Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
Gingrich Plays A Major Role
In America's Troubles
From  Dick Eastman
5-8-8
 
Rockefeller operative Newt Gingrich has played a major part in all of our troubles -- the NEW "contract on America" he is floating for his masters starkly confirms their anti-social intentions.
 
Pay special attention to the proposal floated by Gingrich for the Rockefeller interests that the US Census be cut back and questions eliminated -- blinding the nation to what is being done to us economically and democraphically. The effects of their crimes against us are being hidden -- just as they have hidden the effects of economic crimes of monetary policy when the stopped reporting and gethering  the M3 and L money supply statistic. This new Contract on America with the gutting of the population census is itself a major crime -- if people will take the trouble to understand it.
 
Not one person commented on what I wrote a few days ago ('Answering Gingrich,' below)  -- which of course fills me with total despair -- I might as well be mumbling to myself in a padded cell for all the reaction anything I put out gets amoung you.  But I know how busy your all are pushing Ron Paul.
 
Still, I know there is a solid core of intelligent people of good will who have enough facts to have reached the right conclusions. It is always too early to quit.
 
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
 
 
 
Answering Gingrich
 
By Dick Eastman
 
Newt Gingrich (soi-disant "Rockefeller Republican", who went with Bill Clinton on every globalist measure in Congress, who was on Richard Perle's Defense Policy Board with Wolfowitz and Kissinger -- who planned in detail the War on Terror and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan wars BEFORE Sept. 11 happened and therefore must be an accomplice in the frame-up) is now telling the nation that the Republicans are collapsing because of opposition to Bush in Congress and that McCain is doing better than the Republicans in general because of his independent stand on the issues.
 
 
How ironic that after Waco when the nation turned against Clinton and the militias formed and for the first time in decades the Democrats were turned out of both houses of Congree and replaced by Republicans IN REACTION TO CLINTON -- that through the greatest deceit in Congress up to that time Gingrich was given personal credit for the victory -- as if it was he himself personally who had accomplished the "revolution" -- yes all of the media reinforced this lie -- and so Gingrich became Speaker of the House and proceeded to give Clinton everything that the bankers told Clinton to give us -- Gingrich backed Clinton on NAFTA and everything else. 
 
 
 
And he invented his own Contract with America -- a Rockefeller wish list -- and said that that bogus and poisonus contract was what the Republican victory of 1994 was all about -- and he proceeded to vote it in -- all of it against us, all of it poison to us -- right down to the deregulation of the derivatives market which is so big a part of the collapse of the American economy today. But low and behold he is doing the same thing again -- he is pushing a Rockefeller wish list as the GOP's only chance for averting disaster in November. He is telling the Republican's that in order to win they must do what he knows the people really want, a new contract with American which includes, for example, "redirecting the oil being put into the national petroleum reserve onto the open market" and " pledge to uphold the presidential veto of bills with earmarks," and "overhaul the census and cut its budget radically," and "implement a space-based, GPS-style air traffic control system." Do you see what I mean about Gingrich once again  selling the Rockefeller agenda as "the will of the people?"
And yes I myself heard Gingrich state on national talk radio several years ago -- notwithstanding his wearing the label  "Conservative" and "Reaganite"  declare that has ALWAYS been a "Rockefeller Republican" and always will be -- which of course is exactly the opposite of what Conservative Republicans have stood for (Taft, Goldwater, even Nixon and Reagan) -- so now this public enemy is telling us that the Republicans are going to lose because they are not following McCain as closely as they should. Never does he say that the ONLY reason any Republican would support McCain is because of the terror they feel at the prospect of a Clinton victory -- they would favor ANYBODY against THAT alternative -- but Gingrich says McCain is stronger than the Congressional Republicans because the GOP are not being independent like McCain is independent -- that is they are not cleaving to McCain as McCain is cleaving to what Hillary is advocating (as Gingrich clove to Bill Clinton) which is the Rockefeller globalist line that is at war with the rest of us (and winning).
 
All it would take is 15 minutes of someone telling people this on one of the big national talk radio shows and that would be the end of Clinton-McCain-Gingrich and the beginning of draft Bob Bowman. But that will never happen -- so if you know a Republican, mention this to him. If you have a Republican Congressman in your district -- let him know how wrong Mr. Gingrich is.
 
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
From: HumanEvents@HumanEventsOnline.com - Newt Gingrich
To: olfriend@nwinfo.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:30 AM
Subject: My Plea to Republicans
My Plea To Republicans -
 
It's Time for Real Change to Avoid Real Disaster 
By Newt Gingrich 
 
The Republican loss in the special election for Louisiana's Sixth Congressional District last Saturday should be a sharp wake up call for Republicans: Either Congressional Republicans are going to chart a bold course of real change or they are going to suffer decisive losses this November.
 
 
The facts are clear and compelling.
 
Saturday's loss was in a district that President Bush carried by 19 percentage points in 2004 and that the Republicans have held since 1975.
 
 
This defeat follows on the loss of Speaker Hastert's seat in Illinois. That seat had been held by a Republican for 76 years with the single exception of the 1974 Watergate election when the Democrats held it for one term. That same seat had been carried by President Bush 55-44% in 2004.
 
Two GOP Losses That Validate a National Pattern
 
These two special elections validate a national polling pattern that is bad news for Republicans. According to a New York Times/CBS Poll, Americans disapprove of the President's job performance by 63 to 28 (and he has been below 40% job approval since December 2006, the longest such period for any president in the history of polling).
 
A separate New York Times/CBS Poll shows that a full 81 percent of Americans believe the economy is on the wrong track.
 
The current generic ballot for Congress according to the NY Times/CBS poll is 50 to 32 in favor of the Democrats. That is an 18-point margin, reminiscent of the depths of the Watergate disaster.
 
 
Congressional Republicans Can't Take Comfort in McCain's Poll Numbers
 
 
Senator McCain is currently running ahead of the Republican congressional ballot by about 16 percentage points. But there are two reasons that this extraordinary personal achievement should not comfort congressional Republicans.
 
First, McCain's lead is a sign of the gap between the McCain brand of independence and the GOP brand. No regular Republican would be tying or slightly beating the Democratic candidates in this atmosphere. It is a sign of how much McCain ... is a non-traditional Republican that he is sustaining his personal popularity despite his party's collapse. 
 
 
Second, there is a grave danger for the McCain campaign that if the generic ballot stays at only 32 % for the GOP it will ultimately outweigh McCain's personal appeal and drag his candidacy into defeat.
 
The Anti-Obama, Anti-Wright, and Anti-Clinton GOP Model Has Been Tested -- And It Failed
 
The Republican brand has been so badly damaged that if Republicans try to run an anti-Obama, anti- Reverend Wright, or (if Senator Clinton wins), anti-Clinton campaign, they are simply going to fail.
 
This model has already been tested with disastrous results.
 
In 2006, there were six incumbent Republican Senators who had plenty of money, the advantage of incumbency, and traditionally successful consultants.
 
 
But the voters in all six states had adopted a simple position: "Not you." No matter what the GOP Senators attacked their opponents with, the voters shrugged off the attacks and returned to, "Not you."
 
 
The danger for House and Senate Republicans in 2008 is that the voters will say, "Not the Republicans."
 
Republicans Have Lost the Advantage on Every Single-Issue Poll
 
 
A February Washington Post poll shows that Republicans have lost the advantage to the Democrats on which party can handle an issue better -- on every single topic.
 
Americans now believe that Democrats can handle the deficit better (52 to 31), taxes better (48 to 40) and even terrorism better (44 to 37).
 
 
This is a catastrophic collapse of trust in Republicans built up over three generations on the deficit, two generations on taxes, and two generations on national security.
 
House Republicans Should Call an Emergency, Members-Only Conference
 
 
Faced with these election results, the House Republicans should hold an emergency members-only meeting. At the meeting, they should pose this stark choice: Real change or certain defeat.
 
If a majority of the House Republicans vote for real change, they should instruct Republican Leader John Boehner and his team to come back with a new plan by the Wednesday before the Memorial Day recess. This plan should involve real change in legislative, communications, and campaign strategy and involve immediate, real action, including a complete overhaul of the Congressional Campaign Committee. The House Republican Conference would then vote for the plan or insist on its revision.
 
If a majority of the House Republicans are opposed to acting then the minority who are activists should establish a parallel organization dedicated to real change. This group should focus its energies on creating the changes necessary to survive despite a conference with a minority mindset that accepts defeat rather than fights for real change (which is what we had when I entered Congress in 1978).
 
Nine Acts of Real Change That Could Restore the GOP Brand
 
Here are nine acts of real change that would begin to rebuild the American people's confidence that Republicans share their values, understand their worries, and are prepared to act instead of just talk. The Republicans in Congress could get a start on all nine this week if they had the will to do so.
 
Repeal the gas tax for the summer, and pay for the repeal by cutting domestic discretionary spending so that the transportation infrastructure trust fund would not be hurt. At a time when, according to The Hill newspaper, Senator Clinton is asking for $2.3billion in earmarks, it should be possible for Republicans to establish a "government spending versus your pocketbook" fight over cutting the gas tax that would resonate with most Americans. Lower taxes and less government spending should be a battle cry most taxpayers and all conservatives could rally behind.
 
Redirect the oil being put into the national petroleum reserve onto the open market. That oil would lower the price of gasoline an extra 5 to 6 cents per gallon, and its sale would lower the deficit.
 
Introduce a "more energy at lower cost with less environmental damage and greater national security bill" as a replacement for the Warner-Lieberman "tax and trade" bill which is coming to the floor of the Senate in the next few weeks (see my newsletter next week for an outline of a solid pro-economy, pro-national security, pro-environment energy bill). When the American people realize how much the current energy prices are actually a "politicians' energy crisis" they will demand real change in our policies.
 
Establish an earmark moratorium for one year and pledge to uphold the presidential veto of bills with earmarks through the end of 2009. The American people are fed up with politicians spending their money. They currently believe both parties are equally bad. This is a real opportunity to show the difference.
 
Overhaul the census and cut its budget radically. The recent announcement that the Census Bureau could not build an effective hand-held computer for $1.3 billion and is turning instead to 600,000 temporary workers to do a paper and pencil census in 2010 is an opportunity to slash its budget, shrink its bureaucracy, and turn to entrepreneurial internet-based companies to build an information-age census. This is an absurdity that cries out for bold, decisive reform (see my YouTube video "FedEx versus federal bureaucracy" for an example of what I mean).
 
Implement a space-based, GPS-style air traffic control system. The problems of the Federal Aviation Administration are symptoms of a union-dominated bureaucracy resisting change. If we implemented a space-based GPS-style air traffic system we would get 40% more air travel with one-half the bureaucrats. The union has stopped 200,000,000 passengers from enjoying more reliable air travel to protect 7,000 obsolete jobs. This real change would allow the millions of frustrated travelers to have champions in congress trying to help them get places better, safer, faster.
 
Declare English the official language of government. This real change is supported by 87% of the American people including a majority of Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and Latinos. It is an issue of national unity that brings Americans together in a red, white, and blue majority.
 
Protect the workers' right to a secret ballot. The vast majority (around 81%) of Americans believe that American workers have a right to have a secret ballot election before they are forced to join a union. Last year the House Democrats passed a bill that would strip American workers of the secret ballot. A new bill should be introduced reaffirming that right, and it should be brought up again and again until marginal Democrats are forced to vote with the American people against the union power structure.
 
Remind Americans that judges matter. Senate Republicans should mount an ongoing fight (including a filibuster of other activities if necessary) to get the American people to realize that liberals want to block all current judicial appointments in order to maximize the number of left wing radical judges they can appoint if they win the White House. This issue has three advantages. It reminds people that judges matter and that a leftwing radical Supreme Court would be bad for the values of most (70 to 90 percent, depending on the issue) Americans. It shows the Democrats are not engaged in fair play. It arouses the activism of those who have been disappointed by Republicans and have forgotten how bad a liberal Democratic Presidency would be.
 
What Is at Stake
 
No Republicans should kid themselves. It's time to face up to a stark choice. 
Without change we could face a catastrophic election this fall.
Without change the Republican Party in the House could revert to the permanent minority status it had from 1930 to 1994.
Without change, the majorities of Americans who support the Republican principle of smaller, more efficient, smarter and fairer government will be in for a rude awakening.
 
It's time for real change to avoid a real disaster.
 
The "May Day Massacre": Can Liberals Govern in a Global Economy?
Despite the poor outlook for conservatives in our elections this November, there is encouraging news from across the Atlantic. The conservative wave sweeping Europe hit England last week when the liberal Labor Party suffered its worst local election results in 40 years.
 
Boris Johnson became the first Conservative Party member elected mayor of London when he defeated Labour candidate "Red" Ken Livingstone. In contests for more than 4,000 local seats across England, Conservatives captured 44 percent of the vote, compared to 25 percent for the Liberal Democrats and just 24 percent for Labour.
 
This Conservative victory in England comes on the heels of a history-making rout of the Communists and the Greens in parliamentary elections Italy two weeks ago. And the Italian results follow center-right victories in France (Sarkozy) and Germany (Merkel). The countries of so-called "old" Europe are turning away from the liberal high tax, big government policies that have crippled their economies and are turning toward pro-growth, pro-competitive center-right solutions.
 
All of which raises the question: Can the Left successfully govern in a modern, global economy? The voters of Europe seem to be saying no.
 
- Newt Gingrich
 
 
P.S. -- Father's Day is just around the corner and there are great gift ideas available at great prices at Newt.org. Just click here to order personally signed copies of my new novel, Days of Infamy, as well as Pearl Harbor and Real Change. With the purchase of either of these three personally signed books, you can get a signed copy of Gettysburg for only $5. If you buy both a personalized copy of Pearl Harbor and Days of Infamy, you will receive a signed Gettysburg for free! 
P.P.S. -- The Days of Infamy book tour took me to New York City last week where Callista took some great pictures of us on the set of Hannity and Colmes, The View, The Daily Show and others. You can view them here.
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros