Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com

Time Jumps - Update
By Ted Twietmeyer
2-20-8
 
I have received a number of inquiries from readers who have pondered my theory of time jumps. Therefore, to assist in the understanding of the theory I'm adding the following update essay.
 
In relation to the "Possible Time Jump?" article, as of 12 hours later the GOES10 X-ray chart is no longer being auto-updated every five minutes. The last update from 12 hours earlier showed ZERO X- Ray level for both red and blue plot lines for a 3 hour space as of 11AM EST on 2/20/08. I brought the earlier chart of what was happening yesterday to public attention on the Kevin Smith show the night of 2/19/08, which may have caused NASA to cease updating the chart. We shall continue monitoring this and report as this develops.
 
IRREGULARITIES IN THE FLOW OF TIME
 
Contrary to common theory, the flow of time is not as consistent as you might think. It is a human construct to mark the passage of time and nothing more that makes reality what it is, and this is loosely based on sunrise and sunset which of course, vary slightly every day all year long. We have 60 minutes in an hour and 24 hours in a day. Mankind could also have simply decided there are 1440 units in a day and night as well and accomplished the same thing, but this would be harder mentally to relate to. The 60/24 thing is simply a human invention.
 
Out in space, our measure of time on Earth is completely meaningless. Some of Einstein's theories have already been wrong, such as the energy in a photon. The on-going functioning of the two Voyager spacecraft which are still transmitting images since 1976 are more proof of this. It is my theory that the further you are from any gravitational field such as Earth, the slower time passes at your location. The microwave transmitters employed in the two Voyager spacecraft use a vacuum tube, known as a traveling wave tube. Reliable solid state microwave transistor technology had not yet become a reality back in the mid 1970's when these two identical spacecraft were designed. When traveling wave tubes were used in television communications satellites around the Earth from the 1960's through the 1980's, they had a lifetime of about 5 to 7 years before seriously degrading in power output. When this happens television images become noisy and the communications satellites were then re-assigned to telephone signal use which needs far less power. The Voyagers were powered by radioisotope thermoelectric generators and not solar cells. These generators can provide power for centuries.
 
In the 1980's the Voyager spacecraft transmitter tubes should have degraded to the point where they would have ceased to function. Yet both of these vehicles left our solar system several years ago and their continued functioning appears to show that for them time is almost stopped. They may continue working for centuries.
 
Relativity has always stated you must move at very high speeds to see any measurable change in the passage of time. This has empircally been proven as NOT true. Those who climb high mountains and astronauts see a small difference in their watches when they come down. Why? After all, the shuttle moving at 15,000 MPH is hardly remotely close to light moving at 186,00 miles per second. Compared to the shuttle, a mountain climber is standing still. Yet both see a small time change on their watches. What is the common denominator? Both are further from the sea level surface of the Earth. This proves it has little to do with velocity and far more to do with the Earth's gravitational field, which is strongest at the surface of the planet. The higher you go, the further you will be from the surface of the Earth and gravity's effects. That is the common denominator. And the longer (and further) you stay above the surface of the Earth, the more of an accumulated time shift you'll observe.
 
I believe that gravity and time are two sides of the same coin, if not the same thing. No one has proved exactly what gravity is. Perhaps science is looking at it in the wrong way.
 
The human mind exists outside of spacetime. Thought and memory take place at the quantum level. This means the although the 3D world around you will show you that even if the past or present has changed, there will be no record of it. That gear-like object which appeared at the base of the sundial post on the two rovers on Mars is one such example. It wasn't on the sundial about a year ago, and this is according to several people I personally know who are familiar with numerous sundial images. This has quite an interesting impact on time travel theory.
 
One theory about time travel effects states that any change in the past will create a new timeline. What the sundial change shows us is that this simply isn't true. What this has shown us is that a change in our present time instantly reflects what was changed in the past. It appears that someone went back into the past and had the designer of the sundial add the gear-like structure at the base of the post. Perhaps this was a test to see if anyone in the present would notice the change, and many of us did.
 
A time shift signature can appear when the reality of something that you and others already know as an historial fact no longer has any evidence of it being that way in our reality. You can know for sure reality was or is different than what you see now, but there isn't any way to prove it. There is only your memory and the memory of others who also observed what you did or know what you know, and nothing more. Proposing this concept to people or telling them you saw something change in reality that wasn't that way before often provokes a laughing response, since the average person can barely handle reality as it is today.
 
 
 
The rock group "Coup" came out with this album cover
in JUNE 2001. How did they know? This image was on
the MTV website and has since been removed, however
the text about the group's leader stating he received a phone call
telling him he MUST change the album cover was still
on the MTV website as of about 4 years ago.
 
There is one grammar error in the previous "Possible Time Jump?" article that some readers may have noticed. The sentence which begins with "The affects of time jumps... " should be "The effects of time jumps..."
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros