Foundation in 1931 where he was influenced by eugenicists like Raymond
Fosdick and Frederick Osborn. Both were founding members of the American
Eugenics Society. In 1952, he used his own funds to found the New York-based
Population Council in which he promoted studies on over-population dangers
that were openly racist. For the next 25 years, the Council spent $173
million on global population reduction and became the world's most influential
organization promoting these supremacist ideas.
- But it avoided the term "eugenics" because
of its Nazi association and instead used language like birth control, family
planning and free choice. It was all the same, and before the war Rockefeller
associate and family Foundation board member, Frederick Osborn, enthusiastically
supported Nazi eugenics experiments that led to mass exterminations now
vilified. Back then, he believed this was the "most important experiment
that has ever been tried" and later wrote a book. It was called "The
Future of Human Heredity" with "eugenics" in the subtitle.
It stated women could be convinced to reduce their births voluntarily and
began substituting the term "genetics" for the one now out of
- During the Cold War, culling the population drew supporters
that included the cream of corporate America. They backed private population
reduction initiatives like Margaret Sanger's International Planned Parenthood
Federation (IPPF). The major media also spread the notion that "over-population
in developing countries leads to hunger and more poverty (which, in turn,
becomes) the fertile breeding ground for" international communism.
American agribusiness would later get involved through a policy of global
food control. Food is power. When used to cull the population, it's a weapon
of mass destruction.
- Consider the current situation with the UN Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) reporting sharply higher food prices along with severe
shortages, and warned this condition is extreme, unprecendented and threatens
billions with hunger and starvation. Prices are up 40% this year after
a 9% rise in 2006, and it forced developing states to pay 25% more for
imported food and be unable to afford enough of it.
- Various explanations for the problem are cited that include
growing demand, higher fuel and transportation costs, commodity speculation,
the use of corn for ethanol production (taking one-third of the harvest
that's more than what's exported for food) and extreme weather while ignoring
the above implications - the power of agribusiness to manipulate supply
for greater profits and "cull the herd" in targeted Third World
countries. Affected ones are poor, and FAO cites 20 in Africa, nine in
Asia, six in Latin America and two in Eastern Europe that in total represent
850 million endangered people now suffering from chronic hunger and related
poverty. They depend on imports, and their diets rely heavily on the type
grains agribusiness controls - wheat, corn and rice plus soybeans. If current
prices stay high and shortages persist, millions will die - maybe by design.
- Fateful War and Peace Studies
- Engdahl reviewed how American elites in the late 1930s
began planning an American century in the post-war world - a "Pax
Americana" to succeed the fading British Empire. The New York Council
of Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies Group led the effort, and Rockefeller
Foundation money financed it. As Engdahl put it: they'd be paid back later
"thousands-fold." First though, America had to achieve world
dominance militarily and economically.
- The US business establishment envisioned a "Grand
Area" to encompass most of the world outside the communist bloc. To
exploit it, they hid their imperial designs beneath a "liberal and
benevolent garb" by defining themselves as "selfless advocates
of freedom for colonial peoples (and) the enemy of imperialism." They
would also "champion world peace through multinational control."
- Like today, it was just subterfuge for their real aims
that were pursued under the banner of the United Nations, the new Bretton
Woods framework, the IMF, World Bank and the GATT. They were established
for one purpose - to integrate the developing world into the US-dominated
Global North so its wealth could be transfered to powerful business interests,
mostly in the US. The Rockefeller family led the effort, the four brothers
were involved, and Nelson and David were the prime movers.
- While JD III was plotting depopulation and racial purity
schemes, Nelson worked "the other side of the fence....as a forward-looking
international businessman" in the 1950s and 1960s. While preaching
greater efficiency and production in targeted countries, he schemed, in
fact, to open world markets for unrestricted US grain imports. It became
the "Green Revolution."
- Nelson concentrated on Latin America. During WW II, he
coordinated US intelligence and covert operations there, and those efforts
laid the groundwork for family interests post-war. They were tied to the
region's military because friendly strongmen are the type leaders we prefer
to guarantee a favorable business climate.
- From the 1930s, Nelson Rockefeller had significant Latin
American interests, especially in areas of oil and banking. In the early
1940s, he sought new opportunities and along with Laurance bought vast
amounts of cheap, high-quality farmland so the family could get into agriculture.
It wasn't for family farming, however. The Rockefellers wants global monopolies,
and their scheme was to do in agriculture what the family patriarch did
in oil along with using food and agricultural technology as Cold War weapons.
- By 1954, PL 480, or "Food for Peace," established
surplus food as a US foreign policy tool, and Nelson used his considerable
influence on the State Department because every post-war Department Secretary,
from 1952 through 1979, had ties to the family through its Foundation:
namely, John Foster Dulles, Dean Rusk, Henry Kissinger and Cyrus Vance.
- These men supported Rockefeller views on private business
and knew the family saw agriculture the way it sees oil - commodities to
be "traded, controlled, (and) made scarce or plentiful" to suit
the foreign policy goals of dominant corporations controlling their trade.
- The family got into agriculture in 1947 when Nelson founded
the International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC). Through it, he introduced
"mass-scale agribusiness in countries where US dollars could buy huge
influence in the 1950s and 1960s." Nelson then allied with grain-trading
giant Cargill in Brazil where they began developing hybrid corn seed varieties
with big plans for them. They would make the country "the world's
third largest producer of (these) crop(s) after the US and China."
It was part of Rockefeller's "Green Revolution" that by the late
1950s "was rapidly becoming a strategic US economic strategy alongside
oil and military hardware."
- Latin America was the beginning of a food production
revolution with big aims - to control the "basic necessities of the
majority of the world's population." As agribusiness in the 1990s,
it was "the perfect partner for the introduction....of genetically
engineered food crops or GMO plants." This marriage masqueraded as
"free market efficiency, modernization (and) feeding a malnourished
world." In fact, it was nothing of the sort. It cleverly hid "the
boldest coup over the destiny of entire nations ever attempted."
- Creating Agribusiness - Rockefeller and Harvard Invent
- The "Green Revolution began in Mexico and spread
across Latin America during the 1950s and 1960s." It was then introduced
in Asia, especially in India. It was at a time we claimed our aim was to
help the world through free market efficiency. It was all one way, from
them to us so corporate investors could profit. It gave US chemical giants
and major grain traders new markets for their products. Agribusiness was
going global, and Rockefeller interests were in the vanguard helping industry
globalization take shape.
- Nelson worked with his brother, JD III, who set up his
own Agriculture Development Council in 1953. They shared a common goal
- "cartelization of world agriculture and food supplies under their
corporate hegemony." At its heart, it aimed to introduce modern agriculture
techniques to increase crop yields under the false claim of wanting to
reduce hunger. The same seduction was later used to promote the Gene Revolution
with Rockefeller interests and the same agribusiness giants backing it.
- In the 1960s, Lyndon Johnson also used food as a weapon.
He wanted recipient nations to agree to administration and Rockfeller preconditions
that population control and opening their markets to US industry was part
of the deal. It also involved training developing world agriculture scientists
and agronomists in the latest production concepts so they could apply them
at home. This "carefully constructed network later proved crucial"
to the Rockefeller strategy to "spread the use of genetically-engineered
crops around the world," helped along with USAID funding and CIA mischief.
- "Green Revolution" tactics were painful and
took a devastating toll on peasant farmers. They destroyed their livelihoods
and forced them into shantytown slums that now surround large Third World
cities. There they provide cheap exploitable labor from people desperate
to survive and easy prey for any way to do it.
- The "Revolution" also harmed the land. Monoculture
displaces diversity, soil fertility and crop yields decrease over time,
and indiscriminate use of chemical pesticides causes serious later health
problems. Engdahl quoted an analyst calling the "Green Revolution"
a "chemical revolution" developing states couldn't afford. That
began the process of debt enslavement from IMF, World Bank and private
bank loans. Large landowners can afford the latter. Small farmers can't
and often, as a result, are bankrupted. That, of course, is the whole idea.
- The "Green Revolution" was based on the "proliferation
of new hybrid seeds in developing markets" that characteristically
lack reproductive capacity. Declining yields meant farmers had to buy seeds
every year from large multinational producers that control their parental
seed lines in house. A handful of company giants held patents on them and
used them to lay the groundwork for the later GMO revolution. Their scheme
was soon evident. Tradition farming had to give way to High Yield Varieties
(HYV) of hybrid wheat, corn and rice with major chemical inputs.
- Initially, growth rates were impressive but not for long.
In countries like India, agricultural output slowed and fell. They were
losers so agribusiness giants could exploit large new markets for their
chemicals, machinery and other product inputs. It was the beginning of
"agribusiness," and it went hand-in-hand with the "Green
Revolution" strategy that would later embrace plant genetic alterations.
- Two Harvard Business School professors were involved
early on - John Davis and Ray Goldberg. They teamed with Russian economist,
Wassily Leontief, got Rockefeller and Ford Foundation funding, and initiated
a four-decade revolution to dominate the food industry. It was based on
"vertical integration" of the kind Congress outlawed when giant
conglomerates or trusts like Standard Oil used them to monopolize entire
sectors of key industries and crush competition.
- It was revived under Trilateralist President Jimmy Carter
disguised as "deregulation" to dismantle "decades of carefully
constructed....health, food safety and consumer protection laws."
They would now give way under a new wave of industry-friendly vertical
integration. Supported by a public campaign, it claimed that government
was the problem, it encroached too much on our lives, and it had to be
rolled back for greater personal "freedom."
- Early in the 1970s, agribusiness producers controlled
US food supplies. They'd now go global on a scale without precedent. The
goal - "staggering profits" by "restructur(ing) the way
Americans grew food to feed themselves and the world." Ronald Reagan
continued Carter's policy and let the top four or five monopoly players
control it. It led to an unprecedented "concentration and transformation
of American agriculture" with independent family farmers driven off
their land through forced sales and bankruptcies so "more efficient"
agribusiness giants could move in with "Factory Farms." Remaining
small producers became virtual serfs as "contract farmers." America's
landscape was changing with people trampled on for profits.
- Engdahl explained a gradual process of "wholesale
merger(s) and consolidation....of American food production....into giant
corporate global concentrations" with familiar names - Cargill, Archer
Daniels Midland (ADM), Smithfield Foods and ConAgra. As they grew bigger,
so did their bottom lines with annual equity returns rising from 13% in
1993 to 23% in 1999. Hundreds of thousands of small farmers lost out for
it as their numbers dropped by 300,000 from 1979 to 1998 alone. It was
even worse for hog farmers with a drop from 600,000 to 157,000 so 3% of
producers could control 50% of the market.
- The social costs were staggering and continue to be as
"entire rural communities collapsed and rural towns became ghost towns."
Consider the consequences:
- -- by 2004, the four largest beef packers controlled
84% of steer and heifer slaughter - Tyson, Cargill, Swift and National
- -- four giants controlled 64% of hog production - Smithfield
Foods, Tyson, Swift and Hormel;
- -- three companies controlled 71% of soybean crushing
- Cargill, ADM and Bunge;
- -- three giants controlled 63% of all flour milling,
and five companies controlled 90% of global grain trade;
- -- four other companies controlled 89% of the breakfast
cereal market - Kellogg, General Mills, Kraft Foods and Quaker Oats;
- -- in 1998, Cargill acquired Continental Grain to control
40% of national grain elevator capacity;
- -- four large agro-chemical/seed giants controlled over
75% of the nation's seed corn sales and 60% of it for soybeans while also
having the largest share of the agricultural chemical market - Monsanto,
Novartis, Dow Chemical and DuPont; six companies controlled three-fourths
of the global pesticides market;
- -- Monsanto and DuPont controlled 60% of the US corn
and soybean seed market - all of it patented GMO seeds; and
- -- 10 large food retailers controlled $649 billion in
global sales in 2002, and the top 30 food retailers account for one-third
of global grocery sales.
- At the dawn of a new century, family farming was decimated
by corporate agribusiness' vertically integrated powers that surpassed
their earlier 1920s heyday dominance. The industry was now the second most
profitable national one after pharmaceuticals with domestic annual sales
exceeding $400 billion. The next aim was merging Big Pharma with Big food
producing giants, and the Pentagon's National Defense University took note
in a 2003-issued paper - "Agribusiness (now) is to the United States
what oil is to the Middle East." It's now considered a "strategic
weapon in the arsenal of the world's only superpower," but at a huge
cost to consumers everywhere.
- Engdahl reviewed the "revolution" in animal
factory production that EarthSave International founder and Baskin-Robbins
heir, John Robbins, covered honestly, thoroughly and compassionately in
two explosive books on the subject - "Diet for A New America"
in 1987 and "The Food Revolution" in 2001. They were both stinging
indictments of corporate-produced foods - horrifying animal cruelty, unsafe
foods, unsanitary conditions, rampant use of anti-biotics humans then ingest,
massive environmental pollution, and new unknown dangers from genetic engineering
- all allowed by supposed government watchdog regulatory agencies that
ignore public health concerns.
- Agribusiness was on a roll, government supports it with
tens of billions in annual subsidies, and the 1996 Farm Bill suspended
the Secretary of Agriculture's power to balance supply and demand so henceforth
unrestricted production is allowed. Food producing giants took full advantage
to control market forces. They crushed family farmers by over-producing
and forcing down prices. They also pressured land values as small operators
failed. It created opportunities for land acquisition on the cheap for
greater concentration and dominance.
- Next came integrating the Gene Revolution into agribusiness
the way Harvard's Ray Goldberg saw it coming. Entire new sectors were to
be created from genetic engineering. It would include GMO drugs from GMO
plants in a new "argi-ceutical system." Goldberg predicted a
"genetic revolution (through) an industrial convergence of food, health,
medicine, fiber and energy businesses" - in a totally unregulated
marketplace. Unmentioned was a threatening consumer nightmare hidden from
- Food is Power
- Rockefeller Foundation funding was the Gene Revolution's
catalyst in 1985 with big aims - to learn if GMO plants were commercially
feasible and if so spread them everywhere. It was the "new eugenics"
and the culmination of earlier research from the 1930s. It was also based
on the idea that human problems can be "solved by genetic and chemical
manipulations....as the ultimate means of social control and social engineering."
Foundation scientists sought ways to do it by reducing infinite life complexities
to "simple, deterministic and predictive models" under their
diabolical scheme - mapping gene structures to "correct social and
moral problems including crime, poverty, hunger and political instability."
With the development of essential genetic engineering techniques in 1973,
they were on their way.
- They're based on what's called recombitant DNA (rDNA),
and it works by genetically introducing foreign DNA into plants to create
genetically modified organisms, but not without risks. London Institute
of Science in Society chief biologist, Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, explained the dangers
because the process is imprecise. "It is uncontrollable and unreliable,
and typically ends up damaging and scrambling the host genome, with entirely
unpredictable consequences" that might unleash a deadly unrecallable
"Andromeda Strain." Research continued anyway amidst lies that
risks were minimal and a promised future lay ahead. All that mattered were
huge potential profits and geopolitical gain so let the good times roll
and the chips fall where they may.
- One project was to map the rice genome. It launched a
17 year effort to spread GMO rice around the world with Rockefeller Foundation
money behind it. It spent millions funding 46 worldwide science labs. It
also financed the training of hundreds of graduate students and developed
an "elite fraternity" of top scientific researchers at Foundation-backed
research institutes. It was a diabolical scheme aiming big - to control
the staple food for 2.4 billion people and in the process destroy the biological
diversity of over 140,000 developed varieties that can withstand droughts,
pests and grow in every imaginable climate.
- Asia was the prime target, and Engdahl explained the
sinister tale of a Philippines-based Foundation-funded institute (IRRI).
It had a gene bank with "every significant rice variety known"
that comprised one-fifth of them all. IRRI let agribusiness giants illegally
use the seeds for exclusive patented genetic modification so they could
introduce them in markets and dominate them by requiring farmers be licensed
and forced to pay annual royalty fees.
- By 2000, a successful "Golden Rice" was developed
that was beta-carotene (Vitamin A) enriched. It was marketed on the fraudulent
claim that a daily bowl could prevent blindness and other Vitamin A deficiencies.
It was a scam as other products are far better sources of this nutrient
and to get enough of it from any type rice requires eating an impossible
nine kilograms daily (about 20 pounds). Nonetheless, gene revolution backers
were ready for their next move: "the consolidation of global control
over humankind's food supply" with a new tool to do it - the WTO.
Corporate giants wrote its rules favoring them at the expense of developing
nations shut out.
- Unleashing GMO Seeds - A Revolution in World Food Production